RESUMO
Background: Emerging evidence suggests that immunogenic chemotherapy not only kills tumor cells but also improves the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment by inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD), leading to sustained anti-tumor effects. The lack of ICD inducers explored in lung cancer necessitates investigation into new inducers for this context, therefore, this study aims to explore whether the gemcitabine (GEM) and celecoxib can activate the immunogenic chemotherapy progress in lung cancer tissue. Methods: We assessed five chemotherapeutic agents for their ability to trigger ICD using ex vivo and in vivo experiments, including western blotting (WB), flow cytometry, and tumor preventive vaccine assays. Additionally, we evaluated the synergistic effects of GEM, celecoxib, and anti-programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody (aPD-1) in tumor-bearing mice to understand how GEM activates antitumor immunity and enhances immunochemotherapy. Results: GEM was identified as an effective ICD inducer, showing high expression of calreticulin (CRT) and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). Co-culture with GEM-treated cells [Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) and CMT-64] enhanced dendritic cell (DC) activity, evidenced by maturation markers and increased phagocytic capacity. Moreover, celecoxib was found to enhance ICD by reducing indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) expression and increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS)-based endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. The combination therapy [GEM, celecoxib, and aPD-1 (GCP)] exhibited potent and sustained antitumor activity in immunocompetent mice, with enhanced recruitment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: These findings support the potential use of GCP therapy as a treatment option for lung cancer patients.
RESUMO
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers. Cellular senescence plays a vital role in carcinogenesis by activating many pathways. In this study, we aimed to identify biomarkers for predicting the survival and recurrence of CRC through cellular senescence-related genes. Methods: Utilizing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, RNA-sequencing data and clinical information for CRC were collected. A risk model for predicting overall survival was established based on five differentially expressed genes using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regression (LASSO-Cox regression), receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The study also delved into both the tumor microenvironment and the response to immunotherapy. Moreover, we gathered clinical sample data from our center in order to confirm the findings of public database analysis. Results: Through ROC and Kaplan-Meier analyses, a risk model was developed using five cellular senescence-related genes [i.e., CDKN2A, SERPINE1, SNAI1, CXCL1, and ETS2] to categorize patients into high- and low-risk groups. In the TCGA-colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) and GEO-COAD cohorts, the high-risk group was associated with a bleaker forecast (P<0.05), immune cell inactivation, and insensitivity to immunotherapy in IMvigor210 database (http://research-pub.gene.com/IMvigor210CoreBiologies/). Clinical samples were then used to confirm that ETS2 and CDKN2A could serve as independent prognostic biomarkers in CRC. Conclusions: Gene signatures related to cellular senescence, specifically involving CDKN2A and ETS2, are emerging as promising biomarkers for predicting CRC prognosis and guiding immunotherapy.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Intramural metastasis (IM) is a poor prognostic factor for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted this study to assess the prognostic impact of IM in an Uzbekistan cohort and to identify the factors associated with the poor prognosis of patients with ESCC and IM. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective analysis were 1083 patients with thoracic ESCC, who underwent curative esophagectomy between 2001 and 2021 at the National Cancer Center of Uzbekistan. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with versus those without IM and evaluated the factors associated with the poor prognosis of patients with IM. RESULTS: Patients with pathological IM (n = 59, 5.4%) were significantly older, had a higher percentage of lymphatic invasion and worse pathological N stage, and had shorter overall survival (OS) than patients without IM. Multivariable analysis of OS identified multiple IMs as the only independent prognostic factor in patients with IM (hazard ratio, 6.04; 95% confidence interval, 2.77-13.18; P < 0.001). Patients with multiple IMs had shorter OS and recurrence-free survival than those with a single IM. CONCLUSION: IM was a poor prognostic factor for patients with ESCC in this Uzbekistan cohort and multiple IMs were associated with worse outcomes.