Effect of passive versus active abdominal drainage on wound infection after pancreatectomy: A meta-analysis.

Following pancreatic resection, there may be a variety of complications, including wound infection, haemorrhage, and abdominal infection. The placement of drainage channels during operation may decrease the chances of postoperative complications. However, what kind of drainage can decrease the rate of postoperative complications is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of both active and passive drainage for post-operation wound complications. From the beginning of the database until November 2023, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Pubmed database have been searched. The two authors collected 2524 related studies from 3 data bases for importation into Endnote software, and 8 finished trials were screened against the exclusion criteria. Passive drainage can decrease the incidence of superficial wound infection in postoperative patients with pancreas operation (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.60 p = 0.01); No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of deep infections among the two groups (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.68-3.36 p = 0.31); No statistical significance was found for the rate of haemorrhage after active drainage on the pancreas compared with that of passive drainage (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.77 p = 0.47); No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of death after operation for patients who had received a pancreas operation in active or passive drainage (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.57-1.42 p = 0.65); On the basis of existing evidence, the use of passive abdominal drainage reduces postoperative surface wound infections in patients. But there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of severe complications, haemorrhage after surgery, or mortality. However, because of the limited sample size of this meta-analysis, it is necessary to have more high-quality research with a large sample size to confirm the findings.

Single-minded homolog 2 as a potential prognostic signature and assessment of its correlation with immune cell infiltration in pancreatic cancer.

Single-minded homolog 2 (SIM2) has been identified as a potential contributor to the development of solid tumors. Despite this, there is a lack of comprehensive research regarding its biological role and underlying mechanism within pancreatic cancer (PC), as well as its prognostic impact. This study systematically evaluated the expression level and clinical significance of SIM2 in patients with PC using various databases, including The Cancer Genome Atlas, KM Plotter, and gene expression profiling interactive analysis. To investigate the relationship between SIM2 expression and immune cell infiltration, we conducted ESTIMATE and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) analyses. Single-minded homolog 2 was up-regulated in patients with PC. Pancreatic cancer patients with higher SIM2 expression had poorer overall survival rates. Gene set enrichment analysis results suggested that SIM2 may have a significant impact on the progression of PC and the regulation of immune responses. According to the ssGSEA algorithm, SIM2 has a negative correlation with the levels of infiltrating TFH, mast cells, and pDC. Our study demonstrated that SIM2 serves as a biomarker, and is associated with both prognosis and immune infiltration in PC. This provides a solid foundation for future investigations into the precise role of SIM2 in the carcinogenesis and progression of PC.