The assessment of autoinflammatory disease classification criteria (Eurofever/PRINTO) in a real-life cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity rates of Eurofever/PRINTO autoinflammatory recurrent fever classification criteria with real-life data in patients with an autoinflammatory disease. METHODS: A total of 119 patients were included in the study. Based on clinical symptoms, they were divided into four subgroups: cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), and syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF) using the Eurofever/PRINTO clinical classification criteria. In the last step, the patients were re-evaluated in the light of genetic results and their final diagnosis was reached. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients, including 37 CAPS, 13 TRAPS, 8 MKD, 39 SURF, 14 NLRP12-related autoinflammatory disease (NLRP12-AID), and 8 familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients were evaluated in the study. While the sensitivity of the new clinical Eurofever/PRINTO criteria was 48% for CAPS, 77% for TRAPS, 87.5%for MKD, and the specificity of the clinical criteria was 86% for CAPS, 85% for TRAPS, and 60% for MKD. The sensitivity of the new mixed (genetic plus clinical variables) Eurofever/PRINTO criteria was 27% for CAPS, 61% forTRAPS, 85% for MKD, and the specificity of the mixed criteria for each group was 100%. CONCLUSION: We found the sensitivity of the Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria to be low as genotypic changes between populations cause phenotypic differences. For this reason, we think that patient-based evaluation is correct rather than standard classification criteria in real life. Key-points • In systemic autoinflammatory diseases, common variants in the populations may alter the phenotype, and making it difficult to classify some patients with the current classification criteria. • In populations with common genetic variants, the classification criteria should be modified according to the clinical phenotype.

Clinical and genetic spectrum from a prototype of ciliopathy: Joubert syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Joubert syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a distinctive hindbrain malformation called molar tooth sign, causing motor and cognitive impairments. More than 40 genes have been associated with Joubert syndrome. We aim to describe a group of Joubert syndrome patients clinically and genetically emphasizing organ involvement. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical information and molecular diagnosis data of 22 patients with Joubert syndrome from multiple facilities. Clinical exome or whole-exome sequencing were performed to identify causal variations in genes. RESULTS: The most common variants were in the CPLANE1, CEP290, and TMEM67 genes, and other causative genes were AHI1, ARMC9, CEP41, CSPP1, HYLS1, KATNIP, KIAA0586, KIF7, RPGRIP1L, including some previously unreported variants in these genes. Multi-systemic organ involvement was observed in nine (40%) patients, with the eye being the most common, including Leber's congenital amaurosis, ptosis, and optic nerve coloboma. Portal hypertension and esophageal varices as liver and polycystic kidney disease and nephronophthisis as kidney involvement was encountered in our patients. The HYLS1 gene, which commonly causes hydrolethalus syndrome 1, was also associated with Joubert syndrome in one of our patients. A mild phenotype with hypophyseal hormone deficiencies without the classical molar tooth sign was observed with compound heterozygous and likely pathogenic variants not reported before in the KATNIP gene. CONCLUSION: Some rare variants that display prominent genetic heterogeneity with variable severity are first reported in our patients. In our study of 22 Joubert syndrome patients, CPLANE1 is the most affected gene, and Joubert syndrome as a ciliopathy is possible without a classical molar tooth sign, like in the KATNIP gene-affected patients.