An update on the use of antihistamines in managing chronic urticaria.

INTRODUCTION: Urticaria, a mast cell-mediated skin disease, manifests as acute or chronic, with the latter divided into spontaneous and inducible types and requires individualized management, including identifying triggers and comorbidities. Antihistamines, particularly the second generation group, form the mainstay of primary treatment plans consisting of dosage adjustments and/or in combination with other treatment modalities depending on underlying disease control. AREAS COVERED: A literature search was conducted using 'antihistamines,' 'urticaria,' 'pharmacogenomics,' 'genomics,' 'biomarkers' and 'treatment response' as key words. In this review, we focus on the comprehensive understanding and application of antihistamines in managing adult and adolescent patients with chronic urticaria. EXPERT OPINION: Using antihistamines to treat urticaria is set to change significantly, focusing more on personalized medicine and identifying key biomarkers to enhance treatment response prediction. These changes aim to make treatments more specific and cost-effective by avoiding unnecessary tests. Applying new approaches in everyday clinical care faces challenges like proving the biomarkers' reliability, updating current guidelines, and incorporating individualized treatments into standard procedures. Efforts should now concentrate on finding easy-to-use biomarkers, improving access to pharmacogenomics, understanding why some patients are resistant to treatment, and creating more specific treatment options based on patient needs.

Eating Increases and Exercise Decreases Disease Activity in Patients With Symptomatic Dermographism.

BACKGROUND: Eating can increase disease activity in patients with symptomatic dermographism , the most common subtype of chronic inducible urticaria, but it is unclear how common this is. The effects of exercising on symptomatic dermographism disease activity have also not yet been determined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of exercise and nonspecific carbohydrate-rich food intake on the severity and intensity of symptomatic dermographism after exercise and nonspecific carbohydrate-rich food intake. METHODS: We assessed disease activity by FricTest provocation testing in 75 symptomatic dermographism patients before and after eating, exercising, or both. We determined the rates of food-dependent (FD) symptomatic dermographism and food-exacerbated (FE) symptomatic dermographism. By comparing post- and pre-exercise FricTest scores, we identified complete responders: that is, patients with a negative FricTest response after exercising and partial responders. Finally, we evaluated whether exercise protects patients with FD-symptomatic dermographism or FE-symptomatic dermographism from eating-induced worsening of symptomatic dermographism. RESULTS: Of 64 symptomatic dermographism patients, eight had FD-symptomatic dermographism (13%), 42 had FE-symptomatic dermographism (66%), and 14 patients showed no negative impact of eating on disease activity (21%). Physical exercise reduced FricTest skin provocation test responses in 83% of 58 patients. Exercising protected patients with FD/FE-symptomatic dermographism from worsening of symptomatic dermographism owing to eating in half of cases, with higher rates for exercise after eating (67%) compared with exercise before eating (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that eating often worsen symptomatic dermographism symptoms, and exercise often improves it. Our findings might aid patients in controlling symptoms better.

Food-dependent and food-exacerbated symptomatic dermographism: New variants of symptomatic dermographism.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic dermographism (SD) is the most common form of chronic inducible urticaria. The criterion standard for diagnosing SD and disease activity assessment in SD is provocation testing. As of now, if and what cofactors have an impact on provocation test results is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the induction of signs and symptoms of SD is affected by the intake of food. METHODS: We performed standardized skin provocation testing with a dermographometer (FricTest) before and after the intake of food. Patients were off antihistamine treatment for at least 3 days before testing. In total, 17 patients were tested after not having eaten for at least 4 hours (preprandial) on one volar forearm and 60 minutes after a carbohydrate-rich meal (postprandial) on the other. FricTest responses (wheals, itch) at trigger thresholds were assessed at 5 and 30 seconds as well as at 1, 2, 5, and 10 minutes. RESULTS: We identified 7 patients with SD who showed faster onset of FricTest-induced whealing and/or lower trigger thresholds after the intake of food, that is, food-exacerbated SD. In 5 other patients, FricTest provocation testing resulted in a positive response only after the intake of food, but not before. Three of these 5 patients with food-dependent SD had comorbid chronic spontaneous urticaria and 1 had cholinergic urticaria. CONCLUSIONS: We describe 2 previously unknown subtypes of SD, food-exacerbated SD and food-dependent SD. The prevalence and underlying pathomechanisms of food-exacerbated SD and food-dependent SD need to be investigated, and the impact of food intake on other forms of chronic inducible urticaria should be explored.