[Radiation-Induced Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma after Breast-Conserving Surgery-A Case Report].

The patient was a 73-year-old woman who had undergone breast-conserving surgery followed by irradiation (50 Gy/25 Fr)to the residual breast for left breast cancer 4 years before. Computed tomography for routine examination revealed a soft tissue mass on her left chest wall. Ultrasonography showed a hypoechoic mass with heterogeneous internal echo, 3.5×3.0×1.5 cm in size. Core-needle biopsy was performed, and histological examination revealed proliferation of spindle-shaped or pleomorphic and highly atypical cells. On immunohistochemistry, the tumor was negative for AE1/AE3, CD34, SMA, desmin, and S-100 and focally positive for CD68. Based on these findings, undifferentiated sarcoma was suspected. The patient underwent wide local excision of the chest wall with a surgical margin of 3-4 cm from the tumor edge. The histological diagnosis was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Judging from the clinical course, this tumor was radiation-induced sarcoma. The patient remains disease-free 54 months after the operation.

Breast metastasis from EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature.

Although lung cancer rarely metastasizes to the breast, we report a case of breast metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. This breast metastasis was initially considered recurrent breast cancer and was later diagnosed based on histopathological and molecular examinations as metastasis from lung cancer.

[A case of S-1/CDDP-resistant recurrent gastric cancer responsive to capecitabine/CDDP].

We present a case of recurrent gastric cancer in which stable disease status was achieved for four months due to treatment with capecitabine/cisplatin (CDDP)after the failure of multiple anticancer drugs including S-1/CDDP. A 67-year-old man was diagnosed with multiple liver metastases one year after distal gastrectomy+D2 dissection for gastric cancer. S-1/CDDP was given as the first-line treatment, followed by paclitaxel (PTX), irinotecan (CPT-11), and docetaxel (DOC). The tumor in the anterior segment of the liver was resistant to all of these chemotherapies except for PTX, which is why the regimens were changed. However, this tumor shrank and achieved stable disease status for four months after capecitabine/CDDP therapy given as fifth-line treatment. Our case suggests that S-1 and capecitabine do not always exhibit cross-resistance. Therefore, capecitabine may be effective in S-1-pretreated patients, and vice versa.

Differences in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activities between gastric and colorectal cancer.

We studied the relation between clinicopathological factors and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity in gastric and colorectal carcinomas. Specimens obtained by surgery from 27 gastric and 17 colorectal carcinomas and their normal mucosa were examined. The levels of DPD activity in the gastric carcinomas and their normal mucosa were significantly higher than those in colorectal carcinomas and their normal counterparts, respectively (both P's < 0.0001). The gastric carcinomas had significantly higher DPD activities than their normal mucosa (P = 0.028), but the colorectal carcinomas did not. Among the clinicopathological factors, which included invasion/metastatic status and staging, the only effect was that of the histological differences of gastric cancer on DPD activity. That is, the level of DPD activity of the histologically undifferentiated gastric carcinoma was significantly higher than that of the differentiated type. No prognostic predictive values of DPD were recognized in either gastric and colorectal cancer. In conclusion, the higher DPD activity in gastric cancer than colorectal cancer may be due to the higher DPD activity in the background mucosa of origin, and the higher population of undifferentiated type of histological classification, compared to the colorectal counterparts.