De Novo Biopsy-Proven Glomerular Disease Following COVID-19 Vaccination.

Background: There is still no consensus about the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-associated glomerular disease (CVAGD). Given the large number of vaccinations administered and the variations in glomerulopathy observed across different countries and regional environments, CVAGD remains an important area of concern. Aim of study: We aimed to elucidate the findings of CVAGD within a Taiwanese cohort using biopsy data. Additionally, we endeavored to clarify the presentation of CVAGD. Methods: We collected data from patients who underwent renal biopsy from June 2021 to October 2022 at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Two independent nephrologists meticulously reviewed the charts to exclude cases unrelated to vaccination. Results: Initially, a total of 286 patients underwent renal biopsy at our institute. Ultimately, we identified 14 patients with highly suspected CVAGD. All 14 patients exhibited proteinuria and hematuria. The urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio was elevated (median of 2012.1 mg/g; interquartile range (IQR) 25%-IQR 75%: 941.85-3884.1 mg/g) with a median serum creatinine level of 1.71 mg/dL (0.79-5.35). The majority of CVAGD cases were diagnosed as immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (n = 5, 35.7%), followed by antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-related rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) (n = 4, 28.6%). There were only three cases of minimal change disease each: one case of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, one of membranous glomerulonephritis, and one of lupus nephritis. The culprit of COVID-19 vaccinations was 35.7% (n = 5) of Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1-S), 42.9% (n = 6) of Moderna, and 21.4% (n = 3) of BNT162b2. Most patients experienced improvements in renal function. Only two cases of P-ANCA RPGN and one case of IgA nephropathy did not recover. Eighty percent of IgA nephropathy cases had favorable outcomes, but none of the patients with P-ANCA RPGN achieved full recovery. Conclusions: IgA nephropathy and ANCA-related RPGN were the most common CVAGD, and all types of COVID-19 vaccines posed a risk for CVAGD. However, further studies are required to confirm causality.

Reducing Waiting Times and Admission Periods through Pre-Admission Testing: A Quality Improvement Study on In-Hospital Renal Biopsy.

Background: Admission for renal biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing kidney disease. However, prolonged waiting times for admission can lead to delayed diagnosis. Despite this issue, there are currently no studies demonstrating how to improve the efficiency of renal biopsy procedures. Methods: We initiated a quality improvement project to implement pre-admission testing (PAT) for renal biopsy from 2016 to 2024 (until 15 April). Our evaluation focused on waiting times for admission, length of admission periods, hospitalization expenses, percentage of cases with no renal biopsy performed, incidence of severe bleeding due to renal biopsy, and percentage of cases with adequate tissue samples obtained. Additionally, we highlighted the time periods during the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. Results: The highest annual case number was observed in time period 1 (168.3/year). Following the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, there was a notable decrease in case numbers during time period 2 (119.8), which then increased to 143.0 in time period 3 (post-SARS-CoV-2 era). The mean waiting time was 13.72 ± 40.30 days for time period 1 and 10.00 ± 47.80 days for time period 2, without statistical significance. Following the implementation of PAT, patients now only need to wait approximately 0.76 days for admission, representing a significant reduction in waiting time. Subsequently, following the implementation of PAT, the waiting time decreased significantly to 2.09 ± 2.65 days. Additionally, hospitalization expenses per patient significantly decreased from approximately USD 69.62 ± 97.09 to USD 41.66 ± 52.82. The percentage of missed biopsy is significantly low (p < 0.001). Severe bleeding events (indicated as embolization and blood transfusion) were consistent across the three time periods (p = 0.617). Conclusions: The implementation of PAT can improve the pre-admission process for renal biopsy, resulting in decreased waiting times, fewer missed appointments, shorter admission durations, and reduced hospitalization expenses. We propose implementing PAT for outpatient individuals awaiting in-hospital renal biopsy procedures to mitigate delayed diagnosis, reduce pre-admission waiting periods, and streamline admission processes, thereby enhancing overall patient care efficiency.

Prevention and management of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in kidney transplant: A consensus statement of the Transplantation Society of Taiwan.

Kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. A strategy for mitigating the risk of CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients has not yet been established in Taiwan. The Transplantation Society of Taiwan aimed to develop a consensus by expert opinion on the prevention and management of CMV infection. Based on the results of Consensus Conference, we suggested low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis (450 mg once daily) for kidney transplant recipients. The prophylaxis duration was ≥6 months for high-risk (D+/R-) patients and 3 months for moderate-risk (R+) patients. Even for low-risk (D-/R-) patients, prophylaxis for at least 3 months is recommended because of the high seroprevalence of CMV in Taiwan. CMV prophylaxis was suggested after anti-thymocyte globulin treatment but not after methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Routine surveillance after prophylaxis, secondary prophylaxis after CMV disease treatment, and mTOR inhibitors for primary CMV prophylaxis were not recommended. Letermovir and marabavir are emerging CMV agents used for prophylaxis and refractory CMV disease. CMV immunoglobulins have been used to treat refractory CMV disease in Taiwan. We hope this consensus will help professionals manage patients with CMV in Taiwan to improve the quality of care.

Dialysate cyclophilin A as a predictive marker for historical peritonitis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Introduction: No markers have been used to diagnose historical peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. Cyclophilin A (CypA) is associated with glucose toxicity and inflammation. We hypothesize that dialysate CypA can be a marker for historical peritonitis (at least 3 months free from peritonitis). Method: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit was used to measure the concentration of dialysate CypA. Clinical and laboratory data were collected to correlate with historical peritonitis. Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used for analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate predictive power. Results: Out of a total of 31 patients who had undergone PD for at least 2 years, 18 had no history of PD-related peritonitis, while 13 had experienced PD-related peritonitis at least once. Overall, the patients in this population were in good health (normal white blood cell count, no anemia, normal electrolyte and serum albumin levels). There were no significant differences between patients with and without a history of peritonitis, except for blood white blood cell count (5650.6 ± 1848.4 vs. 7154.6 ± 2056.8, p = 0.032) and dialysate CypA value (24.27 ± 22.715 vs. 54.41 ± 45.63, p = 0.020). In the univariate analysis, only the dialysate CypA level showed a statistically significant association with historical peritonitis (HR = 1.030, 95 % CI = 1.010-1.062, p = 0.046). The AUC for dialysate CypA (>34.83 ng/mL) was 0.748, with a sensitivity of 0.615 and specificity of 0.833. Conclusion: PD peritonitis poses a significant threat to the long-term use of peritoneal dialysis. Based on our study, even in the absence of concurrent infection, dialysate CypA can serve as a predictive marker for historical peritonitis, demonstrating high predictive power along with fair sensitivity and good specificity.

Safety of midodrine in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) poses significant health risks. Midodrine for maintaining blood pressure in HFrEF, requires further safety investigation. This study explores midodrine's safety in HFrEF through extensive matched analysis. Methods: Patients with HFrEF (LVEF <50%) without malignancy, non-dialysis dependence, or non-orthostatic hypotension, were enrolled between 28 August 2013, and 27 August 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) created 1:1 matched groups. Outcomes included mortality, stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), emergency room (ER) visits, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, hospitalizations, and respiratory failure. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for each outcome, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on gender, age (20-<65 vs. ≥65), medication refill frequency, and baseline LVEF. Results: After 1:1 PSM, 5813 cases were included in each group. The midodrine group had higher risks of respiratory failure (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08-1.25), ICU admissions (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.23), hospitalizations (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12-1.31), and mortality (HR: 1.090, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17). Interestingly, midodrine use reduced ER visits (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.83). Similar patterns of lower ER visit risk and higher risks for ICU admissions, respiratory failure, and overall hospitalizations were observed in most subgroups. Conclusion: In this large-scale study, midodrine use was associated with reduced ER visits but increased risks of respiratory failure, prolonged ICU stays, higher hospitalizations, and elevated mortality in HFrEF patients. Further research is needed to clarify midodrine's role in hemodynamic support and strengthen existing evidence.

Effectiveness of the Huddles in Improving the Patient Safety Attitudes Among Clinical Team Members.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Huddles among members of interdisciplinary medical teams involve short stand-up sessions and allow team members to focus on existing or emerging patient safety issues, thereby facilitating team communication. Hospital managers are able to recognize the current situation of the organization through patient safety attitudes, strengthen team members' awareness of patient safety, and improve the quality of health care. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of huddles on improving team members' attitudes toward patient safety. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental design and selected 2 adult wards with similar properties as the experimental and comparison groups by convenience sampling. Data collection was from December 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, at a teaching hospital in central Taiwan. Team members of the ward performing huddles formed the experimental group, and they participated 2 times per week in 15-minute huddles from 8:15 to 8:30 am for a total of 4 weeks. The comparison group adopted the routine team care process. Both groups completed the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire during the pre- and post-tests of the study. RESULTS: The experimental group scored significantly higher in the post-test than in the pre-test in all aspects of safety attitudes, with the exception of stress recognition. These improved aspects were teamwork climate (76.47 ± 15.90 vs 83.29 ± 13.52, P < .001), safety climate (75.94 ± 16.14 vs 82.81 ± 13.74, P < .001), job satisfaction (74.34 ± 20.22 vs 84.40 ± 17.22, P <.001), perceptions of management (78.02 ± 19.99 vs 85.51 ± 15.97, P < .001), and working conditions (78.85 ± 17.87 vs 86.81 ± 14.74, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Through the huddles, clinical team members improved their understanding of different aspects of safety attitudes. Such a study provided ward units with real-time improvement and adjustment in terms of patient safety during their medical work processes with better patient safety.

The screening, diagnosis, and management of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A national consensus statement from Taiwan.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) worldwide. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ADPKD in Taiwan remains unavailable. In this consensus statement, we summarize updated information on clinical features of international and domestic patients with ADPKD, followed by suggestions for optimal diagnosis and care in Taiwan. Specifically, counselling for at-risk minors and reproductive issues can be important, including ethical dilemmas surrounding prenatal diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Studies reveal that ADPKD typically remains asymptomatic until the fourth decade of life, with symptoms resulting from cystic expansion with visceral compression, or rupture. The diagnosis can be made based on a detailed family history, followed by imaging studies (ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging). Genetic testing is reserved for atypical cases mostly. Common tools for prognosis prediction include total kidney volume, Mayo classification and PROPKD/genetic score. Screening and management of complications such as hypertension, proteinuria, urological infections, intracranial aneurysms, are also crucial for improving outcome. We suggest that the optimal management strategies of patients with ADPKD include general medical care, dietary recommendations and ADPKD-specific treatments. Key points include rigorous blood pressure control, dietary sodium restriction and Tolvaptan use, whereas the evidence for somatostatin analogues and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors remains limited. In summary, we outline an individualized care plan emphasizing careful monitoring of disease progression and highlight the need for shared decision-making among these patients.

AST-120 improved uremic pruritus by lowering indoxyl sulfate and inflammatory cytokines in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Pruritus is a common and distressing symptom that affects patients with chronic kidney disease. The concentration of protein bounded uremic toxin was associated with the uremic pruritus. The aim is to assess the efficacy of AST-120 for uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The participants were enrolled and then divided into the AST-120 treatment group and control group with a ratio of 2:1. All participants underwent pre-observation screenings two weeks before the study with three visits. In the treatment phase (week 1 to week 4), the treatment group added 6g/day of AST-120 along with routine anti-pruritic treatment. Visual analog scale (VAS) and biochemical parameters were measured. RESULTS: The VAS score began to be lower in the AST-120 treatment group after the 5th visiting (p < 0.05). The reduction in indoxyl sulfate (IS) at 5th week along with TNF-alpha. The reduction ratio of indoxyl sulfate correlated with reduction of parathyroid hormone. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that the four-week treatment of AST-120 decreased the severity of uremic pruritus in patients with ESRD. The concentration of IS and TNF-alpha decreased in the AST-120 treatment group. The reduction of iPTH correlated with the reduction of IS in the AST-120 treatment.

Phase 2 Trial of Cemdisiran in Adult Patients with IgA Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: IgA nephropathy is the most common primary GN. Clinical features of IgA nephropathy include proteinuria, which is the strongest known surrogate of progression to kidney failure. Complement pathway activation is a critical driver of inflammation and tissue injury in IgA nephropathy. Cemdisiran is an investigational RNA interference therapeutic that suppresses hepatic production of complement component 5 (C5), thereby potentially reducing proteinuria in IgA nephropathy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cemdisiran in adult patients with IgA nephropathy at high risk of kidney disease progression. METHODS: In this phase 2, 36-week, double-blind study, adult patients with IgA nephropathy and urine protein ≥1 g/24 hours were randomized (2:1) to subcutaneous cemdisiran 600 mg or placebo every 4 weeks in combination with the standard of care. The primary end point was percentage change from baseline at week 32 in urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) measured by 24-hour urine collection. Additional end points included change from baseline in UPCR measured by spot urine, serum C5 level, and safety assessments. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were randomized (cemdisiran, N =22; placebo, N =9). Cemdisiran-treated patients had a placebo-adjusted geometric mean change in 24-hour UPCR of -37.4% (cemdisiran-adjusted geometric mean ratio to baseline [SEM], 0.69 [0.10]) at week 32. Spot UPCR was consistent with 24-hour UPCR placebo-adjusted change of -45.8% (cemdisiran-adjusted geometric mean ratio to baseline [SEM], 0.73 [0.11]). Mean (SD) change in serum C5 level from baseline at week 32 was -98.7% (1.2) with cemdisiran and 25.2% (57.7) with placebo. Over 36 weeks, most adverse events were mild or moderate and transient; the most common adverse event after cemdisiran treatment was injection-site reaction (41%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that treatment with cemdisiran resulted in a reduction of proteinuria at week 32 and was well tolerated.