Low skeletal muscle mass predicts poor prognosis for patients with stage III cervical cancer on concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether low skeletal muscle mass before initial treatment is an independent prognostic factor defining overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients diagnosed with stage III cervical cancer. METHODS: Body composition and clinicopathologic data were collected retrospectively. Information was extracted and analyzed from the medical records of 92 patients with stage III cervical cancer and undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Skeletal muscle mass in the L3 region was measured using cross-sectional computed tomography images and corrected for body surface area to calculate the skeletal muscle index (SMI). The primary outcome was OS, and the secondary outcome was PFS. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS and PFS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazard ratios. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff value for predicting 5-y survival was 35.6 cm2/m2, defined based on data derived from 24 patients with a low SMI and 68 patients without a low SMI. A low SMI was significantly associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.470; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.208-5.053; P = 0.013), with no significant difference in PFS (HR, 1.651; 95% CI, 0.876-3.110; P = 0.121). Multivariate analysis also identified a low SMI as an independent OS-defining prognostic factor (HR, 2.473; 95% CI, 1.151-5.314; P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: A low pretreatment SMI is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients diagnosed with stage III cervical cancer and treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Validation of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 as a specific biomarker for preoperative prediction of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary.

BACKGROUND: Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI2) is a novel serum biomarker that discriminates ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) from borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) and non-clear cell epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Here, we examined the performance of TFPI2 for preoperative diagnosis of CCC. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained preoperatively from patients with ovarian masses, who needed surgical treatment at five hospitals in Japan. The diagnostic powers of TFPI2 and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) serum levels to discriminate CCC from BOTs, other EOCs, and benign lesions were compared. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients including 69 CCCs were analyzed. Serum TFPI2 levels were significantly higher in CCC patients (mean ± SD, 508.2 ± 812.0 pg/mL) than in patients with benign lesions (154.7 ± 46.5), BOTs (181 ± 95.5) and other EOCs (265.4 ± 289.1). TFPI2 had a high diagnostic specificity for CCC (79.5%). In patients with benign ovarian endometriosis, no patient was positive for TFPI2, but 71.4% (15/21) were CA125 positive. TFPI2 showed good performance in discriminating stage II-IV CCC from BOTs and other EOCs (AUC 0.815 for TFPI2 versus 0.505 for CA125) or endometriosis (AUC 0.957 for TFPI2 versus 0.748 for CA125). The diagnostic sensitivity of TFPI2 to discriminate CCC from BOTs and other EOCs was improved from 43.5 to 71.0% when combined with CA125. CONCLUSIONS: High specificity of TFPI2 for preoperative detection of CCC was verified with the defined cutoff level of TFPI2 in clinical practice. TFPI2 and CA125 may contribute substantially to precise prediction of intractable CCC.

Outcome of Radiation Therapy for Stage IVB Uterine Cervical Cancer With Distant Lymph Nodes Metastases; Sequential Irradiation for Distant Lymph Nodes Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of radiation therapy for patients with distant lymph node (LN) metastases, without organ metastases from uterine cervical cancer (UCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with UCC with distant LN metastases received radiotherapy and were retrospectively analyzed. The sites of distant LN metastasis were as follows; Supraclavicular in 19, inguinal in nine, axillary in four, and others in three. The mean dose prescribed for these was 50 (range=40-60) Gy. RESULTS: The 2-year overall, cause-specific, and progression-free survival, and local control of primary tumor rates were 51.3%, 51.3%, 46.9%, and 67.9%. In multivariate analysis, performance status ≥1 (p=0.007), para-aortic LN metastases (p=0.001), and lack of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (p=0.033) were significantly associated with poor overall survival. Performance status ≥1 (p=0.004), and para-aortic LN metastases (p=0.014) were significantly associated with poor cause-specific survival. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated favorable local control in patients with UCC with distant LN metastases.

Outcome of Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Vulvar Carcinoma: Analysis of Inguinal Lymph Node.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to define the outcome of radiation therapy for vulvar carcinoma, and to investigate the effectiveness of therapeutic and prophylactic inguinal lymph node (ILN) irradiation. Because reports about the treatment of ILN were limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive vulvar carcinoma patients were treated using external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for definitive disease (n=25) or postoperatively (n=5). Twenty-four (80%) had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Tumor stages (2002 UICC) ranged from 0 to IVB, with no distant metastases. RESULTS: The median total prescribed dose for primary tumor was 64.8 Gy. The 2-year overall survival rate was 25.3%. The outcome was significantly better in patients with ILNs<30 mm (p=0.005) and patients receiving prescribed doses >60 Gy (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: ILN diameters ≤30 mm and prescribed doses over 60 Gy were associated with ILN control in patients with vulvar carcinoma.

Radiation Therapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer With Lung Metastases Including Oligometastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the role and outcomes of radiation therapy (RT) for stage IVB uterine cervical cancer (UCC) patients with lung (oligo) metastases due to the lack of recent reports on the subject. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cohort for this retrospective study comprised 23 consecutive patients with UCC (squamous cell carcinoma, n=13) and lung metastases who had received pelvic RT. Ten had lung metastases only, including 7 with oligometastases (≤4 lung metastases); the remaining 13 also had other distant metastases. RESULTS: Nine (39.1%) of the 22 patients (95.7%) completed RT without interruption. The 1-year primary progression-free rate was 95.2%. The 1-year overall survival rate was 47.2 % (estimated median survival: 9 months). Significant prognostic factors for survival included: i) ≤4 lung metastases (p=0.035), ii) unilateral lung metastases (p=0.039), iii) primary tumor diameter <100 mm (p<0.001), and iv) ECOG performance status <1 (p=0.015). CONCLUSION: RT is safe and effective for stage IVB UCC patients with lung metastases.

Evaluation of endocervical curettage with conization in diagnosis of endocervical lesions.

AIM: Endocervical curettage (ECC) at the time of conization has been reported to be effective for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and/or early stage cervical cancer. We aimed to verify the accuracy of ECC with conization. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 540 patients with suspected neoplastic cervical lesions who underwent conization at the Yokohama City University Hospital from January 2008 to December 2015. To validate the effectiveness of ECC for evaluating endocervical lesions, histopathologic findings from ECC samples were compared with those from endocervical specimens obtained by conization. In patients who subsequently underwent hysterectomy, specimens of residual endocervical stump lesions were compared with the specimens obtained by ECC. RESULTS: ECC was performed in 58.9% of patients who underwent conization. Positive findings were only observed in 7.9%, while negative findings were found in 67.3% of ECC samples; however, 24.8% of the samples were inadequate for diagnosis. None of the patients had an upgraded diagnosis according to ECC results. The sensitivity of ECC in predicting endocervical stump lesions that were identified by conization specimens was 25.0%, the specificity was 94.2% and the positive predictive value was 55.0% (κ = 0.238; P < 0.001). ECC samples yielded a sensitivity of 42.9%, a specificity of 83.9%, and positive predictive value of 54.5% (κ = 0.284; P = 0.053) in predicting residual endocervical lesions in the uterus. CONCLUSIONS: As it offers low sensitivity and positive predictive value, ECC at the time of conization is of limited benefit for evaluating endocervical lesions.

Metachronous serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma and serous peritoneal carcinoma: analysis of probable independent lesions.

BACKGROUND: Uterine serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is an immediate precursor of invasive carcinoma. The majority of stage IA SEICs are curable, but those with latent peritoneal metastasis and/or capillary lymphatics invasion may have poor prognoses Careful pathologic staging is thus needed to predict the risk of recurrence and to determine postoperative therapeutic strategies. CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old woman was hospitalized for the treatment of peritoneal carcinoma. She had undergone total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy due to SEIC (stage IA) at age 63 years, and had received medical check-ups every year since. Elevated serum CA125 (184 U/mL) was detected for the first time 8 years after surgery. A thorough workup revealed no potential primary lesion other than that in the peritoneum. Tumor reduction surgery was performed. Histologic analysis of the peritoneal lesion was high-grade serous carcinoma. The peritoneal carcinoma was diffusely immunostained for p53; thus, possible recurrence of SEIC was suspected. Tumor DNAs were microdissected from the uterine and peritoneal lesions and p53 mutation analysis was done. SEIC and peritoneal carcinomas had distinct p53 mutations that were mutually exclusive. CONCLUSIONS: The present case raised a concern about the difficulty of histologic staging for SEICs. Although SEICs confined to the uterine endometrium in most cases predict a good prognosis, microscopic metastasis to the peritoneum may not be detectable at hysterectomy. If secondary malignancies of a serous phenotype develop years later, comprehensive reexamination of SEIC is mandated, with the help of DNA analysis.

Metastatic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung arising from the uterus: A pitfall in lung cancer diagnosis.

A 41-year-old female smoker presented with a vaginal mass. Gynecological examination showed a mass filling the uterine corpus, cervix, and vagina. A total abdominal hysterectomy was performed. Macroscopic findings included a large fragile mass involving the uterine cavity, cervix, and vagina. Histology revealed atypical ducts admixed with solid components consisting of large atypical cells. The initial pathological diagnosis was grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The patient was designated as stage II according to the 2008 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging. Two years later, two nodules were found in the upper lobe of the left lung, and the patient underwent an upper lobectomy. The masses, which exhibited solid and organoid growth patterns of large atypical cells, had histological characteristics of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung. However, the tumor was immunohistochemically positive for neuroendocrine markers, such as synaptophysin in addition to estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, and the tumor was negative for thyroid transcription factor-1. These immunohistochemical results were almost identical to those of the solid portions of the uterine carcinoma. The final diagnosis was LCNEC combined with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus and lung metastasis of the LCNEC component of the endometrial carcinoma. LCNEC often arises in the lung, but it rarely arises in other organs. Some patients with metastatic components exhibited only a LCNEC pattern although the primary tumor was a mixed carcinoma consisting of LCNEC and other histology, like the present case. LCNEC is often poorly differentiated, especially in extrapulmonary primary organ LCNEC. Therefore, pathologists should consider metastatic carcinoma when they encounter lung LCNEC in a patient with a preceding extrapulmonary carcinoma composed of a poorly differentiated component or LCNEC component, and they should clarify tumor immunohistochemical characteristics to confirm the diagnosis.