Posterior Compression Test: a Provocative Test for Detecting Posterior Labral Tears.

Purpose: The purpose is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a provocative test coined as the 'posterior compression test' (PCT) in those with the suspected posterior labral tear or lesion. Methods: A total of 515 'arthroscopic labral repairs' were identified between April 2013 and September 2020. Excluding those with concomitant shoulder pathologies, and only including those with pre-operative documentation of the PCT and/or the Jerk test, 191 patients were included. For the purposes of the analyses, the patients were divided into 'non-posterior' labral tear group which included the anterior labral tears and/or the superior labral anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) tears, versus 'any posterior' labral tear group which included the isolated posterior labral tears, the SLAP tears with posterior extension and the pan-labral tears. Results: When the PCT was performed for the isolated posterior labral tears, the sensitivity was 92.6% with the specificity of 86.5%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 71.4-97%, respectively. The Jerk test's sensitivity was 77.8% but when the two tests were combined, the sensitivity increased up to 96.3%. The combined sensitivity with the Jerk test was still up to 94.6% with the AUC (area under curve) /ROC (receiver operator characteristic) at 0.855. Low 'false-positive' rate with the PCT was observed when the test was performed for the 'non-posterior' labral group, with the sensitivity of 13.5%. Conclusions: The posterior compression test correlated well with the arthroscopic diagnoses in a subset of patients with suspected posterior labral pathology, possibly by means of direct stimulation. Level of Evidence: III; Diagnostic Study.

Rotator cuff repairs with all-suture tape anchors: no difference in outcomes between with or without all-suture tape anchors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed at comparing the outcomes of medium- to large-sized rotator cuff repairs performed using the suture bridge technique either with or without tape-like sutures, and single row techniques with conventional sutures. METHODS: A total of 135 eligible patients with medium to large rotator cuff tears were identified and analyzed retrospectively, from 2017 to 2019. Only repairs using all-suture anchors were included in the study. Patients were divided into the following three groups: single-row (SR) repair (N = 50), standard double-row suture bridge (DRSB) repair with conventional sutures (N = 35), and DRSB with tape-like sutures (N = 50). The average postoperative follow-up period was 26.3 ± 9.8 months (range, 18-37). RESULTS: DRSB with tapes had the highest re-tear rate of 16% (8/50), but there was no significant difference with the re-tear rates observed in SR (8%, 4/50) and DRSB with conventional sutures (11.4%, 4/35) (n.s.). DRSB with tapes demonstrated higher rate of type 2 re-tears (10%) compared to type 1 re-tears (6%), but the other two groups showed either similar or higher rates of type 1 re-tears compared to that of type 2. Post-operative functional scores of the three groups improved significantly (all p < 0.05), but the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: No clinical difference in functional outcomes and re-tear rates were observed in DRSB with tapes when compared with SR and DRSB using the conventional sutures. Tape-like DRSB suture which was expected to be superior by its biomechanical advantage was clinically non-superior to conventional DRSB suture. There were no significant differences in VAS scores and UCLA scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Arthroscopic decompression of calcific tendinitis without cuff repair.

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of arthroscopic decompression of calcific tendinitis performed without repairing the rotator cuff defect. Methods: A total of 99 patients who underwent treatment between December 2013 and August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were reviewed pre- and postoperatively according to the location, size, physical characteristics, and radiological features of the calcific deposits. Additionally, the influence of any residual calcific deposits shown on postoperative radiographs was explored. The healing rate of the unrepaired cuff defect was determined by reviewing the 29 patients who had follow-up MRIs. Results: Statistically significant improvement from pre- to postoperation was seen in all VAS and ASES scores for each group, but no statistical differences were seen between the postoperative scores according to the differences in the features of the calcific deposits. When residual calcification was observed postoperatively, the mean ASES and VAS (rest) scores improved significantly to 95.0 (SD 5.6) and 0.0 (SD 0.0), respectively (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001), and did not differ from those who had the complete removal. Of 29 patients who had follow-up MRIs, six (20.7%) showed signs of an interstitial tear. This group's mean postoperative ASES and VAS (rest) scores improved to excellent levels of 96.0 (SD 3.7) and 0.0 (SD 0.0), respectively, and were similar to those of the 23 patients with normal MRI appearances. Conclusion: Arthroscopic removal of calcific deposits without repairing the rotator cuff defect resulted in significant improvement in function and pain level, regardless of the deposit's location, size, type, and whether or not complete excision was achieved. Despite leaving the defects unrepaired, in the limited number of patients with follow-up MRIs, 23 of 29 patients (79.3%) showed good healing, and the rest, who had persistent signs of interstitial defects on the MRIs, still had excellent outcomes. The removal of calcific deposits without repairing the cuff defects provided excellent outcomes.

The scissors sign: a provocative test for detecting the leading-edge tear of subscapularis tendon: a diagnostic study.

BACKGROUND: Several physical examination tests and signs have been described to aid in the diagnosis of subscapularis (SSC) tear, but have limitations and variable sensitivity. This study aimed to introduce a novel test for detecting a leading-edge tear of the subscapularis (LETS), the most important tendinous portion of SSC. METHODS: A total of 233 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for anterior and superior cuff tears between January 2018 to September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The provocative test we have coined as the "scissors sign" and the other related clinical tests (i.e., belly press, belly off, Napoleon, lift off, internal rotation lag, bear hug tests) were performed preoperatively. Whether the patient has a LETS or the complete tear of the SSC (CTS) was confirmed by arthroscopic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test. RESULTS: In patients who had LETS with or without supraspinatus tear, the scissors sign showed the highest sensitivity (91.4%) with a specificity of 81.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 80.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.1%. In patients with isolated LETS, the scissors sign also showed the highest sensitivity (90.3%) with a specificity of 81.6%, PPV of 57.1%, and NPV of 96.8%. The scissors sign for the complete tear of the subscapularis (CTS) with or without supraspinatus tear and the isolated CTS had a sensitivity of 73.1 and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The scissors sign is a novel provocative test that can be helpful in the diagnosis of subscapularis tears, especially LETS, with its high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. In combination with other tests, the scissors sign will be a good screening tool.

Antegrade Intramedullary Fixation for Clavicular Shaft Fracture: A Technical Trick.

SUMMARY: The standard open reduction and internal fixation technique with a plate and screws for a simple mid shaft clavicular fracture necessitates a relatively large incision and can also lead to variable amount of keloid scar formation. Historically, other techniques of more minimally invasive retrograde intramedullary fixation with the entry point posterolaterally on the shoulder have shown their own disadvantages and complications. We present a surgical technique of antegrade intramedullary fixation for mid shaft clavicular fractures and an illustrative case series.

Medialized vs. lateralized humeral implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the comparison of outcomes in pseudoparalysis with massive rotator cuff tear.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of lateralized humeral implants in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), it is still unclear whether this design will be as advantageous as the medialized humeral implants in the setting of pseudoparalysis (PP). METHODS: A total of 51 eligible RTSA cases for PP signs due to massive rotator cuff deficiency were selected for the retrospective review. Twenty-five patients were allocated to group L in which the isolated humeral side lateralization was performed (neck-shaft angle of 145°), and 26 patients were allocated to group M (neck-shaft angle of 155°). Pre- and postoperative radiologic measurements including critical shoulder angle, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), lateral humeral offset (LHO), and deltoid wrapping offset (DWO), as well as range of motion (ROM) and clinical outcome scores, were compared. The mean age was 71.0 ± 6.5 years for group L and 70.3 ± 7.0 years for group M, and the overall mean follow-up period was 49.0 ± 13.5 months (range, 25.7-68.9). RESULTS: The preoperative radiologic measurements were similar, but the postoperative LHO and DWO were significantly larger for group L, whereas the postoperative AHD was larger for group M compared with group L, with the values being 39.8 ± 9.7 mm and 33.6 ± 10.4 mm, respectively (P = .034). For the ROM, active forward elevation did improve significantly for both, starting preoperatively with the active ranges of 39° ± 19° (passively 153° ± 24°) for group L and 42° ± 18° (passively 156° ± 11°) for group M-the final postoperative active ranges being 142° ± 16° and 133° ± 33°, respectively, without significant difference between the groups (P = .426). The postoperative recovery of PP for group L was 100% (25 of 25), whereas for group M, it was 96.2% (25 of 26). The final visual analog scale (VAS) scores and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores improved significantly for both groups, but the differences between the groups at the final assessments were insignificant. The 4 complications were periprosthetic fracture, acromial stress fracture, periprosthetic joint infection, and neuropraxia, all of which were in group M, and scapular notching with higher grades were more prevalent for group M (26.9%, 7 of 26). CONCLUSIONS: With RTSA, good outcomes and recovery were achieved in most cases of PP. The postoperative active elevation range and functional outcomes were not affected by medialization or lateralization of the humeral implant. Earlier recovery of motion was observed with the lateralized group, but no significant differences were seen in the final ROM between the groups.

Retracted Rotator Cuff Repairs Heal With Disorganized Fibrogenesis Without Affecting Biomechanical Properties: A Comparative Animal Model Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the differences in the scar tissue formation during the healing of the repaired retracted cuff tear from that of the nonretracted tear. METHODS: Eighteen right rabbit shoulders received a 1-cm transverse cuff incision over the footprint to simulate "nonretracted cuff tears" before the transosseous repairs (group A). A 1-cm tendinous portion was excised from 18 left shoulders to create defects to simulate "retracted cuff tears" before repairing the defects (group B). At week 12 postrepair, 20 and 16 shoulders underwent histologic and biomechanical analyses, respectively. Eight shoulders were used as a control group for biomechanical analyses. RESULTS: All specimens showed good healing and continuity of the repaired tendons. At low magnification, fibrous tissue firmly held the tendon-to-bone junctions in group A; however, all specimens in group B showed medially retracted tendons with fibrous tissue continuity between the tendon stumps and footprints. At medium magnification, more irregular collagen fiber orientation was observed in group B. Polarized light microscopy showed fibrous tissue continuity with medially retracted tendons in group B. When we quantified collagen fiber orientation using ImageJ software, group B had inferior grayscale measurements when compared with group A (P = .001). At week 12, no statistical differences existed in mean loads-to-failure at the repair sites between the groups (P = .783). CONCLUSIONS: In the nonretracted cuff tears, fibrous tissue bound the tendon-to-bone junction with healing. After the healing of the retracted cuff tears, continuity of nontendinous tissue was observed adjacent to the medially retracted tendon, which comprised more disorganized immature fibrous tissue than that in the nonretracted cuff tears. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Unlike the healing of nonretracted rotator cuff tear, repairing of the "retracted" tendon end of cuff tear still resulted in retraction of the tendon back to its original position but being held down with fibrous tissue to the footprint.

Nontendinous healing after repairing of retracted rotator cuff tear: an imaging study.

BACKGROUND: Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after rotator cuff repair can sometimes demonstrate healing with nontendinous tissue that extends from the footprint to the retracted tendon end, which is inferred as fibrous tissue formation. The aim was to investigate this particular finding and its significance. METHODS: There were 494 eligible cases of healed supero-posterior medium-sized to massive rotator cuff repairs, after the exclusion of retears. A retrospective review was performed for the 3 groups that were divided according to their MRI appearances of healing: type I described the direct healing of the tendon to the footprint, whereas type II demonstrated the distinctive continuity of nontendinous tissue from the footprint to the retracted tendinous portion, and type III also showed a similar appearance but with obvious thinning of the tissue, without any evidence of defect confirmed on the routine outpatient ultrasonograph. RESULTS: Only 108 of 494 patients (21.9%) demonstrated type I healing, whereas the signs of nontendinous healing were evident for the rest, with the 116 patients (23.5%) being classified as type III with attenuation. Comparing the preoperative tendon retraction, 34.8% and 37.2% of the Patte stages 2 and 3, respectively, resulted in type III healing, which were significantly higher compared with that of stage 1 (15.3%, P < .001). Type III healing had the highest average preoperative Goutallier grades. The average postoperative visual analog scale and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores have improved significantly for all 3 groups (P < .05), with the ASES score being 86.1±15.9 for type I, 93.7±36.1 for type II, and 87.8±15.1 for type III without significant differences between the groups (P = .3). CONCLUSIONS: Only a fifth of the rotator cuff repairs led to a direct healing to the footprint, and the rest healed with MRI appearance of nontendinous tissue formation bridging the retracted tendinous portion and the footprint. These MRI appearances did not represent the true tendinous tissue formation between the torn end of the tendon and the bone after healing. Such appearances did not seem to affect the clinical outcomes.

Biceps Rerouting for Semirigid Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with biceps rerouting (BR) and those of conventional repair for semirigid, large-to-massive rotator cuff tear. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of 111 patients who underwent either ARCR + BR (n = 59, group 1) or only ARCR (n = 52, group 2) for semirigid, large-to-massive rotator cuff tear between January 2016 and December 2018. We comparatively analyzed both groups with respect to preoperative factors including concomitant lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive variables for occurrence of retear after ARCR + BR. RESULTS: Mean age of groups 1 and 2 were 62.8 and 63.7 years, respectively (P = .484). Mean follow-up period in groups 1 and 2 were 15.1 and 25.1 months, respectively (P = .102). Mean range of motion and functional scores improved significantly (P < .05) and comparably (P > .05) in both groups. In total, 11 (18.6%) and 25 (48.1%) patients from groups 1 and 2, respectively, showed retear of the repaired rotator cuff at final follow-up (P < .01). Of 45 group 1 patients who showed less than 50% partial tearing of the LHBT preoperatively, 6 (13.3%) experienced retear. Comparatively, of 14 patients with partial tearing involving more than 50% of the LHBT, 5 (35.7%) suffered postoperative retear. If the patients had partial tear involving more than 50% of LHBT preoperatively, the odds ratio (OR) to have retear was 4.222 (P = .037). Wider (OR, 1.445, P = .047) and thinner (OR, 0.166, P = .019) LHBT were the prognostic factors to have retear. Three (5.1%) group 1 patients showed the Popeye deformity at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ARCR + BR for semirigid, large-to-massive rotator cuff tears effectively improved clinical and structural outcomes as also shown in the conventional repairs. However, the retear rate was significantly lower in patients who underwent ARCR + BR than those treated conventionally. Partial tearing involving more than 50% of the LHBT and wide and/or thin tendon morphology were significant risk factors for postoperative occurrence of retear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative trial.

Effects of comorbidities on the outcomes of manipulation under anesthesia for primary stiff shoulder.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the effects of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for primary stiff shoulder when different comorbidities are present are lacking. Our aim was to assess how comorbidities influence the recovery speed and clinical outcomes after MUA. METHODS: Between April 2013 and September 2018, 281 consecutive primary stiff shoulders in the frozen phase treated with MUA were included in this study. We investigated the comorbidities of patients and divided them into the control (n = 203), diabetes mellitus (DM) (n = 32), hyperlipidemia (n = 26), and thyroid disorder (n = 20) groups. The range of motion (ROM) and clinical scores for each group before MUA and 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months after MUA were comparatively analyzed. We identified the ROM recovery time after MUA and the responsiveness to MUA. Then, subjects were subdivided into early and late recovery groups based on their recovery time and into successful and nonsuccessful MUA groups based on their responsiveness to MUA. RESULTS: Significant improvements in ROM and clinical scores at 3 months after MUA were observed in all groups. Significant differences in ROM among the 4 groups were also observed during follow-up (P < .05). The DM group had significantly lower ROM values, even at 3 months after MUA, compared with the control group. The ROM recovery speed after MUA was slowest in the DM group, followed by the thyroid disorder, hyperlipidemia, and control groups. Most (90.6%) of the DM group experienced late recovery. The proportion of nonsuccessful MUA was higher in the DM and thyroid disorder groups than that in the control and hyperlipidemia groups (P = .004). During follow-up, there were no differences among groups regarding the visual analog scale, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder, and Constant scores. CONCLUSION: The ROM recovery speed and responsiveness to MUA for primary stiff shoulder were poorer for the DM and thyroid disorder groups than for the control group. In particular, compared with any other disease, outcomes were poorer when the comorbidity was DM. If patients have comorbidities, then they should be informed before MUA that the comorbidity could affect the outcomes of treatment.

Functional and radiologic outcomes of uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humeral fractures: cementing the humeral component is not necessary.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the radiologic and functional outcomes of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humeral fractures and to assess whether the uncemented humeral components put them at risk for early loosening and failure. METHODS: Thirty-three patients were identified in our hospital database (January 2004-December 2012). Twenty patients were assessed using American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Up-to-date shoulder radiographs were evaluated for evidence of radiologic loosening. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 3.0 years (range, 2.5-7.8 years), and the mean age at the time of surgery was 76.5 years (range, 62-87 years). The mean ASES was 75.9 of 100 (range, 55-98.3), with a mean visual analog scale pain score of 2 of 10. The mean OSS was 42.5 of 48 (range, 35-48), and the mean CSS was 54.1 of 100 (range, 32-72). Upon radiographic assessment of the humeral component, 6 patients (30%) had 3 or more lucent zones, and 12 patients (60%) had a lucent zone measuring more than 2 mm in width; however, only 2 patients (10%) had 3 or more lucent zones measuring 2 mm or more in width and were identified as "at risk of loosening." No patients had tilt or subsidence of the humeral prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated satisfactory functional and radiologic outcomes of patients compared with other studies, suggesting that RSA is a good management option for elderly patients with these fractures. The uncemented nature of the humeral component did not result in early loosening or failure.

Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Complex acute proximal humeral fractures may require prosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been suggested as an alternative to hemiarthroplasty in the management of such fractures. This study compared the functional outcomes of RSA with hemiarthroplasty in patients with acute proximal humeral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent RSA or shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2010 were identified from The New Zealand Joint Registry. Baseline information, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS] at 6 months and 5 years, revision rate, and mortality rate) were examined and compared between the study groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 55 patients underwent RSA and 313 underwent shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. Compared with hemiarthroplasty patients, RSA patients were significantly older (mean age, 79.6 vs 71.9 years; P < .001) and more often women (93% vs 78%, P = .013). The 6-month OSS was 28.1 for RSA and 27.9 for hemiarthroplasty, which was not significantly different (P = .923); however, the RSA group had a significantly better 5-year OSS than the hemiarthroplasty group (41.5 vs 32.3; P = .022). There was no significant difference between the RSA and hemiarthroplasty groups in revision rate per 100 component-years (1.7 vs 1.1; P = .747) or in 1-year mortality (3.5% vs 3.6%; P > .99). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute proximal humeral fractures who undergo RSA appear to achieve superior 5-year functional outcomes compared with patients who undergo hemiarthroplasty.

The superomedial bare area of the costal scapula surface: a possible cause of snapping scapula syndrome.

PURPOSE: Scapulothoracic bursitis is a painful condition of the scapulothoracic articulation, which may be caused by various pathological anatomical associations. We have arthroscopically observed a constant bare area of bone on the costal scapula surface in patients with scapulothoracic bursitis, contradictory to traditional anatomical reports of scapular muscle relations. We undertook a cadaveric study to further define this anatomical feature. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric shoulders were dissected. The costal surface of the scapula was systematically examined for the presence of a superomedial bare area in each shoulder by three independent clinicians, with dimensions measured using digital calipers. RESULTS: In all shoulders, there was a clearly defined bare area of bone on the superomedial aspect of the costal surface of the scapula between the serratus anterior insertion and subscapularis origin. The bare area was typically crescenteric in shape, with variable length (mean 22.3 ± 6.0 mm) and width (10.8 ± 2.8 mm). The bare area length (p = 0.043) and width (p = 0.033) were significantly greater in female shoulders compared to male shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: We have established the presence of the superomedial bare area of the costal scapula surface. With an absence of overlying subscapularis muscle, this bare area carries the potential for scapulothoracic impingement, and should be considered as a possible aetiological factor in all patients presenting with scapulothoracic bursitis.