Women in Neurosurgery: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of Where We Stand and a Pilot Study on How to Move Forward.

BACKGROUND: Surgical specialties struggle to recruit women. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review to describe progress of women in neurosurgery and highlight areas where further research is needed. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried with "women in neurosurgery" OR "female neurosurgeon," and publications with empiric research were included. Bias was assessed on the basis of study designs. RESULTS: We found 127 papers, and 36 met inclusion criteria. Much of this research is recent-85% has been published within the past 3 years. These papers detail differences between genders and examine possible causes, but they do not test interventions to remedy inequities. The authors designed an intervention focusing on medical students' perceptions of gender issues within neurosurgery. A seminar was designed with 2 objectives: inform medical students about changes within neurosurgery and introduce them to a female neurosurgery attending who could serve as a potential future mentor. Student attitudes were assessed before and after the seminar by survey. Fourteen students completed both surveys: 10 females and 4 males. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-hour seminar significantly reduced the mean perceived difficulty to enter neurosurgery from 4.4 to 4.1 (P = 0.014); additionally, the mean perceived additional difficulty for career advancement faced by women in neurosurgery decreased from 3.6 to 2.8 (P = 0.026). Much research has gone into documenting the advancement and potential impediments for women in neurosurgery. Less research has tested solutions. Our pilot was small and susceptible to bias, but given that some results achieved significance, it merits more rigorous study.

Tubal factor infertility and its impact on reproductive freedom of African American women.

In the past, the reproductive freedom of African American women was hindered by forced reproduction and sterilization campaigns. Unfortunately, these involuntary practices have now mostly been replaced by inequality because of disproportionate tubal factor infertility rates within African American communities. Our work aimed to describe the inequities in increased rates of pelvic inflammatory disease and tubal factor infertility as it relates to African American women. In addition, we highlighted the need for improved access to screening and treatment of sexually transmitted infections, access to barrier contraception, and health literacy related to the understanding and prevention of tubal factor infertility in African American women.

Validation of a field spinal motion restriction protocol in a level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Spinal motion restriction (SMR) after traumatic injury has been a mainstay of prehospital trauma care for more than 3 decades. Recent guidelines recommend a selective approach with cervical spine clearance in the field when criteria are met. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In January 2014, the Department of Health Services of the City of Los Angeles, California, implemented revised guidelines for cervical SMR after blunt mechanism trauma. Adult patients (aged ≥18 y) with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≥13 presented to a single level I trauma center after blunt mechanism trauma over the following 1-y period were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, injury data, and prehospital data were collected. Cervical spine injury (CSI) was identified by International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, codes. RESULTS: Emergency medical services transported 1111 patients to the emergency department who sustained blunt trauma. Patients were excluded if they refused c-collar placement or if documentation was incomplete. A total of 997 patients were included in our analysis with 172 (17.2%) who were selective cleared of SMR per protocol. The rate of Spinal Cord Injury was 2.2% (22/997) overall and 1.2% (2/172) in patients without SMR. The sensitivity and specificity of the protocol are 90.9% (95% confidence interval: 69.4-98.4) and 17.4% (95% confidence interval: 15.1-20.0), respectively, for CSI. Patients with CSI who arrived without immobilization having met field clearance guidelines, were managed without intervention, and had no neurologic compromise. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for cervical SMR have high sensitivity and low specificity to identify CSI. When patients with injuries were not placed on motion restrictions, there were no negative clinical outcomes.

Limit Crystalloid Resuscitation after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are often resuscitated with crystalloids in the emergency department (ED) to maintain cerebral perfusion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether crystalloid resuscitation volume impacts mortality in TBI patients. This was a retrospective study of trauma patients with head abbreviated injury scale score ≥2, who received crystalloids during ED resuscitation between 2004 and 2013. Clinical characteristics and volume of crystalloids received in the ED were collected. Patients who received <2 L of crystalloids were categorized as low volume (LOW), whereas those who received ≥2 L were considered high volume (HIGH). Mortality and outcomes were compared. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine the odds of mortality while controlling for confounders. Over 10 years, 875 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality was 12.5 per cent. Seven hundred and forty-two (85%) were in the LOW cohort and 133 (15%) in the HIGH cohort. Gender and age were similar between the groups. The HIGH cohort had lower admission systolic blood pressure (128 vs 138 mm Hg, P = 0.001), lower Glasgow coma scale score (10 vs 12, P < 0.001), higher head abbreviated injury scale (3.8 vs 3.3, P < 0.001), and higher injury severity score (25 vs 18, P < 0.001). The LOW group had a lower unadjusted mortality (10 vs 26%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis adjusting for confounders demonstrated that those resuscitated with ≥2 L of crystalloids had increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.25, P = 0.005). Higher volume crystalloid resuscitation after TBI is associated with increased mortality, thus limited resuscitation for TBI patients may be indicated.

Association Between Enoxaparin Dosage Adjusted by Anti-Factor Xa Trough Level and Clinically Evident Venous Thromboembolism After Trauma.

Importance: Trauma patients are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The VTE rate when enoxaparin sodium is dosed by anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) trough level is not well described. Objective: To determine whether targeting a prophylactic anti-Xa trough level by adjusting the enoxaparin dose would reduce the VTE rate in trauma patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-institution, historic vs prospective cohort comparison study at an urban, academic, level I trauma center. The prospective cohort was enrolled from August 2014 to May 2015 and compared with a historic cohort admitted from August 2013 to May 2014. Trauma patients who received enoxaparin adjusted by anti-Xa trough level (adjustment group) were compared with those who received enoxaparin sodium at a dosage of 30 mg twice daily (control group). Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, had a length of hospital stay less than 2 days, or had preexisting deep vein thrombosis. Patients were excluded from the adjustment group for changes in the choice of thromboprophylaxis (heparin, enoxaparin once-daily dosing, early ambulation), hospital discharge before initial trough levels could be drawn, or incorrect timing of trough levels. Exposures: Anti-Xa trough levels were monitored in patients in the adjustment group receiving 3 or more consecutive doses of enoxaparin sodium, 30 mg twice daily. Patients with a trough level of 0.1 IU/mL or lower received enoxaparin sodium increased by 10-mg increments. After providing 3 adjusted doses of enoxaparin, the trough level was redrawn and the dosage was adjusted as necessary. Patients in the control group received enoxaparin sodium at a dosage of 30 mg twice daily without adjustments. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of symptomatic VTE (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, confirmed by duplex ultrasonography and chest computed tomographic angiography, respectively) and bleeding risk. Results: A total of 205 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [18.2] years; 75.1% male) were studied, 87 in the adjustment group and 118 in the control group, with similar baseline characteristics and injury profiles. Subprophylactic anti-Xa troughs were noted in 73 of 87 patients (83.9%) in the adjustment group, and the majority of patients (57 of 87 patients [65.5%]) required dosage adjustment of enoxaparin sodium to 40 mg twice daily. Incidence of VTE was significantly lower in the adjustment group than in the control group (1.1% vs 7.6%, respectively; P = .046). When the adjustment group was compared with the control group, no significant difference was noted in the rate of packed red blood cell transfusion (6.9% vs 12.7%, respectively; P = .18) or mean (SD) hematocrit at discharge (34.5% [6.3%] vs 33.4% [6.8%], respectively [to convert to proportion of 1.0, multiply by 0.01]; P = .19). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, subprophylactic anti-Xa trough levels were common in trauma patients. Enoxaparin dosage adjustment may lead to a reduced rate of VTE without an increased risk of bleeding.