The relative and combined ability of stress hyperglycemia ratio and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to predict all-cause mortality in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are independently associated with increased mortality risk in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the role of these biomarkers in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease (MVD) remains unknown. The present study aimed to assess the relative and combined abilities of these biomarkers to predict all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes and MVD. METHODS: This study included 1148 diabetic patients with MVD who underwent coronary angiography at Tianjin Chest Hospital between January 2016 and December 2016. The patients were divided into four groups according to their SHR (SHR-L and SHR-H) and NT-proBNP (NT-proBNP-L and NT-proBNP-H) levels. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of SHR and NT-proBNP levels with all-cause mortality. RESULTS: During a mean 4.2 year follow-up, 138 patients died. Multivariate analysis showed that SHR and NT-proBNP were strong independent predictors of all-cause mortality in diabetic patients with MVD (SHR: HR hazard ratio [2.171; 95%CI 1.566-3.008; P < 0.001; NT-proBNP: HR: 1.005; 95%CI 1.001-1.009; P = 0.009). Compared to patients in the first (SHR-L and NT-proBNP-L) group, patients in the fourth (SHR-H and NT-proBNP-H) group had the highest mortality risk (HR: 12.244; 95%CI 5.828-25.721; P < 0.001). The areas under the curve were 0.615(SHR) and 0.699(NT-proBNP) for all-cause mortality. Adding either marker to the original models significantly improved the C-statistic and integrated discrimination improvement values (all P < 0.05). Moreover, combining SHR and NT-proBNP levels into the original model provided maximal prognostic information. CONCLUSIONS: SHR and NT-proBNP independently and jointly predicted all-cause mortality in diabetic patients with MVD, suggesting that strategies to improve risk stratification in these patients should incorporate SHR and NT-porBNP into risk algorithms.

Prediabetes is Associated with Worse Long-Term Outcomes in Young Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Purpose: The incidence of prediabetes mellitus (pre-DM) is increasing among young individuals. Whether pre-DM can predict adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pre-DM on the long-term clinical outcomes of patients aged≤ 45 years with new-onset ACS. Patients and methods: A total of 1113 patients with new-onset ACS (aged≤ 45 years) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into three groups according to their glycemic status or history: normal glucose metabolism (NGM), prediabetes (pre-DM), and diabetes mellitus (DM). The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or unplanned repeat revascularization. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to explore the association between abnormal glycemic status and MACE. Results: The prevalence of NGM, pre-DM, and DM were 45.9% (n=511), 27.0% (n=301), and 27.0% (n=301), respectively. During a median follow-up of 65 months, MACE occurred in 23.5% (n=120) of NGM, 29.2% (n=88) of pre-DM, and 34.6% (n=104) of DM (P=0.003). After multivariate adjustment, both pre-DM and DM significantly increased the risk of MACE compared with the NGM group (pre-DM: HR1.38, CI95% 1.05-1.83, P=0.023; DM: HR1.65, CI95% 1.27-2.16, P<0.001). Moreover, pre-DM had a similar impact on MACE as DM in young patients with ACS (P=0.162). Conclusion: Pre-DM was common among patients aged≤ 45 years with new-onset ACS. Pre-DM was associated with an increased risk of future MACE compared to NGM.

Early versus late delayed percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are a substantial proportion of elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) miss the optimal time window (12 h from symptom onset) of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). For these patients, the ideal timing of delayed PCI remains undetermined. Therefore, this study compared the clinical outcomes of early versus late delayed PCI in elderly patients with STEMI. METHODS: From January 2014 to September 2019, 512 patients aged ≥ 65 years with STEMI who underwent delayed PCI after 12 h from symptom onset were included and then categorized into the early PCI group (12-48 h, n = 111) and late PCI group (48 h-28 days, n = 401) according to the timing of delayed PCI. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust the confounding factors between groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and ischemia-driven revascularization. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 77 months, 163 (31.8%) patients developed MACCE and 93 (18.2%) died. Early or late delayed PCI did not make a significant difference in clinical outcomes of MACCE (Before PSM: HR 0.773, 95% CI 0.520-1.149, P = 0.203; After PSM: HR 0.869, 95% CI 0.498-1.517, P = 0.622), all-cause death, cardiac death, recurrent MI, stroke, and ischemia-driven revascularization in both overall patients and the PSM cohorts. CONCLUSION: Early delayed PCI (12-48 h from symptom onset), for elderly patients with STEMI who present > 12 h after symptom onset is not associated with better long-term clinical outcomes compared with late delayed PCI (48 h-28 days).

Culprit vessel vs. immediate multivessel vs. out-of-hospital staged intervention for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Background and aims: The optimal interventional strategy remains undetermined in hemodynamically stable patients with NSTEMI and MVD. This study aimed to examine clinical prognosis among culprit vessel, immediate multivessel, and staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with NSTEMI and MVD. Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study included 943 hemodynamically stable patients with NSTEMI and MVD who had undergone successful drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation from January 2014 to December 2019. Patients were categorized into culprit lesion-only PCI (CL-PCI), immediate multivessel PCI (MV-PCI), and out-of-hospital staged MV-PCI according to PCI strategy. The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or unplanned repeat revascularization. The secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, and unplanned repeat revascularization. Results: Over a median follow-up of 59 months, immediate MV-PCI was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death than CL-PCI (HR: 0.591, 95%CI: 0.364-0.960, P = 0.034). Out-of-hospital staged MV-PCI was associated with a reduced risk of MACE (HR: 0.448, 95%CI: 0.314-0.638, P < 0.001) and all-cause death (HR: 0.326, 95%CI: 0.183-0.584, P < 0.001) compared with CL-PCI. The above results were accordant after multivariate COX analysis and propensity score matching. MACE (HR: 0.560, 95%CI: 0.385-0.813, P = 0.002) and repeat revascularization (HR: 0.627, 95%CI: 0.400-0.982, P = 0.041) were significantly less likely to occur with out-of-hospital MV-PCI rather than immediate MV-PCI. However, the incidences of primary and secondary outcomes were comparable between immediate and staged PCI after confounder adjustment using multivariate regression and propensity score matching analysis. For subgroup analyses stratified by synergy between PCI with taxus and cardiac surgery score, staged MV-PCI was found to lower the risk of MACE compared with immediate MV-PCI in patients with more complex coronary disease. Conclusion: Hemodynamically stable patients with NSTEMI and MVD benefited from the strategy of MV-PCI. Patients with complex coronary anatomy treated with out-of-hospital staged MV-PCI rather than immediate MV-PCI had lower risks of MACE. These need to be confirmed in the future randomized study.