Safety and Limitations of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Short and Long-term Outcomes With Open Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a standard treatment strategy for gastric cancer (GC); however, the clinical impact of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) on survival outcomes remains unclear. We compared the short- and long-term results of LTG with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for Stage I/II/III GC between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into those undergoing LTG (n=143, LTG group) and OTG (n=173, OTG group). The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: The LTG group exhibited a higher prevalence of early T and N factors, with pStage I/II/III distribution skewed toward early-stage in a ratio of 86/24/33 compared to 38/65/69 in the OTG group (p<0.001), respectively. Longer operation time (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), fewer grade 3-4 complications (p<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (p<0.001) were observed in the LTG than in the OTG group. LTG was associated with survival benefits for patients without indication for adjuvant chemotherapy [5-year RFS rate, 96.3% vs. 73.2%; hazard ratio (HR)=0.24; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.10-0.56; p<0.001]. Among the eligibility criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy (Stage II/III excluding pT1 and pT3N0), while the LTG group received more frequently doublet-agent administration (56.5% vs. 11%, p<0.001), conversely, the OTG group exhibited slightly better long-term survival rates (5-year RFS rate, 33.9% vs. 50.2%; HR=1.31; 95%CI=0.82-2.10; p=0.251). CONCLUSION: LTG contributed to favorable short-term outcomes and demonstrated improved long-term outcomes in early-stage GC; however, careful consideration of indications is warranted for advanced GC cases.

Clinical Impact of Laparoscopic Surgery on the Long-term Survival of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients With Regard to Facilitating Doublet Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The impact of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), a standard gastric cancer (GC) management strategy, in advanced GC cases involving doublet adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. This study was aimed at comparing short- and long-term LG and open gastrectomy (OG) results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for stage II/III GC between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients undergoing LG (n=96, LG-group) and OG (n=148, OG-group). The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Compared with the OG group, the LG group was associated with a longer operation time (373 vs. 314 min, p<0.001), less blood loss (50 vs. 448 ml, p<0.001), fewer grade 3-4 complications (5.2 vs. 17.1%, p=0.005), and a shorter hospital stay (12 vs. 15 days, p<0.001). More lymph nodes were dissected in the LG group (49 vs. 40, p<0.001). The intergroup difference in prognosis was insignificant [5-year RFS: 60.4% (LG) vs. 63.1% (OG), p=0.825]. The LG group more frequently received doublet adjuvant chemotherapy (46.8 vs. 12.7%, p<0.001) and started treatments within 6 weeks after surgery (71.1% vs. 38.9%, p=0.017), and the completion rate of doublet AC was significantly higher in the LG group (85.4% vs. 58.8%, p=0.027). Compared to OG, LG for stage III GC tended to be associated with improved prognosis (HR=0.61, 95%CI=0.33-1.09, p=0.096). CONCLUSION: LG for advanced GC may facilitate doublet regimens due to favorable postoperative outcomes and its intervention may contribute to survival benefits.

[Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Showing Marked Tumor Shrinkage after the First Dose of Nivolumab for Fourth-Line Chemotherapy].

We report a case of locally advanced gastric cancer, which showed marked tumor shrinkage after the first dose of nivolumab. A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer with pancreatic invasion and pyloric stenosis. We performed gastrojejunostomy before chemotherapy. The first-line, second-line, and third-line chemotherapies were not effective, resulting in tumor progression and necrosis with abdominal wall penetration. Her performance status was good, so we started nivolumab therapy as the fourth-line chemotherapy. Nine days after the first dose of nivolumab, she had a severe abdominal pain and a sense of fatigue. CT imaging showed a remarkable degree of tumor necrosis just beneath the skin. We diagnosed progressive disease and discontinued the chemotherapy. However, her general condition gradually improved and CT imaging 4 months after the first dose of nivolumab showed marked tumor shrinkage. We restarted nivolumab therapy and she has been alive for 2 years 10 months since the introduction of chemotherapy. It was suggested that a single dose of nivolumab only could lead to marked tumor shrinkage in chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.