Comparison of vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Hawley retainers (HRs) and vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs) are the 2 most commonly used retainers in orthodontics. However, the basis for selection of an appropriate retainer is still a matter of debate among orthodontists. In this systematic review, we evaluated the differences between VFRs and HRs. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, and Pro-Quest) were searched with no language restriction. The relevant orthodontic journals and reference lists were checked for all eligible studies. Two article reviewers independently screened the retrieved studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the primary studies. RESULTS: A total of 89 articles were retrieved in the initial search. However, only 7 articles met the inclusion criteria. Some evidence suggested that no difference exists to distinguish between the HRs and VFRs with respect to changes in intercanine and intermolar widths after orthodontic retention. In terms of occlusal contacts, cost effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and survival time, there was insufficient evidence to support the use of VFRs over HRs. CONCLUSIONS: Additional high-quality, randomized, controlled trials concerning these retainers are necessary to determine which retainer is better for orthodontic procedures.

[Dynamic experiment on controlling of Microcystis aeruginosa by UV-C irradiation].

A plug-flow UV-C reactor equipped with low pressure UV lamp was utilized to study the suppression effect after UV-C irradiation under the dynamic conditions on Microcystis aeruginosa, a typical cyanobacterium in algae blooms in China. The culture fluid of Microcystis aeruginosa was exposed to UV-C irradiation when pumped through the reactor. After that, the fluid was incubated under the normal culture condition, and sampled at 2 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 7 d, 9 d for determination of cell density using the inverted system fluorescence microscope. The experiments showed that, UV-C irradiation did not cause severe cell lysis, and UV-C irradiation at dose ranged from 36 to 115 mW x s x cm(-2), and 31 to 50 mW x s x cm(-2) could suppress Microcystis aeruginosa biomass growth for the 2.6 x 10(5)-2.7 x 10(5) cells x mL(-1) and 9.0 x 10(5)-1.15 x 10(6) cells x mL(-1) fluid in 9 days, respectively.

The effects of sub-lethal UV-C irradiation on growth and cell integrity of cyanobacteria and green algae.

The effects of UV-C irradiation on algal growth and cell integrity were investigated to develop a potential method for preventing cyanobacterial blooms. The toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa and three common freshwater green algae Chlorella ellipsoidea, Chlorella vulgaris, and Scenedesmus quadricanda were exposed to UV-C irradiation at 0-200mJcm(-2) and subsequently incubated for 9-15 d under normal culture conditions. Cell density and cell integrity were assessed using flow cytometry. The results suggested that UV-C irradiation at 20-200mJcm(-2) can suppress M. aeruginosa growth for 3-13 d in a dose-dependent manner. UV-C irradiation at 20 and 50mJcm(-2) is sub-lethal to M. aeruginosa cells as over 80% of the exposed cells remained intact. However, UV-C irradiation at 100 and 200mJcm(-2) induced severe cell disintegration in more than 70% of the irradiated cells. Neither significant suppression nor disintegration effects on green algae were observed for UV-C irradiation at 20-200mJcm(-2) in this study. Taken together, the sensitivity of M. aeruginosa to UV-C irradiation was significantly higher than that of the non-toxic C. ellipsoidea, C. vulgaris, and S. quadricauda, suggesting the potential application of sub-lethal UV-C irradiation for M. aeruginosa bloom control with a predictable low ecological risk.