Burden of Illness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with huge clinical and economic burden in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) which can be curtailed by efficacious treatment. In order to achieve this, current treatment pathways for T2DM and associated costs need to be assessed. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort review was conducted to collect country-specific and patient-specific clinical data, over a minimum observation period of 5 years in the KSA. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns were recorded. The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (CDM) version 9.5 Plus was used to assess the burden of illness, which included long-term projections of clinical (life expectancy [LE], quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs], event rates of diabetes-related complications) and direct medical cost (per-patient annual or lifelong [50 years]) outcomes of the most commonly used first-line (1st-line) regimens for T2DM from a payer perspective in the KSA. RESULTS: Data were collected from a subpopulation of 638 patients from 15 participating centres. There was an equal gender representation with a majority of the patients belonging to Arabian/Saudi ethnicity (71.0%). Biguanides (81.5%), sulfonylureas (51.6%), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors (26.2%) and fast-acting insulins (17.2%) were the most prescribed 1st-line agents. The most frequently used 1st-line regimens resulted in an estimated LE of 25-28 years, QALYs of 18-21 years and lifelong total cost of illness of 201,377-437,371 Saudi Arabian riyal (53,700-116,632 US dollars). CONCLUSION: Our study addresses gaps in the current research by providing a complete landscape of baseline demographic, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns from a heterogeneous group of patients with T2DM in the KSA. Additionally, the burden of illness analysis using CDM showed substantially higher cost of T2DM care from a payer perspective in the KSA.

Clinical effectiveness of Liraglutide 3.0 mg and impact of weight loss in improving obesity-related comorbid conditions in King Fahad Medical City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A real-world experience.

Obesity has emerged as one of the most challenging worldwide problems and, if left untreated, can lead to major illnesses and consequences that can impair patients' health The study's objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of Liraglutide 3.0 mg in inducing weight loss and to assess the improvement of obesity-related comorbid conditions among people living with obesity (PwO) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). A retrospective cohort review of PwO with or without diabetes and taking Liraglutide 3.0 mg in combination with diet and exercise for weight management was performed and evaluated at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, KSA. We collected patient data from electronic medical records for different parameters. The side effects were not recorded. A cohort of 399 patients who used Liraglutide 3.0 mg for 6 months was included in the study. At baseline, the mean age of the cohort was 46.4 (±12.1) years, mean BMI was 40.4 (±7.7) kg/m2 and most patients (74.4%) were women. Their mean average weight loss was 6.5 (±9.5) kg; p < .001. In the entire cohort, 52.6% of subjects had lost ≥5% of their bodyweight, 27.8% of subjects had lost ≥10%, and 11.3% of subjects had lost ≥15% of their bodyweight. There was a significant reduction in HbA1c by 0.5% (p < .0001) at 6 months of the treatment. Liraglutide 3.0 mg treatment did not affect systolic blood pressure and alanine transferase. Liraglutide 3.0 mg resulted in clinically significant weight loss with better glycaemic control, confirming the drug's effectiveness in the real-world evidence setting.

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia - CAPTURE study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Saudi Arabia using data from the CAPTURE cross-sectional study. METHODS: CAPTURE was a non-interventional, multinational study carried out between December 2018 and September 2019. In Saudi Arabia, clinical (including medication) and demographic data were collected across 7 sites (Alhada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif; King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh; Specialized Medical Centre Hospital, Riyadh; King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah; King Abdulaziz Hospital for National Guard, Al Ahsa; Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, Buraidah; and Dallah Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) from adults aged ≥18 years. The prevalence of CVD was estimated and weighted according to care setting, with data between groups not statistically compared. RESULTS: Among the 883 adults enrolled in this study (566 from primary care, 317 from secondary care), 158 had established CVD, making the weighted prevalence of 18% (95% CI: [15.5-20.5]). The weighted prevalence of atherosclerotic CVD was 15.1% (95% CI: [12.8-17.5]), accounting for 82.4% of the CVD cases. Coronary heart disease was the most common subtype of CVD (13.4%), followed by cerebrovascular disease (1.7%). A total of 23.6% of patients were treated with glucose-lowering agents with proven cardiovascular benefit. CONCLUSION: In Saudi Arabia, approximately one in 5 adults with T2DM had established CVD, lower than the global prevalence, possibly because of disparities in patient characteristics, potential genetic predispositions, or a lack of accurate documentation due to poor coordination between care settings.

Glycaemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Insulin Degludec: A Real-World, Prospective Non-interventional Study-UPDATES Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec (degludec) has proven benefits in type 2 diabetes (T2D), in terms of improved glycaemic control, low risk of hypoglycaemia, and flexibility in dosing time. This prospective non-interventional UPDATES study aimed to investigate whether results obtained from randomised clinical trials and other real-world studies with degludec are generalisable to patients with T2D in routine clinical practice in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Eligible adults (n = 561) with T2D received degludec for 26-34 weeks, at physicians' discretion and in accordance with local routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in HbA1c from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline to EOS in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), daily insulin dose and rate of hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: At baseline, mean age, HbA1c and FPG were 55.7 years, 9.4% and 185.6 mg/dL, respectively. Mean (standard error [SE]) changes from baseline to EOS (crude analysis) were statistically significant for HbA1c (- 1.1 [0.08] %-points, 95% CI - 1.29, - 0.98; P < 0.0001), FPG (- 39.1 [3.42] mg/dL, 95% CI - 45.9, - 32.4; P < 0.0001) and total daily insulin dose (+ 4.7 [1.6] units, 95% CI 1.63, 7.86; P = 0.003, insulin-experienced population). In exploratory analysis of patients switching from insulin glargine U100 or U300 to degludec, similar reductions were seen in HbA1c and FPG. The rate of hypoglycaemia was significantly reduced with degludec versus previous treatment, with no apparent or unexpected safety and tolerability issues. The number of insulin-experienced patients utilising resources associated with severe hypoglycaemia was also reduced. Most patients (95.5%) were willing to continue treatment at EOS, and expressed a preference for degludec over their previous regimen (93.0%). CONCLUSION: Patients with T2D treated with degludec in routine clinical practice in Saudi Arabia experienced clinically significant improvements in glycaemic control and a lower rate of hypoglycaemia compared with baseline, with no new safety concerns reported. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03785522.

Gender Differences in the Attitudes and Management of People with Obesity in Saudi Arabia: Data from the ACTION-IO Study.

Purpose: Several studies have investigated gender differences in various obesity-related outcomes. Females were found to have more accurate weight perception and reported more frequency of attempted weight loss. The objective of this study was to assess gender differences in the attitudes and management of people with obesity (PwO) in Saudi Arabia using data from the ACTION-IO study. Patients and Methods: A survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia in June and July 2018 on adults with obesity (based on self-reported body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2). Results: A total of 1000 people with obesity completed the survey; 565 (56.5%) were male (mean age of 36.9 years and mean BMI of 33.5 kg/m2) and 435 (43.5%) were female (mean age of 36.3 years and mean BMI of 34.5 kg/m2). The two most reported motivations for wanting to lose weight for both groups were to improve appearance (38%) and to have more energy (35%). Females were more likely to trust their health-care provider (HCP) advice about weight management when compared to males (87% females, 82% males, p = 0.059) and were more likely to have concerns regarding long-term safety associated with prescription weight loss medications (65% female versus 59% males, p = 0.043). On the other hand, males were more likely to seek their physician to prescribe weight loss medication if they hear of a new medication (55% males versus 46% females, p = 0.014), and more to believe that there are good options available for weight loss medications (74% males versus 67% females, p = 0.040). Also, more males prefer to take weight loss medications than to have a weight loss surgery (65% males, 59% females, p = 0.054). Conclusion: Overall, this study increases our understanding on the attitudes of both females and males towards the management of weight loss and opens the discussion for gender-specific weight loss interventions.