Adjunctive use of celecoxib with anti-tuberculosis drugs: evaluation in a whole-blood bactericidal activity model.

COX-2 inhibition may be of benefit in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) through a number of pathways including efflux pump inhibition (increasing intracellular TB drug levels) and diverse effects on inflammation and the immune response. We investigated celecoxib (a COX-2 inhibitor) alone and with standard anti-tuberculosis drugs in the whole-blood bactericidal activity (WBA) model. Healthy volunteers took a single dose of celecoxib (400 mg), followed (after 1 week) by a single dose of either rifampicin (10 mg/kg) or pyrazinamide (25 mg/kg), followed (after 2 or 7 days respectively) by the same anti-tuberculosis drug with celecoxib. WBA was measured at intervals until 8 hours post-dose (by inoculating blood samples with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and estimating the change in bacterial colony forming units after 72 hours incubation). Celecoxib had no activity alone in the WBA assay (cumulative WBA over 8 hours post-dose: 0.03 ± 0.01ΔlogCFU, p = 1.00 versus zero). Celecoxib did not increase cumulative WBA of standard TB drugs (mean cumulative WBA -0.10 ± 0.13ΔlogCFU versus -0.10 ± 0.12ΔlogCFU for TB drugs alone versus TB drugs and celecoxib; mean difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.00; p = 0.16). The lack of benefit of celecoxib suggests that efflux pump inhibition or eicosanoid pathway-related responses are of limited importance in mycobacterial killing in the WBA assay.

Coadministration of Allopurinol To Increase Antimycobacterial Efficacy of Pyrazinamide as Evaluated in a Whole-Blood Bactericidal Activity Model.

Coadministering pyrazinamide (PZA) with the xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol increases systemic levels of the active metabolite, pyrazinoic acid (POA), but the effects on bactericidal activity against tuberculosis are unknown. We randomized healthy volunteers to take a single dose of PZA (either 10 or 25 mg/kg of body weight) at the first visit and the same dose 7 days later, coadministered with allopurinol (100 mg daily; 2 days before to 1 day after the PZA dose). Blood was drawn at intervals until 48 h after each PZA dose, and drug levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Whole-blood bactericidal activity (WBA) was measured by inoculating blood samples with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and estimating the change in bacterial CFU after 72 h of incubation. Allopurinol increased the POA area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8) (18.32 h · µg/ml versus 24.63 h · µg/ml for PZA alone versus PZA plus allopurinol) (P < 0.001) and its peak plasma concentration (Cmax) (2.81 µg/ml versus 4.00 µg/ml) (P < 0.001). There was no effect of allopurinol on mean cumulative WBA (0.01 ± 0.02 ΔlogCFU versus 0.00 ± 0.02 ΔlogCFU for PZA alone versus PZA plus allopurinol) (P = 0.49). Higher systemic POA levels were associated with greater WBA levels (P < 0.001), but the relationship was evident only at low POA concentrations. The lack of an effect of allopurinol on WBA despite a significant increase in blood POA levels suggests that host-generated POA may be less effective than POA generated inside bacteria. Coadministration of allopurinol does not appear to be a useful strategy for increasing the efficacy of PZA in clinical practice. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02700347.).