The association between levosimendan and mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Levosimendan is increasingly being used in patients with sepsis or septic shock because of its potential to improve organ function and reduce mortality. We aimed to determine if levosimendan can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock via meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through 1 October 2022. Literature evaluating the efficacy of levosimendan in patients with sepsis or septic shock was included. DATA EXTRACTION AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate an odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P -values for 28-day mortality (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included changes in indexes reflecting cardiac function before and after treatment, changes in serum lactate levels in the first 24 h of treatment, and the mean SOFA score during the study period. Safety outcomes included rates of tachyarrhythmias and total adverse reactions encountered with levosimendan. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials were identified, encompassing a total of 1044 patients. After using levosimendan, there was no statistical difference between groups for 28-day mortality (34.9% and 36.2%; OR: 0.93; 95% CI [0.72-1.2]; P  = 0.57; I 2  = 0%; trial sequential analysis-adjusted CI [0.6-1.42]) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and more adverse reactions seemed to occur in the levosimendan group, although the septic shock patient's heart function and serum lactate level improved. CONCLUSION: There was no association between the use of levosimendan and 28-day mortality and SOFA scores in patients with septic shock, though there was statistically significant improvement in cardiac function and serum lactate.

Dexmedetomidine use for patients in palliative care with intractable pain and delirium: A retrospective study.

Patients seen by the palliative care team often have difficult and intractable symptoms. The current standard of practice to manage these symptoms is the deeply sedating midazolam continuous subcutaneous infusion for patients who are expected to expire within hours to days. Dexmedetomidine provides sedation but lacks evidence in palliative care use. This study describes continuous subcutaneous infusion of dexmedetomidine's effect on refractory pain and delirium. Retrospective, observational chart review and conducted in accordance with SQUIRE (quality improvement study). Twenty adult patients (18 years of age or older) with metastatic cancer disease admitted to three palliative complex care units of Fraser Health who received continuous subcutaneous infusion of dexmedetomidine between January 2017 to August 31, 2019. Average length of dexmedetomidine use was 9 days (1/3 length of stay). Eight of the 13 patients with pain symptoms exhibited an overall decline in pain. Four of the 6 patients with delirium had an initial decrease in delirium, but it did not last beyond the first day. Despite progressive clinical deterioration, adjunctive medications decreased or remained the same for 53% of as needed medications and 65% for regularly scheduled medications. Forty-five percent of patients had ≥50% days of rousable sedation. Hypotension occurred in 85% of patients. Dexmedetomidine provided benefit in managing intractable pain while allowing patients to remain rousable, but only had a short effect on delirium symptoms.

CLINICAL PHENOTYPES OF SEPSIS-ASSOCIATED ENCEPHALOPATHY: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

ABSTRACT: Background: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a dysfunction of the central nervous system experienced during sepsis with variable clinical and pathophysiologic features. We sought to identify distinct SAE phenotypes in relation to clinical outcomes. Methods: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database and the eICU database were used to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Adult sepsis patients were included and SAE was defined as having a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ˂15 or delirium. The following our clinical phenotypes were defined as: ischemic-hypoxic, metabolic, mixed (ischemic-hypoxic and metabolic), and unclassified. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: The study enrolled 4,120 sepsis patients, 2,239 from MIMIC-IV (including 1,489 patients with SAE, 67%), and 1,881 from eICU (1,291, 69%). For the SAE cohort, 2,780 patients in total were enrolled (median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 56-76.8; 1,589 (57%) were male; median GCS score was 12 [8-14]; median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 6 [4-9]). The SAE phenotype distributions between the MIMIC-IV and eICU cohorts were as follows (39% vs. 35% ischemic-hypoxic, P = 0.043; 38% vs. 40% metabolic, P = 0.239; 15% vs. 15% mixed, P = 0.972; 38% vs. 40% unclassified, P = 0.471). For the overall cohort, the in-hospital mortality for patients with ischemic-hypoxic, metabolic, mixed, or unclassified phenotypes was 33.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.37), 28.4% (0.26-0.31), 41.5% (0.37-0.46), and 14.2% (0.12-0.16), respectively. In the multivariable logistic analysis, the mixed phenotype was associated with the highest risk of in-hospital mortality after adjusting for age, sex, GCS, and modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (adjusted odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.67; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Four SAE phenotypes had different clinical outcomes. The mixed phenotype had the worst outcomes. Further understanding of these phenotypes in sepsis may improve trial design and targeted SAE management.

The Impact of Wearable Devices on Physical Activity for Chronic Disease Patients: Findings from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey.

BACKGROUND: Wearable devices are shown to be an advanced tool for chronic disease management, but their impacts on physical activity remain uninvestigated. This study aims to examine the effect of wearable devices on physical activity in general people and chronic patients. METHODS: Our sample was from the third cycle of the fifth iteration of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), which includes a total of 5438 residents. Genetic matching was used to evaluate the effect of wearable devices on physical activity in different populations. RESULTS: (1) Both using wearable devices and using them with high frequency will improve physical activity for the whole population. (2) Wearable devices may have greater positive effects on physical activity for chronic patients. (3) Especially in patients with hypertension, high-frequency use of wearable devices can significantly improve the duration and frequency of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable devices lead to more physical activity, and the benefit is more noticeable for chronic patients, particularly those with hypertension.

Is rosuvastatin protective against sepsis-associated encephalopathy? A secondary analysis of the SAILS trial.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a common cause of death in emergency departments and sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a major complication. Rosuvastatin may play a neuroprotective role due to its protective effects on the vascular endothelium and its anti-inflammatory functions. Our study aimed to explore the potential protective function of rosuvastatin against SAE. METHODS: Sepsis patients without any neurological dysfunction on admission were prospectively enrolled in the "Rosuvastatin for Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome" study (SAILS trial, ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00979121). Patients were divided into rosuvastatin and placebo groups. This is a secondary analysis of the SAILS dataset. Baseline characteristics, therapy outcomes, and adverse drug events were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were eligible for our study. Of these patients, 51 were treated with rosuvastatin. There were significantly fewer cases of SAE in the rosuvastatin group than in the placebo group (32.1% vs. 57.1%, P=0.028). However, creatine kinase levels were significantly higher in the rosuvastatin group than in the placebo group (233 [22-689] U/L vs. 79 [12-206] U/L, P=0.034). CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin appears to have a protective role against SAE but may result in a higher incidence of adverse events.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with poor outcomes after ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) determined by platelet function assays is present in certain patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, it is unclear whether HTPR is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship of HTPR with recurrent vascular events in ischemic stroke or TIA. METHODS: Pubmed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies from inception to January 1, 2022. Stata 17.0 software was used to calculate the risk ratio (RR). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the source of heterogeneity. A random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was present. Primary endpoint of the meta-analysis was the risk ratio of recurrent vascular events in HTPR Patients. While stroke and TIA, all-cause death, early neurological deterioration, early new ischemic lesions, and stroke severity measured by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission were also pooled. RESULTS: Thirty articles (7995 patients) were eligible including 28 cohort studies and 2 prospective case-control studies. The prevalence of HTPR varied from 5.9% to 60%. HTPR was associated with an increased risk of recurrent vascular events (RR = 2.94, 95% CI 2.04-4.23), stroke recurrence (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.43-2.95), and all-cause mortality (RR = 2.43; 95% CI 1.83-3.22). Subgroup analysis showed that HTPR determined by optical aggregometry, Verify-Now system and 11dh TXB2 is related to a higher risk of recurrent vascular events (RR = 3.53, 95% CI 1.51-9.40; RR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.02-4.56; RR = 3.76, 95% CI 1.51-9.40, respectively). Moreover, patients with HTPR had an increased incidence of early neurological deterioration (RR = 2.75; 95% CI 1.76-4.30) and higher NIHSS scores at admission (Mean difference 0.19, 95% CI 0.01-0.36). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates HTPR is associated with higher risk of recurrent vascular events, early neurological deterioration and increased severity in patients with ischemic stroke and TIA. HTPR measured by platelet function assays may guide the use of antiplatelet agents in ischemic stroke and TIA.

Norepinephrine use in cardiogenic shock patients is associated with increased 30 day mortality.

AIMS: Norepinephrine is recommended as a first-line vasopressor agent in the haemodynamic stabilization of cardiogenic shock. The survival benefit of norepinephrine therapy has not been demonstrated in clinical practice, however. This study aimed to explore the relationship between norepinephrine use and outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients in real-world conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Cardiogenic shock patients were enrolled and categorized into a norepinephrine group or a non-norepinephrine group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for confounders. Cox proportional-hazards models and multivariable logistic regression were used to investigate the relationship between norepinephrine treatment and mortality. A total of 927 eligible patients were included: 552 patients in the norepinephrine group and 375 patients in the non-norepinephrine group. After PSM, 222 cases from each group were matched using a 1:1 matching algorithm. Thirty day mortality for patients treated with norepinephrine was significantly higher than for those in the non-norepinephrine group (41% vs. 30%, OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.39, P = 0.017; HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.06, P = 0.013). In the multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference between norepinephrine therapy and long-term (90 day, 180 day, or 1 year) mortality (90 day (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.82-1.74, P = 0.363), 180 day (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80-1.70, P = 0.418), 1 year (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79-1.66, P = 0.477). Patients in the norepinephrine group required more mechanical ventilation (84% vs. 67%, OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.70-4.25, P < 0.001) and experienced longer ICU stays (median 7 vs. 4 days, OR 7.92, 95% CI 1.40-44.83, P = 0.020) than non-norepinephrine group. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiogenic shock patients treated with norepinephrine were associated with significantly increased short-term mortality, while no significant difference was found on long-term survival rates. Future trials are needed to validate and explore this association.

Development of an intensive simulating training program in emergency medicine for medical students in China.

BACKGROUND: A national standardized emergency medicine (EM) curriculum for medical students, including specific competencies in procedural skills, are absent in many countries. The development of an intensive simulating training program in EM, based on a tight schedule, is anticipated to enhance the competency of medical students. METHODS: A 3-day intensive EM training program, consisting of four procedural skills and 8-hour case-based learning (CBL), was developed by experienced physicians from the EM department in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). Medical students from Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) and Tsinghua University (THU) participated in the training. Three written tests were cautiously designed to examine the short-term (immediately after the program) and long-term (6 months after the program) efficacy of the training. After completion of the training program, an online personal appraisal questionnaire was distributed to the students on WeChat (a mobile messaging App commonly used in China) to achieve anonymous self-evaluation. RESULTS: Ninety-seven out of 101 students completed the intensive training and took all required tests. There was a significant increase in the average score after the intensive simulating training program (pre-training 13.84 vs. 15.57 post-training, P<0.001). Compared with the pre-training test, 63 (64.9%) students made progress. There was no significant difference in scores between the tests taken immediately after the program and 6 months later (15.57±2.22 vs. 15.38±2.37, P=0.157). Students rated a higher score in all diseases and procedural skills, and felt that their learning was fruitful. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a standardized intensive training program in EM focusing on key competencies can improve clinical confidence, knowledge, and skills of medical students toward the specialty. In addition, having such a program can also enhance student's interest in EM as a career choice which may enhance recruitment into the specialty and workplace planning.

Thiamine combined with vitamin C in sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thiamine and vitamin C have been increasingly used in patients with sepsis or septic shock because of their potential for improving metabolism and reducing mortality. OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine if thiamine combined vitamin C can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock. EVIDENCE SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception dates through 1 January 2021. Literature works evaluating the efficacy of thiamine combined vitamin C in patients with sepsis or septic shock were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate an odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P values for in-hospital mortality (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included duration of ICU stay, duration of hospital stay, duration of vasopressor use, and change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials were identified, encompassing a total of 868 patients. There was no statistical difference between groups for in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.11; 95% CI [0.79-1.56]; P = 0.55). Other than improving SOFA score during the first 72 h after enrollment and duration of vasopressor use, we found no other significant associations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread enthusiasm for thiamine combined with vitamin C for sepsis and septic shock, we only found an association with reduced SOFA score and time of vasopressor use. There was no association with in-hospital mortality.

Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in immunocompetent patients with septic shock.

BACKGROUND: The use of corticosteroids in septic shock has been studied for many decades but yielded conflicting results. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of corticosteroids in immunocompetent patients with septic shock. METHODS: Medline via PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2020. Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing corticosteroids with a control group for immunocompetent patients with septic shock. Data were abstracted and reported following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Intervention and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The efficacy outcome included mortality and shock reversal. The safety outcomes were infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hyperglycemia. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with a total of 1,298 patients were included. Compared with the control group, corticosteroid group did not lower the short-term (28 or 30 days) mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.06, inconsistency [I 2]=0%, trial sequential analysis [TSA]-adjusted CI 0.83 to 1.09, moderate-certainty evidence). Corticosteroids significantly shortened the time to shock reversal compared with the control group (mean difference [MD] -21.56 hours; 95% CI -32.95 to -10.16, I 2=0%; TSA-adjusted CI -33.33 to -9.78, moderate-certainty evidence). The corticosteroid treatment was associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia but not the infection or gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The corticosteroid treatment is not associated with lower short- or long- term mortality compared with placebo in immunocompetent patients with septic shock. However, corticosteroids significantly shorten the time to shock reversal without increasing the risk of infection. The patient's immune status should also be considered during clinical treatment and clinical trials in future.

Role of anti-allergic agents on attenuating transfusion reactions in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-allergic agents (e.g. dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine or promethazine) are commonly administered to patients prior to blood product transfusions. However, the use of these agents is largely experience-based instead of evidence-based. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the evidence behind using anti-allergic agents to attenuate transfusion reactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Biomedical literature (CMB) databases were all queried for related articles. Data from groups treated with and without anti-allergic agents were collected for meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. Baseline characteristics and univariate statistics between groups were compared using SPSS 19.0. RESULTS: Eight eligible articles (six case control studies and two randomized controlled trials, all with high risks of bias) were identified (22060 total cases). Administered anti-allergic agents in these studies only included dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine or promethazine. Baseline characteristics showed no significant age or gender differences between treatment or control groups. There were no significant differences between the pooled experimental or control groups (for each of the three medications) in terms of fever, pruritis, rash, airway spasm or overall transfusion reaction rates. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine or promethazine can prevent transfusion reactions. Avoiding the arbitrary use of such anti-allergic agents before blood transfusions may potentially avoid needless adverse drug reactions.

Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: Insight into Injury and Pathogenesis.

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy causes long-term health problems in patients with sepsis. This review explores the pathogenesis of sepsis-associated encephalopathy, including its effects on the blood-brain barrier, microglia activation, mitochondrial dysfunction, the inflammatory medium and neurotransmitters and its roles in amino acid balance disorders, hyperammonemia, and intestinal flora imbalance. Understanding the etiology of sepsis-associated encephalopathy may allow the development of adjunctive therapies targeting its underlying mechanism and help develop preventative strategies.

Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for septic shock in immunocompromised patients: A cohort study from MIMIC.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have been widely used as adjunct therapy for septic shock for many decades, but both the efficacy and safety remain unclear. The study was designed to investigate overall benefits and potential risks of corticosteroids in immunocompromised patients with septic shock. METHODS: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database was employed to conduct a cohort study. Immunocompromised patients with septic shock were enrolled and categorized by whether exposure to intravenous corticosteroids. Cox Proportional-Hazards models were used to control for confounders and assess the relationship between corticosteroids use and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 866 patients were enrolled in this study, including 395 in the corticosteroids group and 471 in the non-corticosteroids group. Corticosteroids infusion was not associated with improved 30-day mortality in overall immunocompromised population [34.7% vs 32.1%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.43, p = 0.37]. The mortality effects were similar in 90-day, 180-day, 1-year and hospital mortality. For the subgroup of patients with metastatic cancer, corticosteroids infusion was associated with a statistically significant increase in the 30-day mortality risk (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.06-2.37; p = 0.02). Corticosteroids had adverse effects on hemodynamic stability, prolonged ICU and hospital duration, and increased risk of hyperglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids therapy for the maintenance of blood pressure was not associated with improved mortality or hemodynamic stability in overall immunocompromised population with septic shock. Future randomized clinical trials are required to validate the effects of corticosteroids for septic shock in the special immunocompromised population.

Prognosis of Patients with Sepsis and Non-Hepatic Hyperammonemia: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND Hyperammonemia has been reported in some critically ill patients with sepsis who do not have hepatic failure. A significant proportion of patients with non-hepatic hyperammonemia have underlying sepsis, but the association between non-hepatic hyperammonemia and prognosis is unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS Information about patients with sepsis and non-hepatic hyperammonemia was retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III database. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to identify prognostic factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to measure the predictive ability of ammonia in terms of patient mortality. RESULTS A total of 265 patients with sepsis were enrolled in this study. Compared with the non-hyperammonemia group, the patients with hyperammonemia had significantly higher rates of hospital (59.8% vs. 43.0%, P=0.007), 30-day (47.7% vs. 34.8%, P=0.036), 90-day (61.7% vs. 43.7%, P=0.004), and 1-year mortality (67.3% vs. 49.4%, P=0.004). In the survival analysis, hyperammonemia was associated with these outcomes. Serum ammonia level was an independent predictor of hospital mortality. The area under the ROC curve for the ammonia levels had poor discriminative capacity. The hyperammonemia group also had significantly lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (P=0.020) and higher incidences of delirium (15.9% vs. 8.2%, P=0.034) and encephalopathy (37.4% vs. 19.6%, P=0.001). Intestinal infection and urinary tract infection with organisms such as Escherichia coli may be risk factors for hyperammonemia in patients who have sepsis. CONCLUSIONS Higher ammonia levels are associated with poorer prognosis in patients with sepsis. Ammonia also may be associated with sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Therefore, we recommend that serum ammonia levels be measured in patients who are suspected of having sepsis.

Prognostic Role of Ammonia in Critical Care Patients Without Known Hepatic Disease.

Background and Aims: Hyperammonemia usually develops because of hepatic disease, but it may occur in patients with non-hepatic hyperammonemia (NHH). But, studies on the prognosis and possible risk factors of this disorder are lacking. The aim of this study was to find possible prognostic and risk factors for NHH in critically ill patients. Methods: Data were extracted from MIMIC III Database. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. Results: Valproic acid, carbamazepine, corticosteroids, recent orthopedic surgery, epilepsy, disorders of urea cycle metabolism, and obesity were found to be risk factors for NHH. Patients in the hyperammonemia group had a higher 30 day mortality than those in the non-hyperammonemia group. After final regression analysis, ammonia was found to be independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion: Ammonia was an independent prognostic predictor of 30 day mortality for critical care patients without liver disease.

N-acetylcysteine as a treatment for amatoxin poisoning: a systematic review.

Introduction: Amatoxin leads to the majority of deaths by mushroom poisoning around the world. Amatoxin causes gastrointestinal disturbances and multiple organ dysfunction, including liver and renal failure. As a potential treatment for amatoxin poisoning, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been used for decades but its benefit is still unproven.Objectives: We undertook a systematic review to evaluate the performance and safety of N-acetylcysteine on patients suffering amatoxin intoxication.Methods: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and SinoMed databases, from inception to August 31, 2019. Articles were eligible if there were five or more patients with amatoxin poisoning and N-acetylcysteine was included in the therapeutic regimen. Mortality rate including liver transplant cases (MRLTi) was the primary outcome. Mortality rate not including liver transplant cases, liver and renal function, clinical complications, as well as any adverse reactions to intravenous NAC were secondary outcomes.Results: Thirteen studies with a total of 506 patients were included. The MRLTi of amatoxin-poisoning patients with NAC treatment was 11% (57/506), and a MRLTe of 7.9% (40/506) and a liver transplantation rate of 4.3% (22/506). Transaminase concentrations generally peaked around 3 days after ingestion, prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) generally worsened during the first 3-4 days after ingestion before returning to normal four to 7 days after ingestion, and Factor V levels normalized in about 4-5 days after ingestion in patients treated with NAC. Renal failure was reported in 3% (3/101) and acute kidney injury was reported in 19% (5/27). Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 21% (15/71). Anaphylactoid reactions were the principle adverse reaction to NAC treatment in amatoxin-poisoning patients with an incidence of 5% (4/73).Conclusions: NAC treatment combined with other therapies appears to be beneficial and safe in patients with amatoxin poisoning. Until further data emerge, it is reasonable to use NAC in addition to other treatments for amatoxin poisoning.

An integrated process to produce prebiotic xylooligosaccharides by autohydrolysis, nanofiltration and endo-xylanase from alkali-extracted xylan.

Alkali-extracted xylan from lignocellulosics is a promising feedstock for production of prebiotic xylooligosaccharides (XOS). An integrated process was established combining autohydrolysis, nanofiltration and xylanase hydrolysis. Results show that after autohydrolysis 48.37% of xylan was degraded into oligomers and dissolved into the autohydrolysate, of which 57.83% were XOS. By-products and xylose were removed by nanofiltration with discontinuous diafiltration, while high recovery yields of XOS (84.15%) and xylan (87.45%) were obtained. High yields of XOS were obtained by adding xylanase to the autohydrolysates; after enzymatic hydrolysis an XOS yield of 96-98% was obtained. The enzymatic hydrolysates showed positive prebiotic effects on B. adolescentis with an increase in cell concentration by 4.8-fold after fermentation for 24 h. The main products were short-chain fatty acids with carbon balanced during the whole fermentation process. This integrated strategy resulted in a final XOS conversion of 41.22% contrasted to the initial xylan in raw alkali-extracted xylan.

Role of penehyclidine in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning.

BACKGROUND: Penehyclidine is a newly developed anticholinergic agent. We aimed to investigate the role of penehyclidine in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning (OP) patients. METHODS: We searched the Pubmed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical literature (CBM) and Wanfang databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting acute OP patients were identified for meta-analysis. Main outcomes included cure rate, mortality rate, time to atropinization, time to 60% normal acetylcholinesterase (AchE) level, rate of intermediate syndrome (IMS) and rate of adverse drug reactions (ADR). RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs involving 1,334 patients were identified. Compared with the atropine- or penehyclidine-alone groups, atropine combined with penehyclidine significantly increased the cure rate (penehyclidine+atropine vs. atropine, 0.97 vs. 0.86, RR 1.13, 95% CI [1.07-1.19]; penehyclidine+atropine vs. penehyclidine, 0.93 vs. 0.80, RR 1.08, 95% CI [1.01-1.15]) and reduced the mortality rate (penehyclidine+atropine vs. atropine, 0.015 vs. 0.11, RR 0.17, 95% CI [0.06-0.49]; penehyclidine+atropine vs. penehyclidine, 0.13 vs. 0.08, RR 0.23, 95% CI [0.04-1.28]). Atropine combined with penehyclidine in OP patients also helped reduce the time to atropinization and AchE recovery, the rate of IMS and the rate of ADR. Compared with a single dose of atropine, a single dose of penehyclidine also significantly elevated the cure rate, reduced times to atropinization, AchE recovery, and rate of IMS. CONCLUSION: Atropine combined with penehyclidine benefits OP patients by enhancing the cure rate, mortality rate, time to atropinization, AchE recovery, IMS rate, total ADR and duration of hospitalization. Penehyclidine combined with atropine is likely a better initial therapy for OP patients than atropine alone.

Reassessment of venous thromboembolism and bleeding risk in medical patients receiving VTE prophylaxis.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The majority of hospitalized nonsurgical medical patients receive pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and reassessment of changes in thrombosis and bleeding risk factors during hospital admission may represent an opportunity to discontinue unnecessary or unsafe therapy. The use of validated, clinically derived risk assessment models (RAMs) represents a shift towards an individualized, patient-centred approach to VTE prophylaxis. We are interested in using these tools to assess whether risk categories for VTE and bleeding change during admission and to assess whether such changes result in discontinuation of prophylaxis. Our primary objective was to determine whether VTE and bleed risk categories changed during the course of admission to warrant discontinuation of VTE prophylaxis, using the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) VTE and Bleed RAMs, respectively. Secondary objectives were to determine the number of patients whose risk categorizations for VTE and bleeding warranted discontinuation of VTE prophylaxis and to survey whether prophylaxis was continued or discontinued. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken for a cross-sectional, randomly selected sample of patients who received VTE prophylaxis while admitted to medical wards in a collection of regional hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 351 medical records reviewed, only eight patients (2.3%) changed their VTE risk category and six (1.7%) changed their bleed risk category to warrant discontinuation of VTE prophylaxis. Ninety patients (26%) were at high risk of VTE and low risk of bleed throughout admission, warranting continued VTE prophylaxis. The majority of patients remained at low risk of VTE throughout admission but remained on VTE prophylaxis until discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Risk categories for VTE and bleeding for medical patients did not appreciably change throughout hospital admission. Use of VTE RAMs at admission and prior to initiation of therapy should reduce unnecessary prophylaxis in the majority of medical patients who are at low risk of VTE.

Continuous Bioconversion of Oleuropein from Olive Leaf Extract to Produce the Bioactive Product Hydroxytyrosol Using Carrier-Immobilized Enzyme.

Feasibility and stability were evaluated of a continuous multi-batch process for converting oleuropein (OLE) from olive leaf extract to the bioactive product hydroxytyrosol (HT). Carrier beads made of three different materials (calcium alginate, chitosan with deacetylated α-chitin nanofibers (DEChN), or porous ceramic) were investigated for morphology, thermogravimetric, sorption, and viscoelastic properties. Enzymatic hydrolysis of OLE conducted in a packed bed bioreactor containing cellulase immobilized to carrier beads yielded OLE degradation rates of ~ 90% and an average HT yield of ~ 70% over 20 batches. Ultimately, inorganic porous ceramic beads were less costly and exhibited superior performance relative to organic carriers and thus were deemed most suitable for industrial-scale HT production. Systems utilizing enzyme immobilization within packed bed reactors hold promise for achieving efficient production of valuable bioproducts from discarded biomass materials.