RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of epinephrine in the treatment of pulp capping in patients with reversible pulpitis is not clear. AIM: To explore the role of epinephrine in the treatment of pulp capping in patients with reversible pulpitis. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with reversible pulpitis who were treated in Anhui Jieshou People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were included in the study. They were categorized into an observation group (n = 50; treatment with adrenaline) and a control group (n = 50; treatment with zinc oxide eugenol paste). The 24-h postoperative pain, regression time of gingival congestion and redness, clinical efficacy, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the groups. Patients were further categorized into the ineffective and effective treatment groups based on clinical efficacy. Logistic multiple regression analysis explored factors affecting the efficacy of pulp capping treatment. RESULTS: A significant difference in 24-h postoperative pain was observed between the groups (P < 0.05), with a higher proportion of grade I pain noted in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.01). The regression time of gingival congestion and swelling was lower in the observation group (2.61 ± 1.44 d and 2.73 ± 1.36 d, respectively) than in the control group (3.85 ± 1.47 d and 4.28 ± 1.61 d, respectively) (P < 0.05). The 2-wk postoperative total effective rate was lower in the control group (80.00%) than in the observation group (94.00%) (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was not significantly different between the control (14.00%) and observation (12.00%) groups (P > 0.05). The proportion of adrenaline usage was lower (P < 0.05) and that of anaerobic digestion by Streptococcus and Fusobacterium nucleatum was higher in the ineffective treatment group than in the effective treatment group (P < 0.05). Logistic multiple regression analysis revealed adrenaline as a protective factor (P < 0.05) and anaerobic digestion by Streptococcus and F. nucleatum as risk factors for pulp capping in reversible pulpitis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Adrenaline demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in pulp capping treatment for reversible pulpitis, reducing pain and improving clinical symptoms safely. It is a protective factor for pulp capping, whereas Streptococcus and F. nucleatum are risk factors. Targeted measures can be implemented to improve clinical efficacy.
RESUMO
Aberrant composition of glycans in the tumor microenvironment (TME) contributes to tumor progression and metastasis. Chondroitin polymerizing factor (CHPF) is a glycosyltransferase that catalyzes the biosynthesis of chondroitin sulfate (CS). It is also correlated to transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) expression, a crucial mediator in the interaction of cancer cells with TME. In this study, we investigated the association of CHPF expression with the clinicopathological features of breast cancer (BRCA), as well the oncogenic effect and the underling mechanisms of CHPF upon BRCA cells. We found that CHPF expression is significantly increased in human BRCA tissues, and it is positively associated with TGF-ß expression (r = 0.7125). The high-expression of CHPF predicts a poor prognosis and is positively correlated with tumor mass, lymph node metastasis, clinical staging and HER-2 negative-expression. The mechanistic study revealed that it promotes BRCA cell proliferation, migration and invasion through TGF-ß1-induced SMAD3 and JNK activation in vitro, JNK (SP600125) or SMAD3 (SIS3) inhibitor can remove the promotion of CHPF upon cell proliferation, migration and invasion in MDA-MB-231 cells, which is derived from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Collectively, our finding suggested CHPF may function as an oncogene and is highly expressed in human BRCA tissues. Pharmacological blockade of the upstream of JNK or SMAD3 signaling may provide a novel therapeutic target for refractory TNBC patients with CHPF abnormal high-expression.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the related factors of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) so as to guide treatment and predict prognosis. METHODS: The prognostic factors of 463 cases with intracerebral hemorrhage were analyzed with single factor and Logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Age, Glasgow coma scale, amount of hemorrhage, NIHSS score, mean arterial blood pressure, with or without ventricular breakage, with or without midline shift and the incidence of complications at random blood glucose levels were analyzed for the correlation with the prognosis of patients. The poor prognosis group had significant differences with the good prognosis group with regards to these factors. The average age of patients with a poor prognosis was 71 years old, the average hematoma volume 29 ml and the average GCS score 11.2 versus 65 years old, 15 ml, 15.1 for those with a good prognosis (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, amount of hemorrhage and disturbance of consciousness was an independent adverse prognostic factor for cerebral hemorrhage at three months. The OR values were 1.32, 8.66 and 1.08 respectively. CONCLUSION: The etiologies of ICH are diverse. Maintaining normal blood pressure is an important preventive measure for ICH. Hematoma volume, disturbance of consciousness and age may be used to predict the prognosis of cerebral hemorrhage.