Phase II meningococcal B vesicle vaccine trial in New Zealand infants.

BACKGROUND: A tailor-made serogroup B outer membrane vesicle vaccine was evaluated in the context of a serogroup B meningococcal epidemic dominated by Neisseria meningitidis strain B:4:P1.7b,4. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity in infants aged 6-8 months of a meningococcal B vaccine developed against the New Zealand epidemic strain. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Observer-blind, randomised, controlled trial conducted in 296 healthy infants in Auckland, New Zealand. INTERVENTION: Infants were randomised 4:1 to receive three doses of New Zealand candidate vaccine (epidemic strain NZ98/254, B:4:P1.7b,4) or meningococcal C conjugate vaccine at 6-weekly intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Immune response was determined by human complement mediated serum bactericidal assay. Sero-response was a fourfold or greater rise in titre compared to baseline, with baseline titres <4 required to increase to >or=8. Blood samples were taken before vaccination, 6 weeks after dose two, and 4 weeks after dose three. Local and systemic reactions were recorded for 7 days following vaccination. RESULTS: Sero-response to the candidate vaccine strain, NZ98/254, was demonstrated in 74% of vaccinees (95% CI: 68% to 80% intention-to-treat; 67% to 79% per protocol) after three doses of New Zealand candidate vaccine. No meningococcal C conjugate vaccine recipients were sero-responders to NZ98/254 after three doses. Both vaccines were well tolerated with no vaccine related serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the New Zealand candidate vaccine administered in three doses to this group of 6-8-month-old infants was safe and immunogenic against the candidate vaccine strain NZ98/254 (Neisseria meningitidis B:4:P1.7b,4).

Combined administration of serogroup B meningococcal vaccine and conjugated serogroup C meningococcal vaccine is safe and immunogenic in college students.

This study evaluated the first use of a combination of the lyophilized components of the conjugated group C vaccine Menjugate reconstituted with the liquid group B outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccine MeNZB. At 6-week intervals, healthy residential students received three doses of MeNZB alone or concomitantly with one dose of Menjugate (MeNZB+MenC). Short-lasting injection-site reactions of mild or moderate intensity were frequent in both groups. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events. After three doses, the percentage of subjects with serum bactericidal assay (SBA) titres > or = 1:8 against the serogroup B strain NZ98/254 was 82% for MeNZB+MenC and 78% for MeNZB. All subjects in the MeNZB+MenC group achieved SBA titres > or = 1:8 against serogroup strain C11 and 67% in the MeNZB group. All SBA and ELISA responses of the combined vaccine were at least as good as for MeNZB alone. After vaccination, the pharyngeal carriage rate of any meningococcus in the vaccinated group had declined from 40% to 21%.

Immunogenicity and safety of a strain-specific MenB OMV vaccine delivered to under 5-year olds in New Zealand.

To control the devastating group B meningococcal epidemic in New Zealand a strain-specific OMV vaccine (MeNZB) was extensively tested before vaccination of >1,000,000 people under 20 years. After the three-dose course 75% of 6-8-month-old infants and 16-24-month-old toddlers showed four-fold increases in bactericidal antibodies. In 6-10-week-old infants a fourth dose was needed to obtain similar results. After primary vaccination, the antibody titre decline was most pronounced among the youngest but both young infants and toddlers showed a clear booster response to a fourth dose. MeNZB was safe and well tolerated. The comprehensive post-licensure safety surveillance revealed no safety concerns.

Safety and antigenicity of non-adjuvanted and MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/Duck/Singapore/97 (H5N3) vaccine: a randomised trial of two potential vaccines against H5N1 influenza.

BACKGROUND: In 1997, pathogenic avian influenza A/Hong Kong/97 (H5N1) viruses emerged as a pandemic threat to human beings. A non-pathogenic variant, influenza A/Duck/Singapore/97 (H5N3), was identified as a leading vaccine candidate. We did an observer-blind, phase I, randomised trial in healthy volunteers to assess safety, tolerability, and antigenicity of MF59-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines. METHODS: 32 participants were randomly assigned MF59, and 33 non-adjuvanted vaccine. Two doses were given 3 weeks apart, of 7.5, 15, or 30 microg haemagglutinin surface-antigen influenza A H5N3 vaccine. Antibody responses were measured by haemagglutination inhibition, microneutralisation, and single radial haemolysis (SRH). The primary outcome was geometric mean antibody titre 21 days after vaccination. FINDINGS: The A/Duck/SIngapore vaccines were safe and well tolerated. Antibody response to non-adjuvanted vaccine was poor, the best response occurring after two 30 microgram doses: one, four, four, and one person of eleven seroconverted by haemagglutination inhibition, microneutralisation, H5N3 SRH, and H5N1 SRH, respectively. The geometric mean titres of antibody, and seroconversion rates, were significantly higher after MF59 adjuvanted vaccine. Two 7.5 microg doses of MF59 adjuvanted vaccine gave the highest seroconversion rates: haemagglutination inhibition, six of ten; microneutralisation, eight of ten; H5N3 SRH, ten of ten; H5N1 SRH, nine of ten. Geometric mean titre of antibody to the pathogenic virus, A/Hong Kong/489/97 (H5N1), was about half that to A/Duck/Singapore virus. INTERPRETATION: Non-adjuvanted A/Duck/Singapore/97 (H5N3) vaccines are poorly immunogenic and doses of 7.5-30 microg haemagglutinin alone are unlikely to give protection from A/Hong Kong/97 (H5N1) virus. Addition of MF59 to A/Duck/Singapore/97 vaccines boost the antibody response to protection levels. Our findings have implications for development and assessment of vaccines for future pandemics.

Dose range evaluation of a new inactivated hepatitis A vaccine administered as a single dose followed by a booster.

A total of 242 healthy adults were immunised with a first dose of an investigational inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. Three concentrations (3, 6 and 12 EU [ELISA units]) of the experimental vaccine were used and compared to a licensed reference vaccine. The aim was to determine the antigenic concentration of the study vaccine inducing the highest seroconversion rate and anti-Hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody response at 2 weeks after the primary immunisation. A booster dose was given at month 6. At 15 days after the primary immunisation the seroconversion rates in subjects vaccinated with the 6 and 12 EU vaccines were 78 and 94%, respectively. At 30 and 180 days after the primary immunisation the percentages of seropositivity were 100% for both groups. The antibody response to the 12 EU study vaccine was similar to that to the reference vaccine. The percentages of seropositivity at 15 and 180 days after the primary immunisation were 94 vs 93%, and 100 vs 93% in the experimental and reference vaccine respectively. Thus, because it induces early and lasting seroconversion, the 12 EU study vaccine seems to be the most effective as a high potency HAV vaccine.