RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the long-term effectiveness, safety, and factors affecting Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) improvement during abatacept treatment in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: The ORIGAMI study is an ongoing observational study of biologic-naïve RA patients with moderate disease activity treated with subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg, once-weekly). Patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were extracted from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry as an historical, weighted control group. The primary endpoint for this interim analysis was the proportion of patients with J-HAQ remission (score ≤0.5) at 3 years. RESULTS: Among 279 abatacept-treated and 220 csDMARD-treated patients, J-HAQ remission was achieved at 3 years in 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.7%-46.2%) and 28.9% (95% CI 9.9%-47.8%), respectively. Age, RA duration <1 year, baseline J-HAQ score, and Simplified Disease Activity Index remission at 6 months were associated with 3-year J-HAQ remission in the abatacept group. Overall, 24/298 patients (8.1%; safety analysis set) experienced serious adverse drug reactions with an incidence of 5.3 per 100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the 3-year effectiveness and safety, and revealed potential factors associated with J-HAQ remission in biologic-naïve RA patients treated with abatacept in real-world clinical practice.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the effects of age on clinical characteristics and outcomes in biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD)-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We analysed the cases of 234 Japanese b/tsDMARD-naïve RA patients who underwent b/tsDMARD treatment in a multicentre ultrasound prospective observational cohort. We compared the clinical characteristics at baseline and outcomes at 12 months between those aged ≥60 years and those <60 years. RESULTS: Compared to the <60-year-old group (n = 78), the ≥60-year-old group (n = 156) had higher inflammatory marker values and ultrasound combined scores, especially wrist joints, at baseline. Age at baseline positively correlated significantly with the ultrasound scores at baseline; however, age was not a significant variable by the multiple regression analysis. The patients treated with different MOAs in the ≥60-year-old group had comparable outcomes and multiple regression analysis revealed that mechanism of action (MOA) was not a significant contributor to the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients with advanced age demonstrated distinctive clinical characteristics. The MOAs were not associated with clinical outcomes and ultrasound outcomes in RA patients with advanced age.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Glucocorticoids are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when used appropriately considering the balance of the risks and benefits, especially at low doses. We aimed to evaluate the response of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients having already been treated with glucocorticoids. METHODS: We reviewed RA patients treated with b/tsDMARDs in a prospective multicenter ultrasound cohort study. We compared the differences in the clinical characteristics at baseline and outcomes at 12 months between the two groups having been treated with and without glucocorticoids at baseline. The differences in the clinical characteristics and the treatments were balanced by the inverse probability weighting (IPW) with the propensity score. RESULTS: Of 307 patients with RA, 160 patients were treated with glucocorticoids at baseline. The median dose of glucocorticoids was equivalent to 5.0 mg/day of prednisolone. Significant differences were in age and concomitant methotrexate use, composite measures for the disease activity, and the ultrasound grayscale score at baseline. Patients treated with glucocorticoids had less frequent remissions defined by composite measures and ultrasound findings than those treated without glucocorticoids. These significant differences in the achievement of remissions remained robust even after adjusting differences in the clinical characteristics and the treatments between the two groups by IPW. CONCLUSION: RA patients treated with glucocorticoids had a higher disease activity at baseline and a poorer response to treatments with b/tsDMARDs than those without glucocorticoids. The states of patients requiring glucocorticoids might be associated with the poor response to the b/tsDMARDs.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Humanos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim is to evaluate outcomes and risk factors for death in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who developed Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). METHODS: We included RA patients who were diagnosed with PCP at seven participating community hospitals between July 2005 and October 2020. Clinical features were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) before PCP onset and after PCP recovery were also examined. RESULTS: Seventy RA patients developed PCP, and among them, 60 (85.7%) received methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy (40%) or MTX combination therapy with other DMARDs (45.7%). PCP was more likely to occur after 12 months of MTX monotherapy and within 3 months of MTX combination therapy. Thirteen patients (18.6%) died despite PCP treatment. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that coexisting RA-associated interstitial lung disease (odds ratio, 6.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-32.63) and delayed PCP treatment with anti-Pneumocystis drugs (odds ratio, 15.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-156.15) are significant risk factors for PCP mortality in RA patients. Most survivors successfully resumed DMARD therapy without PCP prophylaxis; one recurrent PCP case was observed during follow-up (median, 4.1 years). CONCLUSIONS: To avoid a treatment delay, RA patients should be followed up for signs and symptoms of PCP development, especially those with RA-associated interstitial lung disease.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis , Humanos , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/complicações , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Metotrexato , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/complicações , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We performed post-hoc analyses of the ORIGAMI study to investigate whether concomitant methotrexate (MTX) influences the clinical outcomes of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Enrolled patients (n = 325) were divided into two groups according to whether abatacept was prescribed without (MTX-) or with (MTX+) concomitant MTX. We compared the changes in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), and Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) through to 52 weeks of treatment, the abatacept retention rate, and safety. RESULTS: At Week 52, the mean SDAI (8.9 vs. 8.8), DAS28-CRP (2.6 vs. 2.6), and J-HAQ (0.92 vs. 0.91) scores were comparable in the MTX- (n = 129) and MTX+ (n = 150) groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed no significant association between MTX use and SDAI (low disease activity) or J-HAQ (minimum clinically important difference). The abatacept retention rates, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, were 73.2% and 66.7% in the MTX- and MTX+ groups, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 47.5% (of 139) and 52.2% (of 159) of patients in the MTX- and MTX+ groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of abatacept appeared comparable with or without concomitant MTX in this real-world clinical setting.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Produtos Biológicos , Humanos , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Abatacepte/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
ABSTRACT: We evaluated the effect of abatacept treatment on osteoclast-related biomarkers and explored whether the biomarkers are associated with the therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with abatacept.We enrolled 44 RA patients treated with abatacept from a multicenter prospective ultrasound cohort study of patients who received biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. We evaluated the disease activity score (DAS) 28-CRP (C-reactive protein), musculoskeletal ultrasound scores including the total grayscale score (GS)/power Doppler (PD) score and the serum concentrations of isoform 5b of tartrate-resistant acid phosphate (TRACP-5b) and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (sRANKL) at baseline and at 3 and 6âmonths of treatment. "PD responder" was defined as a patient whose Δtotal PD score over 6âmonths was greater than the median change of that.Abatacept significantly improved DAS28-CRP as well as the total GS/PD score over 6âmonths. Serum TRACP-5b was significantly elevated and serum sRANKL was significantly decreased at 6âmonths (Pâ<â.0001 and Pâ<â.01, respectively). At 6âmonths, serum sRANKL was significantly decreased in the patients who achieved DAS28-CRP remission and the PD responders but not in those who did not. However, serum TRACP-5b rose regardless of the therapeutic response.Among RA patients treated with abatacept, serum sRANKL decreased in the patients with a good therapeutic response, but serum TRACP-5b elevated paradoxically regardless of the therapeutic response.
Assuntos
Abatacepte/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoclastos/efeitos dos fármacos , Abatacepte/farmacologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antirreumáticos/farmacologia , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Ligante RANK/biossíntese , Indução de Remissão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fosfatase Ácida Resistente a Tartarato/biossínteseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of treatment on serum bone biomarkers and explore whether serum bone biomarkers are associated with therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with abatacept. METHODS: We enrolled 59 RA patients treated with abatacept from a multicenter, exploratory, short-term, prospective and observational ultrasound cohort study of patients who received biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. We evaluated the patients' clinical disease activity and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) scores. The serum concentrations of five bone biomarkers were evaluated (dickkopf-1 [Dkk-1], sclerostin [SOST], osteocalcin [OC], osteopontin [OPN], and osteoprotegerin [OPG]) by multiplex bead assays at baseline, 3, and 6 months: the change over 6 months was defined as the Δ value. 'Power Doppler (PD) responder' was defined as a patient whose Δtotal PD score over 6 months was greater than the median change. RESULTS: Abatacept significantly improved the clinical disease activity and MSUS score over 6 months. Serum OPG was significantly elevated at 6 months after the abatacept introduction (p = 0.016). The ΔSOST and ΔOPG were significantly greater in the PD responders versus the non-PD responders (p = 0.0041 and 0.0073, respectively). The serum Dkk-1 at baseline was significantly lower in the PD responders (n = 30) vs. the non-PD responders (n = 29) (p = 0.026). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the serum Dkk-1 at baseline (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.91, p = 0.043) was an independent predictor of PD responder status. CONCLUSION: Serum levels of bone biomarkers may be useful for predicting RA patients' therapeutic responses to abatacept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of the registry: Assessment of therapeutic responsiveness by imaging of the joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; A observational cohort study Trial registration number: UMIN000012524 Date of registration: 12/9/2013 URL of trial registry record: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000014657.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Abatacepte/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Japão , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare effectiveness between tofacitinib and tocilizumab treatments for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve patients or previous bDMARD-failure patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: We used two ongoing real-world registries of patients with RA who had first started tofacitinib or tocilizumab between August 2013 and February 2019 at our institutions. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI)-based improvements at 12 months were used for comparisons between tofacitinib and tocilizumab treatments, separately for bDMARD-naïve and previous bDMARD-failure patients. RESULTS: A total of 464 patients with RA with high or moderate CDAI were enrolled (247 with tofacitinib and 217 with tocilizumab). After adjustments for treatment-selection bias by propensity score matching, we showed that tofacitinib was more likely to induce and maintain ≥85% improvement in CDAI (CDAI85), CDAI70 and remission at 12 months compared with tocilizumab in bDMARD-naïve patients. After adjusting for concurrent use of MTX and prednisolone, the ORs of tofacitinib versus tocilizumab were 3.88 (95% CI 1.87 to 8.03) for CDAI85, 2.89 (95% CI 1.43 to 5.84) for CDAI70 and 3.31 (95% CI 1.69 to 6.48) for remission. These effects were not observed in bDMARD-failure patients. In tofacitinib treatment for bDMARD-failure patients, the number of previously failed bDMARD classes was not associated with CDAI-based improvements. The rate of overall adverse events was similar between both treatments. Similar ORs were obtained from patients adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with tocilizumab, tofacitinib can induce greater improvements during the first 12-month treatment in bDMARD-naïve patients, but this difference was not observed in previous bDMARD-failure patients.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Produtos Biológicos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Piperidinas , PirimidinasRESUMO
ABSTRACT: We aimed to evaluate the utility of a simplified ultrasonography (US) scoring system, which is desired in daily clinical practice, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).A total of 289 Japanese patients with RA who were started on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, abatacept, tocilizumab, or Janus kinase inhibitors between June 2013 and April 2019 at one of the 15 participating rheumatology centers were reviewed. We performed US assessment of articular synovia over 22 joints among bilateral wrist and finger joints, and the 22-joint (22j)-GS and 22-joint (22j)-PD scores were evaluated as an indicator of US activity using the sum of the GS and PD scores, respectively.The top 6 most affected joints included the bilateral wrist and second/third metacarpophalangeal joints. Therefore, 6-joint (6j)-GS and -PD scores were defined as the sum of the GS and PD scores from the 6 synovial sites over the aforementioned 6 joints, respectively. Although the 22j- or 6j-US scores were significantly correlated with DAS28-ESR or -CRP scores, the correlations were weak. Conversely, 6j-US scores were significantly and strongly correlated with 22j-US scores not only at baseline but also after therapy initiation.Using a multicenter cohort data, our results indicated that a simplified US scoring system could be adequately tolerated during any disease course among patients with RA receiving biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/classificação , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Ultrassonografia/normasRESUMO
To compare therapeutic efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) cyclers and non-TNFi switchers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) having inadequate response to previous TNFis (TNF-IR patients) using composite measures including imaging assessment with power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS). Patients with RA who had inadequate response to one or more previous TNFi agents with moderate or higher disease activity were enrolled. The outcomes of 56 TNF-IR patients were analysed. Patients were divided into 19 TNFi cyclers and 37 non-TNFi switchers (16 abatacept [ABT] and 21 tocilizumab [TCZ] switchers). Retention ratio at 6 months was significantly higher in non-TNFi switchers than in TNFi cyclers (p < .05). Although there was no significant difference, non-TNFi switchers tended to have a larger decrease than TNFi cyclers in efficacy indicators based on clinical disease activity index and PDUS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a following independent factor associated with both EULAR good response and retention of a biologic agent: non-TNFi switch (p < .05 for both). Non-TNFi switchers were shown to have significantly higher percentage of EULAR good response and higher retention than TNFi cyclers. A non-TNFi biologic agent may hence be a preferential next-line treatment for TNF-IR patients.
Assuntos
Abatacepte/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Substituição de Medicamentos , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/administração & dosagem , Ultrassonografia , Abatacepte/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare retention of tocilizumab (TCZ) as monotherapy vs combination therapy with MTX in RA patients achieving clinical improvements during the first year. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cohort study using a real-life registry containing RA patients who had begun TCZ with or without MTX between April 2008 and November 2016. Among patients with ≥50% improvement of clinical disease activity index (CDAI) during the first year (CDAI50 responders), we evaluated whether MTX use may have affected TCZ discontinuation during the second and subsequent years (maintenance therapy). RESULTS: Among 510 patients with high or moderate CDAI, 328 (64.3%) were CDAI50 responders. The rate of MTX use was 53.0% among responders and 54.4% among non-responders. During maintenance therapy (mean follow-up 30.7 months), 43.9% of CDAI50 responders discontinued TCZ. The most common cause was efficacy loss followed by adverse events. Kaplan-Meier estimates for TCZ retention were 48.3 months (95% CI 42.0, 54.5) for monotherapy and 50.0 months (95% CI 45.9, 54.0) for combination therapy. According to Gray's test, there was no significant impact of MTX use on cumulative incidence of efficacy loss or adverse events. In the Fine-Gray competing risk regression model, CDAI >10 at the start of maintenance therapy and age were predictive factors for TCZ discontinuation due to efficacy loss (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% CI 1.41, 4.72) and adverse events (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.01, 1.08), respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in TCZ retention between monotherapy and combination therapy with MTX.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/métodos , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Indução de Remissão/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore the variables associated with initial favorable power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US) response induced by biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We have been prospectively investigating the course of active RA patients using US after the introduction of b/tsDMARDs in the Kyushu region of Japan since June 2013. A total of 150 patients have completed the first 6 months of observation at present and have been evaluated. US was assessed in 22 joints of bilateral hands using gray-scale and PD images on a scale from 0-3. The sum of these scores was used as the indicator of US disease activity. We defined PD remission as attaining a total PD score of 0 at 6 months and investigated the associated variables by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The total PD and gray-scale scores and the clinical composite measures significantly improved at 6 months, whereas these reductions were less in bDMARD switchers as compared with bDMARD-naive patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that short disease duration, the absence of any previous use of bDMARDs, and low total PD scores at baseline were independent predictors of PD remission at 6 months. CONCLUSION: This present prospective US cohort has for the first time shown the variables that are associated with initial PD response to b/tsDMARDs.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Articulação da Mão/efeitos dos fármacos , Articulação da Mão/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/imunologia , Substituição de Medicamentos , Feminino , Articulação da Mão/imunologia , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução de Remissão , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objective This study was designed to directly compare the outcomes of tofacitinib therapy for methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) between biologic-naïve patients and patients who had experienced an inadequate response to biological agents. Methods We prospectively enrolled and followed 113 patients who had a high or moderate clinical disease activity index (CDAI) (36 biologic-naïve patients and 77 biologic-experienced patients). Patients received 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily. Effectiveness and adverse events were examined at month 6 of treatment. Results At month 6, 65 patients (57.5%) reached CDAI50, which is defined as achieving ≥50% improvement. The number of previous biological agents was twice as high in CDAI50 non-responders as in responders (2.2 versus 1.1, p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the type of previous agents or the reason for discontinuation. According to a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the previous use of biological agents [odds ratio (OR) 4.48, p=0.002] and the concurrent use of prednisolone (OR 2.40, p=0.047) were associated with a failure to achieve a CDAI 50 response. Biologic-naïve patients were more likely to achieve CDAI50 than biologic-experienced patients (80.6% versus 46.8%, p=0.001). Mean CDAI values were higher in biologic-experienced patients (11.4 versus 4.8, p=0.001), and remission rates were higher in biologic-naïve patients (41.7% versus 11.7%, p=0.001). Biologic-naïve patients more rapidly achieved remission. Rates of discontinuation resulting from adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusion Although tofacitinib can provide an effective treatment option for intractable RA patients, its impact on outcomes is lower in patients with previous biologic failure.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
This study was designed to determine the prevalence of renal dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to identify factors associated with this complication. Between October 2014 and May 2015, we consecutively recruited RA patients at rheumatology sections of community hospitals in Japan. Each patient's absolute and body surface area (BSA)-indexed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were measured twice over a 3-month interval. Renal dysfunction was defined as absolute eGFR or BSA-indexed eGFR < 60. Albuminuria and hematuria were also recorded. Associations between renal dysfunction and possible risk factors were examined by multivariate logistic regression analyses. A total of 1908 outpatients with RA were included in this study. The prevalence of renal dysfunction based on absolute eGFR and BSA-indexed eGFR was 33.8 and 18.6%, respectively. Albuminuria was observed in 8.1% of this patient cohort, and the prevalence of hematuria was 7.5%. Advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 7.24, p < 0.001), female sex (OR 3.12, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR 2.22, p < 0.001), and obesity (OR 0.59, p < 0.001) were independently associated with the risk of absolute eGFR-based renal dysfunction. Advanced age (OR 5.19, p < 0.001) and hypertension (OR 3.05, p < 0.001) also had associations with BSA-indexed eGFR-based renal dysfunction. RA duration, stages, severity, and cumulative steroid dose were considered significant risk factors in univariate analyses, but their associations were less potent after adjustment for other covariates. Renal dysfunction is relatively common in RA patients and is mainly associated with advanced age and hypertension but not with RA-related factors.
Assuntos
Albuminúria/epidemiologia , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Albuminúria/etiologia , Albuminúria/fisiopatologia , Artrite Reumatoide/fisiopatologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/etiologia , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Nefropatias/etiologia , Nefropatias/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Knowing the risk of hospitalized infection associated with individual biological agents is an important factor in selecting the best treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study examined the comparative risk of hospitalized infection between biological agents in a routine care setting. METHODS: We used data for all RA patients who had first begun biological therapy at rheumatology divisions of participating community hospitals in Japan between January 2009 and December 2014. New treatment episodes with etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, abatacept, or tocilizumab were included. Patients were allowed to contribute multiple treatment episodes with different biological agents. Incidence rates (IRs) of hospitalized infection during the first year of follow-up were examined. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for overall hospitalized infection and for pulmonary hospitalized infection, adjusting for possible confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1596 new treatment episodes were identified. The incidence of overall hospitalized infection during the first year was 86 with 1239 person-years (PYs), yielding a crude IR of 6.9 per 100 PYs (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-8.6). After correction for confounders, no significant difference in risk of hospitalized infection was observed between treatment groups: adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1.54 (0.78-3.04) for infliximab, 1.72 (0.88-3.34) for adalimumab, 1.11 (0.55-2.21) for abatacept, and 1.02 (0.55-1.87) for tocilizumab compared with etanercept. Patient-specific factors such as age, RA functional class, body mass index (BMI), prednisolone use, and chronic lung disease contributed more to the risk of hospitalized infection than specific biological agents. The incidence of pulmonary hospitalized infection was 50 and a crude IR of 4.0 per 100 PYs (95% CI, 3.1-5.3). After adjustment for confounders, adalimumab had a significantly higher HR for pulmonary hospitalized infection compared with tocilizumab: an adjusted HR (95% CI) was 4.43 (1.72-11.37) for adalimumab. BMI, prednisolone use, diabetes mellitus, and chronic lung disease were also significant factors associated with the risk of pulmonary hospitalized infection. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the risk of overall hospitalized infection was not determined by the type of biological agents, and patient-specific risk factors had more impact on the risk of hospitalized infection. For pulmonary hospitalized infections, the use of adalimumab was significantly associated with a greater risk of this complication than tocilizumab use.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Artrite Reumatoide/mortalidade , Demografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Severe myelosuppression is a serious concern in the management of rheumatic disease patients receiving methotrexate (MTX) therapy. This study was intended to explore factors associated with the development of MTX-related myelosuppression and its disease severity. METHODS: We retrospectively examined a total of 40 cases of MTX-related myelosuppression that had been filed in the registries of participating rheumatology and hematology divisions. Data before onset were compared with those of 120 controls matched for age and sex. Cytopenia was graded according to the National Cancer Institute criteria for adverse events. Data before and at onset were compared between the severe and non-severe groups. RESULTS: Non-use of folic acid supplements, concurrent medications, and low renal function were significantly associated with the development of myelosuppression (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). In addition, significantly lower MTX dosages, higher blood cell counts, and lower hemoglobin levels were seen in the myelosuppression group (p < 0.001). No patients exhibited leukocytopenia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia in routine blood monitoring taken within the past month. One-fourth developed myelosuppression within the first two months (an early-onset period). Myelosuppression was severe in approximately 40% of patients. Hypoalbuminemia and non-use of folic acid supplements were significantly associated with the severity of pancytopenia (p = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively). Besides these two factors, early onset and the use of lower doses of MTX were significantly associated with the severity of neutropenia (p = 0.003, 0.007, 0.003, and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Myelosuppression can occur abruptly at any time during low-dose MTX therapy, but severe neutropenia is more likely to occur in the early-onset period of this therapy. Contrary to our expectations, disease severity was not dependent on MTX doses. Serum albumin levels and folic acid supplementation are the important factors affecting the severity of MTX-related pancytopenia and neutropenia.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Hematológicas/etiologia , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Ácido Fólico/administração & dosagem , Doenças Hematológicas/sangue , Humanos , Hipoalbuminemia/sangue , Hipoalbuminemia/complicações , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/sangue , Neutropenia/etiologia , Pancitopenia/sangue , Pancitopenia/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Albumina Sérica/metabolismoAssuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Assessment of synovitis in the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints with ultrasound has been shown to improve the accuracy of assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the presence of intraarticular low-echoic synovial area (LESA) in the MTP joints in healthy subjects complicates the sonographic assessment of these joints. METHOD: Healthy subjects with no arthritic symptoms in their MTP joints were recruited. All subjects completed a questionnaire and underwent physical examination and sonographic assessment. LESAs in the dorsal aspect of all MTP joints were measured in the longitudinal view. RESULTS: One thousand non-arthritic MTP joints in 100 healthy subjects (female 73, mean age 41.0 years old) were evaluated. Measurable LESAs were identified in all joints assessed. Mean length of LESA in each of the 1st-5th MTP joints was 17.8, 13.9, 11.9, 10.6, and 9.2 mm, respectively, whereas mean thickness was 2.4, 2.4, 1.8, 1.2, and 0.8 mm, respectively. Multivariate linear regression models identified the difference between 1st and 5th MTP joints as the most independently influential factor on the measurement of LESA. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide the normal reference values for the measurements of LESA in Japanese, which should be taken into consideration when the synovitis in MTP joints is evaluated with ultrasound.
Assuntos
Articulação Metatarsofalângica/diagnóstico por imagem , Membrana Sinovial/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Físico , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The ability of the ImmuKnow (Cylex) assay to predict the risk of infection in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was examined. METHODS: The amount of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) produced by CD4+ cells in response to phytohemagglutinin was measured in whole blood from 117 RA patients without infection versus 17 RA patients with infection, and compared with results in 75 healthy controls. RESULTS: The mean ATP level was significantly lower in patients with infection compared to both healthy controls (P < 0.0005) and patients without infection (P = 0.040). Also, the mean ATP level in patients without infection was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (P = 0.012). There was no correlation between the ATP level and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints. CONCLUSION: ImmuKnow assay results may be effective in identifying RA patients at increased risk of infection, but the results showed no correlation with RA activity. Larger studies are required to establish the clinical advantages of this assay in RA treatment.
Assuntos
Trifosfato de Adenosina/sangue , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/metabolismo , Infecções/complicações , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/sangue , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Infecções/etiologia , Articulações/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fito-Hemaglutininas/farmacologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Risco , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of mizoribine (MZR) in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was retrospectively investigated in terms of drug survival, improvement in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28)-C-reactive protein (CRP), and blood MZR concentration obtained 3 h after dosing (MZR-C3). METHODS: To compare the efficacy of MZR administered via different regimens, the subjects were divided into 2 groups: those receiving a single dose of MZR at 100-150 mg every other day (group A) and those receiving 2 or 3 divided doses of the drug on consecutive days, which is the usual dosing method of the drug (group B). RESULTS: Group A had significantly higher MZR-C3 levels compared with group B, as well as significantly greater improvement in DAS28-CRP. Moreover, drug survival was significantly longer in group A. The primary regression equation suggested that the effective blood MZR concentration in RA treatment is MZR-C3 of 1.47 µg/mL or more. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that it is possible to increase the efficacy of MZR in a blood concentration-dependent manner, and also to control RA over a prolonged period, using single administration of MZR on alternate days at an increased dose.