Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To date, few studies have compared effectiveness and survival rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (NACI) and conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The present study was conducted to compare therapeutic response and survival between NACI and NCRT. METHODS: The study cohort comprised patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with either NACI or NCRT followed by surgery between June 2018 and March 2021. The 2 groups were compared for treatment response, 3-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method, differences were compared using the log-rank test, and potential imbalances were corrected for using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. RESULTS: Among 202 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 81 received NACI and 121 received conventional NCRT. After IPTW adjustment, the R0 resection rate (85.2% vs 92.3%; P = .227) and the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (27.5% vs 36.4%; P = .239) were comparable between the 2 groups. Nevertheless, patients who received NACI exhibited both a better 3-year OS rate (91.7% vs 79.8%; P = .032) and a better 3-year DFS rate (87.4% vs 72.8%; P = .039) compared with NCRT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: NACI has R0 resection and pCR rates comparable to those of NCRT and seems to be correlated with better prognosis than NCRT. NACI followed by surgery may be an effective treatment strategy for locally advanced ESCC.

Pathologic responses and surgical outcomes after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: Currently, the role of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is gradually attracting attention. Few studies compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). Our study aimed to compare treatment response and postoperative complications after NICT followed by surgery with that after conventional NCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC. Methods: Of 468 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 154 received conventional NCRT, whereas 314 received NICT. Treatment response, postoperative complications and mortality between two groups were compared. Pathological response of primary tumor was evaluated using the Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) scoring system. Pathological complete response (pCR) of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) was defined as no viable tumor cell within all resected metastatic LNs. According to regression directionality, tumor regression pattern was summarized into four categories: type I, regression toward the lumen; type II, regression toward the invasive front; type III, concentric regression; and type IV, scattered regression. Inverse probability propensity score weighting was performed to minimize the influence of confounding factors. Results: After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the R0 resection rates (90.9% vs. 89.0%, P=0.302) and pCR (ypT0N0) rates (29.8% vs. 34.0%, P=0.167) were comparable between two groups. Patients receiving NCRT showed lower TRG score (P<0.001) and higher major pathological response (MPR) rate (64.7% vs. 53.6%, P=0.001) compared to those receiving NICT. However, NICT brought a higher pCR rate of metastatic LNs than conventional NCRT (53.9% vs. 37.1%, P<0.001). The rates of type I/II/III/IV regression patterns were 44.6%, 6.8%, 11.4% and 37.1% in the NICT group, 16.9%, 8.2%, 18.3% and 56.6% in the NCRT group, indicating a significant difference (P<0.001). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the incidence of total postoperative complications (35.8% vs. 39.9%, P=0.189) and 30-d mortality (0.0% vs. 1.1%, P=0.062). Conclusion: For patients with locally advanced ESCC, NICT showed a R0 resection rate and pCR (ypT0N0) rate comparable to conventional NCRT, without increased incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. Notablely, NICT followed by surgery might bring a promising treatment response of metastatic LNs.

Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Objectives: The left tracheobronchial (4L) lymph nodes (LNs) are considered as regional LNs for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but there is a controversy about routine prophylactic 4L LN dissection for all resectable ESCCs. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for preoperative prediction of station 4L lymph node metastases (LNMs). Methods: A total of 522 EC patients in the training cohort and 370 in the external validation cohort were included. The prognostic impact of station 4L LNM was evaluated, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of station 4L LNM. A nomogram model was developed based on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated in both cohorts in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Results: The incidence of station 4L LNM was 7.9% (41/522) in the training cohort. Patients with station 4L LNM exhibited a poorer 5-year overall survival rate than those without (43.2% vs. 71.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, six variables were confirmed as independent 4L LNM risk factors: sex (p = 0.039), depth of invasion (p = 0.002), tumor differentiation (p = 0.016), short axis of the largest 4L LNs (p = 0.001), 4L conglomeration (p = 0.006), and 4L necrosis (p = 0.002). A nomogram model, containing six independent risk factors, demonstrated a good performance, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921 (95% CI: 0.878-0.964) in the training cohort and 0.892 (95% CI: 0.830-0.954) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve showed a good agreement on the presence of station 4L LNM between the risk estimation according to the model and histopathologic results on surgical specimens. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test demonstrated a non-significant statistic (p = 0.691 and 0.897) in the training and validation cohorts, which indicated no departure from the perfect fit. Decision curve analysis indicated that the model had better diagnostic power for 4L LNM than the traditional LN size criteria. Conclusions: This model integrated the available clinical and radiological risk factors, facilitating in the precise prediction of 4L LNM in patients with ESCC and aiding in personalized therapeutic decision-making regarding the need for routine prophylactic 4L lymphadenectomy.

99m Tc bone scintigraphy does not affect preoperative workup for patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: 99m Tc bone scintigraphy (BS) is the mainstay and most widely used technique in evaluation of bone metastasis (BM) in China. This study aimed to investigate the value of 99m Tc BS in preoperative workup for patients with potentially resectable (cT1-4a N0-3 ) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: This prospective cross-section clinical trial (ChiCTR1800020304) enrolled a total of 385 patients with ESCC diagnosed at thoracic surgery clinic from October 2018 to September 2020. All patients were diagnosed with stage cT1-4a N0-3 and were potential candidates for surgical resection. BS was performed preoperatively and the treatment strategy was changed after confirmation of BM. The primary endpoint was the rate of change of the treatment regimen because of BM, while the secondary endpoint was the rate of positive BS findings. RESULTS: Out of the 385 patients, only two (0.5%) changed their treatment regimen because of BM. The rate of positive BS findings was 1%, while two patients (0.5%) had false-positive or false-negative results. The BS diagnostic performance for BM was sensitivity 50%, specificity 99.5%, positive predictive value 50%, negative predictive value 99.5%, and accuracy 99.0%. There was no significant difference in BM in relation to age, sex, tumor location or clinical stage. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that 99m Tc bone scintigraphy does not significantly affect the preoperative workup in patients with potentially resectable ESCC, especially in early clinical stage patients.

Clinical significance of left tracheobronchial lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The left tracheobronchial lymph nodes are considered as regional lymph nodes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but routine prophylactic left tracheobronchial lymph node dissection for all resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has been controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of left tracheobronchial lymph node dissection and left tracheobronchial lymph node metastases in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and to analyze the risk factors of left tracheobronchial lymph node metastases. METHODS: A total of 3522 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy were included. Overall survival was calculated by a Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching was conducted to adjust confounding factors. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors of left tracheobronchial lymph node metastases. RESULTS: In this study, 608 patients underwent left tracheobronchial lymph node dissection and 45 patients had left tracheobronchial lymph node metastases (7.4%). After propensity score matching, the 5-year overall survival in patients receiving left tracheobronchial lymph node dissection was better than in patients who did not (68.2% vs 64.6%, P = .012). In patients receiving left tracheobronchial lymph node dissection, patients with left tracheobronchial lymph node metastases had a significantly poorer survival than patients without (5-year overall survival: 40.5% vs 62.2%, P = .029). Multivariable logistic analyses showed that clinical T stage and tumor differentiation were independent risk factors for left tracheobronchial lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: In thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, station left tracheobronchial lymph node metastases indicate a poor prognosis and left tracheobronchial lymph nodes dissection seems to be associated with a more favorable prognosis. Clinical T stage and tumor differentiation were independent risk factors for left tracheobronchial lymph node metastases. For patients with high risk, routine prophylactic left tracheobronchial lymph node dissection should be performed.

Nutritional assessment in esophageal fast-track surgery: comparisons of 4 objective malnutrition screening tools.

BACKGROUND: This cohort study aimed to compare the performance of the 2015 diagnostic criteria for malnutrition of the European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and Short-Form of Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF) in detecting malnutrition risk and predicting postoperative complications and the failure of early oral feeding (EOF) programs in esophageal cancer patients. METHODS: The 4 tools were used to conduct malnutrition assessments before surgery. The patients were divided into the groups of severe malnutrition and mild/moderate malnutrition and the incidences of the endpoints were observed. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen consecutive esophageal cancer patients were included in the study. The prevalence rates of severe malnutrition as determined by the ESPEN 2015 criteria, MUST, NRS 2002, and MNA-SF were 24.7%, 29.7%, 23.7%, and 16.0%, respectively. The moderate/severe malnutrition risk screened by the MUST had a high sensitivity (100.0%) with malnutrition identified by the ESPEN 2015 criteria. In total, 42 (19.2%) patients experienced major complications, and the incidence rate of EOF failure was 7.3%. The severe malnutrition identified by the ESPEN 2015 criteria, MUST, and NRS 2002 were comparable in predicting the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, anastomotic leakage, readmission to intensive care units (ICUs), and EOF failure, but the ESPEN 2015 criteria was better in predicting postoperative overall complications, major complications, and delayed hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The ESPEN 2015 criteria specializes in identifying severe malnutrition and is better in predicting adverse surgical outcomes; however, the MUST and NRS 2002 are better superior in detecting early malnutrition and are also valuable in the perioperative management in esophageal surgery. It is recommended that the MUST be used as the malnutrition screening tool before the ESPEN 2015 criteria is applied.

A phase III study on neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Henan Cancer Hospital Thoracic Oncology Group 1909 (HCHTOG1909).

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) are the standard treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate is still far from satisfactory. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results in the treatment of ESCC. More than 20 phase II clinical trials have been launched to explore combinations of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting for ESCC. Based on our phase II clinical trial, a two-arm phase III trial was launched in Henan Cancer Hospital. ICIs combined with NAC may usher in a new era and may benefit locally advanced, resectable ESCC patients. METHODS: A two-arm phase III trial was launched in April 2020 in Henan Cancer Hospital. Patient recruitment will be completed within 18 months. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints include pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS) rate, overall response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, major pathologic response (MPR), adverse events (AEs), complication rate and quality of life (QOL). A biobank of pretreatment, resected tumor tissue and paired blood samples will be built for translational research in the future. DISCUSSION: This RCT directly compares NAC with neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy in terms of EFS for locally advanced ESCC. The results may usher in a new era of resectable ESCC treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04280822 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04280822). Registered title: "A Phase III, Randomized Controlled Study of Neo-adjuvant Toripalimab (JS001) in Combination with Chemotherapy versus Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma". Version 1.0/Nov. 21, 2019.

Factors associated with the costs of hospitalization after esophagectomy: a retrospective observational study at a three-tertiary cancer hospital in China.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer represents a major health threat in China. Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for respectable esophageal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the costs of hospitalization in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy, and to analyze the factors influencing these costs. METHODS: A retrospective observational study which enrolled 196 patients who underwent esophagectomy from September, 2018, to April, 2019, in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University were conducted. RESULTS: The median inpatient cost was ï¿¥72,772 (range, ï¿¥49,796-128,771). Materials accounted for 39.7% of the direct medical costs, which was the highest proportion for any of the cost components. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE, OR: 0.031; 95% CI: 0.005-0.209), cardiopathy comorbidity (OR: 0.344; 95% CI: 0.136-0.872), and anastomotic leak (OR: 0.012; 95% CI: 0.001-0.131) were risk factors for higher cost, while early oral feeding (OR: 3.979; 95% CI: 1.430-11.067) was a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the factors associated with high hospitalization costs will help to reduce healthcare expenditure. By controlling complications and promoting early oral feeding, the economic burden on esophagectomy patients can be relieved. Further research based on a longitudinal design is needed to investigate the full costs of hospitalization associated with esophageal cancer.

Highlighting sarcopenia management for promoting surgical outcomes in esophageal cancers: Evidence from a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have provided controversial and limited knowledge regarding the impact of sarcopenia on surgical outcomes in esophageal cancers due to retrospective study designs and single muscle-mass assessment. This prospective cohort study aimed to resolve these issues. METHODS: Bioelectrical impedance analysis, handgrip strength measurement, and the 4-m walking test were conducted before surgery. Sarcopenia was diagnosed as low appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (<7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.7 kg/m2 in women) plus low handgrip strength (<26 kg in men and <18 kg in women) and/or low gait speed (<0.8 m/s). Presarcopenia was diagnosed as either: (1) solely low muscle mass index; or (2) solely low handgrip strength and/or gait speed. Endpoints included perioperative biochemical indicators, postoperative complications, and the recovery of postoperative quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: In total, 212 patients were enrolled, including 55 (25.9%) and 60 (28.3%) patients diagnosed with sarcopenia and presarcopenia, respectively. The presarcopenic and normal patients showed a similar risk of postoperative complications and were combined. Despite similar baseline levels, sarcopenic patients (vs. non-sarcopenic) showed decreased prealbumin on postoperative day (POD) 1, decreased albumin on PODs 1, 3, and 5, and delayed recovery of lymphocyte counts (all P < 0.05). The levels of C-reactive protein in sarcopenic patients was lower than in non-sarcopenic patients on POD 1 (P = 0.010) but higher on POD 5 (P = 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated the independent predictive value of sarcopenia for overall complications (P < 0.001), major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III, P = 0.001), and delayed hospital discharge (>12 days, P < 0.001). Sarcopenia was demonstrated as a risk factor for deteriorated global QOL (P = 0.001), physical (P = 0.001) and role functions (P = 0.006), and severe fatigue (P = 0.004) at four weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia was associated with poor metabolic stress and immune responses surrounding esophagectomy and was a potential target for reducing complications and promoting recovery of QOL.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-Centre, open-label, randomized, controlled, clinical trial (HCHTOG1903).

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy plus oesophagectomy has been accepted as the standard treatment for patients with potentially curable locally advanced oesophageal cancer. No completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) has directly compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of the current RCT is to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery on overall survival for patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: This open label, single-centre, phase III RCT randomized patients (cT2-T4aN + M0 and cT3-4aN0M0) in a 1:1 fashion to receive either the CROSS regimen (paclitaxel 50 mg/m2; carboplatin (area under the curve = 2), q1w, 5 cycles; and concurrent radiotherapy, 41.4 Gy/23 F, over 5 weeks) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2; and cisplatin 75 mg/m2, q21d, 2 cycles). Assuming a 12% 5-year overall survival difference in favour of the CROSS regimen, 80% power with a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 and a 5% dropout each year for an estimated 3 years enrolment, the power calculation requires 456 patients to be recruited (228 in each group). The primary endpoint is 5-year overall survival, with a minimum 5-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints include 5-year disease-free survival, toxicity, pathological complete response rate, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality and quality of life. A biobank of pre-treatment and resected tumour tissue will be built for translational research in the future. DISCUSSION: This RCT directly compares a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen with a standard CROSS regimen in terms of overall survival for patients with locally advanced ESCC. The results of this RCT will provide an answer for the controversy regarding the survival benefits between the two treatment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04138212, date of registration: October 24, 2019.

LncRNA SNHG1 Regulates the Progression of Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer by the miR-204/HOXC8 Axis.

OBJECTIVE: Long noncoding RNA small nucleolar RNA host gene 1 (SNHG1) has been reported to be aberrantly expressed and plays an important role in human cancers, including esophageal squamous cell cancer. However, the regulatory mechanism underlying SNHG1 in the progression of esophageal squamous cell cancer is poorly defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three esophageal squamous cell cancer patients were recruited and overall survival was analyzed. EC9706 and KYSE150 cells were cultured for study in vitro. The expression levels of SNHG1, microRNA (miR)-204 and homeobox c8 (HOXC8) were detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blot. Cell cycle distribution, apoptosis, migration and invasion were determined by flow cytometry and transwell assays, respectively. The target interaction among SNHG1, miR-204 and HOXC8 was validated by luciferase reporter assay and RNA immunoprecipitation. Xenograft model was established to investigate the role of SNHG1 in vivo. RESULTS: High expression of SNHG1 was exhibited in esophageal squamous cell cancer and indicated poor outcomes of patients. SNHG1 silence led to cell cycle arrest at G0-G1 phase, inhibition of migration and invasion and increase of apoptosis. miR-204 was validated to sponge by SNHG1 and target HOXC8 in esophageal squamous cell cancer cells. miR-204 knockdown or HOXC8 restoration reversed the inhibitive role of SNHG1 silence in the progression of esophageal squamous cell cancer cells. Furthermore, inhibiting SNHG1 decreased xenograft tumor growth by regulating miR-204 and HOXC8. CONCLUSION: SNHG1 knockdown suppresses migration and invasion but induces apoptosis of esophageal squamous cell cancer cells by increasing miR-204 and decreasing HOXC8.

Sarcopenia and Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the value of preoperative sarcopenia in predicting complications after esophagectomy. Clinicopathologic characteristics of sarcopenia patients, which may support sarcopenia management, also were studied. METHODS: This study searched for articles describing an association between sarcopenia and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Mantel-Haenszel and inverse variance models were used for the meta-analyses of end points. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 14 studies comprising a total of 2387 patients. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with advanced age (weighted mean difference [WMD], 3.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-4.74), lower body mass index (WMD - 2.22; 95% CI - 2.65 to - 1.79), squamous cell carcinoma (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 95% CI 1.72-4.47), advanced clinical tumor stage (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.28-2.15), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.38-2.53). The sarcopenia patients showed lower preoperative albumin levels (WMD - 0.11; 95% CI - 0.19 to - 0.04) than the nonsarcopenia patients. Sarcopenia was significantly predictive of pneumonia (OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.75-3.81) and overall complications (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.07-2.15) after esophagectomy. The sarcopenia patients also showed nonsignificant increases in the risks of anastomotic leakage (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.99-1.67), vocal cord palsy (OR 2.03; 95% CI 0.89-4.64), and major complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade III; OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.95-1.79) but not increased operation time, blood loss, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative sarcopenia assessment showed considerable potential for predicting postoperative complications for esophageal cancer patients. To realize this potential, more effective diagnostic criteria and severity classifications for sarcopenia are warranted.

Early oral feeding following thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Nil-by-mouth with enteral tube feeding is widely practised for several days after resection and reconstruction of oesophageal cancer. This study investigates early changes in postoperative gastric emptying and the feasibility of early oral feeding after thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2013 and August 2013, gastric emptying of liquid food and the feasibility of early oral feeding after thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy was investigated in 68 patients. Sixty-five patients previously managed in the same unit who routinely took liquid food 7 days after thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy served as controls. RESULTS: The mean preoperative half gastric emptying time (GET1/2) was 66.4 ± 38.4 min for all 68 patients, and the mean GET1/2 at postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 7 was statistically significantly shorter than preoperative GET1/2 (23.9 ± 15.7 min and 24.1 ± 7.9 min, respectively, both P-values <0.001). Of the 68 patients who were enrolled to analyse the feasibility of early oral feeding, 2 (3.0%) patients could not take food as early as planned. The rate of total complication was 20.6% (14/68) and 29.2% (19/65) in the early oral feeding group and the late oral feeding group, respectively (P = 0.249). Compared with the late oral feeding group, time to first flatus and bowel movement was significantly shorter in the early oral feeding group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with preoperative gastric emptying, early postoperative gastric emptying for liquid food after oesophagectomy is significantly faster. Postoperative early oral feeding in patients with thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy is feasible and safe.