Exploring non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: Current treatment optimization and future indication expansion.

The increasing popularity of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a treatment for early gastric cancer has highlighted the importance of quality assessment in achieving curative resections. This article emphasizes the significance of evaluating ESD quality, not only for curative cases but also for non-curative ones. Postoperative assessment relies on the endoscopic curability (eCura) classification, but management strategies for eCuraC-1 tumour with a positive horizontal margin are unclear. Current research primarily focuses on comparing additional surgical procedures in high-risk patients, while studies specifically targeting eCuraC-1 patients are limited. Exploring management strategies and follow-up outcomes for such cases could provide valuable insights. Furthermore, the application of molecular imaging using near-infrared fluorescent tracers holds promise for precise tumour diagnosis and navigation, potentially impacting the management of early-stage gastric cancer patients. Advancing research in these areas is essential for improving the overall efficacy of endoscopic techniques and refining treatment indications.

Artificial intelligence for diagnosing microvessels of precancerous lesions and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Intrapapillary capillary loop (IPCL) is an important factor for predicting invasion depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The invasion depth is closely related to the selection of treatment strategy. However, diagnosis of IPCLs is complicated and subject to interobserver variability. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system to predict IPCLs subtypes of precancerous lesions and superficial ESCC. METHODS: Images of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging from three hospitals were collected retrospectively. IPCLs subtypes were annotated on images by expert endoscopists according to Japanese Endoscopic Society classification. The performance of the AI system was evaluated using internal and external validation datasets (IVD and EVD) and compared with that of the 11 endoscopists. RESULTS: A total of 7094 images from 685 patients were used to train and validate the AI system. The combined accuracy of the AI system for diagnosing IPCLs subtypes in IVD and EVD was 91.3% and 89.8%, respectively. The AI system achieved better performance than endoscopists in predicting IPCLs subtypes and invasion depth. The ability of junior endoscopists to diagnose IPCLs subtypes (combined accuracy: 84.7% vs 78.2%, P < 0.0001) and invasion depth (combined accuracy: 74.4% vs 67.9%, P < 0.0001) were significantly improved with AI system assistance. Although there was no significant differences, the performance of senior endoscopists was slightly elevated. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed AI system could improve the diagnostic ability of endoscopists to predict IPCLs classification of precancerous lesions and superficial ESCC.

Synchronous multiple primary malignancies of the esophagus, stomach, and jejunum: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of synchronous multiple primary malignancies is quite often very challenging. Herein, we report on a rare case of synchronous multiple primary malignancies in the esophagus, stomach, and jejunum. CASE SUMMARY: A 50-year-old man who was a heavy drinker and smoker with a poor diet, and had a family history of cancer sought treatment due to dysphagia lasting for 4 mo. He was finally diagnosed with lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (pT3N2M0, G2, stage IIIB), gastric angular adenocarcinoma (pT3N2M0, G2-G3, stage IIIA) with greater omental lymph node metastasis, and jejunal stromal tumor (high risk). The high-risk jejunal stromal tumor was found during surgery. In spite of radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis occurred 21 mo later. The patient responded poorly to additional chemotherapy and refused further examination and therapy. He died of widespread metastases 33 mo after surgery. CONCLUSION: This case indicates a poor prognosis of synchronous multiple advanced primary malignancies and the importance of comprehensive assessment in the population at high risk for cancer.

New anti-reflux plastic stent to reduce the risk of stent-related cholangitis in the treatment of biliary strictures.

BACKGROUND: There is little data available on the role of new anti-reflux plastic stents (ARPSs). AIM: To compare the use of ARPSs with that of traditional plastic stents (TPSs) for patients with biliary strictures. METHODS: Consecutive patients with biliary strictures who underwent first endoscopic biliary stenting between February 2016 and May 2019 were included. The onset of stent-related cholangitis, stent patency, clinical success, and other adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients in the ARPS group and 66 patients in the TPS group were included in the final analyses. Fewer patients experienced stent-related cholangitis in the ARPS group than that in the TPS group (8 patients vs 18 patients; P = 0.030). The median time till the onset of first stent-related cholangitis was later in the ARPS group than that in the TPS group (128.5 d vs 76 d; P = 0.039). The cumulative median stent patency in the ARPS group was 185 d, which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group (133 d; P = 0.001). The clinical success rates and other adverse events did not significantly differ between both groups. CONCLUSION: Placement of new ARPS might be a safe and effective optional therapeutic strategy to reduce the risk of stent-related cholangitis and prolong stent patency.

Negative-Pressure Isolation Mask for Endoscopic Examination During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, endoscopists have high risks of exposure to exhaled air from patients during gastroscopy. To minimize this risk, we transformed the oxygen mask into a fully closed negative-pressure gastroscope isolation mask. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of use of this mask during gastroscopy. METHODS: From February 28, 2020, to March 10, 2020, 320 patients undergoing gastroscopy were randomly assigned into the mask group (n = 160) or conventional group (n = 160). Patients in the mask group wore the isolation mask during gastroscopy, whereas patients in the conventional group did not wear the mask. The adenosine triphosphate fluorescence and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in patients' exhaled air were measured to reflect the degree of environmental pollution by exhaled air. Patients' vital signs, operation time, and adverse events during endoscopy were also evaluated. RESULTS: Four patients were excluded because of noncooperation or incomplete data. A total of 316 patients were included in the final analysis. The difference between the highest CO2 concentration around patients' mouth and CO2 concentration in the environment was significantly decreased in the mask group compared with the conventional group. There was no significant difference in the adenosine triphosphate fluorescence, vital signs, and operation time between the 2 groups. No severe adverse events related to the isolation mask, endoscopy failure, or new coronavirus infection during follow-up were recorded. DISCUSSION: This new isolation mask showed excellent feasibility of use and safety compared with routine gastroscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Management of an endoscopy center during the outbreak of COVID-19: Experience from West China Hospital.

Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), various measures have been taken to protect against the infection. As droplet and contact transmission are the main routes of COVID-19 infection, endoscopy centers are considered to be high-risk areas for exposure to COVID-19. We have undertaken several countermeasures in our endoscopic center during the pandemic, and have gained significant experience in terms of prevention and control of COVID-19. We here present our experience and strategies adopted for preventing hospital infection in our endoscopy center during the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe our management of the environment, endoscope, patients, and medical staff, and our self-made masks.

Endoscopic palliative resection of a giant 26-cm esophageal tumor: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal carcinosarcoma, usually presenting as a pedunculated polypoid mass, is a rare malignancy with coexisting sarcomatoid and carcinomatous components. Its imaging and endoscopic characteristics are similar to those of leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma and so forth. The diagnosis needs histological confirmation. Surgical resection is the traditional therapy. Endoscopic resection is minimally invasive but still controversial. This paper reports the case of a patient with a giant esophageal carsinosarcoma who underwent a palliative endoscopic resection. CASE SUMMARY: A 55-year-old male patient presented with dysphagia and weight loss for 1 mo. Imaging and endoscopy showed a gray-white, polypoid, stalk-like mass, with a bulky pedicle located in the middle and lower esophagus. The mass almost filled the whole esophageal lumen, but the endoscope could still pass through. Despite the suspicion of a malignancy, repeated biopsies indicated necrosis and inflammation. After multidisciplinary team consultation, an endoscopic resection to diagnose and relieve the obstruction was recommended. The pedicle of the mass was cut off, the bleeding was stopped, and the mass was cut into pieces and pulled out. The mass was 26 cm × 5 cm × 4 cm in size. The final diagnosis was esophageal carcinosarcoma. No postoperative complications occurred. After 1 mo, the patient gained 6 kg and endoscopic reexamination revealed no obstruction. Radical surgery with lymph node dissection was carried out successfully. This lesion was the largest endoscopically resected esophageal carcinosarcoma reported to date. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic palliative resection can help obtain adequate tissue for diagnosis and relieve obstructions in patients with giant esophageal carcinosarcoma.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for management of gastrointestinal motility disorder.

Achalasia is a type of esophageal motility disorder, consisting of relaxation dysfunction of the lower esophagus and disturbed esophageal peristalsis. Related clinical symptoms include dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss. Traditional treatment options include endoscopic botulinum toxin injection, endoscopic pneumatic dilation, and laparoscopic Heller's myotomy. These therapies mainly relieve symptoms by reducing the pressure on the lower esophageal sphincter and reducing blood flow resistance at the esophagogastric junction. Based on endoscopic submucosal dissection and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a purely endoscopic method of myotomy with minimal invasiveness and a low rate of adverse events when performed by experienced operators. Since then, numerous studies have shown the significant clinical efficacy and safety of POEM. The purpose of this article is to introduce different modified POEMs, special indications for different POEMs, and their advantages as well as disadvantages.

Clinical course of suspected small gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach.

BACKGROUND: Gastric subepithelial lesions are frequently encountered during endoscopic examinations, and the majority of them are small and asymptomatic. Among these lesions, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the major concern for patients and clinicians owing to their malignant potentials. Although previous guidelines suggested periodic surveillance for such small (≤ 20 mm) lesions, several patients and clinicians have still requested or prescribed repeated examinations or radical resection, posing extra medical burdens and risks. AIM: To describe the clinical course of suspected small gastric GISTs and provide further evidence for surveillance strategy for tumor therapy. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study was conducted at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Consecutive patients with suspected small gastric GISTs were reviewed from November 2004 to November 2018. GIST was suspected according to endoscopic ultrasonography features: hypoechoic lesions from muscularis propria or muscularis mucosa. Eligible patients with suspected small (≤ 20 mm) GISTs were included for analysis. Patients' demographic data, lesions' characteristics, and follow-up medical records were collected. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients (male/female, 121/262; mean age, 54 years) with 410 suspected small gastric GISTs (1 lesion in 362 patients, 2 lesions in 16, 3 lesions in 4, and 4 lesions in 1) were included for analysis. The most common location was gastric fundus (56.6%), followed by body (29.0%), cardia (12.2%), and antrum (2.2%). After a median follow-up of 28 mo (interquartile range, 16-48; range, 3-156), 402 lesions (98.0%) showed no changes in size, and size of 8 lesions (2.0%) was increased (mean increment, 10 mm). Of the 8 lesions with size increment, endoscopic or surgical resection was performed in 6 patients (5 GISTs and 1 leiomyoma). For other 2 remaining patients, unroofing biopsy or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration was carried out (2 GISTs), while no further change in size was noted over a period of 62-64 mo. CONCLUSION: The majority of suspected small (≤ 20 mm) gastric GISTs had no size increment during follow-up. Regular endoscopic follow-up without pathological diagnosis may be highly helpful for such small gastric subepithelial lesions.

Biliary spontaneous dislodgement spiral stent for patients who underwent mechanical lithotripsy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cholangitis (PEC) in patients who underwent mechanical lithotripsy (ML) for large stone removal is high (up to 13.3%). One of the main causes is remaining small fragments or sludge that can impair normal biliary drainage. Endoscopic placement of a nasobiliary tube or a conventional plastic biliary stent has been commonly used under such conditions, but the patient may suffer from significant discomfort after the placement of a nasobiliary tube, while additional endoscopy is required for stent removal. We developed a biliary spontaneous dislodgement spiral stent (BSDSS) to overcome those shortcomings. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of inserting a BSDSS for patients who underwent ML for large stone removal. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, cohort study at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. A total of 91 consecutive patients with large biliary stones (≥ 10 mm) in the common bile duct who underwent ML between November 2017 and July 2018 were included. The 49 eligible patients were divided into the BSDSS group and the nasobiliary tube group. Technical success, post-ERCP adverse events (including PEC, post-ERCP pancreatitis, stone recurrence, BSDSS retention, self-extraction and dislocation of the nasobiliary tube), drainage time, and postoperative stay were measured and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients in the BSDSS group and 28 patients in the nasobiliary tube group were included in the analyses. The baseline characteristics and clinical information were similar in the two groups. Insertions of BSDSS and nasobiliary tube were technically successful in all 49 patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of overall post-ERCP adverse events between the two groups (4.8% in the BSDSS group vs 17.9% in the nasobiliary tube group, P = 0.219). The median duration of drainage time (3 d in the BSDSS group vs 4 d in the nasobiliary tube group) and length of postoperative stay (4 d in the BSDSS group vs 5 d in the nasobiliary tube group) also did not differ (P = 0.934, and P = 0.223, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic placement of a BSDSS appears to be feasible, safe and effective for patients who underwent ML for large stone removal.

Risk factors for distal migration of biliary plastic stents and related duodenal injury.

BACKGROUND: The risk factors of duodenal injury from distal migrated biliary plastic stents remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors of distal migration and its related duodenal injury in patients who underwent placement of a single biliary plastic stent for biliary strictures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with biliary strictures who underwent endoscopic placement of a single biliary plastic stent from January 2006 to October 2017. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-eight patients with 402 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures were included. The incidence of distal migration was 6.2%. The frequency of duodenal injury was 2.2% in all cases and 36% in cases with distal migration. Benign biliary strictures (BBS), length of the stent above the proximal end of the stricture (> 2 cm), and duration of stent retention (< 3 months) were independently associated with distal migration (p = 0.018, p = 0.009, and p = 0.016, respectively). Duodenal injury occurred more commonly in cases with larger angle (≥ 30°) between the distal end of the stent and the centerline of the patient's body (p = 0.018) or in cases with stent retention < 3 months (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors of distal migration are BBS and the length of the stent above the proximal end of the stricture. The risk factor of duodenal injury due to distal migration is large angle (≥ 30°) between the distal end of the stent and the centerline of the patient's body. Distal migration and related duodenal injury are more likely to present during the early period after biliary stenting.

Endoscopic applications of magnets for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases.

Endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal diseases has developed rapidly in recent years, due to its minimally invasive nature. One of the main contributing factors for this progress is the improvement of endoscopic instruments, which are essential for facilitating safe and effective endoscopic interventions. However, the slow learning curve required in the implementation of many advanced endoscopic procedures using standard devices is associated with a high risk of complications. Other routine procedures may also be complicated by unexpected difficulties. Based on the ferromagnetic properties of many objects, both internal and external magnetic devices have been developed and applied for multiple endoscopic interventions. The applications of magnets, mainly including compression, anchoring and traction, facilitate many difficult procedures and make it feasible to operate procedures that were previously impossible. Other novel endoscopic applications, such as magnetic nanoparticles, are also under development. In this article, we reviewed published studies of endoscopic applications of magnets for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases such as precancerous lesions and cancer, obstruction, stricture, congenital and acquired malformations, motility disorders, and ingestion of foreign bodies. Since several endoscopic applications of magnets may also be relevant to surgery, we included them in this review.

New antireflux plastic stent for patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary stenting is a well-established palliative treatment for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, the main problem with stent placement is the relatively short duration of stent patency. Although self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have a longer patency period than plastic stents (PSs), the higher costs limit the wide use of SEMSs. A PS with an antireflux valve is an attractive idea to prolong stent patency, but no ideal design for an antireflux PS (ARPS) has been proposed. We developed a new ARPS with a "duckbilled" valve attached to the duodenal end of the stent. AIM: To compare the patency of ARPSs with that of traditional PSs (TPSs) in patients with unresectable distal MBO. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. This study was conducted at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Consecutive patients with extrahepatic MBO were enrolled prospectively. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either an ARPS or a TPS. Patients were followed by clinic visits or telephone interviews every 1-2 mo until stent exchange, death, or the final study follow-up in October 2018. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency. Secondary outcomes included the rate of technical success, the rate of clinical success, adverse events, and patient survival. RESULTS: Between February 2016 and December 2017, 38 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, with 19 patients in each group, to receive ARPSs or TPSs. Stent insertion was technically successful in all patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of clinical success or the rates of early or late adverse events (P = 0.660, 1.000, and 1.000, respectively). The median duration of stent patency in the ARPS group was 285 d [interquartile range (IQR), 170], which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group (median, 130 d; IQR, 90, P = 0.005). No significant difference in patient survival was noted between the two groups (P = 0.900). CONCLUSION: The new ARPS is safe and effective for the palliation of unresectable distal MBO, and has a significantly longer stent patency than a TPS.

Short-term effect of a negative colonoscopy in patients with functional constipation.

The yield of colonoscopy for neoplasia among patients with chronic constipation is very low. However, a negative colonoscopy may benefit these patients by decreasing anxiety and thereby alleviating constipation symptoms. We performed a prospective study to characterize the effect of a negative colonoscopy in patients with functional constipation. Seventy-five patients with chronic constipation were enrolled, and 69 patients were diagnosed with functional constipation through the Rome III criteria. After excluding patients whose constipation symptoms were affected by medications (e.g., laxatives, prokinetics), 45 patients were included in the study. Among the 45 patients, the average health-related anxiety score decreased from 21.0 to 15.6 at 1 week after colonoscopy (P < 0.01). Sustained improvement was observed in anxiety scores at 1 month (14.0), 2 months (12.4), and 6 months (11.2). Mean constipation symptom score was also decreased at 1 week (8.7), 1 month (8.0), 2 months (7.6), and 6 months (6.8) compared with the precolonoscopy period (11.5; P < 0.01). These results suggest that a negative colonoscopy in patients with functional constipation is associated with a decline in health-related anxiety and constipation symptom scores. (Registration number: ChiCTR-OOh-16008488).