On the Concerning Early Failure of a Short Stem Press-Fit Humeral Component.

INTRODUCTION: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common surgical intervention for various shoulder pathologies, predominantly glenohumeral osteoarthritis. While generally considered safe and effective, complications remain a challenge. Short stem implants, aim to preserve bone stock and reduce complications. However, concerns about a specific short stem implant (Univers Apex; Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) have surfaced due to high reported rates relatively early aseptic loosening. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 116 consecutive TSA patients with Univers Apex implants from 2004 to 2022. 15 revision cases were assessed for radiographic loosening, and explanted implants were examined for damage using a 0-3 scale. Histopathological analysis evaluated cellular responses to wear debris. RESULTS: Of the patients, 13% (15/116) required revision at 23.2 months on average. A distinct radiographic loosening pattern was identified, with humeral component subsidence and thinning of the proximal humeral cortex. Histopathology revealed a robust inflammatory response to wear debris, with a potential association between macrophage infiltration, hinge damage, and polyethylene wear. CONCLUSION: This study reveals a notable rate of early aseptic humeral loosening with the Univers Apex short stem implant, emphasizing concerns raised in previous reports and providing a potential explanation for the high rate of early failure. Surgeons should exercise caution and closely monitor patients with this implant design.

Social Media in Hip Arthroscopy Is an Underused Resource That Enhances Physician Online Reputation.

Purpose: To analyze the impact of professional social media (SM) presence, activity level, and physician practice-specific variables on online ratings and rating frequency for hip arthroscopists across 3 leading physician review websites (PRWs). Methods: The Arthroscopy Association of North America and American Orthopaedic Society of Sports Medicine directories were queried to identify practicing hip arthroscopists. Physicians included were residency-trained surgeons practicing within the United States. Surgeon ratings, comments, and reviews were compiled from 3 PRWs (Google, Healthgrades, Vitals). Google searches assessed for professional Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram accounts and demographic information. Surgeons were considered active if they posted the month before data collection. Logistical regression and a univariate model analyzed effects of demographic factors and other variables on SM use and PRW statistics. Results: In total, 555 surgeons met inclusion criteria (93.2% male, 6.8% female); 41% had a professional SM account (27.4% Facebook, 24.3% Twitter, 12.1% Instagram). Few surgeons with SM actively posted (30.5% Facebook, 43.7% Twitter, 37.3% Instagram). Surgeons with any SM had significantly greater number of ratings on all review websites (P < .001). Linear regression revealed academic physicians had lower number of ratings (P = .002) and average ratings (P < .001). Instagram users had an average 12.4 more ratings. Surgeons more likely to use SM resided in greater population cities (990 vs 490 [per 1,000]) with higher surgeon density (3.3 vs 2.2). Conclusions: Most hip arthroscopists have no professional SM, and fewer frequently post content. SM presence significantly increases the number of ratings on PRWs but does not affect overall rating. Surgeons using SM practice in more populous cities with more competition. Academic surgeons had fewer ratings and lower average ratings. A professional Instagram account can increase the number of online ratings. Clinical Relevance: Understanding how SM presence affects an orthopaedic surgeon's practice may provide information on how surgeons best connect with patients.

Severe immunosuppression and not a cytokine storm characterizes COVID-19 infections.

COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality have been attributed to a pathologic host response. Two divergent hypotheses have been proposed: hyperinflammatory cytokine storm; and failure of host protective immunity that results in unrestrained viral dissemination and organ injury. A key explanation for the inability to address this controversy has been the lack of diagnostic tools to evaluate immune function in COVID-19 infections. ELISpot, a highly sensitive, functional immunoassay, was employed in 27 patients with COVID-19, 51 patients with sepsis, 18 critically ill nonseptic (CINS) patients, and 27 healthy control volunteers to evaluate adaptive and innate immune status by quantitating T cell IFN-É£ and monocyte TFN-α production. Circulating T cell subsets were profoundly reduced in COVID-19 patients. Additionally, stimulated blood mononuclear cells produced less than 40%-50% of the IFN-É£ and TNF-α observed in septic and CINS patients, consistent with markedly impaired immune effector cell function. Approximately 25% of COVID-19 patients had increased IL-6 levels that were not associated with elevations in other canonical proinflammatory cytokines. Collectively, these findings support the hypothesis that COVID-19 suppresses host functional adaptive and innate immunity. Importantly, IL-7 administered ex vivo restored T cell IFN-É£ production in COVID-19 patients. Thus, ELISpot may functionally characterize host immunity in COVID-19 and inform prospective therapies.