Gelsolin impairs barrier function in pancreatic ductal epithelial cells by actin filament depolymerization in hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis in vitro.

Gelsolin (GSN) is a calcium-regulated actin-binding protein that can sever actin filaments. Notably, actin dynamics affect the structure and function of epithelial barriers. The present study investigated the role of GSN in the barrier function of pancreatic ductal epithelial cells (PDECs) in hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis (HTGP). The human PDEC cell line HPDE6-C7 underwent GSN knockdown and was treated with caerulein (CAE) + triglycerides (TG). Intracellular calcium levels and the actin filament network were analyzed under a fluorescence microscope. The expression levels of GSN, E-cadherin, nectin-2, ZO-1 and occludin were evaluated by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Ultrastructural changes in tight junctions were observed by transmission electron microscopy. Furthermore, the permeability of PDECs was analyzed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran fluorescence. The results revealed that CAE + TG increased intracellular calcium levels, actin filament depolymerization and GSN expression, and increased PDEC permeability by decreasing the expression levels of E-cadherin, nectin-2, ZO-1 and occludin compared with the control. Moreover, changes in these markers, with the exception of intracellular calcium levels, were reversed by silencing GSN. In conclusion, GSN may disrupt barrier function in PDECs by causing actin filament depolymerization in HTGP in vitro.

Exploration of suitable pharmacodynamic parameters for acarbose bioequivalence evaluation: A series of clinical trials with branded acarbose.

AIMS: To determine deficiencies in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s guidance for assessing acarbose bioequivalence (BE) and to explore optimal pharmacodynamic (PD) metrics for better evaluation of acarbose BE. METHODS: Three clinical trials with branded acarbose were conducted in healthy subjects, including a pilot study (Study I, n = 11, 50 and 100 mg), a 2×2 crossover BE study (Study II, n = 36, 100 mg) and a 4×4 Williams study (Study III, n = 16, 50/100/150 mg). Serum glucose concentrations were measured by the glucose oxidase method. RESULTS: In Study I, compared with 50 mg acarbose, only 100 mg acarbose had a significantly lower Cmax0-4h than that of sucrose administration alone (7.96 ± 0.83 mmol/L vs 6.78 ± 1.02 mmol/L, P < .05). In Study II, the geometric mean ratios of the test formulation to the reference formulation (both formulations were the branded drug) for FDA PD metrics, ΔCmax0-4h and ΔAUC0-4h , were 0.903 and 0.776, respectively, and the 90% confidence intervals were 67.44-120.90 and 53.65-112.13, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (confidence interval) for possible optimal evaluation PD metrics (Cmax0-2h and AUC0-2h ) were 1.035 (94.23-112.68) and 0.982 (89.28-107.17), respectively. Further, Cmax0-2h and AUC0-2h also met the sensitivity requirements for BE evaluation in Study III. CONCLUSION: Considering the mechanisms of action of acarbose, the PD effect was shown to be dose independent during the 2-4 hours postadministration of acarbose. Hence PD metrics based on the serum glucose concentration from 0 to 2 hours (Cmax0-2h and AUC0-2h ) are more sensitive than the FDA-recommended PD metrics for acarbose BE evaluation from 0-4 hours (ΔCmax0-4h and ΔAUC0-4h ). The trial has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1800015795, ChiCTR-IIR-17013918, ChiCTR-IIR-17011903). All subjects provided written informed consent before screening.

Pharmacokinetic study of imrecoxib in patients with renal insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Renal insufficiency may influence the pharmacokinetics of drugs. We have investigated the pharmacokinetic parameters of imrecoxib and its two main metabolites in individuals with osteoarthritis (OA) with normal renal function and renal insufficiency, respectively. METHODS: This was a prospective, parallel, open, matched-group study in which 24 subjects were enrolled (renal insufficiency group, n = 12; healthy control group, n = 12). Blood samples of subjects administered 100 mg imrecoxib were collected at different time points and analyzed. Plasma concentrations of imrecoxib and its two metabolites (M1 and M2) were determined by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, and pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance [CL], apparent volume of distribution [Vd], maximum (or peak) serum concentration [Cmax], amount of time drug is present in serum at Cmax [Tmax], area under the curve [AUC; total drug exposure across time], mean residence time [MRT] and elimination half-life [t1/2]) were calculated. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different, with the exception of renal function. The mean Cmax and AUC0-t (AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration) of imrecoxib in the renal insufficiency group were 59 and 70%, respectively, of those of the healthy control volunteers with normal renal function, indicating a significant decline in the former group (P < 0. 05). The mean pharmacokinetic parameters of Ml in the renal insufficiency and healthy control groups did not significantly differ. In contrast, the mean Cmax and AUC0-t of M2 in the renal insufficiency group were 233 and 367%, respectively, of those of the normal renal function group, indicating a significant increase in the former group (P < 0.05). The mean CL/F (clearance/bioavailability) of M2 of the renal insufficiency group was 37% of that of the normal renal function group, indicating a notable reduction in the former group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The exposure of imrecoxib in OA patients with renal insufficiency showed a decline compared to that in healthy subjects. However, in patients with renal insufficiency the exposure of M2 was markedly increased and the CL was noticeably reduced. These results indicate that the dosage of imrecoxib should be reduced appropriately in patients with renal insufficiency.