Deciphering two decades of cellular reprogramming in cancer: A bibliometric analysis of evolving trends and research frontiers.

Recent research has reevaluated the traditional view of cancer's linear progression and recurrence by introducing cellular reprogramming a process in which cancer cells can their state under certain conditions. This change is driven by a combination of genetic and epigenetic factors, with pivotal roles played by key genes, and pathways, notably Wnt and Notch. The complexity of cancer's behavior is further influenced by factors such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and therapy-induced stress, both of which are significant contributors to cancer recurrence. In this context bibliometric analysis emerges as a crucial tool for evaluating the impacts and trends within scientific literature. Our study utilized bibliometrics to analysis the role of cellular reprogramming oncology over the past two decades, highlighting its potential to improve cancer treatment outcomes. In conducting this analysis, we searched for literature search on cellular reprogramming (CR) in the Web of Science database, covering the years 2002-2022. We employed visualization tools like Citespace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix to analyze the collected data resulting in a dataset of 3102 articles. The United States and China emerged as leading contributors to this field, with the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center being the most prolific institution. Menendez was the most influential scholar in this research domain. Cancers was the journal with the most publications on this subject. The most local-cited document was the article titled "Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation". A comprehensive analysis has been conducted based on keywords and cited references. In recent years, the research emphasis has shifted to "extracellular vesicles," "cancer therapy," and "cellular plasticity". Therefore, this analysis uses bibliometrics to chart cutting-edge progress in cancer's cellular reprogramming, aiding experts to quickly understand and innovate in this crucial area.

The Health-Promoting Effects and the Mechanism of Intermittent Fasting.

Intermittent fasting (IF) is an eating pattern in which individuals go extended periods with little or no energy intake after consuming regular food in intervening periods. IF has several health-promoting effects. It can effectively reduce weight, fasting insulin levels, and blood glucose levels. It can also increase the antitumor activity of medicines and cause improvement in the case of neurological diseases, such as memory deficit, to achieve enhanced metabolic function and prolonged longevity. Additionally, IF activates several biological pathways to induce autophagy, encourages cell renewal, prevents cancer cells from multiplying and spreading, and delays senescence. However, IF has specific adverse effects and limitations when it comes to people of a particular age and gender. Hence, a more systematic study on the health-promoting effects and safety of IF is needed. This article reviewed the research on the health-promoting effects of IF, providing a theoretical basis, direction for subsequent basic research, and information related to the clinical application of IF.

Efficacy of Intrapleural or Intrapericardial Injection of Single Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Lung Cancer-Mediated Malignant Effusion.

The usage of bevacizumab for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) or malignant pericardial effusion (MPCE) has attracted increasing interest from researchers, but the precise ways of bevacizumab administration remain unknown. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MPE or MPCE were enrolled in the study and treated with a low dose of single bevacizumab (100 mg) intrapleurally or intrapericardially injected after the drainage of the effusions. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), efficacy, and safety of drug administration were used as evaluation parameters in this study. The results indicated that lung cancer-related symptoms were significantly improved following treatment, compared with symptoms before the treatment (LCSS, score 494 ± 78 vs. score 377 ± 77, mean ± SD) (P < 0.001). Malignant effusions were well controlled, and the median time to progression (TTP) was 91 days and 111 days in MPE and MPCE, respectively. In addition, no severe side effects were observed, except in one patient with mild dizziness. In summary, the low dose of single bevacizumab (100 mg) with intrapleural or intrapericardial injection is effective and safe in the treatment of lung cancer-mediated malignant effusion, rapidly improving the malignant effusion-related symptoms and quality of life in patients with NSCLC.

A study on different therapies and prognosis-related factors for brain metastases in lung adenocarcinoma patients with driver mutation.

Brain metastases (BMs) are frequently occurred in lung adenocarcinoma with driver mutation. There is a need to explore multi-discipline treatments and prognostic factors in those patients with most frequent driver mutations: EGFR mutation and ALK fusion. In the retrospective study, different therapies and prognostic factors were compared between EGFR and ALK-driven lung adenocarcinoma with BMs. 516 patients with EGFR mutation and 76 with ALK fusion were screened for this study, 303 (58.7%) and 34 (44.7%) had BM respectively. In multivariate analyses, the pretreatment factors including delayed BMs and asymptomatic BMs, treatment strategies including the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and cranial radiotherapy (RT) treatment, were associated with much better OS in EGFR mutation patients. Moreover, we found EGFR-mutation patients receiving erlotinib would achieve better survival than those receiving gefitinib (P = 0.032). However, BM patients with ALK fusion treated by only the first generation TKI (HR = 0.23, P = 0.036) or cranial RT (HR = 0.12, P = 0.003), had better OS. After balancing of baseline characteristics of the two groups, there was no significant difference in the survival between BM patients with EGFR mutation and ALK fusion. And only cranial RT was associated with better survival in those patients (HR = 0.52, P < 0.001). In the BM patients of lung adenocarcinoma with driver mutation, TKI underlie the therapy strategies, but cranial RT still plays an important role while receiving the first generation TKI.