Obexelimab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Exploration of Response Based on Gene Pathway Co-Expression Patterns: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Obexelimab is an investigational, bifunctional, noncytolytic monoclonal antibody that binds CD19 and FcyRIIb to inhibit B cells, plasmablasts, and plasma cells. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of obexelimab in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: During screening, patients with active, non-organ-threatening SLE received corticosteroid injections to ameliorate symptoms while immunosuppressants were withdrawn (≤10 mg/day prednisone equivalent and ≤400 mg/day hydroxychloroquine allowed). Patients with improved disease activity were randomized 1:1 to obexelimab 5 mg/kg intravenously or placebo once every 2 weeks until week 32 or loss of improvement (LOI). RESULTS: In this study, 104 patients were randomized. Analysis of the primary endpoint, proportion of patients reaching week 32 without LOI, used an efficacy-evaluable (EE) population defined as patients who completed the study or withdrew for flare or treatment-related toxicity. This endpoint did not reach statistical significance: 21 of 50 obexelimab-treated patients (42.0%) versus 12 of 42 patients (28.6%) treated with a placebo (P = 0.183). Time to LOI was increased in obexelimab-treated patients versus patients treated with a placebo in the EE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, P = 0.025) and intention-to-treat (HR 0.59, P = 0.062) populations. In obexelimab-treated patients, B cells decreased approximately 50%, and trough concentration and inclusion in baseline gene expression clusters with high B cell pathway modules were associated with increased time to LOI. Obexelimab was associated with infusion reactions but was generally safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, secondary analysis showed time to LOI was significantly increased in obexelimab-treated patients, and analysis of patient subsets defined by gene expression patterns at baseline suggests a responding subpopulation.

Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and mechanism of action of obexelimab for the treatment of patients with IgG4-related disease: an open-label, single-arm, single centre, phase 2 pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Obexelimab is a bifunctional, non-cytolytic, humanised monoclonal antibody that binds CD19 and Fc gamma receptor IIb to inhibit B cells, plasmablasts, and CD19-expressing plasma cells. We aimed to evaluate the safety, clinical efficacy, and pharmacodynamic effects of obexelimab in patients with active IgG4-related disease. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, single-arm, single centre, phase 2 pilot trial at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA, USA. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years and had active IgG4-related disease confirmed by an IgG4-related disease responder index score of 3 or more. Patients received 5 mg/kg of obexelimab intravenously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Patients on glucocorticoids at baseline were expected to discontinue usage within 2 months following enrolment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a decrease of 2 or more from baseline in the IgG4-related disease responder index at day 169 (ie, primary responders). Patients who achieved a decrease of 2 or more at any visit were designated as responders. Adverse events were graded on a scale of 1-5 (ie, mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading scale (version 4.3). Exploratory analyses were quantification of B-cell CD19 receptor occupancy, plasmablast, total B-cell and CD4+ cytotoxic T-cell count by flow cytometry, and immunoglobulin concentrations by nephelometry. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02725476. FINDINGS: Between Feb 24, 2016, and Dec 21, 2016, we enrolled 15 patients. The median age was 63 years (IQR 52-65). Ten (67%) of 15 patients were male, five (33%) were female, and 12 (80%) were White. At baseline, 12 (80%) of 15 patients had an elevated median serum IgG4 concentration of 220 mg/dL (IQR 124-441), and the median IgG4-related disease responder index score was 12 (IQR 7-13). 12 (80%) of 15 patients achieved the primary endpoint (ie, primary responders), 14 (93%) were defined as responders. Reductions from baseline in serum B cells and plasmablasts were observed following treatment with obexelimab. However, in most patients with follow-up data, serum B cells recovered to 75% of baseline concentrations within 42 days of the final obexelimab dose. 13 (87%) of 15 patients reported adverse events, one of which (an infusion reaction) resulted in treatment discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: All patients except for one had clinical responses to obexelimab treatment. Both reductions in circulating B cells without evidence of apoptosis during obexelimab treatment and their rapid rebound after treatment discontinuation suggest that obexelimab might lead to B-cell sequestration in lymphoid organs or the bone marrow. These results support the continued development of obexelimab for the treatment of IgG4-related disease. FUNDING: Xencor, Zenas BioPharma, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Complement activation products vs standard ANA testing: Treatment outcomes, diagnosis, and economic impact (CAPSTONE) in systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex clinical diagnosis historically aided by imperfect biomarkers. The advent of a multianalyte assay panel incorporating innovative cell-bound complement activation markers necessitates a comparison of its clinical utility to conventional autoantibodies for the diagnosis and treatment of SLE. OBJECTIVES: To compare the likelihood of SLE diagnosis, SLE treatment initiation, and the downstream impact on health care utilization among patients tested with AVISE Lupus (AVISE) vs standard-of-care laboratory testing with the traditional antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing strategy cohort (tANA). METHODS: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health record (EHR) data from the Illumination Health registry, which integrates EHR records from more than 300 rheumatologists across the US. Health records from January 2016 to December 2020 and administrative claims with cost data for a subset of patients linkable to the HealthCore Integrated Research Database and Medicare data were analyzed. The AVISE and tANA test results were classified as positive, negative, or indeterminate, and outcomes were stratified based on test results. Two cohorts were established: AVISE testing strategy and the tANA approach. Analyses included test impact on SLE diagnosis, treatment initiation, patterns of repeat testing, and downstream health care utilization. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) comparing the likelihood of SLE medication initiation and SLE diagnosis between the AVISE and tANA cohorts. RESULTS: The main cohort included 21,827 AVISE testing episodes and 22,778 tANA testing episodes. A total of 2,437 (11.2%) patients tested positive by AVISE compared with 5,364 (23.6%) of tANA positive patients. Among patients with no baseline prescription for SLE medication(s), patients with a positive AVISE test result were more likely to initiate SLE medications compared with tANA positive patients (43% vs 32%; OR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.41-1.76). The treatment effect was larger in patients new to the practice within the preceding year (55% vs 33%; adjusted OR = 2.77; 95% CI = 2.31-3.32). AVISE positive patients were more than 5-fold more likely to be diagnosed with SLE, as compared with the tANA patients (31% vs 8%; OR = 5.11; 95% CI = 4.43-5.89), and similar in the new patient cohort (30% vs 6%; OR = 6.34; 95% CI = 5.12-7.86). Linked EHR-Medicare data revealed a greater decrease in posttest vs pretest mean annualized outpatient laboratory testing in AVISE negative (-$985; P < 0.0001) vs tANA negative (-$356; P < 0.0001) patients. A similar analysis in the EHR-HealthCore linked data revealed similar numerical trends as the Medicare data for outpatient laboratory testing but did not reach significance (P > 0.05). Cost comparisons in the categories of hospitalization, emergency department, outpatient imaging, and pharmacy costs did not yield significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly greater likelihood of SLE diagnosis and SLE medication initiation in AVISE positive vs tANA positive patients is consistent with improved clinical actionability, potentially shortening time to diagnosis. AVISE negative patients experienced a greater decrease in outpatient laboratory testing posttest relative to tANA negative patients, supporting the improved negative predictive value of AVISE vs tANA. DISCLOSURES: Mr O'Malley and Dr Zack are employed by Exagen Inc. Drs Curtis and Xie, Ms Su, and Ms Clinton are affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Mr Haechung and Dr Grabner are employees of HealthCore, Inc., which received funding from Bendcare (owner of the Illumination Health Registry) for the conduct of parts of the study on which this manuscript is based. Exagen Inc. provided funding to Bendcare for the conduct of the study. Dr Grabner is also a shareholder of Anthem, Inc.

A Review of Complement Activation in SLE.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Complement activation is a key event in the pathogenesis of tissue inflammation and injury in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This review is aimed at comparing the usefulness of measurement of complement proteins in serum/plasma (C3, C4) to complement activation (split) products in plasma and on circulating blood cells for SLE diagnosis, disease monitoring, and prognosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Complement split products, C3dg, iC3b, and C4d, are elevated in SLE, and C3dg/C3 and iC3b/C3 ratios correlate with active SLE. C4d also is higher in patients with lupus nephritis. An elevated level of the alternative pathway split product, Bb, in early lupus pregnancy is a predictor of adverse outcomes in SLE patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Elevated levels of cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs), namely, B cell-bound C4d (BC4d) and erythrocyte-bound C4d (EC4d), within a multiparameter assay panel, may predict transition to SLE more than other lupus biomarkers. EC4d better correlates with lupus disease activity than low plasma complement levels. Elevated platelet-bound C4d (PC4d) correlates with thrombosis in SLE. Both EC4d and PC4d are increased in primary and secondary anti-phospholipid syndrome, and anti-beta2glycoproteinI antibodies may directly activate the complement system. Abnormal levels of plasma complement split products and CB-CAPs support complement activation as an important pathogenetic mechanism in SLE and the antiphospholipid syndromes. These tests show promise for the diagnosis of SLE and monitoring of disease activity.

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus patients with the BAFF antagonist "peptibody" blisibimod (AMG 623/A-623): results from randomized, double-blind phase 1a and phase 1b trials.

INTRODUCTION: Blisibimod is a potent B cell-activating factor (BAFF) antagonist that binds to both cell membrane-expressed and soluble BAFF. The goal of these first-in-human studies was to characterize the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of blisibimod in subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: SLE subjects with mild disease that was stable/inactive at baseline received either a single dose of blisibimod (0.1, 0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg subcutaneous [SC] or 1, 3, or 6 mg/kg intravenous [IV]) or placebo (phase 1a; N = 54), or four weekly doses of blisibimod (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg SC or 6 mg/kg IV) or placebo (phase 1b; N = 63). Safety and tolerability measures were collected, and B cell subset measurements and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. RESULTS: All subjects (93 % female; mean age 43.7 years) carried the diagnosis of SLE for ≥ 1 year. Single- and multiple-dose treatment with blisibimod produced a decrease in the number of naïve B cells (24-76 %) and a transient relative increase in the memory B cell compartment, with the greatest effect on IgD(-)CD27+; there were no notable changes in T cells or natural killer cells. With time, memory B cells reverted to baseline, leading to a calculated 30 % reduction in total B cells by approximately 160 days after the first dose. In both the single- and multiple-dosing SC cohorts, the pharmacokinetic profile indicated slow absorption, dose-proportional exposure from 0.3 through 3.0 mg/kg SC and 1 through 6 mg/kg IV, linear pharmacokinetics across the dose range of 1.0-6.0 mg/kg, and accumulation ratios ranging from 2.21 to 2.76. The relative increase in memory B cells was not associated with safety signals, and the incidence of adverse events, anti-blisibimod antibodies, and clinical laboratory abnormalities were comparable between blisibimod- and placebo-treated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Blisibimod changed the constituency of the B cell pool and single and multiple doses of blisibimod exhibited approximate dose-proportional pharmacokinetics across the dose range 1.0-6.0 mg/kg. The safety and tolerability profile of blisibimod in SLE was comparable with that of placebo. These findings support further studies of blisibimod in SLE and other B cell-mediated diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02443506 . Registered 11 May 2015. NCT02411136 Registered 7 April 2015.

Comparison of physician and patient global assessments over time in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis from the RADIUS cohort.

BACKGROUND: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is discordance between patient and physician assessments of disease severity and treatment response. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis of the RADIUS (RA Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Intervention and Utilization Study) 1 cohort examined specific factors that influence differences in global assessments for therapeutic effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs made by physicians (physician global assessment [PhGA]) and patients (patient global assessment [PtGA]). METHODS: The RADIUS 1 cohort consisted of primarily community-based private practice patients with RA requiring either the addition of or a switch to a new biologic or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and who were followed for up to 5 years by their rheumatologists. Periodic assessments included PhGA, PtGA, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 28-item tender/painful joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and acute-phase reactants. RESULTS: Among 4359 patients (mean disease duration, 7.3 years), PhGA most highly correlated with TJC28 (0.6956; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6881-0.7030) and SJC28 (0.6757; 95% CI, 0.6678-0.6834). Moderate overall correlations were observed for PtGA with TJC28 (0.5000; 95% CI, 0.4890-0.5108) and less 50 with SJC28 (0.3754; 95% CI, 0.3628-0.3878). Patient global assessment most strongly correlated with pain VAS (0.8349; 95% CI, 0.8305-0.8392) and moderately correlated with HAQ-DI (0.5979; 95% CI, 0.5886-0.6071). Acute-phase reactants poorly correlated with PhGA and PtGA. CONCLUSIONS: Low correlations between PhGA and acute-phase reactants suggest that these measurements have a limited contribution compared with the physical examination when physicians make global assessments. These results also suggest that physicians should consider patients' assessments of their disease activity (HAQ, pain VAS, and PtGA) and put joint counts into proper context.

Associations between inflammation, nocturnal back pain and fatigue in ankylosing spondylitis and improvements with etanercept therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationships between inflammation, nocturnal back pain and fatigue in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and the impact of 12 weeks' etanercept treatment versus sulfasalazine or placebo. METHODS: Data were combined from four clinical trials for patients with AS who received at least one dose of etanercept, sulfasalazine or placebo and had at least one postbaseline assessment value. Linear regression was performed (controlling for site, protocol and demographics), to explore the relationship between inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP]), nocturnal back pain (visual analog scale [VAS] 0-100 mm) and fatigue (VAS 0-100 mm Bath AS Disease Activity Index fatigue item). RESULTS: Out of 1283 patients (etanercept, n = 867; sulfasalazine, n = 187; placebo, n = 229), improvement in nocturnal back pain was a significant predictor of improvement in fatigue. Significant correlations were found between nocturnal back pain and fatigue, but not CRP levels. Etanercept provided significantly greater pain/fatigue improvement than sulfasalazine or placebo. Improvements in nocturnal back pain and fatigue had weak relationships with improvement in inflammation (CRP level). CONCLUSIONS: AS patients treated with etanercept demonstrated superior improvement in nocturnal back pain and fatigue versus sulfasalazine or placebo. Decrease in nocturnal back pain can improve fatigue. Assessing treatment response using CRP levels alone may be misleading without also examining patient-reported outcomes such as back pain and fatigue.

Female patients with ankylosing spondylitis: analysis of the impact of gender across treatment studies.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact (if any) of gender on the clinical, functional and patient-reported outcomes of treatment using data pooled from four controlled clinical trials. METHODS: Study data were pooled from four clinical control trials in which 1283 adult patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were treated with etanercept, sulfasalazine or placebo. Patients were stratified by gender and analysed for differences/similarities in baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and efficacy in AS outcome measures and safety and discontinuation rates after 12 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Significant baseline differences were observed between 326 female patients compared with 957 male patients. Female patients had an older mean age of disease onset (35.0 vs 31.2 years; p<0.001), shorter mean time of disease duration (7.4 vs 9.5 years; p<0.001) and lower mean baseline C-reactive protein (13.1 vs 20.9 mg/l; p<0.001); a lower proportion was HLA-B27 positive (76.3% vs 85.2%; p<0.001) compared with male patients. Women had significantly (p<0.001) smaller differences in all week 12 efficacy assessments including AS disease activity score (0.87 vs -1.08), Bath AS disease activity index (-19.22 vs -23.41) and Bath AS functional index (-13.89 vs -16.88) relative to men. A similar relationship was observed between women and men in the adjusted mean difference of nocturnal back pain (4.04, 95% CI 0.77 to 7.32; p<0.05), total back pain (3.80, 95% CI 0.77 to 7.32; p<0.05) and patient global assessment (4.79, 95% CI 1.51 to 8.08; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Women had a higher burden of disease and less improvement in AS outcome measures compared with men. This was observed despite women having a later disease onset of shorter duration; the mechanism behind this observation is unclear. Additional research is necessary to better understand female patients with AS and the burden of disease in this population.

A novel modality of BAFF-specific inhibitor AMG623 peptibody reduces B-cell number and improves outcomes in murine models of autoimmune disease.

OBJECTIVES: AMG623, also known as A-623, is an antagonist of B-cell activating factor (BAFF). The present study was to evaluate the effects of AMG623 on murine models of autoimmune diseases. METHODS: AMG623 was generated through phage library. Inhibitory activities of AMG623 against human and murine BAFF were measured by biacore binding and BAFF-mediated B-cell proliferation assay. Pharmacological effects of AMG623 were studied in BALB/c mice, collagen-induced arthritis model (CIA) and in the NZBxNZW F1 lupus model. RESULTS: AMG623 binds to both soluble and cell surface BAFF. AMG623 blocks both human murine BAFF binding to the receptors. Treatment of AMG623 resulted in B-cell number reduction, and improvement of arthritis and lupus development in mice. CONCLUSIONS: AMG623 is a novel modality of BAFF antagonist. AMG623 is a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, and other B-cell-mediated autoimmune diseases.

Comparison of health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis and effects of etanercept treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before and after treatment with etanercept in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis using spydergram representations. METHODS: Data from randomised, controlled trials of etanercept in patients with RA, PsA and psoriasis were analysed. HRQoL was assessed by the medical outcomes survey short form 36 (SF-36) physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary and domain scores. Baseline comparisons with age and gender-matched norms and treatment-associated changes in domain scores were quantified using spydergrams and the health utility SF-6D measure. RESULTS: Mean baseline PCS scores were lower than age and gender-matched norms in patients with RA and PsA, but near normative values in patients with psoriasis; MCS scores at baseline were near normal in PsA and psoriasis but low in RA. Treatment with etanercept resulted in improvements in PCS and MCS scores as well as individual SF-36 domains across all indications. Mean baseline SF-6D scores were higher in psoriasis than in RA or PsA; clinically meaningful improvements in SF-6D were observed in all three patient populations following treatment with etanercept. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA, PsA and psoriasis demonstrated unique HRQoL profiles at baseline. Treatment with etanercept was associated with improvements in PCS and MCS scores as well as individual domain scores in patients with RA, PsA and psoriasis.

The relationship between joint damage and functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To summarise the relationship between joint damage and functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature from 1990 to 2008 was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The search strategy focused on RA, joint damage and disability. Only longitudinal studies or randomised clinical trials with 1 year or more of follow-up containing data correlating joint damage and disability were included. The comparisons were categorised in four ways: baseline damage versus disability at end of follow-up (correlation A); damage versus disability measured cross-sectionally at each of several time points (correlation B); changes in damage versus final disability (correlation C) and changes in damage versus changes in disability (correlation D). RESULTS: From a total of 1902 abstracts, 42 studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. More than 50% of the studies that measured baseline damage to later disability (A) reported a statistically significant association. Correlation was significant when measured at multiple time points over time (B; 16/19 studies). Statistically significant associations between changes in damage and either disability at end of follow-up or changes in disability were also found (C and D; 11/13 studies). CONCLUSIONS: While many of the studies did not include multivariate analysis with confounder adjustment, the published evidence indicates a link between joint damage and functional disability and that an increase in joint damage is associated with an increase in disability over time. Treatments to limit progressive joint damage may lead to better joint function and improved patient outcome with less disability.

A randomized, double-blind study of AMG 108 (a fully human monoclonal antibody to IL-1R1) in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

INTRODUCTION: AMG 108 is a fully human, immunoglobulin subclass G2 (IgG2) monoclonal antibody that binds the human interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor type 1, inhibiting the activity of IL-1a and IL-1b. In preclinical studies, IL-1 inhibition was shown to be beneficial in models of osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this two-part study was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK; Part A) and clinical effect (Part B) of AMG 108 in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study in patients with OA of the knee. METHODS: In Part A, patients received placebo or AMG 108 subcutaneously (SC; 75 mg or 300 mg) or intravenously (IV; 100 mg or 300 mg) once every 4 weeks for 12 weeks; in Part B, patients received placebo or 300 mg AMG 108 SC, once every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. The clinical effect of AMG 108 was measured in Part B by using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index pain score. RESULTS: In Part A, 68 patients were randomized, and 64 received investigational product. In Part B, 160 patients were randomized, and 159 received investigational product. AMG 108 was well tolerated. Most adverse events (AEs), infectious AEs, serious AEs and infections, as well as withdrawals from the study due to AEs occurred at similar rates in both active and placebo groups. One death was reported in an 80-year-old patient (Part A, 300 mg IV AMG 108; due to complications of lobar pneumonia). AMG 108 serum concentration-time profiles exhibited nonlinear PK. The AMG 108 group in Part B had statistically insignificant but numerically greater improvement in pain compared with the placebo group, as shown by the WOMAC pain scores (median change, -63.0 versus -37.0, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of AMG 108 SC and IV was comparable with placebo in patients with OA of the knee. Patients who received AMG 108 showed statistically insignificant but numerically greater improvements in pain; however, minimal, if any, clinical benefit was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT00110942.

Rodent preclinical models for developing novel antiarthritic molecules: comparative biology and preferred methods for evaluating efficacy.

Rodent models of immune-mediated arthritis (RMIA) are the conventional approach to evaluating mechanisms of inflammatory joint disease and the comparative efficacy of antiarthritic agents. Rat adjuvant-induced (AIA), collagen-induced (CIA), and streptococcal cell wall-induced (SCW) arthritides are preferred models of the joint pathology that occurs in human rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Lesions of AIA are most severe and consistent; structural and immunological changes of CIA best resemble RA. Lesion extent and severity in RMIA depends on experimental methodology (inciting agent, adjuvant, etc.) and individual physiologic parameters (age, genetics, hormonal status, etc.). The effectiveness of antiarthritic molecules varies with the agent, therapeutic regimen, and choice of RMIA. All RMIA are driven by overactivity of proinflammatory pathways, but the dominant molecules differ among the models. Hence, as with the human clinical experience, the efficacy of various antiarthritic molecules differs among RMIA, especially when the agent is a specific cytokine inhibitor.

A phase 2 randomized, double-blind study of AMG 108, a fully human monoclonal antibody to IL-1R, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Preclinical work has suggested that IL-1 plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of a long-acting IL-1 receptor inhibitor, AMG 108, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-dosing study in patients with active RA who were receiving stable methotrexate (15 to 25 mg/week). METHODS: Patients were randomized equally to receive placebo or 50, 125, or 250 mg AMG 108 subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology response (ACR20) at week 24; other efficacy endpoints included the ACR50, the ACR70, and the RA disease activity score (28-joint count Disease Activity Score) responses, patient-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), infectious AEs, serious AEs, serious infections, injection site reactions, laboratory abnormalities, and antibodies to AMG 108. RESULTS: Of 813 patients enrolled in the study, 204 patients were randomized to the 50 mg group, 203 to the 125 mg group, 203 to the 250 mg group, and 203 to placebo. At week 24, 40.4% of the 250 mg group, 36% of the 125 mg group, 30.9% of the 50 mg group, and 29.1% of the placebo group achieved an ACR20 (P = 0.022, 250 mg vs. placebo). Of the individual ACR components, numerical dose-dependent improvements were only seen in tender joint counts, pain (visual analog scale), and the acute phase reactants, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. No dose-related increase was observed in the incidence of treatment-emergent AEs. No deaths were reported, and the incidence of AEs and infections, serious AEs and infections, and withdrawals from study for safety were similar in the AMG 108 and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: This large double-blind randomized trial with a long-acting IL-1 receptor blocker, AMG 108, is consistent with the experience of other IL-1 blockers, represents a definitive experiment showing that IL-1 inhibition provides only moderate symptomatic amelioration of arthritis activity in the majority of RA patients, and provides an answer to a question that has been discussed for many years in the rheumatologic community. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00293826.

Summary of worldwide pediatric malignancies reported after exposure to etanercept.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about a potential link between the use of TNF inhibitors and development of malignancy in the pediatric population. We examined the worldwide experience of etanercept use in pediatric patients and the occurrence of malignancies as reported from clinical trials, registry studies, post-marketing surveillance, and published scientific literature. METHODS: All reports of "malignancy" in pediatric patients (including subjects who received etanercept before age 18 and developed a malignancy before age 22) were collected from the etanercept clinical trials database and global safety database using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; v12.0) standardized MedDRA query "Malignancies" from 1998 to August 2009. Cases were collected irrespective of treatment indication. All cases were included regardless of exposure to other TNF blockers or other biologics and whether the other exposure was before or after etanercept. RESULTS: A total of 18 potential malignancies were identified: 4 leukemias, 7 lymphomas, and 7 solid tumors. Three of the 18 malignancies remain unconfirmed. No malignancies were reported from clinical trials or the open-label extension studies in any indication in children. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that there does not appear to be an increased risk of malignancy overall with the use of etanercept. Among etanercept-exposed patients aged 4 to 17 years, the estimated worldwide and US reporting rates for lymphoma were approximately 0.01 per 100 patient-years (1 in 10,000 pt-yrs). While the reported rate of lymphoma is higher in pediatric patients treated with etanercept than in normal children, the expected rate of lymphoma in biologic naïve JIA patients is currently unknown. The risk of TNF inhibitors in the development of malignancies in children and adolescents is difficult to assess because of the rarity of malignant events, the absence of knowledge of underlying frequency of leukemia and lymphoma in JIA, and the confounding use of concomitant immunosuppressive medications.

Sample stability and variability of B-cell subsets in blood from healthy subjects and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Characterization of peripheral leukocytes is an important aspect of monitoring the effect of immunotherapeutic interventions in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We analyzed cell surface markers commonly used to assess patients with SLE, focusing on the effect of holding blood prior to processing/analysis and the relative reliability of the measurements that were conducted. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (HV; n = 20) and patients with SLE (n = 42) were studied. Whole blood was collected for flow cytometric analysis on days 1, 8, 15, 105, 195, 285, and 375 and held overnight for analysis. A subset of samples was additionally analyzed on the day of collection. RESULTS: Variability arising from overnight storage of whole blood was found to be within 20% for most lymphocyte subsets. There was greater between rather than within subject variability over a 1-year period. As anticipated, the data showed higher CD38 and lower CD19 densities on B cells from patients with SLE compared to HV. Although a higher percentage of cells with markers of plasmablasts/cells were observed in the blood of patients with SLE relative to HV, these measurements were found to be among the least reliable (i.e., most variable). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides technical perspectives for those conducting immunophenotypic analyses of B-cells in patients with SLE. We envision that our data, which addresses sample stability issues and presents a method to describe the relative reliability of one measure over another, holds value for clinical assessments of B-cells in SLE and the evaluation of investigational agents designed to modify the B-cell compartment.

RANKL inhibition by osteoprotegerin prevents bone loss without affecting local or systemic inflammation parameters in two rat arthritis models: comparison with anti-TNFalpha or anti-IL-1 therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Rat adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) feature bone loss and systemic increases in TNFalpha, IL-1beta, and receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL). Anti-IL-1 or anti-TNFalpha therapies consistently reduce inflammation in these models, but systemic bone loss often persists. RANKL inhibition consistently prevents bone loss in both models without reducing joint inflammation. Effects of these therapies on systemic markers of bone turnover and inflammation have not been directly compared. METHODS: Lewis rats with established AIA or CIA were treated for 10 days (from day 4 post onset) with either PBS (Veh), TNFalpha inhibitor (pegsunercept), IL-1 inhibitor (anakinra), or RANKL inhibitor (osteoprotegerin (OPG)-Fc). Local inflammation was evaluated by monitoring hind paw swelling. Bone mineral density (BMD) of paws and lumbar vertebrae was assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Markers and mediators of bone resorption (RANKL, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP 5B)) and inflammation (prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), acute-phase protein alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (alpha1AGP), multiple cytokines) were measured in serum (day 14 post onset). RESULTS: Arthritis progression significantly increased paw swelling and ankle and vertebral BMD loss. Anti-TNFalpha reduced paw swelling in both models, and reduced ankle BMD loss in AIA rats. Anti-IL-1 decreased paw swelling in CIA rats, and reduced ankle BMD loss in both models. Anti-TNFalpha and anti-IL-1 failed to prevent vertebral BMD loss in either model. OPG-Fc reduced BMD loss in ankles and vertebrae in both models, but had no effect on paw swelling. Serum RANKL was elevated in AIA-Veh and CIA-Veh rats. While antiTNFalpha and anti-IL-1 partially normalized serum RANKL without any changes in serum TRACP 5B, OPG-Fc treatment reduced serum TRACP 5B by over 90% in both CIA and AIA rats. CIA-Veh and AIA-Veh rats had increased serum alpha1AGP, IL-1beta, IL-8 and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), and AIA-Veh rats also had significantly greater serum PGE2, TNFalpha and IL-17. Anti-TNFalpha reduced systemic alpha1AGP, CCL2 and PGE2 in AIA rats, while anti-IL-1 decreased systemic alpha1AGP, IL-8 and PGE2. In contrast, RANKL inhibition by OPG-Fc did not lessen systemic cytokine levels in either model. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNFalpha or anti-IL-1 therapy inhibited parameters of local and systemic inflammation, and partially reduced local but not systemic bone loss in AIA and CIA rats. RANKL inhibition prevented local and systemic bone loss without significantly inhibiting local or systemic inflammatory parameters.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha and RANKL blockade cannot halt bony spur formation in experimental inflammatory arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the kinetics of bony spur formation and the relationship of bony spur formation to synovial inflammation and bone erosion in 2 rat arthritis models, and to address whether bony spur formation depends on the expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) or RANKL. METHODS: Analysis of the kinetics of synovial inflammation, bone erosion, osteoclast formation, and growth of bony spurs was performed in rat collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) and adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA). In addition, inhibition experiments were performed to assess whether inhibition of TNFalpha and RANKL by pegylated soluble TNF receptor type I (pegTNFRI) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), respectively, affected bony spur formation. RESULTS: Bony spurs emerged from the periosteal surface close to joints, and initial proliferation of mesenchymal cells was noted as early as 3 days and 5 days after onset of CIA and AIA, respectively. Initiation of bony spur formation occurred shortly after the onset of inflammation and bone erosion. Neither pegTNFRI nor OPG could significantly halt the osteophytic responses in CIA and AIA. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that bony spur formation is triggered by inflammation and initial structural damage in these rat models of inflammatory arthritis. Moreover, emergence of bony spurs depends on periosteal proliferation and is not affected by inhibition of either TNFalpha or RANKL. Bony spur formation can thus be considered a process that occurs independent of TNFalpha and RANKL and is triggered by destructive arthritis.

The evolving systemic and local biomarker milieu at different stages of disease progression in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) were necropsied on 14 occasions during preclinical, acute clinical and chronic clinical stages of AIA progression to characterize local (joint protein extracts) and systemic (serum) levels of mediators regulating inflammation and bone erosion in conjunction with lymphoid tissue-specific leukocyte kinetics. RESULTS: Systemic increases in alpha1 acid glycoprotein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha), interleukin (IL)-17, transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta), and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) together with local IL-1alpha/beta and TGFbeta enrichment and local lymphoid hyperplasia preceded the onset of clinical disease and joint damage. Systemic upregulation of TNFalpha, IL-6, IL-17, TGFbeta, IL-18, CCL2, receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappabeta ligand (RANKL), and prostaglandin E(2) during acute and/or chronic AIA coincided with systemic leukocytosis and CD4+ T cell increase in blood and spleen. In contrast, progression of joint erosions during clinical AIA was associated with intra-articular increases in IL-1alpha/beta, IL-6, RANKL, IL-17, TGFbeta, CCL2, and KC/GRO and also a dramatic decline in osteoprotegerin. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that systemic and local events in inflammatory arthritis are discrete processes, driven by multiple cellular and humoral mediators with distinct kinetic profiles.