Development and Verification of Educational Material for Plain Radiographic Diagnosis of Bone Metastasis: A Preliminary Report.

Our previous studies showed that early diagnosis of painful bone metastasis is difficult and requires improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of plain radiography during an initial patient consultation. In this preliminary study, we evaluate the usefulness of educational material used to improve diagnosis of bone metastasis with plain radiography. This study included imaging data from 129 consecutive patients who visited our orthopedic clinic during the period January 2011 through December 2014. First, we prepared a test to measure the reading ability of orthopedic practitioners, after which the educational material was created. Then, the effectiveness of the educational material was verified by having orthopedic trainees take a pre-test and post-test. The test contained plain radiographic data from 12 patients with lesions and 6 without lesions. The educational material included plain radiographic data from 30 patients with typical findings of bone metastasis, as well as diagnostic magnetic resonance images or computed tomography scans, accompanied by a lecture. The accuracy and sensitivity of diagnosis significantly improved after the lecture; however, specificity decreased. Although the educational material was effective for improving the ability of orthopedic trainees to read plain radiographs of bone metastasis, some aspects of the program need to be improved and revised.

Diagnostic Value of Plain Radiography for Symptomatic Bone Metastasis at the First Visit.

BACKGROUND: To prevent and minimize skeletal-related diseases, early diagnosis of bone metastases is important. However, previous reports have shown that plain radiography has low sensitivity and fails to screen multiple asymptomatic lesions. Limited investigations have been reported on the value of plain radiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic bone metastases. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of plain radiography for symptomatic bone metastasis. METHODS: Two experienced orthopedic surgeons retrospectively evaluated the plain radiographs of 39 patients with symptoms during their first visit between 2011 and 2014 for bone metastases. Another 2 experienced orthopedic surgeons then reviewed the data using 2 reference standards, the clinical results and the retrospectively evaluated results, in a blinded manner. The data were then reviewed by 2 certified orthopedic surgeons and 7 orthopedic surgeons in training with differing years of experience in a blinded manner. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of diagnosis of symptomatic bone metastasis using plain radiography at the clinic first visit was 71.4%. Upon blinded evaluation, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 55.8%, 54.3%, and 68.8% and 77.6%, 73.0%, and 85.7% for clinical results and results from 2 experienced orthopedic surgeons as a reference standard, retrospectively. There was a strong and significant correlation between the accuracy and observers' years of experience in orthopedic surgery among the orthopedic surgeons in training (R=0.942, p=0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Plain radiography around the time of the first visit has a definitive role in the early diagnosis of symptomatic bone metastasis.