Evaluating treatment response to mepolizumab in patients with severe CRSwNP.

BACKGROUND: The SYNAPSE study (NCT03085797) demonstrated that mepolizumab decreased nasal polyp (NP) size and nasal obstruction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP). METHODS: SYNAPSE, a randomized, double-blind study, included patients with recurrent, refractory, severe CRSwNP, eligible for repeated surgery despite receiving standard of care (SoC). Patients received 4-weekly mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo subcutaneously plus SoC for 52 weeks. This post hoc analysis further characterized treatment responses and association with patient characteristics. The proportion of patients meeting any and each of five response criteria indicating improvement in disease-specific quality of life, NP size, nasal obstruction, loss of smell, and overall symptoms at Weeks 24 and 52, were assessed in subgroups: 1) no surgery; 2) neither surgery nor systemic corticosteroids (SCS). RESULTS: Of 407 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 381 and 343 patients had no sinus surgery by Weeks 24 and 52, respectively. More mepolizumab- versus placebo-treated patients without surgery by Weeks 24 and 52 met each response criteria. Of the mepolizumab-treated patients without surgery by Week 24, 109 (55%) responded across >=3 criteria, increasing to 126 (67%) by Week 52. Similar response trends were seen for patients with neither surgery nor SCS by Weeks 24 and 52. At either timepoint, there were no major differences in baseline characteristics between mepolizumab-treated full- (5/5 categories) and non-responders (0/5 categories). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who completed SYNAPSE required neither surgery nor SCS use and in addition achieved a progressive and sustained clinical response to mepolizumab underscoring the therapeutic benefits of mepolizumab in severe CRSwNP.

Treatment response with mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma patients with previous omalizumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: We performed post hoc analyses to evaluate the effect of humanized monoclonal antibody mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma previously treated with omalizumab. METHODS: Data were collected from two randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled studies: MENSA (NCT01691521: 32-week treatment phase) and SIRIUS (NCT01691508: 24-week treatment phase). Active treatment was 75 mg intravenous mepolizumab (MENSA) or 100 mg subcutaneous mepolizumab (MENSA, SIRIUS). Patients had evidence of eosinophilic inflammation ≥150 cells/µl (at screening) or ≥300 cells/µl (during the previous year). Primary outcomes were the rate of exacerbations (MENSA) and the percentage reduction in oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose (SIRIUS). Other outcomes included lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and morning peak expiratory flow), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 576 patients were included from MENSA and 135 from SIRIUS, with 13% and 33% previously receiving omalizumab, respectively. In MENSA, mepolizumab reduced the rate of exacerbations by 57% (prior omalizumab) and 47% (no prior omalizumab) vs placebo. In SIRIUS, reductions in OCS use were comparable regardless of prior omalizumab use. Despite reducing chronic OCS use, mepolizumab also resulted in similar reductions in exacerbation rate relative to placebo in both subgroups. Asthma control and quality of life improved with mepolizumab vs placebo in both studies independent of prior omalizumab use, as shown by ACQ-5 and SGRQ scores. Adverse events were also comparable irrespective of prior omalizumab use. CONCLUSIONS: These post hoc analyses indicate that patients with severe eosinophilic asthma respond positively to mepolizumab regardless of prior use of omalizumab.

Comparison of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast in asthmatic patients using concomitant inhaled corticosteroids.

CONTEXT: For asthmatic patients who remain symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids, augmenting the therapy with additional long-term control medication is advocated. Long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists and leukotriene modifiers are 2 therapeutic alternatives in the long-term controller class. OBJECTIVE: To compare the addition of a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist to the addition of an oral leukotriene modifier for asthma therapy in patients who remain symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids. DESIGN: Double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter clinical studies. SETTING: 54 outpatient clinical centers. PATIENTS: 429 male and female patients with asthma 12 years of age and older who were symptomatic while taking inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: Salmeterol xinafoate 42 mcg via metered dose inhaler twice daily or oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, supplemental albuterol use, asthma quality of life scores, and adverse events. RESULTS: Inhaled salmeterol provided significantly greater improvement in pulmonary function as well as significantly greater relief of both daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms compared with oral zafirlukast in patients concurrently treated with inhaled corticosteroids. The use of supplemental albuterol was reduced to a greater extent with salmeterol compared with zafirlukast. Patients treated with salmeterol showed significantly greater improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores and were satisfied with how fast, how long, and how well the medication worked compared with patients in the zafirlukast group. Both treatments were well tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma not sufficiently controlled with inhaled corticosteroids alone, the combination of inhaled salmeterol and inhaled corticosteroids is superior to the combination of oral zafirlukast and inhaled corticosteroids as stepwise therapy.

Salmeterol powder provides significantly better benefit than montelukast in asthmatic patients receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Comparison of inhaled salmeterol powder vs oral montelukast treatment in patients with persistent asthma who remained symptomatic while receiving inhaled corticosteroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter trials of 12-week duration. SETTING: Outpatients in private and university-affiliated clinics. PATIENTS: Male and female patients > or = 15 years of age with a diagnosis of asthma (baseline FEV(1) of 50 to 80% of predicted) and symptomatic despite receiving inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: Inhaled salmeterol xinafoate powder, 50 microg bid, or oral montelukast, 10 mg qd. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Treatment with salmeterol powder resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline compared with montelukast for most efficacy measurements, including morning peak expiratory flow (35.0 L/min vs 21.7 L/min; p < 0.001), percentage of symptom-free days (24% vs 16%; p < 0.001), and the percentage of rescue-free days (27% vs 20%; p = 0.002). Total supplemental albuterol use was decreased significantly more in the salmeterol group compared with the montelukast group (- 1.90 puffs per day vs - 1.66 puffs per day; p = 0.004) and nighttime awakenings per week decreased significantly more with salmeterol than with montelukast (- 1.42 vs - 1.32; p = 0.015). Patients treated with inhaled salmeterol were significantly more satisfied with their treatment regimen and how well, how fast, and how long it worked than were patients who were treated with oral montelukast. The safety profiles for the two treatments were similar. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent asthma who remain symptomatic while receiving inhaled corticosteroids, adding inhaled salmeterol powder provided significantly greater improvement in lung function and asthma symptoms and was preferred by patients over oral montelukast.

Use of changes in symptoms to predict changes in lung function in assessing the response to asthma therapy.

BACKGROUND: The majority of adult patients with asthma are managed by primary care providers. Although there is no generally accepted gold standard for the assessment of asthma severity in general practice, treatment decisions and modifications to therapy are strongly influenced by patients' symptoms and history of asthma medication use. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between changes in asthma symptoms during treatment and changes in lung function, as measured by peak expiratory flow (PEF). A secondary goal was to compare the relative efficacy (in terms of improvement in asthma symptoms and lung function) of 3 commonly used asthma treatments: inhaled fluticasone propionate, inhaled salmeterol xinafoate, and oral zafirlukast. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparison employing regression analyses of asthma symptom and lung function data from 2890 male and female adolescent and adult patients with persistent asthma who were enrolled in 8 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group studies. Data on patients' self-rated symptoms, PEF, supplemental albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, and frequency of asthma exacerbations were used to ascertain whether there was a correlation between changes in asthma symptoms and changes in pulmonary function, and to compare treatment effects. RESULTS: Changes in patients' ratings of asthma symptoms after treatment with study medications showed a strong correlation with changes in lung function. Similarly, changes in lung function were strongly correlated with changes in supplemental beta-agonist use and quality of life. In addition, fluticasone or salmeterol treatment resulted in significantly greater increases in mean morning PEF (P < 0.001), significantly greater decreases in symptom scores (P < or = 0.004), significantly fewer nights with awakenings due to symptoms (P < or = 0.017), and significantly greater reductions in supplemental beta-agonist use (P < 0.001) compared with zafirlukast treatment or placebo. Patients treated with fluticasone or salmeterol also experienced significantly lower rates of asthma exacerbation (3%) during treatment than did those receiving zafirlukast (7%) or placebo (12%) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015, fluticasone and salmeterol, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings support the validity of primary care practitioners' basing asthma-management decisions on patients' symptoms.

Functional neuroimaging and episodic memory: a perspective.

One area of research that has significantly benefited from the recent development of functional neuroimaging techniques is the study of memory. In this review we explore what has been learned about the neural basis of normal memory function using these techniques. We focus on episodic memory, which is characterized by the ability to consciously recollect memories for facts or events. We highlight three neuroanatomical regions that have been linked to episodic memory: The hippocampal complex, the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala. For each of these regions, we discuss the behavioral methods of assessment and specific episodic memory processes, particularly encoding and retrieval. Finally, we briefly comment on the potential clinical applications for this research and other memory systems.

One-year claims analysis comparing inhaled fluticasone propionate with zafirlukast for the treatment of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that fluticasone propionate (FP) has better objective as well as subjective clinical outcomes than zafirlukast (ZA) in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine whether the superiority of FP over ZA observed in clinical trials is supported under actual practice conditions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of pharmacy and medical claims for asthma was performed. Patients were identified who had at least 1 ICD-9 (493.XX) claim for asthma and were recently prescribed inhaled FP or ZA. Subjects could not have had a claim for any inhaled corticosteroid or oral leukotriene modifier in the 9 months before initiation of FP or ZA. They were subsequently observed for 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 725 persons were new users of FP and 309 of ZA. FP was associated with a 70% reduced risk for hospitalization (P =.0232), a 49% lower risk for an emergency department event (P =.0546), and a 51% reduction in combined emergency department events and hospitalizations (P =.0268) when compared with ZA. Adjusted annual asthma care costs declined significantly for FP and increased for ZA. The adjusted mean difference in annual asthma costs was $215 less per patient for FP (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Asthma care costs decreased for patients treated with FP and increased for patients treated with ZA. Furthermore, FP-treated patients had significantly lower risks of asthma-related hospitalization than ZA patients. This study supports results seen in clinical trials comparing these two medications.

A six-month, placebo-controlled comparison of the safety and efficacy of salmeterol or beclomethasone for persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing the long-term safety and efficacy of long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists versus low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), and placebo over a 6-month treatment period in patients with persistent asthma. METHODS: Salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), BDP (84 microg four times daily), or placebo was administered via metered-dose inhaler to 386 adolescent and adult inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Eligible patients demonstrated a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from 65% to 90% of predicted values. Pulmonary function, symptom control, frequency of asthma exacerbations, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine challenge, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: There were few statistically significant differences between the two active treatments over 6 months of therapy. Asthma symptoms and lung function were significantly improved with both salmeterol and BDP compared with placebo (changes from baseline in FEV1 of 0.28 L (SE = 0.04) and 0.23 L (SE = 0.04), respectively, compared with 0.08 L (SE = 0.04); P < or = .014). There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with respect to the distribution of asthma exacerbations over time. Both salmeterol and BDP significantly reduced BHR compared with placebo (P < or = .033; changes from baseline of 1.29 (SE = 0.26) and 1.42 (SE = 0.24) doubling doses at 6 months, respectively, compared with 0.24 (SE = 0.29) doubling dose for placebo). No rebound effect in BHR was seen upon cessation of any of the three treatment regimens. There were no clinically important differences in the safety profiles among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Both salmeterol and BDP are effective and well-tolerated when administered for 6 months to inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients with persistent asthma.

Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety, and effects on sleep quality of salmeterol and extended-release theophylline in patients with nocturnal asthma. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-period crossover. SETTING: Outpatients at a single center. Patients spent 1 night during screening and 2 nights during each study period in a sleep laboratory for completion of sleep studies. PATIENTS: Male and female patients who were at least 18 years old with nocturnal asthma (baseline FEV1, 50 to 90% of predicted) and who required regular bronchodilator therapy. Patients on inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn, and nedocromil were allowed into the study if their dosing remained constant throughout the study. INTERVENTIONS: Inhaled salmeterol (42 microg per actuation), extended-release oral theophylline (titrated to serum levels of 10 to 20 microg/mL), and placebo taken twice daily. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Efficacy measurements included nocturnal spirometry, nocturnal polysomnography, sleep questionnaires, and daily measurements of lung function and symptoms. Salmeterol was superior to theophylline (p < or = 0.05) in maintaining nocturnal FEV1 levels and was superior to placebo (p < or = 0.05) in improving morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) and in decreasing nighttime albuterol use. The use of salmeterol significantly increased the percentage of days and nights with no albuterol use and decreased daytime albuterol use compared with theophylline and placebo (p < or = 0.05). Sleep quality global scores significantly improved with salmeterol and placebo (p < 0.001) but not with theophylline. The effects on sleep architecture were similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol (but not theophylline) was associated with sustained improvements in morning PEF, protection from nighttime lung function deterioration, reductions in albuterol use, and improvements in patient perceptions of sleep. No differences were seen in polysomnographic measures of sleep quality.

Comparison of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Salmeterol, a long-acting beta2 -agonist, and zafirlukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, are both indicated for the treatment of asthma in adolescent and adult patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effect of 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled salmeterol xinafoate versus oral zafirlukast in the treatment of persistent asthma. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial. Patients, over 80% of whom were on a concurrent inhaled corticosteroid regimen, were treated for 4 weeks with either inhaled salmeterol xinafoate 42 microgram twice daily administered by means of a metered-dose inhaler or oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy measure was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); secondary efficacy measures included evening PEF, asthma symptom scores, supplemental albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, sleep symptoms, asthma exacerbations, and FEV1. RESULTS: Both inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast resulted in within-group improvements from baseline in measures of pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and supplemental albuterol use. Salmeterol treatment resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline compared with zafirlukast for most efficacy measurements, including morning PEF (29.6 vs 13.0 L/min; P

Lack of subsensitivity to albuterol after treatment with salmeterol in patients with asthma.

The development of tolerance to the bronchodilator effects of beta2-agonists used in asthma therapy has been the subject of debate. We conducted two placebo-controlled crossover studies to assess the bronchodilator response to a short-acting beta2-agonist before and after chronic therapy with salmeterol. Patients in one study were corticosteroid-naive; patients in the other study were using inhaled corticosteroids. Changes in FEV1 after cumulative doubling doses of inhaled albuterol were assessed after a 2-wk beta-agonist washout period, before administering study medication on Day 1, and again after 28 d of therapy. Ipratropium bromide was provided as rapid-relief treatment for asthma, and use of any beta2-agonist except the study treatment was prohibited. On both assessment days for salmeterol, and during placebo administration periods, significant increases from predose FEV1 values were observed beginning with the lowest dose of albuterol and continuing throughout the dose-response assessment (p

Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate in the treatment of COPD.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, with inhaled ipratropium bromide and inhaled placebo in patients with COPD. DESIGN: A stratified, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel group clinical trial. SETTING: Multiple sites at clinics and university medical centers throughout the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred eleven symptomatic patients with COPD with FEV1 < or = 65% predicted and no clinically significant concurrent disease. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison of inhaled salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), inhaled ipratropium bromide (36 microg four times a day), and inhaled placebo (2 puffs four times a day) over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Salmeterol xinafoate was significantly (p < 0.0001) better than placebo and ipratropium in improving lung function at the recommended doses over the 12-week trial. Both salmeterol and ipratropium reduced dyspnea related to activities of daily living compared with placebo; this improvement was associated with reduced use of supplemental albuterol. Analyses of time to first COPD exacerbation revealed salmeterol to be superior to placebo and ipratropium (p < 0.05). Adverse effects were similar among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: These collective data support the use of salmeterol as first-line bronchodilator therapy for the long-term treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with COPD.

Salmeterol compared with current therapies in chronic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Therapy with salmeterol, a long-acting, selective, inhaled beta 2-adrenergic agonist, is effective and safe for patients with persistent asthma; however, few long-term studies comparing salmeterol with current combination treatment regimens have been reported. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted in 386 patients over 41 to 46 weeks in 27 medical centers (two thirds of the investigators were primary care physicians). Patients were randomized to receive either salmeterol or placebo, and further randomized to weaning or nonweaning from current asthma therapies (except inhaled corticosteroids). Treatment groups were: salmeterol/weaning (S + W), placebo/weaning (P + W), salmeterol/no weaning (S + NW), and placebo/no weaning (P + NW). Attempts at active weaning were carried out at the discretion of the investigator for 2 to 6 weeks. Pulmonary function, albuterol use, and asthma symptoms were measured. RESULTS: The clinical benefits of salmeterol occurred despite weaning off existing nonsteroidal asthma medications. The mean morning peak expiratory flow rate was significantly increased in the S + W group (32.3 L/min) compared with both the P + W (4.9 L/min) and P + NW (6.8 L/min) groups (P < .001). Compared with the P + W and P + NW groups, the S + W group experienced significant (P < .05) improvements in overall mean asthma symptom scores, mean number of puffs of supplemental albuterol, the percentage of days with no supplemental albuterol use, and the mean number of awakenings caused by asthma (except for the P + NW comparison, P = .090). No significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety evaluation, including 12-lead electrocardiograms. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of salmeterol in the treatment of persistent asthma resulted in sustained improvement in pulmonary function and symptoms. The long-term use of salmeterol is safe and improves the clinical course and stability of asthma following reductions in nonsteroidal asthma therapy.

Salmeterol versus theophylline in the treatment of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Although theophylline is recommended by current guidelines for the management of asthma in patients with persistent symptoms, theophylline has a narrow therapeutic index, requiring individual dose titration and regular monitoring of serum theophylline concentrations to avoid adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To compare the inhaled long-acting bronchodilator, salmeterol, with the oral bronchodilator, theophylline, in the maintenance treatment of asthma. METHODS: In two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies, patients received salmeterol aerosol 42 micrograms, extended-release theophylline capsules, or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 638 adult and adolescent patients with moderate asthma who entered the prebaseline theophylline titration period, 154 were withdrawn prior to randomization (71 due to theophylline-related adverse effects); 484 patients comprised the intent-to-treat population. The mean serum theophylline concentration measured approximately seven hours postdose during the titration period in the theophylline group was 12.7 mg/L (70 mumol/L). The same dose during the treatment period resulted in a mean serum theophylline concentration between 7.6 to 7.9 mg/L (42-44 mumol/L) when measured approximately 12 hours postdose. Salmeterol was significantly more effective than theophylline or placebo in improving mean morning PEF over the entire 12 weeks (P < or = .02). Mean predose FEV1 improved significantly with salmeterol compared with placebo (P < .001); there was no difference between theophylline and placebo. Salmeterol was also significantly more effective than theophylline or placebo (P < .02) in improving asthma symptoms, reducing nighttime awakenings, and reducing the daily use of albuterol. After 12 weeks of treatment, patients in the salmeterol group expressed significantly greater overall satisfaction with their asthma medication than did patients who received theophylline (P < .01). Patients in the theophylline group experienced more gastrointestinal adverse events than did patients in the salmeterol group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Salmeterol, 42 mg twice daily, was better tolerated and significantly more effective than extended-release theophylline twice daily in the maintenance treatment of asthma.

A comparison of salmeterol with albuterol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: An effective, long-acting bronchodilator could benefit patients with asthma who have symptoms not controlled by antiinflammatory drugs. We compared a new long-acting, inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, with a short-acting beta 2-agonist, albuterol, in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS: We randomly assigned 234 patients (150 male and 84 female patients 12 to 73 years old) to one of three treatment groups: one group received 42 micrograms of salmeterol twice daily, one received 180 micrograms of albuterol four times daily, and one received placebo. Treatment was assigned in a double-blind fashion, and all patients could use supplemental inhaled albuterol as needed during the 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: Measurements of the forced expiratory volume in one second, performed hourly for 12 consecutive hours, showed that a single dose of salmeterol produced a greater mean area under the curve than two doses of albuterol taken 6 hours apart (6.3 vs. 4.9 liter.hr, P < 0.05). The difference was significant on day 1 and at week 4 of the study, but not at week 8 or 12. Salmeterol was also more effective than albuterol or placebo (with albuterol taken as needed) in increasing the morning peak expiratory flow rate: salmeterol induced a mean increase of 24 liters per minute over the pretreatment values, as compared with a decrease of 6 liters per minute with albuterol (P < 0.001) and an increase of 1 liter per minute with placebo (P = 0.002). The mean overall symptom score was improved most by salmeterol treatment (P < 0.05), with the number of days with symptoms and of nights with awakenings decreasing by 22 percent and 52 percent, respectively; there were no differences in results between albuterol treatment and placebo administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, and adverse reactions to all the treatments were infrequent and mild. CONCLUSIONS: For the management of mild-to-moderate asthma, salmeterol given twice daily is superior to albuterol given either four times daily or as needed.

Aerosolized beclomethasone in chronic bronchitis. Improved pulmonary function and diminished airway inflammation.

Chronic bronchitis is associated with airways obstruction and inflammation. In order to determine whether aerosolized beclomethasone can modulate airway inflammation and diminish airway obstruction, subjects with chronic bronchitis performed spirometry and underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) before and after receiving 6 wk of therapy (five puffs four times a day) with either aerosolized beclomethasone (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) in a double-blinded, randomized fashion. All subjects received aerosolized albuterol before each use of the study medications. Before BAL, the airways were visually assessed for the appearance of inflammation and assigned a score, the bronchitis index. BAL was performed by instilling five 20-ml aliquots of saline into each of three sites and pooling and separately analyzing the returns from the first aliquots to yield a "bronchial sample." The bronchial lavages were repeated in an additional three sites to increase the volume of fluid available for analysis. The fluid was prepared for cytologic examination by cytocentrifugation. Albumin (as a measure of epithelium permeability) and lactoferrin and lysozyme (as measures of serous cell activity) were measured in unconcentrated BAL fluid by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and concentrations in epithelial lining fluid were estimated using urea as an internal marker for dilution. After treatment, the beclomethasone group, but not the placebo group, showed improvement in FVC (p = 0.02), FEV1 (p = 0.002), and 25 to 75% forced expiratory flow (p = 0.006). Associated with the improvement in spirometry, the bronchitis index fell (13.5 +/- 1.0 versus 10.75 +/- 1.1, p = 0.02) in the beclomethasone-treated group, but not the placebo-treated group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibitors of crayfish glutamic acid decarboxylase.

Crayfish glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), like the homologous enzymes from other species, is inhibited by carbonyl-trapping agents (e.g. aminooxyacetic acid; AOAA) and sulfhydryl reagents (e.g. 5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid); DTNB). It also is inhibited by the product GABA, many anions (e.g. SCN- and Cl-), and some cations (e.g. Zn+2). The inhibition by AOAA, but not that by DTNB, was prevented by increasing the concentration of the pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) coenzyme. GABA blocked the effects of PLP on enzyme activity. The inhibition by AOAA, DTNB, GABA, and chloride all were competitive with substrate. The effect of GABA occurs at physiological concentrations and may contribute to the regulation of GAD activity in vivo. The quantitative effect of anions is dependent on the cation with which they are administered. ATP stimulated GAD activity in homogenates prepared with potassium phosphate or Tris-acetate buffer, even when no exogenous PLP was provided.

Assay and properties of glutamic acid decarboxylase in homogenates of crayfish nervous tissue.

The activity of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) was measured in homogenates of crayfish nervous tissue. Radioactive GABA and CO2 were formed from radioactive glutamic acid in approximately equimolar amounts. Product formation was linear for 9.5 hr at 11-32 degrees C with about 1-30 micrograms homogenate protein. Enzyme activity remained high at pH 7-10 but declined steeply above pH 10.5 and below pH 7. Enzyme activity was stimulated by pyridoxal phosphate, 2-mercaptoethanol, and potassium phosphate; at higher than optimal concentrations of each the activity was reduced. Sodium phosphate altered the stimulatory effect of potassium phosphate. Crayfish GAD behaves like a typical neural GAD but is distinguishable biochemically from GAD of other species.