Second-Line Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on Individual Patient-Level Data of Randomized Trials.

PURPOSE: While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p =0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, 95% CI 0.93-2.07, p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, 95% CI 0.92-2.03, p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

Impact of Etiology on Efficacy Outcomes with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multinational Retrospective Analysis in Asia-Pacific.

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab is a standard first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Given the diversity in HCC etiology and its potential impact on the tumor microenvironment, understanding how different liver disease etiologies affect treatment efficacy is important. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the influence of liver disease etiology on the efficacy of atezolizumab-bevacizumab and evaluated changes in liver function during treatment with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 390 patients with uHCC treated with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab from Asan Medical Center, South Korea, and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore from July 2016 to March 2023. Patients were classified to viral, metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease (MASLD) and nonviral/non-MASLD groups. Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores were recorded at baseline and every two cycles up to cycle six and at the time of disease progression. RESULTS: The majority of patients presented with viral etiologies (74.1%), and 17.2% had MASLD. Across etiological groups (viral versus MASLD versus nonviral/non-MASLD) no significant differences in objective response rate (23.2% versus 29.9% versus 23.5%, respectively; p = 0.515), progression-free survival (median 5.4 versus 7.7 versus 6.0 months; p = 0.320), and overall survival (18.1 versus 18.9 versus 14.4 months; p = 0.400) were observed. Among the patients with disease progression, ALBI scores at the time of progression were significantly higher than at baseline. Subsequent therapy was administered significantly less often to patients with ALBI grade 3 at disease progression compared with those with ALBI grades 1 or 2 (48.4% versus 78.8%, p = 0.002) CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab demonstrates consistent efficacy regardless of HCC etiology, supporting its use as a first-line treatment across diverse patient populations. Liver function assessments remain crucial for managing therapy and predicting outcomes.

Acute pancreatitis as an early sign of pancreatic cancer; a retrospective, matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) often presents as acute pancreatitis (AP). However, data on the clinical outcomes of PDAC initially presenting as AP are limited. We aimed to assess the clinical features of PDAC that manifest as AP. METHODS: We reviewed the PDAC database at the Asan Medical Center between 2010-2016. Our study included 77 patients with PDAC who presented with AP (PDAC-AP group) and 154 age-gender-matched PDAC patients as controls (PDAC-other group). Patients' demographics, disease characteristics, and outcomes were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Acute pancreatitis was an initial symptom in 1.12% of the patients with PDAC (77 of 6,821). Approximately 81.8% of the patients had clinically mild pancreatitis, and 91% were diagnosed with PDAC within two months of presentation with AP. Main tumor size was significantly smaller in the PDAC-AP group than in the PDAC-other group (PDAC-AP: 2.59 ± 1.21 cm vs. PDAC-other: 3.73 ± 1.78 cm, p < 0.01). The PDAC-AP group patients were diagnosed earlier than those in the PDAC-other group (PDAC-AP: stage 1-2, 80.6% vs. PDAC-other: 46.7%, p < 0.01). The proportion of resectable PDAC was significantly higher in the PDAC-AP group (PDAC-AP: 64.9% vs. PDAC-other: 50%, p < 0.01). Overall survival was significantly longer in the PDAC-AP group than in the PDAC-other group (30.2 months vs. 19.9 months, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who presented with clinical AP, PDAC was identified at an earlier stage, and these patients showed better survival rates. These results suggest that AP may be an early sign of PDAC.

Efficacy of cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer experiencing early vs late disease relapse after surgery: a large real-life worldwide population.

BACKGROUND: In the TOPAZ-1, patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) and recurrence within 6 months after surgery were excluded, even if this event is frequently observed in clinical practice. Our study aimed to assess if the efficacy of cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab (CGD) in this population is comparable to that reported in the phase 3 trial. METHODS: The study cohort included patients with BTC who underwent surgery on the primary tumor, experienced disease recurrence occurring ≤6 months or >6 months after surgery or after the end of adjuvant therapy and started CGD. The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed between early and late relapse groups in OS (23.4 months vs not reached; HR 1.26; 95% CI, 0.67-2.37; P = .45) and PFS [7.0 months vs 9.8 months; HR 1.3(95% CI, 0.9-2.1) P = .13]. Overall response rate and disease control rate (P = .33 and P = .62) were comparable between the 2 groups, as the overall safety profile. In addition, we compared survival outcomes between the selected population and a historical cohort of patients with BTC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) and found that despite the absence of statistical significance, CGD showed an outcome trend compared with CG regardless of the time of recurrence after surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy [(CG ≤ 6 vs CGD ≤ 6 months: HR 0.59, 95%CI, 0.35-1.01, P = .05; HR 0.70; 95%CI, 0.46-1.06, P = .09, OS and PFS, respectively) and (CG > 6 vs. CGD > 6 months: HR 0.50; 95%CI, 0.29-0.88, P = 0.0165; HR 0.54; 95%CI, 0.35-0.84, P = .0068, OS and PFS, respectively)]. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that CGD retains its efficacy independently of the timing of relapse after surgery or completion of adjuvant treatment in patients with advanced BTC.

Prognostic value of interim [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumour who underwent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the prognostic value of basal and interim [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT in patients with locally advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) who received peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS: Patients with NET who received PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, patients who underwent both basal and interim (after two cycles of PRRT) [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT were included. Alongside clinicopathologic parameters, PET parameters of maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), tumour-to-liver ratio (TLR), whole tumour volume (WTV) and total receptor expression (TRE: WTV multiplied by mean standardised uptake value) were obtained from basal and interim [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT, and their proportional changes (∆) were assessed for associations with progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were finally included (10 men and 14 women, median age of 56.5 years, age range 32-74 years). Among them, 16 patients (66.7%) experienced disease progression. In univariate analysis, high ∆WTV (≥ -10%, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.053 [1.003-9.289], p = 0.049) and high ∆TRE (≥ -21%, HR = 3.567 [1.144-11.122], p = 0.028) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. In multivariate analyses adjusted for WHO grade, high ∆WTV (HR = 3.345 [1.055-10.601], p = 0.043) and high ∆TRE (HR = 3.894 [1.194-12.695], p = 0.024) were significant predictors of shorter PFS. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that basal and interim [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT scans, through proportional changes in WTV and TRE, effectively predict PFS in neuroendocrine tumour patients receiving PRRT. KEY POINTS: Question Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is utilised for patients with somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours; however, prognostic predictors are not well established. Findings Progression-free survival was significantly associated with the proportional change in whole tumour volume and total receptor expression between basal and interim [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT. Clinical relevance Interim [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT can serve as a valuable imaging method to predict prognosis of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Lenvatinib versus sorafenib second-line therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma progressed to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: a retrospective real-world study.

INTRODUCTION: the most frequently used first-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Upon progression after this treatment, the standard of care in many countries is sorafenib, due to the lack of reimbursement for other drugs. Several randomized trials are currently underway to clarify the best second-line therapy in patients with HCC. This real-world study aims to compare outcomes reached by lenvatinib and sorafenib second-line therapy in this setting. METHODS: the overall cohort included 891 patients with HCC from 5 countries treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in first-line setting between October 2018 and April 2022. At data cut-off (May 2022), 41.5% of patients were continuing first-line treatment, 5.5% were lost at follow up, and 53.0% of patients had progressive disease after first-line therapy. 51.5% of patients with progressive disease received a second-line treatment, while 48.5% didn't receive any subsequent therapy. Between patients receiving second-line treatment, 11.1% patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization, 21.0% received sorafenib, 35.4% underwent lenvatinib, and 32.5% were treated with other drugs. RESULTS: lenvatinib second-line subgroup achieved a median overall survival (mOS) of 18.9 months, significative longer (p = 0.01; HR: 2.24) compared to sorafenib subgroup that reached a mOS of 14.3 months. The multivariate analysis highlighted Albumin-Bilirubin 1 grade [p < 0.01; hazard ratio (HR): 5.23] and lenvatinib second-line therapy (p = 0.01; HR: 2.18) as positive prognostic factors for OS. The forest plot highlighted a positive trend in terms of OS in favor of patients treated with lenvatinib second-line regardless of baseline characteristics before first-line therapy. CONCLUSION: these results suggest that, in patients with HCC progressed to first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, lenvatinib second-line therapy is associated to an improved survival compared to sorafenib.

Disease Etiology Impact on Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab: A Real-World, Multicenter Study.

Introduction: The impact of etiology on response to immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being debated, with contrasting findings between early and recent post hoc analyses of IMbrave-150 and metanalyses of clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 blockers. As a results, it is not clear whether the first-line systemic treatment atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B) is equally effective in viral and nonviral patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 885 HCC patients treated with the first-line A + B from multiple centers from Eastern and Western countries, 53.9% having viral and 46.1% nonviral etiology. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics were analyzed with uni- and multivariate models to explore potential differences on overall survival (OS), time-to-progression (TTP), disease control rates (DCRs) based on etiology and to identify putative prognostic factors in etiology subgroups. Treatment toxicities and access to the second-line treatments and outcomes were also reported and compared between etiologies. Results: Overall, no statistically significant differences were found in median OS (mOS: viral 15.9 months; nonviral 16.3 months), TTP (mTTP: viral 8.3 months; nonviral 7.2 months), and DCRs (viral 78.1%; nonviral 80.8%) based on etiology. Prognostic factors of survival and progression were mainly shared between viral and nonviral etiologies, including alpha-fetoprotein, aspartate transaminase, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and ALBI score. Exploratory analyses highlighted a possible stronger association of immunological factors, i.e., NLR and eosinophil count, to treatment outcomes in viral patients. The toxicity profile, the access to and type of the second-line treatments and their outcome in terms of OS almost overlap in the two etiology subgroups. Conclusion: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab efficacy does not vary according to underlying etiology of HCC in a multicenter, real-world population, matching recent post hoc findings from the IMbrave-150 trial. Preliminary analyses suggest that some prognostic factors differ between viral and nonviral patients, potentially due to biological and immunological differences. Prospective and comparative trials stratifying by etiology are warranted to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.

Artificial Intelligence-Powered Spatial Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as a Potential Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer.

PURPOSE: Recently, anti-programmed cell death-1/anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (anti-PD1/L1) immunotherapy has been demonstrated for its efficacy when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in randomized phase 3 trials for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, no biomarker predictive of benefit has been established for anti-PD1/L1 in BTC. Here, we evaluated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) using artificial intelligence-powered immune phenotype (AI-IP) analysis in advanced BTC treated with anti-PD1. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pretreatment hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images from 339 patients with advanced BTC who received anti-PD1 as second-line treatment or beyond, were employed for AI-IP analysis and correlative analysis between AI-IP and efficacy outcomes with anti-PD1. Next, data and images of the BTC cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were additionally analyzed to evaluate the transcriptomic and mutational characteristics of various AI-IP in BTC. RESULTS: Overall, AI-IP were classified as inflamed [high intratumoral TIL (iTIL)] in 40 patients (11.8%), immune-excluded (low iTIL and high stromal TIL) in 167 patients (49.3%), and immune-desert (low TIL overall) in 132 patients (38.9%). The inflamed IP group showed a substantially higher overall response rate compared with the noninflamed IP groups (27.5% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly longer in the inflamed IP group than in the noninflamed IP group (OS, 12.6 vs. 5.1 months; P = 0.002; PFS, 4.5 vs. 1.9 months; P < 0.001). In the TCGA cohort analysis, the inflamed IP showed increased cytolytic activity scores and IFNγ signature compared with the noninflamed IP. CONCLUSIONS: AI-IP based on spatial TIL analysis was effective in predicting the efficacy outcomes in patients with BTC treated with anti-PD1 therapy. Further validation is necessary in the context of anti-PD1/L1 plus gemcitabine-cisplatin.

Clinical practice recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with solid cancer: a joint report from KSMO and KSP.

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.

Liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and S-1 as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NASOX): A multicenter phase I/IIa study.

INTRODUCTION: This multicenter phase I/IIa study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), oxaliplatin, and S-1 (NASOX) as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease, aged ≥ 19 years, with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. The primary endpoints were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I cohort and overall response rate (ORR) in the phase IIa cohort. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included patients who received the RP2D. RESULTS: In phase I, seven patients were screened, and six were assessed for DLT. None experienced DLT during the first cycle. The RP2D was determined as nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-7 every 14 days. For the ITT (N = 41; 7, and 34 from phases I and IIa, respectively), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (31.7 %), enterocolitis (9.8 %), anorexia (7.3 %), and diarrhea (2.4 %). The ORR was 58.5 % (1 complete, and 23 partial responses). Two underwent conversion surgery; both achieved R0 resection. With median follow-up of 17.5 months, median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 5.0-8.1) and median overall survival was 11.4 months (95 % CI, 9.8-15.5). CONCLUSION: NASOX exhibited a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy outcomes consistent with NALIRIFOX, showing potential to replace infusional 5-fluorouracil with oral S-1 in the triplet regimen.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: A large real-life worldwide population.

BACKGROUND: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a global multicenter retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes. METHODS: We included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin at 39 sites in 11 countries (Europe, the United States, and Asia). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 666 patients were enrolled. Median OS was 15.1 months and median PFS was 8.2 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 32.7 %, with stable disease in 45.2 % of patients. High baseline CEA levels, ECOG PS > 0, metastatic disease, and NLR > 3 were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 92.9 % of patients (grade >2: 46.6 %). Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 20.0 % (grade >2: 2.5 %). Three deaths (0.5 %) were deemed treatment-related, none linked to immunotherapy. Common irAEs were rash (8.2 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2), itching (10.3 % all grades; 0.2 % grade >2), and hypothyroidism (5.1 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2). Durvalumab discontinuation rate due to AEs was 1.5 %. ESMO-recommended genes were analyzed and no outcome differences were found. A comparative analysis with a historical cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone confirmed the positive survival impact of durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine. CONCLUSION: This first global real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.

Bintrafusp alfa and chemotherapy as first-line treatment in biliary tract cancer: A randomized phase 2/3 trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We compared the safety and efficacy of bintrafusp alfa (BA) in combination with gemcitabine+cisplatin (GemCis), to those of GemCis alone, in patients with biliary tract cancer. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive design phase 2/3 trial (NCT04066491) included adults who are treatment-naive with locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer. Patients (N = 297) were randomized to receive an IV infusion of BA (2400 mg once/3 wk) plus GemCis (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 +cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8/3 wk; 8 cycles) (BA group, n = 148) or placebo+GemCis (placebo group, n = 149). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). For adaptation analysis (phase 2-phase 3; data cutoff: May 20, 2021), efficacy was assessed in the first 150 patients who were antibiotic-naive when 80 progression-free survival events had occurred and ≥ 19 weeks of follow-up had been completed (BA, n = 73; placebo, n = 77). Median OS (95% CI) for the BA (11.5 mo [9.3-not estimable]) and placebo (11.5 mo [10.0-not estimable]) groups was comparable (hazard ration 1.23 [95% CI 0.66-2.28]; p = 0.7394); OS data maturity was 27.2% (41 events/151 patients). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was anemia (BA, 26.0%; placebo, 22.8%). Bleeding adverse events were reported more frequently in the BA group (28.8%) versus the placebo group (7.4%). Deaths within 60 days of the first dose were reported in 7.5% and 1.3% of patients in the BA and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BA+GemCis did not provide a clinically meaningful benefit compared with GemCis alone as first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer, and the study was discontinued early (terminated: August 20, 2021).

[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE plus long-acting octreotide versus high­dose long-acting octreotide for the treatment of newly diagnosed, advanced grade 2-3, well-differentiated, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-2): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: There are currently no standard first-line treatment options for patients with higher grade 2-3, well-differentiated, advanced, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (177Lu-Dotatate) treatment. METHODS: NETTER-2 was an open-label, randomised, parallel-group, superiority, phase 3 trial. We enrolled patients (aged ≥15 years) with newly diagnosed higher grade 2 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤20%) and grade 3 (Ki67 >20% and ≤55%), somatostatin receptor-positive (in all target lesions), advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from 45 centres across nine countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. We used interactive response technologies to randomly assign (2:1) patients to receive four cycles (cycle interval was 8 weeks ± 1 week) of intravenous 177Lu-Dotatate plus intramuscular octreotide 30 mg long-acting repeatable (LAR) then octreotide 30 mg LAR every 4 weeks (177Lu-Dotatate group) or high-dose octreotide 60 mg LAR every 4 weeks (control group), stratified by neuroendocrine tumour grade (2 vs 3) and origin (pancreas vs other). Tumour assessments were done at baseline, week 16, and week 24, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded, independent, central radiology assessment. We did the primary analysis at 101 progression-free survival events as the final progression-free survival analysis. NETTER-2 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03972488, and is active and not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Jan 22, 2020, and Oct 13, 2022, we screened 261 patients, 35 (13%) of whom were excluded. We randomly assigned 226 (87%) patients (121 [54%] male and 105 [46%] female) to the 177Lu-Dotatate group (n=151 [67%]) and control group (n=75 [33%]). Median progression-free survival was 8·5 months (95% CI 7·7-13·8) in the control group and 22·8 months (19·4-not estimated) in the 177Lu-Dotatate group (stratified hazard ratio 0·276 [0·182-0·418]; p<0·0001). During the treatment period, adverse events (of any grade) occurred in 136 (93%) of 147 treated patients in the 177Lu-Dotatate group and 69 (95%) of 73 treated patients in the control group. There were no study drug-related deaths during the treatment period. INTERPRETATION: First-line 177Lu-Dotatate plus octreotide LAR significantly extended median progression-free survival (by 14 months) in patients with grade 2 or 3 advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. 177Lu-Dotatate should be considered a new standard of care in first-line therapy in this population. FUNDING: Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company.

Expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical potential and efficacy in EGFR mutation subsets.

Our study aimed to expand tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from primary non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and evaluate their reactivity against tumor cells. We expanded TILs from 103 primary NSCLCs using histopathological analysis, flow cytometry, IFN-γ release assays, cell-mediated cytotoxicity assays, and in vivo efficacy tests. TIL expansion was observed in all cases, regardless of EGFR mutation status. There was also an increase in the median CD4+/CD8+ ratio during expansion. In post-rapid expansion protocol (REP) TILs, 13 out of 16 cases, including all three cases with EGFR mutations, exhibited a two-fold or greater increase in IFN-γ secretion. The cytotoxicity assay revealed enhanced tumor cell death in three of the seven cases, two of which had EGFR mutations. In vivo functional testing in a patient-derived xenograft model showed a reduction in tumor volume. The anti-tumor activity of post-REP TILs underscores their potential as a therapeutic option for advanced NSCLC, irrespective of mutation status.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Clinical outcomes of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have not been investigated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), despite well-established outcomes in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with LAPC who underwent curative resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 2017 and December 2020. RESULTS: Among 1,358 patients, 260 underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among 356 LAPC patients, 98 (27.5%) and 147 (35.1%) of 418 BRPC patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Compared to resectable pancreatic cancer (resectable PC) with upfront surgery, both LAPC and BRPC exhibited higher rates of venous resection (28.6% vs. 49.0% vs. 4.0%), arterial resection (30.6% vs. 6.8% vs. 0.5%) and greater estimated blood loss (260.5 vs. 213.1 vs. 70.4 mL). However, hospital stay, readmission rates, and postoperative pancreatic fistula rates (grade B or C) did not differ significantly between LAPC, BRPC, and resectable PC. Overall and relapse-free survival did not differ significantly between LAPC and BRPC patients. The median overall survival was 37.3 months for LAPC and 37.0 months for BRPC. The median relapse-free survival was 22.7 months for LAPC and 26.0 months for BRPC. CONCLUSION: Overall survival time and postoperative complications in LAPC patients who underwent curative resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed similar results to those of BRPC patients. Further research is needed to identify specific sub-populations of LAPC patients who benefit most from conversion surgery and to minimize postoperative complications.

Comparison of the different versions of NCCN guidelines for predicting margin-negative resection of pancreatic cancer in patients undergoing upfront surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the different versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for defining resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in predicting margin-negative (R0) resection, and to assess inter-reader agreement. METHODS: This retrospective study included 283 patients (mean age, 65.1 years ± 9.4 [SD]; 155 men) who underwent upfront pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2017 and 2019. Two radiologists independently determined the resectability on preoperative CT according to the 2017, 2019, and 2020 NCCN guidelines. The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: R0 resection was accomplished in 239 patients (84.5%). The sensitivity and specificity averaged across two readers were, respectively, 76.6% and 29.5% for the 2020 guidelines, 74.1% and 32.9% for the 2019 guidelines, and 72.6% and 34.1% for the 2017 guidelines. Compared with the 2020 guidelines, both 2019 and 2017 guidelines showed significantly lower sensitivity for R0 resection (p ≤ .009). Specificity was significantly higher with the 2017 guidelines (p = .043) than with the 2020 guidelines. Inter-reader agreements for determining the resectability of PDCA were strong (k ≥ 0.83) with all guidelines, being highest with the 2020 guidelines (k = 0.91). CONCLUSION: The 2020 NCCN guidelines showed significantly higher sensitivity for prediction of R0 resection than the 2017 and 2019 guidelines.

Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of Response to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify clinical and radiologic characteristics that could predict response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 108 advanced HCC patients with intrahepatic lesions who were treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Two radiologists independently analyzed imaging characteristics of the index tumor on pretreatment computed tomography. Predictive factors associated with progressive disease (PD) at the best response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, ver. 1.1 were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 108 patients with a median PFS of 15 weeks, 40 (37.0%) had PD during treatment. Factors associated with PD included the presence of extrahepatic metastases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 14.35; p=0.03), the infiltrative appearance of the tumor (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.05 to 8.93; p=0.04), and the absence of arterial-phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (aOR, 6.34; 95% CI, 2.18 to 18.47; p < 0.001). Patients with two or more of these factors had a PD of 66.7% and a median PFS of 8 weeks, indicating a significantly worse outcome compared to the patients with one or no of these factors. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment, the absence of APHE, infiltrative appearance of the intrahepatic tumor, and presence of extrahepatic metastases were associated with poor response and survival. Evaluation of early response may be necessary in patients with these factors.

Incidence and Predictors of Esophagogastric Varices Bleeding in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Lenvatinib.

Introduction: Lenvatinib is indicated for the forefront treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC), but its use may be limited by the risk of esophagogastric varices (EGV) bleeding. This study assessed the prevalence, predictors, and complications of EGV in aHCC patients treated with lenvatinib. Methods: In this multicenter international retrospective study, cirrhotic patients treated with lenvatinib for aHCC, were enrolled if upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy was available within 6 months before treatment. Primary endpoint was the incidence of EGV bleeding during lenvatinib therapy; secondary endpoints were predictors for EGV bleeding, prevalence, and risk factors for the presence of EGV and high-risk EGV at baseline, as well as impact of EGV bleeding on patients' survival. Results: 535 patients were enrolled in the study (median age: 72 years, 78% male, 63% viral etiology, 89% Child-Pugh A, 16% neoplastic portal vein thrombosis [nPVT], 56% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-C): 234 had EGV (44%), 70 (30%) were at high risk and 59 were on primary prophylaxis. During lenvatinib treatment, 17 patients bled from EGV (3 grade 5), the 12-month cumulative incidence being 3%. The only baseline independent predictor of EGV bleeding was the presence of baseline high-risk EGV (hazard ratio: 6.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.23-21.57, p = 0.001). In these patients the 12-month risk was 17%. High-risk varices were independently associated with Child-Pugh B score (odds ratio [OR]: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.08-4.17, p = 0.03), nPVT (OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.40-4.61, p = 0.002), and platelets <150,000/µL (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.35-4.50, p = 0.003). Conclusion: In hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib, the risk of EGV bleeding was mostly low but significant only in patients with high-risk EGV at baseline.

Clinical and Biomarker Analysis of a Phase I/II Study of PDR001 Plus Imatinib for Advanced Treatment-Refractory Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

PURPOSE: In this phase Ib/II study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PDR001, an anti-PD1 antibody, in combination with imatinib in patients with treatment-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced GIST whose disease had progressed on imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib were enrolled. In phase Ib, the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme was applied. Intravenous administration of PDR001 at 400 mg for every 4 weeks plus imatinib (300 and 400 mg daily for dose levels I and II, respectively) was given. The primary outcome for phase II was the disease control rate at 12 weeks. Exploratory biomarker analysis was performed based on PDL1 IHC, next-generation sequencing, and multiplexed IHC. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the phase Ib part (n = 10), and dose level II was selected as the recommended phase II dose. In the phase II part (n = 29), there was no objective response, and the disease control rate at 12 weeks was 37.9%, not meeting the primary efficacy endpoint. For patients in phase Ib-dose level II and phase II (n = 36), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 2.3 and 9.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse event was anemia. Exploratory biomarker analysis indicated that a higher CD8+ T-cell density was associated with a favorable PFS but to a limited degree. Tumor mutational burden and PDL1 were not associated with better PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with treatment-refractory GIST, PDR001 in combination with imatinib was generally tolerable, but it was not effective.

CX-4945 (Silmitasertib) Induces Cell Death by Impairing Lysosomal Utilization in KRAS Mutant Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Lines.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Macropinocytosis is a non-selective form of endocytosis that facilitates the uptake of extracellular substances, such as nutrients and macromolecules, into the cells. In KRAS-driven cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, macropinocytosis and subsequent lysosomal utilization are known to be enhanced to overcome metabolic stress. In this study, we investigated the role of Casein Kinase 2 (CK2) inhibition in macropinocytosis and subsequent metabolic processes in KRAS mutant cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bovine serum albumin (BSA) uptake indicating macropinocytosis was performed by flow cytometry using the HuCCT1 KRAS mutant CCA cell line. To validate macropinosome, the Rab7 and LAMP2 were labeled and analyzed via immunocytochemistry and western blot. The CX-4945 (Silmitasertib), CK2 inhibitor, was used to investigate the role of CK2 in macropinocytosis and subsequent lysosomal metabolism. RESULTS: The TFK-1, a KRAS wild-type CCA cell line, showed only apoptotic morphological changes. However, the HuCCT1 cell line showed macropinocytosis. Although CX-4945 induced morphological changes accompanied by the accumulation of intracellular vacuoles and cell death, the level of macropinocytosis did not change. These intracellular vacuoles were identified as late macropinosomes, representing Rab7+ vesicles before fusion with lysosomes. In addition, CX-4945 suppressed LAMP2 expression following the inhibition of the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway, which interrupts mature macropinosome and lysosomal metabolic utilization. CONCLUSION: Macropinocytosis is used as an energy source in the KRAS mutant CCA cell line HuCCT1. The inhibition of CK2 by CX-4945 leads to cell death in HuCCT1 cells through alteration of the lysosome-dependent metabolism.