Sagittal Growth Restriction of the Midface Following Isolated Cleft Lip Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Midface hypoplasia (MFH) is a long-term sequela of cleft lip and palate repair, and is poorly understood. No study has examined the aggregate data on sagittal growth restriction of the midface following repair of the lip, but not palate, in these patients.A systematic review of 3780 articles was performed. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria and 11 reported cephalometric measurements amenable to meta-analysis. Patients with Veau class I-III palatal clefts were included so long as they had undergone only lip repair. Groups were compared against both noncleft and unrepaired controls.Cephalometrics were reported for 326 patients (31.3% female). Noncleft controls had an average SNA angle of 81.25° ± 3.12°. The only patients demonstrating hypoplastic SNA angles were those with unilateral CLP with isolated lip repair (77.4° ± 4.22°). Patients with repaired CL had SNA angles similar to noncleft controls (81.4° ± 4.02°). Patients with unrepaired CLP and CL tended toward more protruding maxillae, with SNA angles of 83.3° ± 4.04° and 87.9° ± 3.11°, respectively. Notably, when comparing SNA angles between groups, patients with CLP with isolated lip repair had significantly more hypoplastic angles compared to those with repaired CL (P < .0001). Patients with CLP with isolated lip repair were also more hypoplastic than noncleft controls (P < .0001). In contrast, there was no significant difference between the SNA of patients with repaired CL and controls (P = .648).We found that cleft lip repair only appeared to contribute to MFH in the setting of concurrent cleft palate pathology, suggesting that scarring from lip repair itself is unlikely to be the predominant driver of MFH development. However, studies generally suffered from inadequate reporting of timing, technique, follow-up time, and cleft severity.

Systematic Review of Postoperative Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Incidence and Association With Palatoplasty Timing and Technique.

Cleft palate is among the most common congenital disorders worldwide and is correctable through surgical intervention. Sub-optimal surgical results may cause velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). When symptomatic, VPI can cause hypernasal or unintelligible speech. The postoperative risk of VPI varies significantly in the literature but may be attributed to differences in study size, cleft type, surgical technique, and operative age. To identify the potential impact of these factors, a systematic review was conducted to examine the risk of VPI after primary palatoplasty, accounting for operative age and surgical technique. A search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was completed for original studies that examined speech outcomes after primary palatoplasty. The search identified 4740 original articles and included 35 studies that reported mean age at palatoplasty and VPI-related outcomes. The studies included 10,795 patients with a weighted mean operative age of 15.7 months (range: 3.1-182.9 mo), and 20% (n=2186) had signs of postoperative VPI. Because of the heterogeneity in reporting of surgical technique across studies, small sample sizes, and a lack of statistical power, an analysis of the VPI risk per procedure type and timing was not possible. A lack of data and variable consensus limits our understanding of optimal timing and techniques to reduce VPI occurrence. This paper presents a call-to-action to generate: (1) high-quality research from thoughtfully designed studies; (2) greater global representation; and (3) global consensus informed by high-quality data, to make recommendations on optimal technique and timing for primary palatoplasty to reduce VPI.

The Personal Impact of Involvement in International Global Health Outreach: A National Survey of Former Operation Smile Student Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Humanitarian surgical organizations such as Operation Smile provide global health opportunities for students and medical trainees. Prior studies have shown a positive benefit for medical trainees. This study aimed to determine if the international global health experiences of young student volunteers impact their career choices as adults. METHODS: A survey was sent to adults who were involved with Operation Smile as students. The survey elicited information about their mission trip experience, education, career, and current volunteer and leadership activities. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis. RESULTS: 114 prior volunteers responded. The majority participated in leadership conferences (n = 110), mission trips (n = 109), and student clubs (n = 101) while in high school. Many graduated from college (n = 113, 99%) and completed post-graduate degrees (n = 47, 41%). The most highly represented occupational industry was healthcare (n = 30, 26%), including physicians and medical trainees (n = 9), dentists (n = 5), and other healthcare providers (n = 5). Three-fourths reported that their volunteer experience impacted their career choice, and half reported that their experience allowed them to connect with career mentors. Their experience was associated with the development of leadership skills, including public speaking, self-confidence, and empathy, and increased awareness of cleft conditions, health disparities, and other cultures. Ninety-six percent continued to volunteer. Narrative responses revealed that the volunteer experiences impacted their inter- and intrapersonal development into adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a global health organization as a student may encourage a long-term commitment to leadership and volunteerism and foster interest in a healthcare career. These opportunities also encourage development of cultural competency and interpersonal skills. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Cross-Sectional Study.

Teaching Unilateral Cleft lip Repair: Lessons from Simulation-Based Mining of Trainee Strengths and Performance Gaps.

OBJECTIVE: To identify specific areas for improvement in cleft lip repair teaching. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospectively-collected, blinded data. SETTING: Three residency programs rotating at a single academic children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Plastic surgery residents, and craniofacial/pediatric plastic surgery fellows. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean scores for each skill in an 18-item Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair competency assessment tool (UCLR) (1-3 scale for each item) were rank ordered. Correlation between level of training (PGY) and performance on steps of the procedure was examined using Pearson R. RESULTS: Simulation participants (n = 26) scored highest on skills in the "Marking" subscale (2.38-2.63 mean score). Procedural steps that scored lowest were: closing the nasal floor (2.00), repairing oral mucosa (2.15) and avoiding over/under-dissection (2.19). Interestingly, none of these skills correlated with PGY, suggesting they do not improve with training. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that marking cleft lip repair is taught well in our current teaching environment, while steps like closing the nasal floor and repairing the oral mucosa are taught less well. Improved teaching of these steps could be achieved with deliberate instruction, video, digital simulation, and high fidelity simulation.

Cleft Lip Repair Competence Can Be Evaluated with High-fidelity Simulation.

Background: Demonstrating competency before independent practice is increasingly important in surgery. This study tests the hypothesis that a high-fidelity cleft lip simulator can be used to discriminate performance between training levels, demonstrating its utility for assessing procedural competence. Methods: During this prospective cohort study, participants performed a unilateral cleft lip repair on a high-fidelity simulator. Videos were blindly rated using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and the Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Competency Assessment Tool (UCLR). Digital measurement of symmetry was estimated. Influence of training level and cumulative prior experience on each score was estimated using Pearson r. Results: Participants (n = 26) ranged from postgraduate year 3 to craniofacial fellow. Training level correlated best with UCLR (R = 0.4842, P = 0.0122*) and more weakly with OSATS (R = 0.3645, P = 0.0671), whereas cumulative prior experience only weakly correlated with UCLR (R = 0.3450, P = 0.0843) and not with OSATS (R = 0.1609, P = 0.4323). UCLR subscores indicated marking the repair had little correlation with training level (R = 0.2802, P = 0.1656), whereas performance and result did (R = 0.5152, P = 0.0071*, R = 0.4226, P = 0.0315*, respectively). Correlation between symmetry measures and training level was weak. Conclusions: High-fidelity simulation paired with an appropriate procedure-specific assessment tool has the construct validity to evaluate performance for cleft lip repair. Simply being able to mark a cleft lip repair is not an accurate independent assessment method nor is symmetry of the final result.

Cleft Palate Repair: A History of Techniques and Variations.

Orofacial clefting is a common reconstructive surgical condition that often involves the palate. Cleft palate repair has evolved over three centuries from merely achieving anatomical closure to prioritizing speech development and avoiding midface hypoplasia. Despite centuries of advancements, there is still substantial controversy and variable consensus on technique, timing, and sequence of cleft palate repair procedures. Furthermore, evaluating the success of various techniques is hindered by a lack of universal outcome metrics and difficulty maintaining long-term follow-up. This article presents the current controversies of cleft palate repair and details how the history of cleft palate repair has influenced current techniques commonly used worldwide. Our review highlights the need for a global consortium on cleft care to gather expert opinions on current practices and outcomes and to standardize technique classifications. An understanding of global protocols is crucial in an attempt to standardize technique and timing to achieve anatomical closure with optimal velopharyngeal competence, while also minimizing the occurrence of maxillary hypoplasia and palatal fistulae.

Cleft Lip and Palate Research in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Scientometric Analysis.

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) comprise over 90% of the world's congenital anomalies and cause significant disability worldwide, while disproportionally burdening low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Research can help inform strategies that reduce disparities in accessing CLP care. We performed a scientometric analysis of CLP research in LMICs to identify influential contributors and themes. METHODS: The authors searched seven citation databases accessed via Web of Science, from inception to March 2, 2021. Social network analysis was done using VOSviewer. The Kruskal-Wallis test and linear regression were used. RESULTS: In total, 1561 articles authored by 6414 researchers affiliated with 2113 organizations in 119 countries were included. Most authors (n = 6387, 99.6%) had published two or more articles. The USA (454 articles), Brazil (211 articles), China (175 articles), and India (127 articles) published the most. The most prolific institutions were the University of Sao Paulo (94 articles), the University of Pittsburgh (57 articles), and the University of Iowa (55 articles). Marazita ML (33 articles), Shi B (27 articles), and Murray JC (22 articles) had the highest number of publications. An estimated 510 articles (32.7%) were focused on epidemiology, 240 (15.4%) on management, and 54 (3.5%) on global plastic surgery for CLP. CONCLUSIONS: LMICs are disproportionally burdened by CLP, but research is limited and often produced by high-income countries. This study elucidates partnership and health system strengthening opportunities to improve LMIC research capacity and ultimately informs the management and outcomes for patients with CLP.

The influence of an all-female healthcare environment on mentorship and empowerment of female healthcare professionals.

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have the greatest need for additional healthcare providers, and women outside the workforce help address the need. Women in healthcare need more mentorship and leadership training to advance their careers due to systemic barriers. This study evaluates how women working together on a medical team influences mentorship, leadership and empowerment. A single all-female volunteer team participating in a cleft surgery mission in Oujda, Morocco were surveyed before and after the mission. Statistical analysis with student's t-test or chi-squared were performed. 95 female volunteers from 23 countries participated on this team and 85% completed surveys. Volunteers from high-income countries (32%) and LMICs (68%) had similar mission roles (p = 0.58). Experience as a mission volunteer (p = 0.47), team leader (p = 0.28), and educator (p = 0.18) were equivalent between cohorts. 73% of women had previously received mentorship but 98% wanted more. 75% had previously mentored others, but 97% wanted to be mentors. 73% of volunteers who had no prior mentorship found their first mentor during the mission. All participants found a long-term peer relationship and felt motivated to mentor women at home. 95% were inspired to pursue leadership positions, advance professionally, and continue working with other women. This population of female healthcare professionals overwhelmingly desired more mentorship than is felt to be available. An all-female healthcare environment appears to provide opportunities for mentorship and create lasting motivation to teach, lead, and advance professionally. Findings raise the potential that increasing visibility of female professionals may effectively empower women in healthcare.

Midface Growth Potential in Unoperated Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Competing hypotheses for the development of midface hypoplasia in patients with cleft lip and palate include both theories of an intrinsic restricted growth potential of the midface and extrinsic surgical disruption of maxillary growth centers and scar growth restriction secondary to palatoplasty. The following meta-analysis aims to better understand the intrinsic growth potential of the midface in a patient with cleft lip and palate unaffected by surgical correction. A systematic review of studies reporting cephalometric measurements in patients with unoperated and operated unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), and isolated cleft palate (iCP) abstracted SNA and ANB angles, age at cephalometric analysis, syndromic diagnosis, and patient demographics. Age and Region-matched controls without cleft palate were used for comparison. SNA angle for unoperated UCLP (84.5 ±â€Š4.0°), BCLP (85.3 ±â€Š2.8°), and ICP (79.2 ±â€Š4.2°) were statistically different than controls (82.4 ±â€Š3.5°), (all P ≤ 0.001). SNA angles for operated UCLP (76.2 ±â€Š4.2°), BCLP (79.8 ±â€Š3.6°), and ICP (79.0 ±â€Š4.3°) groups were statistically smaller than controls (all P ≤ 0.001). SNA angle in unoperated ICP (n = 143) was equivalent to operated ICP patients (79.2 ±â€Š4.2° versus 79.0 ±â€Š4.3° P = 0.78). No unoperated group mean SNA met criteria for midface hypoplasia (SNA < 80). Unoperated UCLP/BLCP exhibit a more robust growth potential of the maxilla, whereas operated patients demonstrate stunted growth compared to normal phenotype. Unoperated ICP demonstrates restricted growth in both operated and unoperated patients. As such, patients with UCLP/BCLP differ from patients with ICP and the factors affecting midface growth may differ.Level of Evidence: IV.

The Smile Index: Part 3. A Simple, Prognostic Severity Scale for Unilateral Cleft Palate.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral cleft palates have a large spectrum of variability. Key morphologic factors such as cleft width and palatal length are not represented in current classification systems. Palate length and velopharyngeal port size are clinically linked to speech outcomes, as the soft palate must close the posterior pharynx for proper phonation. This study investigates the relationship between objective preoperative measures and postoperative velopharyngeal port size, to define a reproducible severity scale. METHODS: Surgical data were prospectively collected from unilateral cleft palate patients in Morocco, Bolivia, Vietnam, and Madagascar. Key measurements were cleft width and palate width at the hard-soft palate junction, alveolar cleft width, vertical alveolar discrepancy, velopharyngeal port size. Cleft width ratio (CWR) was defined as the width of the cleft at the hard-soft junction, divided by the palate width. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were evaluated. Thirty-one had complete clefts and average age at surgical repair was 2.9 years. Mean CWR was 0.50 ± 0.12. Palate length was increased by an average of 2.2 mm (11%) after palatoplasty. Multivariate analysis determined greater CWR and larger preoperative velopharyngeal ports were significantly correlated with a smaller percent change in palate length after palatoplasty (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A wider palatal cleft decreases the surgeon's ability to decrease velopharyngeal port size through palatoplasty. Given the ease of measurement even in low-resource settings, CWR may be a valuable tool for setting expectations for speech results, modifying surgical technique, and correlating future speech outcomes in evidence-based cleft care.

Impact of an All-Female Surgical Team on Moroccan Patient Perspectives of Female Healthcare Providers.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing numbers of women in medicine could address Morocco's 5.5-fold deficit in surgical providers. Cultural perceptions towards women limit female advancement in healthcare. This study evaluates the impact of an all-female surgical team on Moroccan attitudes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how attitudes towards female healthcare professionals changed for Moroccan patients after exposure to a unique, all-female medical environment. METHODS: Cleft patients were surveyed after a surgery mission with all-female volunteers in Oujda, Morocco. Analysis included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches. RESULTS: Of 121 respondents (94%), 85% and 77% had prior exposure to a female nurse or doctor, respectively. 94% of respondents strongly agreed to receiving high-quality care. 75% developed increased confidence in female providers. 68% and 69% of respondents, regardless of gender (p = 0.950), felt that having a female nurse or doctor did not impact care. Female patients were more likely than male patients to strongly encourage female relatives to pursue medical careers (p = 0.027). Respondents without prior exposure to female nurses were more likely to: pursue medical careers (p = 0.034), believe female relatives could pursue medical careers (p = 0.006), and encourage them to do so (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Increased visibility of women improved patient attitudes towards female providers, especially in patients without prior exposure. Initiatives that increase female representation in healthcare may have greater effects in cultures with more gender inequity.

Convolutional Neural Network Models for Automatic Preoperative Severity Assessment in Unilateral Cleft Lip.

BACKGROUND: Despite the wide range of cleft lip morphology, consistent scales to categorize preoperative severity do not exist. Machine learning has been used to increase accuracy and efficiency in detection and rating of multiple conditions, yet it has not been applied to cleft disease. The authors tested a machine learning approach to automatically detect and measure facial landmarks and assign severity grades using preoperative photographs. METHODS: Preoperative images were collected from 800 unilateral cleft lip patients, manually annotated for cleft-specific landmarks, and rated using a previously validated severity scale by eight expert reviewers. Five convolutional neural network models were trained for landmark detection and severity grade assignment. Mean squared error loss and Pearson correlation coefficient for cleft width ratio, nostril width ratio, and severity grade assignment were calculated. RESULTS: All five models performed well in landmark detection and severity grade assignment, with the largest and most complex model, Residual Network, performing best (mean squared error, 24.41; cleft width ratio correlation, 0.943; nostril width ratio correlation, 0.879; severity correlation, 0.892). The mobile device-compatible network, MobileNet, also showed a high degree of accuracy (mean squared error, 36.66; cleft width ratio correlation, 0.901; nostril width ratio correlation, 0.705; severity correlation, 0.860). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models demonstrate the ability to accurately measure facial features and assign severity grades according to validated scales. Such models hold promise for the creation of a simple, automated approach to classifying cleft lip morphology. Further potential exists for a mobile telephone-based application to provide real-time feedback to improve clinical decision making and patient counseling.

The Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Revisions within 20 Years after Primary Correction.

BACKGROUND: As patients grow older, the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity becomes more noticeable than the repaired lip. The authors assessed nasal revisions over 20 years of the senior author's management of unilateral complete cleft lip. METHODS: One hundred patients who underwent primary two-stage nasolabial correction of unilateral complete cleft lip between 1991 and 2001 were reviewed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 21 years at the time of analysis. Only 13 percent of patients did not require nasal revision after primary nasolabial repair. One to two nasal revisions were undertaken in 65 percent of patients. The extent of nasal maneuvers during primary labial repair was associated with the number of revisions. Recently treated patients had fewer revisions. Female patients were more likely to undergo several revisions. Of patients who had semiopen suspension sutures at primary repair, 61 percent had this maneuver repeated two or more times. In contrast, patients who had closed suspension sutures at primary repair underwent more nasal revisions and later required more nasal maneuvers. Nasal revision before skeletal maturity was significantly associated with another nasal revision after completion of skeletal growth. Twenty-seven percent of patients eventually required an aesthetic or functional rhinoplasty in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a severe initial nasal deformity require multiple revisions. Semiopen suspension sutures are associated with fewer revisions. Revision of the nasal cartilages or alar base can often be performed in the intermediate phase, in combination with other operations. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Evolution of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.

ABSTRACT: The understanding of cleft lip etiology and approaches for surgical repair have evolved over time, allowing for improved ability to restore form and function. The variability of cleft lip presentations has necessitated a nuanced surgical approach with multidisciplinary cleft care. The earliest documentation of unilateral cleft lip repair predates the 19th century, with crude outcomes observed before the advent of curved incisions and advancement flaps. In the 20th century, straight line, quadrilateral flap, and triangular flap repairs were introduced to mitigate post-repair surgical scarring, increase lip length, and restore the symmetry of the Cupid's bow. Towards the latter part of the century, the development of rotation-advancement principles allowed for improved functional and aesthetic outcomes. Future technical improvements will continue to address the goals of lip and nasal symmetry, muscular continuity, precise scar concealment, and improved patient satisfaction in an increasing range of cleft phenotypes and during subsequent years of growth.

The Use of Crowdsourcing Technology to Evaluate Preoperative Severity in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip in a Multiethnic Population.

ABSTRACT: Crowd sourcing has been used in multiple disciplines to quickly generate large amounts of diverse data. The objective of this study was to use crowdsourcing to grade preoperative severity of unilateral cleft lip phenotype in a multiethnic cohort with the hypothesis that crowdsourcing could efficiently achieve similar rankings compared to expert surgeons. Deidentified preoperative photos were collected for patients with primary, unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL ±â€ŠP). A platform was developed with C-SATS for pairwise comparisons utilizing Elo rankings by crowdsource workers through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Images were independently ranked by 2 senior surgeons for comparison. Seventy-six patients with varying severity of unilateral (CL ±â€ŠP) phenotype were chosen from Operation Smile missions in Bolivia, Madagascar, Vietnam, and Morocco. Patients were an average of 1.2 years' old, ranging from 3 months to 3.3 years. Each image was compared with 10 others, for a total of 380 unique pairwise comparisons. A total of 4627 total raters participated with a median of 12 raters per pair. Data collection was completed in <20 hours. The crowdsourcing ranking and expert surgeon rankings were highly correlated with Pearson correlation coefficient of R = 0.77 (P = 0.0001). Crowdsourcing provides a rapid and convenient method of obtaining preoperative severity ratings, comparable to expert surgeon assessment, across multiple ethnicities. The method serves as a potential solution to the current lack of rating systems for preoperative severity and overcomes the difficulty of acquiring large-scale assessment from expert surgeons.

A Meta-Analysis of Palatal Repair Timing.

ABSTRACT: Developing midface hypoplasia is common after palatoplasty and has been hypothesized to be influenced by the timing of hard palate repair. This meta-analysis assesses the risk of developing midface hypoplasia based on age at hard palate repair. A Pubmed PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was completed for literature focused on palatoplasty and midface hypoplasia published between 1970 and 2019. Cephalometric data were extracted and categorized by age at hard palate repair: <6, 7 to 12, 13 to 18, 19 to 24, and 25 to 83 months. Analysis of these groups and a control were compared using independent T-tests and Spearman correlation coefficients. SNA angles for each group were 77.9 ±â€Š3.1° (<6 months), 77.7 ±â€Š4.2° (7-12 months), 78.7 ±â€Š4.2° (13-18 months), 75.1 ±â€Š4.2° (19-24 months), 75.5 ±â€Š4.8° (25-83 months), and were statistically different than the control group 82.4 ±â€Š3.5° (P < 0.0001). Hard palate repair at 13 to 18 months had a statistically significant greater SNA angle than all other groups except for the repair at <6 months group (P = 0.074). As age at hard palate closure increased beyond 18 months, the SNA decreased, corresponding to a more hypoplastic maxilla (Spearman's correlation coefficient -0.381, P = 0.015). Analysis suggests that younger age at the time of repair is less likely to create in midface hypoplasia in adulthood. Minimizing midface hypoplasia in cleft palate patients by optimizing algorithms of care is a practical way to decrease the burden of disease on patients, families and medical systems. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of technique on outcomes.Level of Evidence: IV.

The Likelihood of Orthognathic Surgery After Orofacial Cleft Repair.

ABSTRACT: Midface hypoplasia is one of the most significant sequelae of cleft lip and/or palate surgery. A complete understanding of the rate of orthognathic surgery across varying cleft phenotypes is a powerful tool for educating patients and families as to the treatment course that the patient will incur during their lifetime. Understanding the average rates of orthognathic intervention also can act to develop metrics for outcome evaluation with different treatment protocols. Attempting to identify the average rates of orthognathic intervention, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by combining studies from 1987 to 2016 describing the frequency of orthognathic intervention on the different cleft phenotypes as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included identification of surgical protocol, age of patient at orthognathic intervention, and the method by which patients were evaluated for orthognathic intervention. The rate of orthognathic surgery was 38.1% for bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), 30.2% for unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), 4.4% for isolated cleft palate (ICP), and 1.8% for patients with isolated cleft lip (ICL). 71% (n = 10) reported using lateral cephalograms for orthognathic surgery evaluation and only one of those studies reported specific objective cephalometric measurements for orthognathic intervention. Our findings demonstrated that BCLP possessed the highest rate of orthognathic intervention followed by UCLP, ICP, and ICL. ICP and ICL both possessed low rates of orthognathic intervention. By sharing our findings, the authors hope to provide a useful tool for informing patients' families as to their risk of needing orthognathic intervention.

The experiences of female surgeons around the world: a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: The Lancet Commission for Global Surgery identified an adequate surgical workforce as one indicator of surgical care accessibility. Many countries where women in surgery are underrepresented struggle to meet the recommended 20 surgeons per 100,000 population. We evaluated female surgeons' experiences globally to identify strategies to increase surgical capacity through women. METHODS: Three database searches identified original studies examining female surgeon experiences. Countries were grouped using the World Bank income level and Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI). RESULTS: Of 12,914 studies meeting search criteria, 139 studies were included and examined populations from 26 countries. Of the accepted studies, 132 (95%) included populations from high-income countries (HICs) and 125 (90%) exclusively examined populations from the upper 50% of GGGI ranked countries. Country income and GGGI ranking did not independently predict gender equity in surgery. Female surgeons in low GGGI HIC (Japan) were limited by familial support, while those in low income, but high GGGI countries (Rwanda) were constrained by cultural attitudes about female education. Across all populations, lack of mentorship was seen as a career barrier. HIC studies demonstrate that establishing a critical mass of women in surgery encourages female students to enter surgery. In HICs, trainee abilities are reported as equal between genders. Yet, HIC women experience discrimination from male co-workers, strain from pregnancy and childcare commitments, and may suffer more negative health consequences. Female surgeon abilities were seen as inferior in lower income countries, but more child rearing support led to fewer women delaying childbearing during training compared to North Americans and Europeans. CONCLUSION: The relationship between country income and GGGI is complex and neither independently predict gender equity. Cultural norms between geographic regions influence the variability of female surgeons' experiences. More research is needed in lower income and low GGGI ranked countries to understand female surgeons' experiences and promote gender equity in increasing the number of surgical providers.

A Competency Assessment Tool for Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.

Objective evaluation of operative performance is increasingly important in surgical training. Evaluation tools include global rating scales of performance and procedure-specific skills checklists. For unilateral cleft lip repair, the numerous techniques make universal evaluation challenging. Thus, we sought to create a unilateral cleft lip evaluation tool agnostic to specific repair technique. METHODS: Four surgeons with expertise in 3 common cleft lip repair techniques participated in a 3-round Delphi process to generate consensus evaluation points spanning all techniques. Items were categorized as marking the repair, performing the repair, and final result. Two blinded raters then scored videos of simulated cleft lip repairs using both the 21-item novel checklist and the modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. Kappa and T values were calculated for both scales to determine level of agreement. RESULTS: Ten videos of repairs performed by novice residents through experienced craniofacial fellows were scored. Moderate (κ = 0.41-0.60) to substantial (κ = 0.61-0.80) interrater reliability was seen for the majority of questions in both the novel tool and the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. A single question in the novel tool had almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.81-1.00), 8 had moderate agreement, and 6 had substantial agreement. Poorly scoring questions were discarded from the final 18-item tool. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variations in unilateral cleft lip repair technique, common themes exist that can be used to assess performance and outcome. A universal evaluation tool has potential implications for trainee assessment, surgeon credentialing, and screening for surgical missions.

The Smile Index: Part 2. A Simple, Prognostic Severity Scale for Unilateral Cleft Lip.

BACKGROUND: There is no universally accepted classification system for unilateral cleft lip that objectively quantifies the spectrum of disease, making it difficult to evaluate postoperative outcomes in the context of preoperative severity. METHODS: Anthropometric measurements and photographs were prospectively collected from unilateral cleft lip patients in Morocco, Bolivia, Vietnam, and Madagascar. Columellar angle, cleft width, nostril widths, vertical lip heights, and horizontal vermillion lengths were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. "Unacceptable" postoperative outcomes were defined as those with a cleft-side/non-cleft-side vertical lip height discrepancy greater than 3 mm, based on previous sociologic and cleft outcome studies. RESULTS: Of the 147 patients studied, 22 had unacceptable outcomes. Univariate logistic and multivariate logistic stepwise models showed that among preoperative characteristics, cleft width ratio (preoperative cleft width divided by commissure width) was the most significant predictor for unacceptable outcomes, controlling for surgeon experience. Cleft width ratio was normally distributed. Two severity categories were created based on iterative data and regression analysis: "severe" (cleft width ratio >0.5) and "not-severe" (cleft width ratio <0.5). Severe patients had a higher likelihood of unacceptable outcomes versus not-severe patients (OR, 2.9; 95 percent CI, 1.1 to 7.7; p = 0.029; 27 percent versus 11 percent). The probability of having unacceptable outcomes for severe individuals was higher versus not-severe individuals (positive predictive value, 73 percent versus 89 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative cleft width ratio greater than 0.5 is associated with having an unacceptable surgical outcome. The authors propose a simple, objective, and clinically reproducible scale to unify the language of unilateral cleft lip severity, as a step toward improving algorithms of care, directing surgical technique, guiding patient/family discussions, and optimizing patient outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.