Evidence of an Unusual Poly(A) RNA Signature Detected by High-Throughput Chemical Mapping.

Homopolymeric adenosine RNA plays numerous roles in both cells and noncellular genetic material. We report herein an unusual poly(A) signature in chemical mapping data generated by the Eterna Massive Open Laboratory. Poly(A) sequences of length seven or more show unexpected results in the selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation read out by primer extension (SHAPE) and dimethyl sulfate (DMS) chemical probing. This unusual signature first appears in poly(A) sequences of length seven and grows to its maximum strength at length ∼10. In a long poly(A) sequence, the substitution of a single A by any other nucleotide disrupts the signature, but only for the 6 or so nucleotides on the 5' side of the substitution.

Principles for Predicting RNA Secondary Structure Design Difficulty.

Designing RNAs that form specific secondary structures is enabling better understanding and control of living systems through RNA-guided silencing, genome editing and protein organization. Little is known, however, about which RNA secondary structures might be tractable for downstream sequence design, increasing the time and expense of design efforts due to inefficient secondary structure choices. Here, we present insights into specific structural features that increase the difficulty of finding sequences that fold into a target RNA secondary structure, summarizing the design efforts of tens of thousands of human participants and three automated algorithms (RNAInverse, INFO-RNA and RNA-SSD) in the Eterna massive open laboratory. Subsequent tests through three independent RNA design algorithms (NUPACK, DSS-Opt and MODENA) confirmed the hypothesized importance of several features in determining design difficulty, including sequence length, mean stem length, symmetry and specific difficult-to-design motifs such as zigzags. Based on these results, we have compiled an Eterna100 benchmark of 100 secondary structure design challenges that span a large range in design difficulty to help test future efforts. Our in silico results suggest new routes for improving computational RNA design methods and for extending these insights to assess "designability" of single RNA structures, as well as of switches for in vitro and in vivo applications.