RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Angiosarcomas are malignant neoplasms that originate from endothelial cells. The symptoms exhibit a non-specific nature, and achieving a preoperative diagnosis is frequently challenging. They are seldom encountered in the abdomen, and their occurrence in the pancreas is even rarer. METHODS: Here we document a 67-year-old man with pancreatic angiosarcoma and analyse the literature to outline the clinicopathologic characteristics of this rare phenomenon. RESULTS: This patient with family history of pancreas cancer presented with abdominal pain, and the CT-scan revealed a 4 cm mass at the neck of the pancreas but CA19-9 was normal. Radiologic findings were unusual for ordinary pancreas cancer. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy through endoscopic ultrasound revealed "undifferentiated malignant cells for which the diagnosis of "carcinoma" was favoured. Total pancreatectomy, splenectomy and portal vein reconstruction were performed and epithelioid angiosarcoma were diagnosed. Despite an uneventful postoperative period, discharge on postoperative day 8 without any complications, as well as diligent post-discharge clinical care, the patient died 65 days postoperatively, attributed to the presence of extensive metastasis. A comprehensive literature search has identified a limited number of documented cases of primary pancreatic angiosarcoma, with only ten cases reported to date. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic angiosarcomas are very rare and prone to misdiagnosis. The formation of a more demarcated but high-grade tumour with necrosis is a feature that distinguishes angiosarcomas from ordinary carcinomas of this organ. Pathologic diagnosis is also highly challenging closely resembling undifferentiated carcinomas. Angiosarcomas are highly aggressive when they occur in the pancreas. Prompt diagnosis at an early stage is crucial as surgery with curative intent serves as the primary treatment approach.
Surgery with curative intent is the mainstay treatment for pancreatic angiosarcoma when diagnosed at an early stage.Oncological treatment options should be taken into consideration according to the follow-up data.Why does this paper matter?This article is important in that it is the most comprehensive review of the literature on pancreatic angiosarcoma, which is a very rare pathology, from the perspective of radiology, pathology and surgery.
Assuntos
Hemangiossarcoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Hemangiossarcoma/diagnóstico , Hemangiossarcoma/cirurgia , Hemangiossarcoma/patologia , Células Endoteliais/patologia , Assistência ao Convalescente , Alta do Paciente , Pâncreas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Abdome/patologiaRESUMO
Background: The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) procedure is the most common bariatric surgical technique worldwide, but controversy continues over staple line reinforcement (SLR) techniques. This prospective randomized study aimed to compare the effects of SLR methods on early postoperative complications and gastrointestinal symptoms in patients undergoing LSG for morbid obesity. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent LSG surgery for obesity between June 2019 and February 2020 in the Department of General Surgery of Bezmialem Vakif University were included in our prospective randomized study. According to the SLR techniques, three groups were determined as Group 1: using fibrin sealant (Tisseel®), Group 2: omentopexy, Group 3: no SLR, with each group having 30 randomly assigned patients. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed by performing the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) for all patients following the first week and first month. On the second postoperative day, all patients underwent swallow-graphy to investigate twists and fistula. Results: The test group included 90 patients totally, of which 17 are males and 73 are females with a mean age of 35.3 ± 11.6 years and a mean body mass index of 45.3 ± 7.7 kg/m2. According to the GSRS, reflux and indigestion scores in Group 3 were significantly higher than those in the other groups in the first week (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in abdominal pain scores in the first week. Group 3's operation time was statistically significantly shorter than the other groups (Group 1 P = .005; Group 2 P = .001). In Group 3, 2 patients (2.2%) had bleeding. There was no mortality. There were no twists or fistulas found in swallow graphs. Symptomatic reflux was not observed in the first-year follow-up period. Conclusions: SLR methods reduce gastrointestinal system complaints in the early postoperative period. In our study, omentopexy and fibrin sealant used in LSG did not show a statistically significant difference in early postoperative complications.
Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Laparoscopia/métodos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common cause of acute abdomen and appendectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic (LA) surgical techniques in the treatment of AA. METHODS: The data of 236 patients treated with the diagnosis of AA in 2019-2020 were analyzed. Of these patients, 85 patients who received OA and 84 patients who received LA were included in the study. Then, the two groups were compared in terms of demographic, laboratory, clinical, and surgical treatments. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 34.9 years (range 16-78), and the male-to-female ratio was 0.69. Statistical analysis revealed that the OA group had more leukocytosis, more female gender, and longer operation time than the LA group, but the LA group's complication rate was lower (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: LA offers less morbidity, a shorter duration of hospital stay, and a fast return to normal activities compared to OA. In the surgical treatment of AA, LA can be applied as a routine and first-line treatment.
RESUMO
Objective: We aim to evaluate the effect of peritoneal closure on postoperative pain and life quality associated with open appendectomy operations. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. Here, 18-65-year-old patients who underwent open appendectomy for acute appendicitis were included. Demographic data of the patients, operation time, length of hospital stay, pain scores using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) on the first postoperative day, quality of life assessment using the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire on postoperative 10th day, deep wound dehiscence, bowel obstruction, and mortality data were recorded. Results: In total, 112 patients were included in the study. The demographic data showed no significant difference between the groups. The median VAS score was lower in the group with open peritoneum, but this difference was not statistically significant (3 vs. 4, p=0.134). The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the peritoneal nonclosure group (31.0 ± 15.1 vs. 38.5 ± 17.5 minutes, p=0.016). Overall complication rates and life quality test (EuroQol-5D-5L) results were similar between groups. Conclusion: Nonclosure of the peritoneum seems to shorten the duration of surgery without increasing complications during open appendectomy. Postoperative pain and life quality measures were not affected by nonclosure of the peritoneum. This trial is registered with NCT02803463.
Assuntos
Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Peritônio/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Bleeding is a rare and dangerous complication of thyroid surgery. One of the hemostatic agents used during surgery are microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) which are local hemostatic agents acquired from purified potato starch. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of two MPH, produced with different biotechniques, in decreasing hemorrhages and drainage following thyroidectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A statistical power analysis predicted that totally 20 patients per each group was needed within 95% confidential interval. Patients were randomized into 3 groups as control, Haemocer TM and Arista TM to be 20 patients in each group. Following bilateral total thyroidectomy, no additional procedures were performed in the first group, 5 g Haemocer was administered to the second group, 5 g Arista was administered to the third group into the operational field, and the operation was ended by placing a double-sided hemovac drain. At post-operative day one, drainage amount, calcium (Ca), phosphate (P) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were noted. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted between the groups for age, gender, removed tissue weight and malignant pathology rates. Also, no significant difference was noted between post-operative drainages and Ca, P, PTH levels of groups either. Hoarseness or hematoma were not observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: MPHs are not proven in effectiveness in decreasing post-operative hemorrhages, which might be a key to avoiding unnecessary expenses.
RESUMO
Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is one of the surgical techniques performed for the distal rectal cancer. The perineal herniation is one of the complications of APR surgery. In this report, we aim to demonstrate a rare case of small bowel evisceration and strangulation secondary to the transvaginal herniation evolved in the late stage after perineal hernia repair following laparoscopic APR.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most preferred technique in morbidly obese patients for weight loss. There is a controversy about the routine preoperative evaluation of the stomach and the routine microscopic examination of all LSG specimens. Our aim is to analyze the results of both preoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and endoscopic biopsies and also the results of histopathological examination of LSG specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of patients who underwent LSG from January 2011 to November 2016 were analyzed retrospectively from a prospectively collected database. Seven hundred fifty five of 819 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Data on patients' demographic variables [age, gender, BMI (kg/m2)], preoperative upper GI endoscopy and biopsy results, postoperative histopathological results of the specimens, and the process of the patients with malignant histopathological investigation in the follow-up period were collected. RESULTS: This study involves 755 patients with a mean age of 39.6 ± 11.7 years and has 496 (65.6%) to 259 (34.4%) female to male ratio. None of the patients harbored macroscopic or microscopic malignant pathological finding in the preoperative assessment. Hiatal hernia was detected in 78 (10.2%) patients and gastric/duodenal ulcers were detected in 52 (6.8%) patients in endoscopy. Incidental malignant and/or premalignant histopathological findings-intestinal metaplasia (1.4%) and malignant lesions (0.5%)-were rarely found in the evaluation of the surgical specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Both preoperative endoscopic assessment and postoperative histopathological examination of the specimen are mandatory in LSG patients.