Comparative analysis of different treatment strategies for septic spondylitis: a retrospective study of one hundred and twelve patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy and prognosis differences between conservative treatment and surgical treatment in patients with non-serious neurologically intact pyogenic spondylitis (Nsi-Nsni-PS), and to provide theoretical reference for the clinical treatment of Nsi-Nsni-PS patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 112 cases of Nsi-Nsni-PS patients treated in our hospital from June 2016 to June 2021. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into conservative treatment group (53 cases) and surgical treatment group (59 cases). The general data, laboratory tests, imaging examinations, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic use, VAS for pain before and after treatment, ODI, local kyphotic angle correction of diseased vertebrae, and recurrence rate were collected and analyzed in both groups. SPSS 26.0 statistical software was used for analysis. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and independent sample t-test or rank sum test was used for comparison between groups, while variance analysis was used for intra-group comparison. Count data were expressed as number (%) and compared between groups using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the changes in local kyphotic angle between the two groups. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in general data and imaging characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05); there were no statistically significant differences in the positive culture rate of pathogens, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic use, treatment complications, WBC, CRP, ESR levels at admission and discharge, VAS and ODI at admission and last follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). The WBC and CRP levels of patients in the conservative group at discharge were lower than those in the surgical group (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the decrease in inflammatory indicators (WBC, CRP, ESR) between the two groups (P > 0.05). By the last follow-up, the neurological function of patients in both groups had significantly improved compared to admission (P < 0.05), with 12 out of 15 ASIA grade D patients in the conservative group recovering to grade E, and 21 out of 25 grade D patients in the surgical group recovering to grade E, with no worsening of neurological function in either group. The differences in VAS and ODI scores at the last follow-up compared to before treatment were statistically significant in both groups (P < 0.05), and all patients regained normal activity. Compared with before treatment, the correction degree of local kyphotic angle in the surgical group at the last follow-up was 0.93 ± 4.94°, slightly higher than that in the conservative group (-0.83 ± 3.37°), and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During our follow-up, we found that both conservative and surgical treatments achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes in patients with Nsi-Nsni-PS. Compared to conservative treatment, surgical intervention did not demonstrate significant advantages in reducing hospitalization time and antibiotic usage duration, increasing pathogen culture positivity rate, lowering treatment complications, or controlling recurrence. However, surgical intervention showed superiority in correcting the local kyphotic angle of spinal lesions, albeit with relatively increased surgical trauma, risks, and treatment costs. At the last follow-up, the surgical group did not exhibit better long-term efficacy. Therefore, when formulating clinical treatment strategies for patients with Nsi-Nsni-PS, it may be preferable to prioritize conservative treatment, supplemented by the use of sensitive or empiric antibiotics for infection management, to improve patient prognosis.

Epidemiologic Correlation and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Different Open Limb Injury External Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To study the epidemiological correlation and drug resistance of external factors of infection caused by open injury of limbs to pathogens. METHODS: This experiment is a retrospective study. We took the geographical location and climate of Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China as the background, analyzed 2017 strains of pathogens from 1589 patients with limb trauma infection in a University Affiliated Hospital from 2012 to 2017. Patients were divided into three groups according to the type of incision: I, In-hospital infection of clean limb incision, II, In-hospital infection with open injury, III, Community infection with open injury of the limb. Groups II and Groups III were divided into six subgroups according to the causes of trauma, including: accidents from non-motor vehicles, machinery, cutting/piercing, pedestrian injuries, struck by/against, pedal cycles, and other injuries. We found eight common pathogens of orthopedic infection, which were mainly divided into Gram-positive bacteria (G+, mainly including Staphylococcus) and Gram-negative bacteria (G-, mainly Enterobacteriaceae). The relationship between main pathogens and damage mechanism, apparent temperature and relative humidity was discussed in this study. SPSS v22.0 was used for statistical analysis of the data. Friedman's two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the difference between the injury mechanism and incidence of pathogenic bacteria. Linear regression was used to determine the trend between the incidence of major pathogens and seasonal temperature and humidity. The level of significance was set as P < 0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the distribution of pathogens between Groups II and Groups III (P>0.05). The drug resistance of Groups III was significantly higher than that of Groups II and Groups I. G+ bacteria were resistant to cephalosporin, ceftriaxone and other cephalosporins and erythromycin and other macrolides. They were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid. G- were resistant to the first- and the second-generation cephalosporins, including cefotetan and cefazolin, and ampicillin and other penicillins, while they were sensitive to third-generation cephalosporins, such as ceftazidime, as well as to levofloxacin and other quinolones, meropenem, and other beta-lactamases. The correlation between the injury mechanism and infection of pathogenic bacteria was not significant. The monthly average apparent temperature and relative humidity were correlated with the infection rate of pathogenic bacteria. CONCLUSION: In open injury of extremities, apparent temperature and relative humidity is an important risk factor for infection by pathogenic bacteria and the drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in out-of-hospital infection was lower than that of hospital infection.

Epidemiology and Drug Resistance Analysis of Mixed Infection in Orthopedic Surgical Sites.

Background: Infection, including mixed infection, is not uncommon in orthopedic surgical incision. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology and drug resistance of mixed infections after orthopedic surgical procedures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 533 orthopedic surgical site infections (SSIs) in a university hospital from 2012 to 2017. Eighty-six patients (218 strains) with bacterial culture results showing more than one strain were screened to explore their epidemiology and drug resistance. Results: Of 218 bacterial strains, 2-7 bacterial infections were noted in each wound. Most infections were caused by two kinds of bacteria (65.1%). The number of infections decreased with increased number of strains. The combinations of pathogenic micro-organisms were all gram-negative, 55.81%; gram-positive and gram-negative, 30.23%; all gram-positive, 12.79%; and gram-positive and fungi, 1.16%. Their resistance is consistent with the bacterial resistance of 447 cases of single bacterial SSI during the same period. Hospitalization duration was longer (9.8-20.6 d). Conclusion: Our study shows no significant changes in epidemiology and drug resistance caused by mixed infections in the orthopedic surgical site because of coordination and competition among micro-organisms. These bacteria are difficult to control, leading to extended hospitalization. Antibiotic agents should be chosen strictly according to drug sensitivity, and ineffective antibiotic agents must be avoided.