Validation of motor component of Glasgow coma scale in lieu of total Glasgow coma scale as a pediatric trauma field triage tool.

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital trauma triage and disability assessment of pediatric patients can be challenging on the field, especially in the pre-verbal age group. It would be useful if the same triage tool and criteria can be used for both adults and children to risk-stratify the need of higher acuity of trauma care. STUDY OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate if using only the motor component of Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS), as a quick field trauma triage tool, was non-inferior to total GCS (tGCS), and if mGCS <6 was non-inferior to tGCS <14, in predicting the need for intensive care or mortality in the pediatric population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients <18-years-old, who presented to our emergency department (ED) with moderate (Injury Severity Score (ISS) 9-15) to severe (ISS > 15) traumatic injuries from January 2012 to December 2021. Using ED triage data, mortality and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission were used as surrogate outcomes to investigate if mGCS <6 was non-inferior to tGCS <14, and the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) was used as a measure of comparability. RESULTS: Among 582 included for analysis, the median age was 7-years-old (2-12), and most were male (63.4%). 22.4% patients demised or required ICU care. mGCS <6 had an AUROC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.79), which was non-inferior to tGCS <14; AUROC 0.76, (95% CI 0.72 to 0.81), for identifying children requiring ICU management or demised. The results shown here were based on the AUROCs that were used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of tGCS <14 and mGCS <6 in prediction of mortality and the need for ICU care. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that mGCS was significantly associated with tGCS, and was non- inferior to the latter as a triage tool in pediatric trauma. It validated the use of mGCS <6 in lieu of tGCS <14 in the pre-hospital field triage of pediatric patients, in identification of children at risk of death or requiring ICU care. Larger prospective, observational studies using on-scene data would be required for more robust validation and determine optimal cut-offs.

Intussusception in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department: An Asian Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: This project examines the presenting complaints of children with intussusception in the emergency department in an Asian population, with a focus on older children, which has not been well described in previous studies. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on children aged 6 months to 15 years, whose conditions were diagnosed with intussusception in KK Women's and Children's Hospital for a 5-year period (2009-2013), based on the case definition established by the Brighton Collaborate Intussusception Working Group. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-one cases were identified to fulfill the case definition as per the Brighton Collaborative Intussusception Working Group. The mean age of children diagnosed with intussusception is 2.59 years, predominantly in males (65.22%). A total of 3.33% were 10 years or older. Only 3.58% presented with the classical triad-intermittent abdominal pain, vomiting, and bloody stools. In contrast, 22.51% of our Asian patients presented with a triad of intermittent abdominal pain, indrawing of legs, and vomiting. A total of 76.73% of our subjects were treated by air enema only, whereas 22 required surgical treatment after unsuccessful attempts of air enema, and 63 resolved spontaneously, including 7 with ileoileal intussusception. No mortality was documented. CONCLUSIONS: Intussusception is usually diagnosed in the younger population (age <1 year) and predominantly in males. Our study has established that older Asian children can also have intussusception. The classical triad is not a very sensitive diagnostic tool, but the combination of abdominal pain, indrawing of legs, and vomiting may be a more common presenting triad in Asian children.