Medical Student Perception of Lifestyle Medicine and Willingness to Engage in Lifestyle Counseling: A Pilot Study of Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Students.

Introduction. This study assessed medical students' perception of lifestyle medicine and readiness to engage in lifestyle counseling. Methods. All medical students in one allopathic and one osteopathic medical school received a survey involving items designed to measure their awareness and interest in lifestyle medicine, perception of physicians serving as lifestyle role models for patients, and intent to practice lifestyle counseling. Results. Two hundred and eight-nine subjects (145 allopathic and 144 osteopathic students) responded to the survey. A total of 24.1% of responding allopathic students had heard about lifestyle medicine compared with 53.9% of responding osteopathic students (P < .01). A total of 90.5% of allopathic students rated their current knowledge of lifestyle medicine as inadequate or poor compared with 78.7% of osteopathic students (P < .01). Ninety-two percent of all respondents wanted to learn more about lifestyle medicine, while 95.2% believed they would provide more effective counseling if they were trained sufficiently to serve as a healthy lifestyle role model for their patients. Conclusions. Both cohorts favored learning more about lifestyle medicine and believed physicians should provide lifestyle counseling to patients with chronic diseases. Given these findings, and the demonstrated benefits of lifestyle medicine-based health care, the authors suggest that training in lifestyle medicine be increased in undergraduate medical education.

Growing Need for Primary Care Physicians Caring for Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: A rising population of cancer survivors is accompanied by a shortage of oncologists for continuity of care. This study examined the physicians who provided most of the care for cancer survivors, along with written information provided to the survivors before transfer of care. METHODS: Data were collected through the CDC-sponsored Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our analysis involved states whose respondents completed a cancer survivorship module from 2016 to 2020. Primary measures were the proportions of physician specialists who provided most of their subsequent health care and the proportions of survivors who received written summaries of their care and instructions. RESULTS: The 36,737 cancer survivor respondents came from 33 states. Most of their health care came from primary care physicians [family physicians (42.3%, 95% CI: 41.3-43.2%) and general internists (26.0%, 95% CI: 25.2-26.9%)]. When seen by primary care physicians rather than subspecialists, a lower proportion of patients recalled receiving summaries of either their cancer treatments (44.3%, 95% CI: 42.5 to 46.2 vs 50.5%, 95% CI: 49.4 to 51.7%) or follow-up instructions (69.9%, 95% CI: 68.8 to 71.0% vs 78.7%, 95%CI 77.1 to 80.2%), regardless of their cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of their cancer type, two-thirds of survivors received most of their health care from primary care physicians. Collaborative community-based care within a shared decision-making framework is essential to prioritize and individualize patients' understandings and needs in this growing population.

Application of Decomposition Analysis of Spatial Accessibility (DASA) in Health Services Research.

Withdrawal mapping is effective in showing the educational impact of residency programs and medical schools. It is often used for advocacy and education purposes, but it lacks grounding in the theoretical foundation of spatial accessibility research. This study proposes an improved technique called Decomposition Analysis of Spatial Accessibility, or DASA, to decompose spatial accessibility by applying the withdrawal mapping concept to the classical 2SFCA application. This study applies the DASA technique to three case studies with policy implications. The first case study details the contribution of Black surgeons to public access to the surgical workforce. The second case study details the contribution of international medical graduates from the original seven travel-ban countries. The third case study demonstrates the market competition between family physicians and general pediatricians. The study showcases the usefulness (particularly for workforce-planning for underserved populations) of the DASA technique in understanding subgroup contributions in spatial accessibility analyses.

Diversity of Department Chairs in Family Medicine at US Medical Schools.

BACKGROUND: As designated department leader, chairs need to be sensitive to diversity and inclusiveness for recruitment and retention of faculty and visibility to medical students and resident physicians. The purpose of this analysis is to describe diversity by sex and race/ethnicity of family medicine (FM) chairs as a beginning to understand trends. METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational study involved 2018 to 2020 data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster. We compared this data with other department chairs, faculty, medical school matriculants, and the US general population. RESULTS: There were 407 FM chair observations. While many FM chairs were White males, this was lower than all other clinical departments combined. The proportion of chairs who were under-represented minorities was highest in FM (16.7%) compared with all other departments The distributions of FM chairs who were Black, Asian, and Native American were comparable with the US population. The proportions of Hispanic FM chairs, FM faculty, and medical school matriculants lagged behind the population. CONCLUSION: Diversity of department chairs in FM is greater than many other clinical departments and more representative of the US general population. Attention by chairs to leadership development of females and recruitment of Hispanic faculty are priorities.

Trends in Cochlear Implantation in Texas: An Exploration of Outpatient Discharge Data, 2010 to 2017.

OBJECTIVES: To describe trends in cochlear implantation (CI) disparities in Texas using an all-payer database from 2010 to 2017. METHODS: Texas Outpatient Surgical and Radiological Procedure Data, a public use data file, was accessed to analyze outpatient CI cases for Texas. Variables analyzed include patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. Population data from the American Community Survey generated CI utilization rates by patient demographic characteristics. RESULTS: There were 6158 CI cases identified during the study period. The number of CI per year nearly doubled from 497 in 2010 to 961 in 2017. The majority of CI recipients were white (59.5%), male (51.9%), and privately insured (47.9%). All sub-populations statewide had more CI in 2017 compared to 2010, with the overall CI per 100 000 population increasing from 1.98 to 3.50 per 100 000 population. Patients over 75 demonstrated the greatest increase in the CI rate per 100 000 population, increasing from 4.60 in 2010 to 14.30 in 2017. Regarding race/ethnicity, all sub-populations noted an increase in the CI per 100 000 population, with white patients demonstrating the highest rate in 2017, at 4.36 CI per 100 000 population. Asian patients had a 502% increase in the CI rate (from 0.42 to 2.53), compared with 87.9%, 84.4%, and 69.2% increases for white, Black, and Hispanic populations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CI became more widespread between 2010 and 2017, benefiting certain populations more than others. Black and Hispanic populations had lower CI per 100 000 population than their white peers, while patients >65 years of age accounted for the greatest increase in CI.

Subspecialization in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Is It Affecting the Future Availability of Women's Health Specialists?

The growth in the number of obstetrics and gynecology resident graduates pursuing fellowships has exceeded growth in the number of resident graduates, because more fellowship programs are being developed in more subspecialties rather than additional residency programs. Approximately 1 in 4 residents pursues subspecialty training, compared with 1 in 12 in 2001. The number of fellowships remains competitive, because nearly all programs fill their match and the number of applicants exceeds the number of positions. Graduating residents who serve as frontline women's health specialists need to serve as leaders of interprofessional teams to better serve their patients, especially in underserved areas.

Recent Trends in Faculty Promotion in U.S. Medical Schools: Implications for Recruitment, Retention, and Diversity and Inclusion.

PURPOSE: Faculty promotion is important for retention and has implications for diversity. This study provides an update on recent trends in faculty promotion in U.S. medical schools. METHOD: Using data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster, the authors examined trends in faculty promotion over 10 years. Promotion status for full-time assistant and full-time associate professors who started between 2000 and 2009 inclusive was followed from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2019. The authors used bivariate analyses to assess associations and promotion rates by sex, race/ethnicity, department, tenure status, and degree type. RESULTS: The promotion rate for assistant professors was 44.3% (2,330/5,263) in basic science departments, 37.1% (17,232/46,473) in clinical science departments, and 33.6% (131/390) in other departments. Among clinical departments, family medicine had the lowest rate of promoting assistant professors (24.4%; 484/1,982) and otolaryngology the highest rate (51.2%; 282/551). Faculty members who were male (38.9%; 11,687/30,017), White (40.0%; 12,635/31,596), tenured (58.7%; 98/167) or tenure-eligible (55.6%; 6,653/11,976), and holding MDs/PhDs (48.7%; 1,968/4,038) had higher promotion rates than, respectively, faculty who were female (36.3%; 7,975/21,998), minorities underrepresented in medicine (URM; 31.0%; 1,716/5,539), nontenured (32.5%; 12,174/37,433), and holding other/unknown degrees (20.6%; 195/948; all P < .001). These differences were less pronounced among associate professors; however, URM and nontenured faculty continued to have lower promotion rates compared with White, Asian, or tenured faculty at the associate professor level. CONCLUSIONS: Promotion rates varied not only by faculty rank but also by faculty sex, race/ethnicity, department, tenure status, and degree type. The differences were more pronounced for assistant professors than associate professors. URM faculty members, particularly assistant professors, were promoted at lower rates than their White and Asian peers. More research to understand the drivers of disparities in faculty promotion seems warranted.

Emergency department presentation of opioid use disorder and alcohol use disorder.

Mixing alcohol and opioid prescription medications can have serious health consequences. This study examines demographic and geographic differences in opioid use disorders (OUD) and alcohol use disorders (AUD) in emergency department (ED) presentations in the state of Texas. Using all diagnosis codes, the study examined discharge records for ED visits related to AUD and OUD in Texas for 2017. The study classified visits into three mutually exclusive groups (AUD-only, OUD-only, and AUD/OUD) and reported the number of visits, fatalities, total charges, proportions, and rates per 100,000 population by patient demographic characteristics. Chi square statistics assessed the association between patient characteristics and ED visit type, and the study used analysis of variance to compare ED visit rates by patient demographics. The study also fitted a multinomial logistic regression w to predict ED visit type by patient demographic and geographic characteristics. There were 221,363 OUD and AUD ED visits from Texans in 2017. Among them, 3863 had both AUD and OUD. There were 2443 fatalities related to AUD-only ED visits, whereas this rate was 292 for OUD-only ED visits. The majority of these patients had Medicare and Medicaid. AUD-only ED visits were more prevalent (680.7 vs 112.5 per 100,000 population) and resulted in higher overall charges than OUD-only ED visits ($6.1 billion vs $1 billion in total charges). However, AUD/OUD ED visits resulted in higher total charges on average than either OUD-only or AUD-only ED visits. Compared to patients with outpatient discharge, patients with inpatient admissions were more likely to belong to the OUD-only visit group (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.17-1.23) or the AUD/OUD visit group (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 2.28-2.61) than to the AUD-only visit group. Compared to urban patients, rural patients were less likely to belong to OUD-related visit groups than the AUD-only visit group. In conclusions, AUD was more prevalent than OUD among ED visits and resulted in a higher number of fatalities and higher medical charges. Current health policy regarding substance use that is heavily tilted toward curbing the opioid crisis remains woefully tolerant to AUDs. While efforts to curb opioid misuse should continue, future efforts should raise awareness among ED providers of the disease burden of and social harms caused by alcoholism and alcohol addiction.

Full-Time Faculty in Clinical and Basic Science Departments by Sex and Underrepresented in Medicine Status: A 40-Year Review.

PURPOSE: To assess the changing diversity of faculty in specific clinical and basic science departments, stratified by sex and underrepresented in medicine (URM) status, at all Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited medical schools. METHOD: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study, the authors used data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster (data pulled in October 2019) to identify trends in clinical department faculty and in basic science department faculty by sex and URM status. They included full-time faculty at all LCME-accredited medical schools from 1979 to 2018. They compared the proportions of faculty across separate departments according to sex and URM status, and they used 2-independent-sample t test and simple linear regressions for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: The number of full-time faculty increased from 49,909 in 1979 to 175,326 in 2018. The largest increase occurred in clinical departments, where the number of faculty increased from 38,726 to 155,677 (a fourfold increase). The number of faculty in basic science departments increased from 11,183 to 19,649 (a 1.8-fold increase). The proportions of faculty who were non-URM females (compared with non-URM males, URM females, and URM males) increased the most-from 14.4% (5,595 of 38,726) to 37.6% (58,478 of 155,677) for clinical departments, and from 14.9% (1,669 of 11,183) to 33.0% (6,485 of 19,649) for basic science departments. Growth was steady but slow among URM faculty, especially for Black males; the absolute number of male URM faculty remained low in both basic science and clinical departments. The proportions of females and URM faculty were highest in the departments of obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, and family medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial increase in faculty, especially in clinical departments, has led to greater diversity, but mostly among non-URM females. The rise of URM male and URM female faculty has been minimal.

Tenure Trends in Academic Emergency Medicine Departments in U.S. Medical Schools.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the long-term trends in tenure status stratified by sex and underrepresented in medicine (URM) status among emergency medicine (EM) department faculty in U.S. medical schools. METHODS: This study used the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster to study trends in tenure status of full-time faculty from 1989 to 2018. The numbers and proportions of faculty by tenure status were studied over the years and compared across sex and URM minority status. Two-independent-sample t-test and simple linear regression were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: The number of EM faculty increased from 177 in 1989 to 5,237 in 2018, with the majority of increase in nontenured (from 120 to 4,485) rather than tenured (from 24 to 198) or tenure track (from 28 to 548) faculty. The proportions of tenure-line faculty increased briefly from 1989 (29.4%) to 1994 (32.5%) and decreased since to 14.2% in 2018. The decreases were greater among men (from 34.5% to 14.9%) or non-URM (from 32.7% to 14.1%) than women (from 24.8% to 13.1%) or URM (from 30.2% to 15.3%). Compared to other academic departments, EM departments had the second lowest proportion of tenure-line faculty in 2018. CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine faculty size increased rapidly in the past 30 years, with the vast majority of growth in nontenured faculty, regardless of sex or URM status. This highlights the need to review career development and academic promotions for EM particularly among nontenured faculty.

US Dermatology Department Faculty Diversity Trends by Sex and Underrepresented-in-Medicine Status, 1970 to 2018.

Importance: Faculty diversity has important implications for improving the cultural competency and diversity of medical students and residents. However, dermatology is one of the least diverse fields in medicine. Objectives: To measure faculty diversity by sex, race, and ethnicity in academic dermatology departments in US medical schools and to evaluate how this representation compares with the diversity of the US population, medical students, department chairs, and faculty in other clinical departments. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster were evaluated to differentiate full-time faculty by sex and designation as a minority underrepresented in medicine (URM; currently including black, Hispanic, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander individuals). Trends in female and URM representation among academic dermatology departments were analyzed from 1970 to 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The numbers and proportions of US dermatology department faculty by sex, race, and ethnicity. Results: The number of full-time US dermatology department faculty increased from 167 in 1970 to 1464 in 2018. The number of female faculty increased from 18 (10.8%) in 1970 to 749 (51.2%) in 2018; the number of URM faculty grew from 8 (4.8%) in 1970 to 109 (7.4%) in 2018. Proportions of female and white dermatology department faculty were similar to the US population in 2018; however, like other clinical departments, the proportion of URM faculty was lower than in the general population. There was an inverse association between increasing faculty rank and the proportion of female faculty overall, but this was not the case among URM faculty. At every rank, there was a proportionately low number of URM faculty represented. Across all specialties, department chairs were least diverse, with white individuals representing 79.7% (n = 2856 of 3585) of all chairs in 2018 and women representing 19.4% (n = 694 of 3585) of all chairs. Conclusions and Relevance: Expansion of faculty in US dermatology departments over the past half century has led to greater female representation, now similar to that in the general population. Higher-ranking faculty is associated with lower diversity. Although dermatology department faculty diversity by sex, race, and ethnicity has partially improved over the past 49 years, continued attention to the lagging representation of URM faculty should be a priority for the field of academic dermatology.

Trends in Tenure Status in Academic Family Medicine, 1977-2017: Implications for Recruitment, Retention, and the Academic Mission.

PURPOSE: Tenure status has important implications for medical school faculty recruitment and retention and may affect educational quality, academic freedom, and collegiality. However, tenure trends in academic family medicine are unknown. This study aimed to describe trends in tenure status of family medicine faculty overall and by gender and status of minorities underrepresented in medicine (URM) in Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited medical schools. METHOD: Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster data were used to describe trends in tenure status of full-time family medicine faculty, 1977 to 2017. Bivariate and trend analyses were conducted to assess associations and describe patterns between tenure status and gender, race, and ethnicity. Interdepartmental variations in tenure trends over the years were also examined. RESULTS: Among family medicine faculty, the proportions of faculty tenured or on a tenure track dropped more than threefold from 1977 (46.6%; n = 507/1,089) to 2017 (12.7%; n = 729/5,752). Lower proportions of women and URM faculty were tenured or on a tenure track than male and non-URM faculty, respectively. But the gaps among them were converging. Compared with other clinical departments, family medicine had the highest proportion of faculty (74.6%; n = 4,291/5,752) not on a tenure track in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Proportion of tenure positions significantly decreased among family medicine faculty in U.S. medical schools. While gaps between male and female faculty and among certain racial/ethnic groups remained for family medicine tenure status, they have decreased over time, mainly because of a substantial increase in nontenured positions.

The Rise of Nontenured Faculty in Obstetrics and Gynecology by Sex and Underrepresented in Medicine Status.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the changing landscape in nontenured faculty, stratified by sex and underrepresented in medicine status, for obstetrician-gynecologists at all U.S. medical schools. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we used data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster to identify trends in career pathways of full-time faculty at all U.S. MD-granting medical schools from 1978 to 2017. Proportions of nontenured faculty were compared with other clinical departments, according to sex and race-ethnicity. Two-sample t-testing and simple linear regression were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: The number of full-time obstetrics and gynecology faculty increased from 1,688 to 6,347, with most being nontenured (from 535 to 4,951; 9.3-fold increase) rather than tenured (from 457 to 587; 1.3-fold increase) or tenure-eligible (from 397 to 514; 1.3-fold increase). The proportions of all faculty who were nontenured increased from 29.6% to 72.5% (a 2.5-fold increase; P<.010) for men and from 43.4% to 81.4% (a 1.9-fold increase; P<.01) for women. The proportion who were nontenured increased similarly for faculty who were underrepresented in medicine (from 27.4% to 83.5%; a 3.0-fold increase; P<.01) and for those who were not underrepresented in medicine (from 32.0% to 77.1%; a 2.4-fold increase; P<.01). Trends in the increased proportions of nontenured obstetrics and gynecology faculty were similar with those in other major clinical departments. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial rise in the number of obstetrics and gynecology faculty was largely among those who were nontenured, regardless of sex or underrepresented in medicine status. This finding signals the essential need for examining career development and academic accomplishment for promoting nontenured faculty.

Differential effects of distance decay on hospital inpatient visits among subpopulations in Florida, USA.

Understanding patients' travel behavior for seeking hospital care is fundamental for understanding healthcare market and planning for resource allocation. However, few studies examined the issue comprehensively across populations by geographical, demographic, and health insurance characteristics. Based on the 2011 State Inpatient Database in Florida, this study modeled patients' travel patterns for hospital inpatient care across geographic areas (by average affluence, urbanicity) and calendar seasons, and across subpopulations (by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and health insurance status). Overall, travel patterns for all subpopulations were best captured by the log-logistic function. Patients in more affluent areas and rural areas tended to travel longer for hospital inpatient care, so did the younger, whites, and privately insured. Longer travel distances may be a necessity for rural patients to cope with lack of accessibility for local hospital care, but for the other population groups, it may indicate rather better mobility and more healthcare choices. The results can be used in various healthcare analyses such as accessibility assessment, hospital service area delineation, and healthcare resource planning.

Teaming up census and patient data to delineate fine-scale hospital service areas and identify geographic disparities in hospital accessibility.

The number of hospital beds per capita, an important measure of equity in healthcare availability and resource allocation, was found to vary across geographic areas in many countries, including the USA. The hospital service areas (HSAs) have proven to be more meaningful spatial units for studying health-seeking behaviors and health resource allocation and service utilization. However, when evaluating the geographical balance in ratios of hospital beds to population (HBtP), no existing HSA delineation methods directly consider the underlying population distribution. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), this study incorporated the State Inpatient Database with census data to develop a population-based HSA delineation method. The census-derived HSAs were produced for Florida and were validated by aggregating and comparing with the traditional flow-based HSAs. The difference in current ratios of HBtP between the most over- and under-served HSAs was approximately 60 times. Significant clusters of high and low ratios were found in Miami and Jacksonville metropolitan areas, respectively. Such results may be of interest to relevant stakeholders and contribute to planning and optimization of hospital resource allocation and healthcare policy-making. Furthermore, the discovery of a strong correlation between the numbers of hospital discharges and the population at ZIP code level holds a remarkable potential for affordable population estimation, especially in non-census years.

Relocation of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Specialists in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patterns in relocation of maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialists during the recent 10 years. STUDY DESIGN: This descriptive study analyzed the migration of MFM specialists between 2006 and 2016 based on county locations. Year-to-year comparisons of physicians in active clinical practice were performed. Demographic and county characteristics were gathered from three data resources. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with relocation. RESULTS: An average of 7.4% (5.5-10.8%) of all 1,104 (1,103-1,115) MFM specialists moved per year. Approximately one in three (36%) relocated during the 10 years, usually once or twice. The likelihood of relocation was higher if the physician was younger, especially under 40 years compared with those aged 60 years and older (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-3.19). No differences were noted based on gender and race/ethnicity. Physicians in independent group practices were more inclined to relocate, especially when compared with those in a solo or two-physician practice (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.27-0.54). Relocations were primarily between urban counties (95.9%) and showed a significant regional pattern. CONCLUSION: Approximately one in three MFM specialists relocated in the past 10 years, mostly between urban counties and especially in independent group practices.