French protocol for the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Because Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a rare disease, and due to the significant prognostic impact of early management, a diagnosis confirmed by a physician with experience in SLE is recommended, for example from an expert center. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, existing manifestations should be identified in particular, renal involvement by an assessment of proteinuria, disease activity and severity should be determined, potential complications anticipated, associated diseases searched for, and the patient's socioprofessional and family context noted. Therapeutic management of SLE includes patient education on recognizing symptoms, understanding disease progression as well as when they should seek medical advice. Patients are informed about routine checkups, treatment side effects, and the need for regular vaccinations, especially if they are receiving immunosuppressive treatment. They are also advised on lifestyle factors such as the risks of smoking, sun exposure, and dietary adjustments, especially when they are receiving corticosteroids. The importance of contraception, particularly when teratogenic medications are being used, and regular cancer screening are emphasized. Support networks can help relieve a patient's isolation. The first-line medical treatment of SLE is hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), possibly combined with an immunosuppressant and/or low-dose corticosteroid therapy. The treatment of flares depends on their severity, and typically involves HCQ and NSAIDs, but may be escalated to corticosteroid therapy with immunosuppressants or biologic therapies in moderate to severe cases. Because there is no curative treatment, the goals of therapy are patient comfort, preventing progression and flares, and preserving overall long-term health and fertility. The frequency of follow-up visits depends on disease severity and any new symptoms. Regular specialized assessments are necessary, especially when treatment changes, but a frequency of every 3 to 6 months is recommended during periods of remission and monthly during active or severe disease, especially in children. These assessments include both clinical and laboratory tests to monitor complications and disease activity, with specific attention to proteinuria.

Development of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria, Phase III-D Report: Multicriteria Decision Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The 2023 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria development, which aimed to identify patients with high likelihood of APS for research, employed a four-phase methodology. Phase I and II resulted in 27 proposed candidate criteria, which are organized into laboratory and clinical domains. Here, we summarize the last stage of phase III efforts, employing a consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to weigh candidate criteria and identify an APS classification threshold score. METHODS: We evaluated 192 unique, international real-world patients referred for "suspected APS" with a wide range of APS manifestations. Using proposed candidate criteria, subcommittee members rank ordered 20 representative patients from highly unlikely to highly likely to have APS. During an in-person meeting, the subcommittee refined definitions and participated in an MCDA exercise to identify relative weights of candidate criteria. Using consensus decisions and pairwise criteria comparisons, 1000Minds software assigned criteria weights, and we rank ordered 192 patients by their additive scores. A consensus-based threshold score for APS classification was set. RESULTS: Premeeting evaluation of 20 representative patients demonstrated variability in APS assessment. MCDA resolved 81 pairwise decisions; relative weights identified domain item hierarchy. After assessing 192 patients by weights and additive scores, the Steering Committee reached consensus that APS classification should require separate clinical and laboratory scores, rather than a single-aggregate score, to ensure high specificity. CONCLUSION: Using MCDA, candidate criteria preliminary weights were determined. Unlike other disease classification systems using a single-aggregate threshold score, separate clinical and laboratory domain thresholds were incorporated into the new APS classification criteria.

Cluster analysis of clinical manifestations assigns systemic lupus erythematosus-phenotype subgroups: A multicentre study on 440 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is a heterogenous disease characterised by a large panel of autoantibodies and a wide spectrum of clinical signs and symptoms that engender different outcomes. We aimed to identify distinct, homogeneous SLE patients' phenotypes. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled SLE patients meeting the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria, enrolled in the French multicentre "APS (antiphospholipid syndrome) and SLE" Registry. Based on 29 variables selected to cover a broad range of clinical and laboratory (excluding autoantibodies) SLE manifestations, unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis followed by hierarchical ascendent-clustering analysis assigned different phenotypes. RESULTS: We included 440 patients, mostly women (94.3%). Median age at SLE diagnosis was 24 (IQR 19-32) years. Cluster analysis yielded three distinct subgroups based on cumulative clinical manifestations, not autoantibody pattern. Cluster 1 (n=91) comprised mostly Caucasian patients, with APS-associated clinical and biological manifestations, e.g., livedo, seizure, thrombocytopaenia and haemolytic anaemia. Cluster 2 (n=221), the largest, included patients with mild clinical manifestations, mainly articular, more frequently associated with Sjögren's syndrome and with less frequent autoantibody-positivity. Cluster 3 (n=128) consisted of patients with the largest panel of SLE-specific clinical manifestations (cutaneous, articular, proliferative nephritis, pleural, cardiac and haematological), the most frequent autoantibody-positivity, low complement levels, and more often of Asian and sub-Saharan African origin. CONCLUSION: This unsupervised clustering method distinguished three distinct SLE patient subgroups, highlighting SLE heterogeneity.

Thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in non-anticoagulated thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome patients: Prospective study from antiphospholipid syndrome alliance for clinical trials and international networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository ("Registry").

BACKGROUND: Long-term anticoagulant therapy is generally recommended for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) patients, however it may be withdrawn or not introduced in routine practice. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the risk of thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in non-anticoagulated TAPS patients, compared to anticoagulated TAPS, and secondly, to identify different features between those two groups. PATIENTS/METHODS: Using an international registry, we identified non-anticoagulated TAPS patients at baseline, and matched them with anticoagulated TAPS patients based on gender, age, type of previous thrombosis, and associated autoimmune disease. Thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding were prospectively analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a marginal Cox's regression model. RESULTS: As of June 2022, 94 (14 %) of the 662 TAPS patients were not anticoagulated; and 93 of them were matched with 181 anticoagulated TAPS patients (median follow-up 5 years [interquartile range 3 to 8]). The 5-year thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding rates were 12 % versus 10 %, and 6 % versus 7 %, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 3.56, p = 0.50 and HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.86; p = 0.32, respectively). Non-anticoagulated patients were more likely to receive antiplatelet therapy (p < 0.001), and less likely to have more than one previous thrombosis (p < 0.001) and lupus anticoagulant positivity (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Fourteen percent of the TAPS patients were not anticoagulated at recruitment. Their recurrent thrombosis risk did not differ compared to matched anticoagulated TAPS patients, supporting the pressing need for risk-stratified secondary thrombosis prevention trials in APS investigating strategies other than anticoagulation.

Activities of Clinical Expertise and Research in a Rare Disease Referral Centre: A Place for Telemedicine beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic?

INTRODUCTION: Rare disease referral centres are entrusted with missions of clinical expertise and research, two activities that have to contend with numerous obstacles. Providing specialist opinions is time-consuming, uncompensated and limited by difficulties in exchanging medical data. Clinical research is constrained by the need for frequent research protocol visits. Our objective was to determine whether telemedicine (TLM) can overcome these difficulties. METHODS: To better characterise the activity of clinical expertise provided by our French centre, each opinion delivered by our team was reported on a standardised form. To investigate our clinical research activity, investigators and patients were asked to complete a questionnaire on the acceptability of research protocol teleconsultations. RESULTS: Regarding clinical expertise, our team delivered 120 opinions per week (representing a total of 21 h), of which 29% were delivered to patients and 69% to medical practitioners. If these were delivered using TLM, it would represent a potential weekly income of EUR 500 (tele-expertise) and EUR 775 (teleconsultations). Regarding the research activity, 70% of investigators considered the frequency of visits to be a limiting factor for patient inclusions; nearly half of the patients surveyed would be in favour of having teleconsultations in place of (40%) or in addition to (56%) in-person visits. CONCLUSION: Whereas TLM has become widely used as a back-up procedure to in-person consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic, the solutions it provides to the problems encountered in performing expertise and research activities have made it a new conventional follow-up modality for patients with rare diseases.

Effect of weight-adjusted intermediate-dose versus fixed-dose prophylactic anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin on venous thromboembolism among noncritically and critically ill patients with COVID-19: the COVI-DOSE trial, a multicenter, randomised, open-label, phase 4 trial.

Background: Venous thromboembolism is a major complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We hypothesized that a weight-adjusted intermediate dose of anticoagulation may decrease the risk of venous thromboembolism COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this multicenter, randomised, open-label, phase 4, superiority trial with blinded adjudication of outcomes, we randomly assigned adult patients hospitalised in 20 French centers and presenting with acute respiratory SARS-CoV-2. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive an intermediate weight-adjusted prophylactic dose or a fixed-dose of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin during the hospital stay. The primary outcome corresponded to symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (fatal) pulmonary embolism during hospitalization (COVI-DOSE ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04373707). Findings: Between May 2020, and April 2021, 1000 patients underwent randomisation in medical wards (noncritically ill) (80.1%) and intensive care units (critically ill) (19.9%); 502 patients were assigned to receive a weight-adjusted intermediate dose, and 498 received fixed-dose thromboprophylaxis. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism occurred in 6 of 502 patients (1.2%) in the weight-adjusted dose group and in 10 of 498 patients (2.1%) in the fixed-dose group (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.22-1.63; P = 0.31). There was a twofold increased risk of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding: 5.9% in the weight-adjusted dose group and 3.1% in the fixed-dose group (P = 0.034). Interpretation: In the COVI-DOSE trial, the observed rate of thromboembolic events was lower than expected in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, and the study was unable to show a significant difference in the risk of venous thromboembolism between the two low-molecular-weight-heparin regimens. Funding: French Ministry of Health, CAPNET, Grand-Est Region, Grand-Nancy Métropole.

Relevance of inflammatory and complement activation biomarkers profiling in antiphospholipid syndrome patients outside acute thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether inflammatory and complement biomarkers are associated with specific characteristics of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: Serum levels of interleukin (IL)-1ß (IL-1ß), IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon-α (IFN)-α, IFN-γ, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin, and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, and plasma levels of soluble C5b-9 (sC5b-9), C3a, C4a, Bb fragment were measured in unselected APS patients. Twenty-five healthy blood donors were included as controls. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and April 2021, 98 APS patients were included outside acute thrombosis (median time from the last APS manifestation: 60 (23;132) months). Levels of IL6, VCAM-1, sC5b-9, C3a, C4a, and Bb were significantly increased in APS patients compared to controls. A cluster analysis allowed to divide patients into two clusters: "inflammatory" (higher levels of IL-6 and VCAM-1) and "complement". In APS, elevated IL-6 was associated with hypertension, diabetes, BMI, and hypertriglyceridaemia. 85% of our APS patients had elevated levels of at least one complement biomarker. Elevated Bb (34%) was associated with aPL positivities, especially with triple aPL positivity (50% vs. 18%, p<0.001). 7/8 patients with history of catastrophic APS had elevated levels of complement biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that APS patients outside acute thrombosis might be divided into two clusters: "inflammatory" and "complement". Elevated IL-6 was associated with cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic parameters, whereas Bb fragments, a marker of alternative pathway complement activation, was strongly associated with aPL profile at highest risk of severe disease.

Precipitating factors of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: the role of anticoagulant treatment in a series of 112 patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), a rare complication of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), is a major goal. OBJECTIVES: We analyzed its precipitating factors, focusing on anticoagulation immediately before CAPS episodes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients in the French multicenter APS/systemic lupus erythematosus database with at least 1 CAPS episode. Then we compared each patient with known APS before CAPS with 2 patients with non-CAPS APS matched for age, sex, center, and APS phenotype. RESULTS: We included 112 patients with CAPS (70% women; mean age, 43 ± 15 years). At least 1 standard precipitating factor of CAPS was observed for 67 patients (64%), which were mainly infections (n = 28, 27%), pregnancy (n = 23, 22%), and surgery (n = 16, 15%). Before the CAPS episode, 67 (60%) patients already had a diagnosis of APS. Of the 61 treated with anticoagulants, 32 (48%) received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), 23 (34%) heparin, and 2 (3%) a direct oral anticoagulant. They were less likely than their matched patients with APS without CAPS to receive VKA (48% vs 66%, p = .001). Among those treated with VKA, 72% had a subtherapeutic international normalized ratio (ie, <2) versus 28% in patients with APS without CAPS (p < .001). Finally, excluding pregnant patients (n = 14) for whom we could not differentiate the effect of treatment from that of pregnancy, we were left with 47 cases, 32 (68%) of whom had recently begun a direct oral anticoagulant, planned bridging therapy, or had VKA treatment with international normalized ratio <2. CONCLUSION: These results strongly suggest that suboptimal anticoagulation management can trigger CAPS in patients with thrombotic APS.

Cutaneous Involvement in Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a Multicenter Cohort of 65 Patients.

Importance: Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a severe, rare complication of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but cutaneous involvement has not yet been adequately described. Objective: To describe cutaneous involvement during CAPS, its clinical and pathological features, and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was a retrospective analysis of patients included in the French multicenter APS/systemic lupus erythematosus register (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02782039) by December 2020. All patients meeting the revised international classification criteria for CAPS were included, and patients with cutaneous manifestations were analyzed more specifically. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical and pathological data as well as course and outcome in patients with cutaneous involvement during CAPS were collected and compared with those in the register without cutaneous involvement. Results: Among 120 patients with at least 1 CAPS episode, the 65 (54%) with skin involvement (43 [66%] women; median [range] age, 31 [12-69] years) were analyzed. Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome was the first APS manifestation for 21 of 60 (35%) patients with available data. The main lesions were recent-onset or newly worsened livedo racemosa (n = 29, 45%), necrotic and/or ulcerated lesions (n = 27, 42%), subungual splinter hemorrhages (n = 19, 29%), apparent distal inflammatory edema (reddened and warm hands, feet, or face) (n = 15, 23%), and/or vascular purpura (n = 9, 14%). Sixteen biopsies performed during CAPS episodes were reviewed and showed microthrombi of dermal capillaries in 15 patients (94%). These lesions healed without sequelae in slightly more than 90% (58 of 64) of patients. Patients with cutaneous involvement showed a trend toward more frequent histologically proven CAPS (37% vs 24%, P = .16) than those without such involvement, while mortality did not differ significantly between the groups (respectively, 5% vs 9%, P = .47). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, half the patients with CAPS showed cutaneous involvement, with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, including distal inflammatory edema. Skin biopsies confirmed the diagnosis in all but 1 biopsied patient.

Determination of four homogeneous subgroups of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a cluster analysis based on 509 cases.

OBJECTIVE: APS is a heterogeneous disease with different phenotypes. Using an unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis, we aimed to determine distinct homogeneous phenotypes among APS patients. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective study of APS patients enrolled in the French multicentre 'APS and SLE' registry who met the Sydney classification criteria. The clustering process involved an unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis followed by a hierarchical ascendant clustering analysis; it used 27 variables selected to cover a broad range of APS clinical and laboratory manifestations. RESULTS: These analyses included 509 patients, mainly women (77.8%). Mean (s.d.) age at APS diagnosis was 36.2 (14.6) years, and mean follow-up since diagnosis 10.3 (8.5) years. This hierarchical classification cluster analysis yielded four homogeneous groups of patients: cluster 1, mostly with venous thromboembolism without any associated autoimmune disease; cluster 2, older, lowest proportion of women, history of arterial events, and/or with migraines, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidaemia; cluster 3, younger, highest proportion of women, associated SLE or other autoimmune diseases, and a history of venous thromboembolism or pregnancy morbidity; and cluster 4, mainly with a history of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, aPL-associated nephropathy, and pregnancy morbidity, with frequent triple positivity and more deaths (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study applied an unsupervised clustering method to distinguish four homogeneous APS patient subgroups that were predominantly venous; arterial; associated with SLE or another autoimmune disease; and arterial microthrombotic. Heterogeneous pathophysiological mechanisms may explain these findings.

Prevalence of post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms twelve months after hospitalization in participants retained in follow-up: analyses stratified by gender from a large prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Persistent post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms (PACSs) have been reported up to 6 months after hospital discharge. Herein we assessed the symptoms that persisted 12 months (M12) after admission for COVID-19 in the longitudinal prospective national French coronavirus disease cohort. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with a confirmed virological diagnosis of COVID-19 were enrolled. Follow-up was planned until M12 after admission. Associations between persistence of ≥3 PACSs at M12 and clinical characteristics at admission were assessed through logistic regression according to gender. RESULTS: We focused on participants enrolled between 24 January 2020 and 15 July 2020, to allow M12 follow-up. The M12 data were available for 737 participants. Median age was 61 years, 475 (64%) were men and 242/647 (37%) were admitted to intensive care units during the acute phase. At M12, 27% (194/710) of the participants had ≥3 persistent PACS, mostly fatigue, dyspnoea and joint pain. Among those who had a professional occupation before the acute phase, 91 out of 339 (27%) were still on sick leave at M12. Presence of ≥3 persistent PACS was associated with female gender, both anxiety and depression, impaired health-related quality of life and Medical Muscle Research Council Scale <57. Compared with men, women more often reported presence of ≥3 persistent PACSs (98/253, 39% vs. 96/457, 21%), depression and anxiety (18/152, 12% vs. 17/268, 6% and 33/156, 21% vs. 26/264, 10%, respectively), impaired physical health-related quality of life (76/141, 54% vs. 120/261, 46%). Women had less often returned to work than men (77/116, 66% vs. 171/223, 77%). CONCLUSIONS: One fourth of the individuals admitted to hospital for COVID-19 still had ≥3 persistent PACSs at M12 post-discharge. Women reported more often ≥3 persistent PACSs, suffered more from anxiety and depression and had less often returned to work than men.

Factors Predicting Statin Initiation During Childhood in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Importance of Genetic Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify childhood and parental factors associated with initiation of statin therapy in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), including underlying genetic diagnosis or parental premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter cohort study included 245 HeFH child-parent pairs from the REFERCHOL national register (2014-2020). Demographic and clinical characteristics at the last visit were collected. Vascular disease in parents was defined as a history of ASCVD, and/or a coronary artery calcium score >100, and/or stenosis of >50% in at least carotid artery. Statistical analyses included descriptive analysis, logistic regression for univariate and multivariate effects of statins, and a sensitivity analysis combining the characteristics of children and parents. RESULTS: Among the 245 children in the study cohort, 135 (58%), with a mean age of 14 ± 3 years, were treated with a statin. In multivariable analysis, the predictive childhood factors associated with statin treatment were genetic diagnosis (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.9; P = .01), older age (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.8-10.6; P = .01), more than 2 visits (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.18-4.73; P = .015), and longer duration of follow-up (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P < .001). The predictive parental factor associated with childhood treatment was the presence of vascular disease (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.7; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: HeFH confirmed by DNA testing during childhood and a history of vascular disease in parents were independently associated with statin treatment in children with HeFH. Genetic diagnosis may be useful for cardiovascular prevention in children.

Association between Routine Laboratory Parameters and the Severity and Progression of Systemic Sclerosis.

(1) Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous connective tissue disease with a high mortality and morbidity rate. Identification of biomarkers that can predict the evolution of SSc is a key factor in the management of patients. The aim of this study was to assess the association of routine laboratory parameters, widely used in practice and easily available, with the severity and progression of SSc. (2) Methods: In this retrospective monocentric cohort study, 372 SSc patients were included. We gathered clinical and laboratory data including routine laboratory parameters: C-reactive-protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), complete blood count, serum sodium and potassium levels, creatinin, urea, ferritin, albumin, uric acid, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), serum protein electrophoresis, and liver enzymes. Associations between these routine laboratory parameters and clinical presentation and outcome were assessed. (3) Results: Median (interquartile range) age was 59.0 (50.0; 68.0) years. White blood cell, monocyte, and neutrophil absolute counts were significantly higher in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc and with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (p < 0.001). CRP was significantly higher in patients with ILD (p < 0.001). Hemoglobin and ferritin were significantly lower in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) including pulmonary arterial hypertension and ILD associated PH (p = 0.016 and 0.046, respectively). Uric acid and NT pro BNP were significantly higher in patients with PH (<0.001). Monocyte count was associated with ILD progression over time. (4) Conclusions: Overall, our study highlights the association of routine laboratory parameters used in current practice with the severity and progression of SSc.

Dyslipidemia is insufficiently treated in antiphospholipid syndrome patients.

OBJECTIVES: Although dyslipidemia is a strong risk factor for thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), it has been poorly studied. This study aimed to assess lipids profile and risk factors for unachieved cholesterol levels in a real-life APS population. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: APS diagnosis according to international classification criteria, referring to the out-patients clinic of our tertiary care center for their follow-up, and having a blood sample collection for lipids levels determination. Cholesterol level targets for each patient were defined according to 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and April 2021, 114 APS patients were included (male 37 (32.5%); mean age 49 ± 14 years). Among them, 40 (35.1%) had a history of dyslipidemia, 48 (42.1%) were under lipid-lowering therapies, and 59 (51.8%) had a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Mean levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride were, respectively, 110 ± 40 mg/dL, 60±20 mg/dL, and 120 (80-190) mg/dL. Unachieved LDL-C levels were found in 77 (67.5%) patients of whom 53 had history of CVD. Overall, 90 (78.9%) had protective HDL-C and 31 (27.2%) had hypertriglyceridemia. In the multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for unachieved LDL-C levels were older age and history of CVD; triple aPL negativity, defined as complete disappearance of aPL over time in APS patients who were previously positive in accordance to international criteria, was an independent protective factor for unachieved LDL-C. CONCLUSION: Our finding suggested that dyslipidemia is frequent in APS patients and mainly insufficiently treated, especially in patients with history of CVD, who are at highest risk of future CV events.

APOE Molecular Spectrum in a French Cohort with Primary Dyslipidemia.

Primary hypercholesterolemia is characterized by elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels isolated in autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH) or associated with elevated triglyceride levels in familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). Rare APOE variants are known in ADH and FCHL. We explored the APOE molecular spectrum in a French ADH/FCHL cohort of 5743 unrelated probands. The sequencing of LDLR, PCSK9, APOB, and APOE revealed 76 carriers of a rare APOE variant, with no mutation in LDLR, PCSK9, or APOB. Among the 31 APOE variants identified here, 15 are described in ADH, 10 in FCHL, and 6 in both probands. Five were previously reported with dyslipidemia and 26 are novel, including 12 missense, 5 synonymous, 2 intronic, and 7 variants in regulatory regions. Sixteen variants were predicted as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and their carriers had significantly lower polygenic risk scores (wPRS) than carriers of predicted benign variants. We observed no correlation between LDL-C levels and wPRS, suggesting a major effect of APOE variants. Carriers of p.Leu167del were associated with a severe phenotype. The analysis of 11 probands suggests that carriers of an APOE variant respond better to statins than carriers of a LDLR mutation. Altogether, we show that the APOE variants account for a significant contribution to ADH and FCHL.

Gender differences in primary antiphospholipid syndrome with vascular manifestations in 433 patients from four European centres.

OBJECTIVES: Gender can influence incidence and clinical course of autoimmune diseases (ADs). Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare AD characterised by thromboses and/or pregnancy morbidities and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) positivity. Our aim is to conduct a gender-oriented analysis of primary thrombotic APS (t-APS). METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with primary t-APS, followed from 1967 to 2019 in four European Centres, were enrolled. RESULTS: The cohort included 296 women and 137 men. Median age at onset [31 (24-46) vs. 41 (29-53) years, p<0.001] was lower in females. In women, venous thromboses were more frequent while, among males, arterial events prevailed. During follow-up, 14% of patients suffered at least two relapses and this occurred especially among males (22% vs. 10%, p=0.001). No gender differences were found in the aPL profile (33% single, 24% double and 43% triple aPL positivity). Most patients had concomitant risk factors (RFs) for thrombosis: established cardiovascular RFs were represented especially among men while estrogenic exposure was the main RF in women. CONCLUSIONS: Women presented mostly with venous thromboses at a younger age, while men with arterial events, later in life and suffered more recurrent events. This different frequency of arterial and venous thromboses could be attributed mainly to the presence of additional RFs rather than to biological gender-specific issues. However, some RFs are exclusive or more represented in one gender rather than the other, so assessing the link of causality between gender and manifestations of t-APS remains difficult.

Initial characteristics and follow-up of patients with a diagnosis of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema.

Background: A differential diagnosis between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) angioedema (AE) and histaminergic AE (hAE) might be challenging. Follow-up data may help discriminate these conditions but are scarcely reported. Objective: To report on the follow-up of patients with suspected ACEi-AE and to describe the baseline characteristics of AE attacks in patients with a diagnosis of ACEi-AE after follow-up. Methods: Sixty-four patients with suspected ACEi-AE (i.e., with exposure to ACEi before the first attack, no urticaria associated, and normal C1-inhibitor levels) and at least one follow-up visit were included. Data were retrospectively collected at baseline and during the follow-up. Results: After the follow-up, the diagnosis of ACEi-AE was probable in only 30 patients. The remaining patients were reclassified as having probable hAE (21 patients) or undetermined-mechanism AE (13 patients). Patients with ACEi-AE were mostly men (61%), with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] ±17 years), with a highly variable delay from ACEi introduction (median: 23 months; interquartile range: 103 months). Attacks preferentially involved lips (50%), tongue (47%), and throat (30%). Interestingly, patients with probable ACEi-AE after a follow-up also frequently presented with a history of allergy and atopic conditions (20%), attacks with preferential evening onset (25%), and spontaneous resolution in < 24 hours (26%), which are usually considered as suggestive of hAE. ACEi-AE attacks responded to icatibant in 79% of the patients. Conclusion: Patients with probable ACEi-AE were mostly men with facial involvement. A third of the patients with an initial suspected diagnosis of ACEi-AE had a final diagnosis of probable hAE. Although a follow-up of all patients should be a standard of care, it is critical to the correct diagnosis in the case of suspected bradykinin-associated AE, which may actually be due to histamine.

Characterisation of a high-risk profile for maternal thrombotic and severe haemorrhagic complications in pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome in France (GR2): a multicentre, prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Prospective data about the risks of thrombotic and severe haemorrhagic complications during pregnancy and post partum are unavailable for women with antiphospholipid syndrome. We aimed to assess thrombotic and haemorrhagic events in a prospective cohort of pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, observational study was done at 76 centres in France. To be eligible for this study, women had to have diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome; have conceived before April 17, 2020; have an ongoing pregnancy that had reached 12 weeks of gestation; and be included in the study before 18 weeks of gestation. Exclusion criteria were active systemic lupus erythematosus nephropathy, or a multifetal pregnancy. Severe haemorrhage was defined as the need for red blood cell transfusion or maternal intensive care unit admission because of bleeding or invasive procedures, defined as interventional radiology or surgery, to control bleeding. The GR2 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02450396. FINDINGS: Between May 26, 2014, and April 17, 2020, 168 pregnancies in 27 centres met the inclusion criteria for the study. 89 (53%) of 168 women had a history of thrombosis. The median term at inclusion was 8 weeks gestation. 16 (10%) of 168 women (95%CI 5-15) had a thrombotic (six [4%] women; 95% CI 1-8) or severe haemorrhagic event (12 [7%] women; 95% CI 4-12). There were no deaths during the study. The main risk factors for thrombotic events were lupus anticoagulant positivity at inclusion (six [100%] of six women with thrombosis vs 78 [51%] of 152 of those with no thrombosis; p=0·030) and placental insufficiency (four [67%] of six women vs 28 [17%] of 162 women; p=0·013). The main risk factors for severe haemorrhagic events were pre-existing maternal hypertension (four [33%] of 12 women vs 11 [7%] of 156 women; p=0·014), lupus anticoagulant positivity at inclusion (12 [100%] of 12 women vs 72 [49%] of 146 women; p<0·0001) and during antiphospholipid history (12 [100%] of 12 women vs 104 [67%] of 156 women; p=0·019), triple antiphospholipid antibody positivity (eight [67%] of 12 women vs 36 [24%] of 147 women; p=0·0040), placental insufficiency (five [42%] of 12 women vs 27 [17%] of 156 women; p=0·038), and preterm delivery at 34 weeks or earlier (five [45%] of 11 women vs 12 [8%] of 145 women; p=0·0030). INTERPRETATION: Despite treatment adhering to international recommendations, a proportion of women with antiphospholipid syndrome developed a thrombotic or severe haemorrhagic complication related to pregnancy, most frequently in the post-partum period. Lupus anticoagulant and placental insufficiency were risk factors for these life-threatening complications. These complications are difficult to prevent, but knowledge of the antenatal characteristics associated with them should increase awareness and help physicians manage these high-risk pregnancies. FUNDING: Lupus France, association des Sclérodermiques de France, association Gougerot Sjögren, Association Francophone contre la Polychondrite chronique atrophiante, AFM-Telethon, the French Society of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, the French Health Ministry, FOREUM, the Association Prix Veronique Roualet, and UCB.