Comparison of restrictive and liberal red blood cell suspension transfusion and analysis of influencing factors on prognosis of premature infants.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of restrictive and liberal red blood cell suspension (RBCs) transfusions on the prognosis of premature infants and to analyze the influencing factors to provide a reference for the transfusion strategy of preterm infants. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 85 cases of anemic premature infants treated in our center, including 63 cases in the restrictive transfusion group and 22 in the liberal transfusion group. RESULTS: RBCs transfusions were effective in both groups, and there were no statistically significant differences in post-transfusion hemoglobin and hematocrit between the two groups (P > 0.05). The outcome events: the duration of ventilatory support was statistically prolonger in the restrictive group compared with the liberal group (P < 0.001); however, the differences in mortality, the increased weight before discharge, and length of stay in the hospital within the two groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.237, 0.36 and 0.771, respectively). Univariate survival analysis showed that age, birth weight, Apgar 1 min and Apgar 10 min scores were the influencing factors for death, with P values of 0.035, 0.004, <0.001, and 0.013, respectively; COX regression analysis showed that Apgar 1 min score was an independent factor of the survival time of preterm infants (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Compared with the restrictive transfusion group, liberal transfusion patients presented a shorter duration of ventilatory support, which is more beneficial to the prognosis of premature infants.

The characteristics of blood transfusion and analysis of preoperative factors associated with intraoperative blood transfusion in congenital heart surgery: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: Blood transfusion is a common and life-saving procedure in congenital heart surgery (CHS), and it is critical for patients to identify risk factors prior to surgery. Our objective is to conduct an analysis of the preoperative factors that influence blood use during CHS and to offer guidance on preoperative blood preparation. METHODS: A total of 1550 cases were retrospectively analyzed in our institution between May 2019 and June 2020. We determined whether to employ red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, and plasma as dependent variables; we treated the data from characteristics and laboratory tests as binary data, except for the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS) methods as multinomial data, and finally taken into binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The total amounts of transfused RBCs, platelets, and plasma were 850.5 U (N = 713, 46%), 159 U (N = 21, 1.4%), and 1374.2 U (N = 953, 61.5%), respectively. Multivariate analysis found age (OR 0.142, 95% CI 0.099-0.203, P < 0.001), weight (0.170, 0.111-0.262, P < 0.001) RACHS method (RACHS2 vs. RACHS1, 3.444, 2.521-4.704, P < 0.001; RACHS3 vs. RACHS1, 9.333, 4.731-18.412, P < 0.001; RACHS4 vs. RACHS1, 31.327, 2.916-336.546, P = 0.004), and hemoglobin (0.524, 0.315-0.871, P = 0.013) to be independent risk predictors of RBC transfused volume; age (9.911, 1.008-97.417, P = 0.049), weight (0.029, 0.003-0.300, P = 0.029), RACHS method (RACHS3 vs. RACHS1, 13.001, 2.482-68.112, P = 0.002; RACHS4 vs. RACHS1, 59.748, 6.351-562.115, P < 0.001) to be platelets; and age (0.488, 0.352-0.676, P < 0.001), weight (0.252, 0.164-0.386, P < 0.001), RACHS method (RACHS2 vs. RACHS1, 2.931, 2.283-3.764, P < 0.001; RACHS3 vs. RACHS1, 10.754, 4.751-24.342, P < 0.001), APTT (1.628, 1.058-2.503, P = 0.027), and PT (2.174, 1.065-4.435, P = 0.033) to be plasma. CONCLUSION: Although patients' age, weight, routine blood test, coagulation function, and protein levels should all be considered for preparing blood before CHS, the RACHS method is the most important factor influencing intraoperative blood transfused volume and should be considered first in clinical blood preparation.