Combination carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced thymic carcinoma.

Thymic carcinoma is a very rare neoplasm for which no optimal chemotherapeutic regimen has been established to date. Hence, we performed this study to investigate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel as a first-line regimen for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. We conducted this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who had received carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy between August 2013 and December 2021. Twelve patients were included in this study and were subjected to efficacy and safety analysis. Their median age was 62 years (range, 47-74 years), and all had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. After a median follow-up time of 19.7 months, the overall response rate was 50%; the median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.8 months and 23.3 months, respectively. Chemotherapy-related peripheral neuropathy was observed in 2 patients (16%; each with grade 1). Other toxicities were manageable, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy regimen showed good efficacy and safety in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.

Evaluation of rapid drug safety communication materials for patients in Japan.

Since 2011, pharmaceutical companies in Japan have been required to issue two types of documents regarding severe adverse drug reactions reported post-marketing, namely the Rapid Safety Communication Materials for Patients and the Related Materials. However, the adequacy of these documents has not yet been systematically assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of these two types of materials. The Rapid Safety Communications for Patients were obtained from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) website. The Related Materials were obtained from pharmaceutical companies or the PMDA website. Three assessors independently scored the Rapid Safety Communication for Patients and the Related Materials using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CCI). In addition, the contents and descriptions of the materials were analyzed. In total, 13 materials for seven drugs were assessed. Almost all materials contained the "main message" and "call to action". However, the average CCI scores for the Rapid Safety Communication for Patients and Related Materials for Patients were 68.8 and 74.3 (out of 100), respectively. Further, none of the evaluated materials were scored above the CCI threshold score (i.e., ≥ 90%). Descriptions regarding "language", "state of science", and "risk" were not adequate. In particular, the terminology used in materials seemed difficult for patients to understand. In conclusion, the Japanese Rapid Communication Materials for Patients require improvement. Furthermore, a system for evaluating these materials prior to publication should be established.

[Current Status and Development of Drug Information Infrastructure System for the Public in Japan and Overseas].

With the progress of medical treatment, information on drugs, etc. is overflowing on the media and the Internet, and some of them are leading to uncertain information for the purpose of profit, and some of them are wrong information or inaccurate information, and the effect on the patient is regarded as a problem. In Japan, information on public pharmaceuticals for patients and consumers is provided on the Internet, but its utilization is not sufficient. In the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act, it is stated that "Citizens shall endeavor to use pharmaceuticals, etc., properly and deepen their knowledge and understanding of their efficacy and safety". On the other hand, there is a variety of information available on the Internet, and simply searching does not necessarily lead to reliable information. It is necessary to provide information with a mechanism to ensure that the information is reliable so that it can lead to appropriate medical care. Overseas, medical information infrastructure systems, including highly reliable public pharmaceuticals based on evidence, have been developed. Examples include National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom, MedlinePlus in the United States, and National Prescribing Service (NPS) MedicineWise in Australia. In the era of digital health, it is necessary to discuss issues and prospects for the construction and dissemination of information provision infrastructure that meets the needs of patients and consumers from the perspective of industry, government, academia, and patients.

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial of Early versus Late Favipiravir Therapy in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.

Favipiravir is an oral broad-spectrum inhibitor of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that is approved for treatment of influenza in Japan. We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial of favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 at 25 hospitals across Japan. Eligible patients were adolescents and adults admitted with COVID-19 who were asymptomatic or mildly ill and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to early or late favipiravir therapy (in the latter case, the same regimen starting on day 6 instead of day 1). The primary endpoint was viral clearance by day 6. The secondary endpoint was change in viral load by day 6. Exploratory endpoints included time to defervescence and resolution of symptoms. Eighty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 69 were virologically evaluable. Viral clearance occurred within 6 days in 66.7% and 56.1% of the early and late treatment groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.76 to 2.62). Of 30 patients who had a fever (≥37.5°C) on day 1, times to defervescence were 2.1 days and 3.2 days in the early and late treatment groups (aHR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.81 to 4.35). During therapy, 84.1% developed transient hyperuricemia. Favipiravir did not significantly improve viral clearance as measured by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) by day 6 but was associated with numerical reduction in time to defervescence. Neither disease progression nor death occurred in any of the patients in either treatment group during the 28-day participation. (This study has been registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials under number jRCTs041190120.).

[Significance and Role of Academic Detailing for Optimal Medication].

"Academic detailing" is used to clearly explain scientific issues. In the field of clinical practice, "academic detailing" is a form of interactive educational outreach to physicians in order to provide unbiased, non-commercial, evidence-based information about medications and other therapeutic modalities, with the goal of improving patient care. It is necessary to provide proper information about prescription drugs for their appropriate use in clinical practice. However, this requires of physicians significant time and labor to comprehensively collect and summarize all necessary information for the proper clinical application of pharmaceutical products, a task which may be both difficult and prohibitive to a busy physician. However, if clinical experience and other pharmaceutical or treatment information is derived solely from the commercial entities, this may lead to improper prescription practices. In western countries, public funds are used to support universities and other research institution programs. In Canada, clinical pharmacists act as "detailers". Their mission and role is to listen to the needs of the physician or health care professional, to provide objective, evidence-based drug information on selected drug therapy topics, to educate physicians on the optimal use of medications, to provide practical alternatives, and to extend the physician's usable knowledge base. The importance of this "academic detailing" activity is also recognized in Japan, and pharmacists can be expected to act as detailers in the future. We hope that this will lead to improvement in the quality of medical care.

[Activities of Choosing Wisely and Role of Pharmacists].

Choosing Wisely (CW) is a pharmaceutical campaign activity that is spreading rapidly internationally. Briefly, it is an activity "aiming for appropriate medical care by reviewing the medical practice that is practiced despite lack of evidence from the viewpoint of evidence based medicine (EBM)". Here, healthcare workers and patients, through dialogue, are aiming to be able to carry out medical practices (examinations, treatment) that are scientifically validated, truly necessary, and have few side effects. In 2012, the American Institute of Internal Medicine listed five topics (Top Five Lists) and presented the medical practices and reasons that should be reconsidered. Based on this, many academic societies and medical professional organizations around the world presented five unique lists from their respective standpoints. And, in 2016, CW Japan was established in our country. The ultimate goal of this activity is to encourage dialogue and share decision-making with the patients so that healthcare workers can "select wisely" appropriate medicine for their patients based on professionalism. In Japan, recent attention has also been paid to problems concerning proper use of polypharmacy and antibiotics, especially for elderly people. To support a sustainable medical system in the future, it is desirable to promote efforts to realize "high-value care" for patients, paying particular attention to limit unnecessary medical care. Under such circumstances, I will introduce some issues and activities that overseas pharmacists are working on in the context of CW, and discuss roles and tasks to be taken by pharmacists in Japan.

[Risk/Benefit Communication: International Developments and Prospects for the Future].

　While expectations for the benefits of pharmaceuticals are high, the occurrence of health damage from adverse drug reactions remains a problem. One of the reasons for this seems to be insufficient risk communication among stakeholders. Healthcare professionals (HCPs), relevant agencies, and pharmaceutical companies have responsibilities to communicate useful information on the risks/benefits of the pharmaceuticals they provide in addition to basic policies and services. Four years have passed since the risk management plan system was introduced in Japan. Although relevant materials for patients and HCPs are offered, it is still difficult to determine whether they are being utilized effectively. The provision of drug information to patients is necessary to allow them to take medicine safely, while maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks associated with pharmacotherapy. By incorporating survey results on patients' level of understanding of drug risks/benefits, a system to provide information emphasizing the perspectives of patients has been promoted in Europe and North America. In the study of safety issues on a scientific basis, risk communication will become an increasingly important subject. This is a field to which pharmacologists and pharmacists can contribute during this symposium. This paper introduces research activities on risk communication that have been carried out in Japan as well as internationally.

Adaptation of the European Commission-recommended user testing method to patient medication information leaflets in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The safe use of drugs relies on providing accurate drug information to patients. In Japan, patient leaflets called Drug Guide for Patients are officially available; however, their utility has never been verified. This is the first attempt to improve Drug Guide for Patients via user testing in Japan. PURPOSE: To test and improve communication of drug information to minimize risk for patients via user testing of the current and revised versions of Drug Guide for Patients, and to demonstrate that this method is effective for improving Drug Guide for Patients in Japan. METHOD: We prepared current and revised versions of the Drug Guide for Patients and performed user testing via semi-structured interviews with consumers to compare these versions for two guides for Mercazole and Strattera. We evenly divided 54 participants into two groups with similar distributions of sex, age, and literacy level to test the differing versions of the Mercazole guide. Another group of 30 participants were divided evenly to test the versions of the Strattera guide. After completing user testing, the participants evaluated both guides in terms of amount of information, readability, usefulness of information, and layout and appearance. Participants were also asked for their opinions on the leaflets. RESULTS: Response rates were 100% for both Mercazole and Strattera. The revised versions of both Guides were superior or equal to the current versions in terms of accessibility and understandability. The revised version of the Mercazole guide showed better ratings for readability, usefulness of information, and layout (p<0.01) than did the current version, while that for Strattera showed superior readability and layout (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: User testing was effective for evaluating the utility of Drug Guide for Patients. Additionally, the revised version had superior accessibility and understandability.

[For the Establishment of an Informative Support Framework in Pharmacies: Informative Support System for Diabetes].

According to the Japanese revitalization strategy endorsed by the government in June, 2013, pharmacies are expected to play an active role as the hub of health information. But this is not sufficiently organized: an infrastructure for providing neutral information which becomes the basis of such health information is not yet established for healthcare professionals, patients and consumers. As for drug information available subsequent to the marketing of pharmaceutical products, information from the pharmaceutical companies including Package Inserts and Interview-forms are often found. However, though such information from companies is important, it is necessary for healthcare professionals and patients to have access to the information evaluated by a trustworthy third party. With overseas distribution, the dissemination of drug information is provided by third parties, which are independent of regulatory agencies. For example, National Health Service (NHS) Evidence in the UK offers wide-ranging information based on evidence from a disease to pharmaceutical products, and is a widely available information source for healthcare professionals, patients and consumers. With regard to therapeutic medications, drug information and health foods in the Japanese community, it is necessary for patients and healthcare professionals that we establish neutral and common systematic information based on the research evidence. By providing information on the Internet, which enables people to access the information easily and to assess a product's usefulness objectively, we hope to eventually develop a system that ensures a patient's safety in the use of drugs.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Nedaplatin and Irinotecan for Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: Thoracic Oncology Research Group 0910.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung is moderately responsive to anticancer drugs, but no specific chemotherapy regimens have yet been established. We conducted a multicenter phase II study of nedaplatin (NP) and irinotecan (CPT) for SCC of the lung. Fifty patients underwent 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy comprising of NP at 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and CPT at 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. Twenty-seven patients received 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy (median=4 cycles). Major toxicities included neutropenia (46.0%), grade 3 or 4 anorexia (22.0%), febrile neutropenia (16.0%), diarrhea (12.0%), hyponatremia (12.0%), grade 4 anemia (10.0%), thrombocytopenia (10.0%) and infection (10.0%). There were no treatment-related deaths. One patient achieved a complete response and 16 a partial response, with an overall response rate of 34.0%. The median survival time was 11.8 months (95% CI=8.3-15.8 months) and the 2-year survival rate was 22.0%. In conclusion, the NP and CPT regimen is not recommend for further evaluation for patients with advanced SCC of the lung.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib administered in combination with amrubicin in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I trial of erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with amrubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor. The aim was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the pharmacokinetics of this combination in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had received previous chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 9 patients with stage IV disease were treated at 3-week intervals with erlotinib once daily on days 1 through 21 plus a 5-minute intravenous injection of amrubicin on days 1 through 3. RESULTS: The dose levels evaluated were erlotinib (mg/body)/amrubicin (mg/m): 100/30 (n=3), 100/35 (n=3), and 150/30 (n=3). The maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib and amrubicin was 100 mg/body and 35 mg/m because 2 of the 3 patients experienced DLTs during the first cycle of treatment at the third dose level of 150 mg/body and 30 mg/m. Cessation of erlotinib administration for 8 days because of grade 3 leukopenia and grade 3 skin infection (erysipelas) were the DLTs. No drug-drug interactions between erlotinib and amrubicin were observed in this study. The overall response rate was 33%, including 3 partial responses, in the 9 patients. The median progression-free survival for all patients was quite long, 11.3 months, and the median overall survival has not yet been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Combined erlotinib plus amrubicin therapy seems to be highly effective, with acceptable toxicity, against non-small cell lung cancer. The recommended dose for phase II studies was erlotinib 100 mg once daily on days 1 through 21, and amrubicin 35 mg/m on days 1 through 3 administered every 21 days.

Relationship between health literacy, health information access, health behavior, and health status in Japanese people.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between health literacy (HL), health information access, health behavior, and health status in Japanese people. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted at six healthcare facilities in Japan. Eligible respondents aged 20-64 years (n=1218) were included. Path analysis with structural equation modeling was performed to test the hypothesis model linking HL to health information access, health behavior, and health status. RESULTS: The acceptable fitting model indicated that the pathways linking HL to health status consisted of two indirect paths; one intermediated by health information access and another intermediated by health behavior. Those with higher HL as measured by the 14-item Health Literacy Scale (HLS-14) were significantly more likely to get sufficient health information from multiple sources, less likely to have risky habits of smoking, regular drinking, and lack of exercise, and in turn, more likely to report good self-rated health. CONCLUSION: HL was significantly associated with health information access and health behavior in Japanese people. HL may play a key role in health promotion, even in highly educated countries like Japan. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In order to enhance the effects of health promotion interventions, health professionals should aim at raising HL levels of their target population groups.

[Drug information for patients (Package Leaflets), and user testing in EU].

Patients and consumers have desired high quality drug information in their pharmacotherapy, and are entitled to receive it. It is desirable that the information should be aimed at shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals about medications. The quality of drug information available to patients should also be assured. With an aim to improve the quality of "Drug Guide for Patients", we investigated Patient Information Leaflets (PILs) which are approved by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom (UK) with regard to the criteria of development and user testing for assuring the quality of the PILs. In the European Union (EU), these are called Package Leaflets (PLs). PILs have been a legal requirement in the UK since 1999 for all medications. The user testing of PILs has been implemented as evidence since 2005 so that people can rely on the information provided in the leaflet. Execution of PILs which follow the guidance of the user testing, according to the guidance of this user testing, would reflect the views of patients. Here, we introduce the development process and implementation of user testing of PILs. In terms of readability, accessibility and understandability of drug information for patients, we need to discuss involving the public in decisions on how its quality should be assured and how it can be made easily be comprehensible for patients, in order to make effective use of "Drug Guide for Patients" in the future in Japan.