Tenofovir-diphosphate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during low, medium and high adherence to emtricitabine/ tenofovir alafenamide vs. emtricitabine/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

OBJECTIVE: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) preferentially loads peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), resulting in higher PBMC tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). No studies have yet compared TFV-DP in PBMC from lower than daily dosing between prodrugs, which has potential implications for event-driven preexposure prophylaxis and pharmacologic forgiveness. DESIGN: Two separate randomized, directly observed therapy (DOT) crossover studies (DOT-DBS and TAF-DBS) were conducted to mimic low, medium and high adherence. METHODS: HIV-negative adults were randomized to two 12-week DOT regimens of 33, 67 or 100% of daily dosing with emtricitabine (F)/TAF 200 mg/25 mg (TAF-DBS) or F/TDF 200 mg/300 mg (DOT-DBS), separated by a 12-week washout. PBMC steady-state concentrations (Css) of TFV-DP and FTC-TP were estimated using nonlinear mixed models and compared between F/TAF and F/TDF. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants contributed to 33% (n = 23), 67% (n = 23) and 100% (n = 23) of daily F/TAF regimens. Forty-four contributed to 33% (n = 15), 67% (n = 16) and 100% (n = 32) of daily F/TDF regimens. PBMC TFV-DP Css were 7.3 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 6.4-8.2], 7.1 (5.9-8.2) and 6.7- (4.4-8.9) fold higher (P < 0.0001) following F/TAF vs. F/TDF; 593 vs. 81.7, 407 vs. 57.4, and 215 vs. 32.3 fmol/106 cells, respectively. TFV-DP was 2.6 (2.1-3.1) fold higher with 33% F/TAF vs. 100% F/TDF. Estimated half-lives (95% CI) of TFV-DP in PBMC were 2.9 (1.5-5.5) days for F/TAF and 2.1 (1.5-2.9) days for F/TDF. FTC-TP was similar in both studies (P = 0.119). CONCLUSION: F/TAF produced 6.7 to 7.3-fold higher TFV-DP in PBMC vs. F/TDF across adherence levels, supporting increased potency and pharmacologic forgiveness with F/TAF in the PBMC compartment.

Pharmacology and drug interactions with HIV PrEP in transgender persons receiving gender affirming hormone therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Transgender persons are at increased risk of HIV infection and would benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use. However, barriers to healthcare and a lack of data regarding PrEP efficacy among transgender persons limits use. A related issue is whether a drug-drug interaction (DDI) exists between gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and PrEP. Recently, small pharmacokinetic studies were conducted to assess this interaction. AREAS COVERED: This review will assess the pharmacology of PrEP agents, existing data regarding potential DDIs between GAHT and PrEP, and hypothetical mechanisms for these DDIs. A summary will be provided on implications for PrEP use among transgender persons. EXPERT OPINION: Theoretically, DDIs are not expected between GAHT and PrEP. However, among transgender women (TGW) on GAHT, small studies identified a minor DDI between GAHT and tenofovir/emtricitabine (TFV/FTC), with TFV/FTC exposures ~12-27% lower among TGW vs. cisgender men. The mechanism of DDIs is unclear and requires further study. For perspective, median TFV/FTC concentrations were still within the range of median concentrations reported across controlled pharmacokinetic studies. TFV-disphosphate/FTC-triphosphate concentrations were similar between TGW and cisgender men. In summary, TDF/FTC likely reaches protective concentrations and should continue to be offered as PrEP for transgender persons.