Reproducibility of c-Met Immunohistochemical Scoring (Clone SP44) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Conventional Light Microscopy and Whole Slide Imaging.

Emerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer targeting c-Met overexpression have recently demonstrated promising results. However, the evaluation of c-Met expression can be challenging. We aimed to study the inter and intraobserver reproducibility of c-Met expression evaluation. One hundred ten cases with non-small cell lung cancer (40 biopsies and 70 surgical specimens) were retrospectively selected in a single laboratory (LPCE) and evaluated for c-Met expression. Six pathologists (4 seniors and 2 juniors) evaluated the H-score and made a 3-tier classification of c-Met expression for all cases, using conventional light microscopy (CLM) and whole slide imaging (WSI). The interobserver reproducibility with CLM gave global Cohen Kappa coefficients (ƙ) ranging from 0.581 (95% CI: 0.364-0.771) to 0.763 (95% CI: 0.58-0.92) using the c-Met 3-tier classification and H-score, respectively. ƙ was higher for senior pathologists and biopsy samples. The interobserver reproducibility with WSI gave a global ƙ ranging from 0.543 (95% CI: 0.33-0.724) to 0.905 (95% CI: 0.618-1) using the c-Met H-score and 2-tier classification (≥25% 3+), respectively. ƙ for intraobserver reproducibility between CLM and WSI ranged from 0.713 to 0.898 for the c-Met H-score and from 0.600 to 0.779 for the c-Met 3-tier classification. We demonstrated a moderate to excellent interobserver agreement for c-Met expression with a substantial to excellent intraobserver agreement between CLM and WSI, thereby supporting the development of digital pathology. However, some factors (scoring method, type of tissue samples, and expertise level) affect reproducibility. Our findings highlight the importance of establishing a consensus definition and providing further training, particularly for inexperienced pathologists, for c-Met immunohistochemistry assessment in clinical practice.

Shifting from Immunohistochemistry to Screen for ALK Rearrangements: Real-World Experience in a Large Single-Center Cohort of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

The identification of ALK fusions in advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (aNSCLC) is mandatory for targeted therapy. The current diagnostic approach employs an algorithm using ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening, followed by confirmation through ALK FISH and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS). Challenges arise due to the infrequency of ALK fusions (3-7% of aNSCLC), the suboptimal specificity of ALK IHC and ALK FISH, and the growing molecular demands placed on small tissue samples, leading to interpretative, tissue availability, and time-related issues. This study investigates the effectiveness of RNA NGS as a reflex test for identifying ALK fusions in NSCLC, with the goal of replacing ALK IHC in the systematic screening process. The evaluation included 1246 NSCLC cases using paired techniques: ALK IHC, ALK FISH, and ALK NGS. ALK IHC identified 51 positive cases (4%), while RNA NGS detected ALK alterations in 59 cases (4.8%). Of the 59 ALK-positive cases identified via NGS, 53 (89.8%) were confirmed to be positive. This included 51 cases detected via both FISH and IHC, and 2 cases detected only via FISH, as they were completely negative according to IHC. The combined reporting time for ALK IHC and ALK FISH averaged 13 days, whereas ALK IHC and RNA NGS reports were obtained in an average of 4 days. These results emphasize the advantage of replacing systematic ALK IHC screening with RNA NGS reflex testing for a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of ALK status.

Characterisation of the protein expression of the emerging immunotherapy targets VISTA, LAG-3 and PRAME in primary uveal melanoma: insights from a southern French patient cohort.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumour in adults, with dismal prognosis once metastases develop, since therapeutic options for the metastatic disease are ineffective. Over the past decade, novel cancer therapies based on immunotherapy have changed the landscape of treatment of different forms of cancer leading to many hopes of improvement in patient overall survival (OS). VISTA, LAG-3 and PRAME are novel promising targets of immunotherapy that have recently gained attention in different solid tumours, but whose relevance in UM remained to be comprehensively evaluated until now. Here, we studied the protein expression of VISTA, LAG-3 and PRAME using immunohistochemistry in representative whole tissue sections from primary UM cases in a cohort of 30 patients from a single centre (Nice University Hospital, Nice, France). The expression of each of these markers was correlated with different clinical and pathological parameters, including onset of metastases and OS. We demonstrated the protein expression of VISTA and LAG-3 in small lymphocytes infiltrating the tumour, while no expression of the proteins was detected in UM cells. For PRAME, nuclear expression was observed in UM cells, but no expression in tumour infiltrating immune cells was identified. Increased levels of VISTA expression in tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were associated with nuclear BAP1 expression and better prognosis. Higher levels of LAG-3 in TILs were associated with higher levels of CD8-positive TILs. PRAME nuclear positivity in melanoma cells was associated with epithelioid cell dominant (>90%) UM histological subtype, higher mitotic numbers and a higher percentage of chromosome 8q gain. This study proposes VISTA as a novel relevant immune checkpoint molecule in primary UM and contributes to confirm LAG-3 and PRAME as potentially important immunotherapy targets in the treatment of UM patients, helping to expand the number of immunotherapy candidate molecules that are relevant to modulate in this aggressive cancer.

Assessment of Different Circulating Tumor Cell Platforms for Uveal Melanoma: Potential Impact for Future Routine Clinical Practice.

Liquid biopsy and circulating tumor cell (CTC) screening has gained interest over the last two decades for detecting almost all solid malignancies. To date, the major limitation in terms of the applicability of CTC screening in daily clinical practice is the lack of reproducibility due to the high number of platforms available that use various technologies (e.g., label-dependent versus label-free detection). Only a few studies have compared different CTC platforms. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of four commercially available CTC platforms (Vortex (VTX-1), ClearCell FX, ISET, and Cellsearch) for the detection and identification of uveal melanoma cells (OMM 2.3 cell line). Tumor cells were seeded in RPMI medium and venous blood from healthy donors, and then processed similarly using these four platforms. Melan-A immunochemistry was performed to identify tumor cells, except when the Cellsearch device was used (automated identification). The mean overall recovery rates (with mean recovered cells) were 39.2% (19.92), 22.2% (11.31), 8.9% (4.85), and 1.1% (0.20) for the ISET, Vortex (VTX-1), ClearCell FX, and CellSearch platforms, respectively. Although paramount, the recovery rate is not sufficient to assess a CTC platform. Other parameters, such as the purpose for using a platform (diagnosis, genetics, drug sensitivity, or patient-derived xenograft models), reproducibility, purity, user-friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and ergonomics, should also be considered before they can be used in daily clinical practice and are discussed in this article.

Lack of correlation between MET and PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer revealed by comparative study of matched biopsies and surgical resection samples.

INTRODUCTION: Both MET expression and the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) are companion diagnostics for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (aNSCLC) patients. We evaluated the rate of correlation between MET expression and the PD-L1 TPS in matched biopsies and surgically resected specimens from NSCLC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis assessed the prevalence and correlation between MET expression (SP44 clone) and the PD-L1 TPS (22C3 clone) by immunohistochemistry together with molecular alterations determined by targeted next-generation sequencing in matched lung biopsy and surgically lung resected specimens from 70 patients with NSCLC. RESULTS: The study found a significant correlation between the MET H-score in surgical samples and matched biopsies (P-value < 0.0001), as well as between the PD-L1 TPS in paired biopsies and surgical samples (P-value < 0.0001). However, there was no significant correlation between the MET H-score or expression subgroups and the PD-L1 TPS in both types of paired samples (P-value = 0.47, and P-value = 0.90). The MET H-score was significantly higher in adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma (P-value < 0.0001). A mutational analysis showed that the MET H-score was significantly higher in NSCLC cases with targetable molecular alterations (P-value = 0.0095), while no significant correlation was found for the PD-L1 TPS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no significant correlation between PD-L1 and MET expression in samples from NSCLC patients, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment strategies based on individual expression profiles. These findings provide valuable insight into the development of effective immunotherapy and targeted therapy for NSCLC patients.

Need for a Dedicated Ophthalmic Malignancy Clinico-Biological Biobank: The Nice Ocular MAlignancy (NOMA) Biobank.

Ophthalmic malignancies include various rare neoplasms involving the conjunctiva, the uvea, or the periocular area. These tumors are characterized by their scarcity as well as their histological, and sometimes genetic, diversity. Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy. UM raises three main challenges highlighting the specificity of ophthalmic malignancies. First, UM is a very rare malignancy with an estimated incidence of 6 cases per million inhabitants. Second, tissue biopsy is not routinely recommended due to the risk of extraocular dissemination. Third, UM is an aggressive cancer because it is estimated that about 50% of patients will experience metastatic spread without any curative treatment available at this stage. These challenges better explain the two main objectives in the creation of a dedicated UM biobank. First, collecting UM samples is essential due to tissue scarcity. Second, large-scale translational research programs based on stored human samples will help to better determine UM pathogenesis with the aim of identifying new biomarkers, allowing for early diagnosis and new targeted treatment modalities. Other periocular malignancies, such as conjunctival melanomas or orbital malignancies, also raise specific concerns. In this context, the number of biobanks worldwide dedicated to ocular malignancies is very limited. The aims of this article were (i) to describe the specific challenges raised by a dedicated ocular malignancy biobank, (ii) to report our experience in setting up such a biobank, and (iii) to discuss future perspectives in this field.

Comparison of Two Rapid Assays for the Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Metastatic Melanoma including Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes.

Testing for the BRAF mutation is mandatory for the management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Molecular analysis based on DNA sequencing remains the gold-standard method for the screening of the different BRAF mutations. These methods must be rapid, sensitive, and specific enough to allow optimal therapeutic management in daily practice and also to include patients in clinical trials. Here, we compared the Idylla BRAF Mutation Test and the anti-BRAF V600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 90 melanoma samples, with a focus on a challenging cohort of 32 positive sentinel lymph nodes. The BRAF status was assessed with both methods independently of the percentage of tumor cells. The concordance rate was calculated excluding both non-contributory analyses and BRAFV600K/R/M mutants due to the specific V600E-IHC test design. The incidence of the BRAFV600E mutation was 33% with both BRAF Idylla and BRAF IHC. The agreement rate was 91% (72/79). Although the agreement rate was high, we suggest that the use of IHC is more suitable for rapid BRAF testing on sentinel lymph node biopsies when associated with a low percentage and scattered tumor cells, which gave a high risk of non-contributory analysis and/or false negative results with the IdyllaTMBRAF Mutation Test.

Analytical validation of automated multiplex chromogenic immunohistochemistry for diagnostic and predictive purpose in non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of an increasing number of diagnostic and predictive markers is playing a central role in precision thoracic oncology. Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC), alongside next-generation sequencing, is ideally situated for this purpose and maximizes tumor tissue preservation for molecular analyses that use increasingly large panels. However, the standardization and validation of mIHC that supports routine clinical laboratory processes are mandatory. After a previous proof-of-concept study, we now (i) optimized two automated four-plex assays on a commercially available IHC autostainer for use in daily practices worldwide and (ii) evaluated the repeatability and concordance of the assessment of the cell density. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two four-plex mIHC assays [i) TTF1, p40, PD-L1, CD8; and, ii) ALK, ROS1, BRAFV600E, NTRK] were optimized on the BenchMark ULTRA autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), as determined in comparison to conventional IHC chromogenic assays. Intra-site repeatability was evaluated on serial tumor sections from non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). The concordance was assessed by linear fit to plots of the percentage staining evaluated on tumor sections from 89 NSCLC patients. RESULTS: Following optimization, an average concordance for a staining rate of 95.4% was achieved between conventional IHC and mIHC across all selected markers. Assessment of intra-site repeatability showed strong concordance for all these markers (average, R2 = 0.96; P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our optimized mIHC assay gave a sensitive and repeatable assessment of two panels of eight diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for NSCLC. The availability of standardized protocols to determine these biomarkers on a widely available IHC platform will expand the number of pathology laboratories able to determine the eligibility of patients with NSCLC for targeted treatment or immunotherapy in a reliable and concordant manner, thus providing a unique sample-sparing tool to characterize limited tissue samples in thoracic oncology.

Detection of EGFR Mutations From Plasma of NSCLC Patients Using an Automatic Cartridge-Based PCR System.

The introduction of liquid biopsies for the detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) has revolutionized the clinical care. However, liquid biopsies are technically challenging and require specifically trained personnel. To facilitate the implementation of liquid biopsies for the detection of EGFR mutations from plasma, we have assessed a fully automated cartridge-based qPCR test that allows the automatic detection of EGFR mutations directly from plasma. We have analyzed 54 NSCLC patients and compared the results of the cartridge-base device to an FDA-approved assay. Detection of EGFR mutations was comparable but slightly lower in the cartridge-based device for L858R mutations (14/15 detected, 93%) and exon 19 deletions (18/20 detected, 90%). Unfortunately, 8/54 (15%) tests failed but increasing the proteinase K volume helped to recover 3/4 (75%) unsuccessful samples. In summary, the fully automated cartridge-based device allowed the detection of EGFR mutations directly from plasma in NSCLC patients with promising accuracy. However, protocol adjustments are necessary to reduce a high test failure rate.

Targeted Assessment of the EGFR Status as Reflex Testing in Treatment-Naive Non-Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients: A Single Laboratory Experience (LPCE, Nice, France).

BACKGROUND: Assessment of actionable EGFR mutations is mandatory for treatment-naïve advanced or metastatic non-squamous lung carcinoma (NSLC), but the results need to be obtained in less than 10 working days. For rapid EGFR testing, an EGFR-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay is an alternative and simple approach compared to next generation sequencing (NGS). Here, we describe how a rapid EGFR-specific PCR assay can be implemented in a single laboratory center (LPCE, Nice, France) as reflex testing in treatment-naïve NSLC. METHODS: A total of 901 biopsies from NSLC with more than 10% of tumor cells were prospectively and consecutively evaluated for EGFR mutation status between November 2017 and December 2019 using the Idylla system (Biocartis NV, Mechelen, Belgium). NGS was performed for nonsmokers with NSLC wild type for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF and with less than 50% PD-L1 positive cells using the Hotspot panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RESULTS: Results were obtained from 889/901 (97%) biopsies with detection of EGFR mutations in 114/889 (13%) cases using the Idylla system. Among the 562 EGFR wild type tumors identified with Idylla, NGS detected one actionable and one nonactionable EGFR mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid and targeted assessment of EGFR mutations in treatment-naïve NSLC can be implemented in routine clinical practice. However, it is mandatory to integrate this approach into a molecular algorithm that allows evaluation of potentially actionable genomic alterations other than EGFR mutations.

In-house Implementation of Tumor Mutational Burden Testing to Predict Durable Clinical Benefit in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Melanoma Patients.

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as an important potential biomarker for prediction of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), notably in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its in-house assessment in routine clinical practice is currently challenging and validation is urgently needed. We have analyzed sixty NSCLC and thirty-six melanoma patients with ICI treatment, using the FoundationOne test (FO) in addition to in-house testing using the Oncomine TML (OTML) panel and evaluated the durable clinical benefit (DCB), defined by >6 months without progressive disease. Comparison of TMB values obtained by both tests demonstrated a high correlation in NSCLC (R2 = 0.73) and melanoma (R2 = 0.94). The association of TMB with DCB was comparable between OTML (area-under the curve (AUC) = 0.67) and FO (AUC = 0.71) in NSCLC. Median TMB was higher in the DCB cohort and progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged in patients with high TMB (OTML HR = 0.35; FO HR = 0.45). In contrast, we detected no differences in PFS and median TMB in our melanoma cohort. Combining TMB with PD-L1 and CD8-expression by immunohistochemistry improved the predictive value. We conclude that in our cohort both approaches are equally able to assess TMB and to predict DCB in NSCLC.

Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Assay (SP384) for Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in a Large Cohort of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The detection of a ROS1 rearrangement in advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) led to a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival of the patients. Thus, it is mandatory to screen for the ROS1 rearrangement in all these patients. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is the gold standard; however, ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used as a screening test because it is widely available, easy and rapid to perform, and cost-effective. METHODS: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interpathologist agreement of two anti-ROS1 IHC clones, SP384 (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) and D4D6 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts), in a training cohort of 51 positive ROS1 FISH LUAD cases, and then in a large validation cohort of 714 consecutive cases of LUAD from six routine molecular pathology platforms. RESULTS: In the two cohorts, the SP384 and D4D6 clones show variable sensitivity and specificity rates on the basis of two cutoff points greater than or equal to 1+ (all % tumor cells) and greater than or equal to 2+ (>30% stained tumor cells). In the validation cohort, the D4D6 yielded the best accuracy for the presence of a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. Interpathologist agreement was moderate to good (interclass correlation 0.722-0.874) for the D4D6 clone and good to excellent (interclass correlation: 0.830-0.956) for the SP384 clone. CONCLUSIONS: ROS1 IHC is an effective screening tool for the presence of ROS1 rearrangements. However, users must be acutely aware of the variable diagnostic performance of different anti-ROS1 antibodies before implementation into routine clinical practice.

Effect of mutant variants of the KRAS gene on PD-L1 expression and on the immune microenvironment and association with clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

OBJECTIVES: The effect of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors on lung adenocarcinomas (LADCs) with KRAS mutations is debatable. We examined the association between specific mutant KRAS proteins and the immune infiltrates with the outcome of patients with LADCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 219 LADCs harboring either wild-type (WT) or mutated KRAS gene, we quantified the density of several immune markers by immunohistochemistry followed by automated digital image analysis. Data were correlated to clinicopathological parameters and outcome of patients. RESULTS: Tumors harboring mutant KRAS-G12 V had a significantly higher PD-L1 expression compared to other tumors (p = 0.044), while mutant KRAS-G12D tumors showed an increase in the density of CD66b+ cells (p = 0.001). High PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was associated to improved overall survival (OS) in KRAS mutant patients (p = 0.012), but not in the WT population (p = 0.385), whereas increased PD-L1 expression in immune cells correlated to poor OS of KRAS-WT patients (p = 0.025), with no difference in patients with KRAS mutations. CONCLUSIONS: KRAS mutational status can affect the immune microenvironment and survival of LADC patients in a heterogeneous way, implying that specific mutant KRAS variants expressed by the tumor should be considered when stratifying patients for immunotherapy.

PD-L1 expression in basaloid squamous cell lung carcinoma: Relationship to PD-1+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells and outcome.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors demonstrated durable clinical responses in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. However, the expression pattern of PD-L1 and the presence of CD8+ and PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating T cells in the basaloid variant of squamous cell carcinoma remain unknown. immunohistochemistry analysis of PD-L1 expression, with three recently validated monoclonal antibodies used in clinical trials (clones SP142, SP263, and 28-8), and detection of CD8+ and PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating T cells was performed on whole-tissue sections from 56 patients following surgery for basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. Data were correlated to clinicopathological parameters and outcome. Fair to poor concordance was observed between the SP142 vs SP263 clones, and SP142 vs 28-8 (κ range, 0.018-0.412), while the 28-8 and SP263 demonstrated a strong correlation in both the tumor cell and immune cell compartments (κ=0.883, and κ=0.721). Expression of PD-L1 correlated with a high content of CD8+ and PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating T cells when using SP142 (P=0.012; P=0.022), but not with SP263 or 28-8 (P=0.314; P=0.611). In the multivariate analysis, we found significantly better disease-free and overall survival rates for high PD-L1 expression with SP142, CD8+ and PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating T cells (P=0.003; P=0.007). No significant prognosis value was observed for SP263 and 28-8 clones, except a correlation between improved overall survival and SP263 in the univariate analysis (P=0.039), not confirmed in the multivariate model. In conclusion, we report that the expression of PD-L1 and the content of CD8+ and PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating T cells is an independent indicator of better outcome in basaloid squamous cell carcinoma patients, although the observed effect is dependent on the PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay.

Immunohistochemistry as a potential tool for routine detection of the NRAS Q61R mutation in patients with metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: It can be useful to assess the NRAS mutation status in patients with metastatic melanoma because NRAS-activating mutations confer resistance to RAF inhibitors, and NRAS-mutated patients appear to be sensitive to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an immunohistochemistry (IHC) approach using a novel anti-NRAS (Q61R) monoclonal antibody on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study on 170 patients with metastatic melanoma. The automated IHC assay was performed using the SP174 clone, and compared with results of the molecular testing. RESULTS: Evaluation of a test cohort with knowledge of the mutation status established a specific IHC pattern for the mutation. In the independent blinded analysis of the remaining cases, the anti-NRAS (Q61R) antibody accurately identified all NRAS Q61R-mutated tumors, and demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include retrospective design and lack of multicenter interobserver reproducibility. CONCLUSION: The NRAS (Q61R) IHC assay is reliable and specific for the evaluation of the Q61R mutation status in metastatic melanoma and may be an alternative to molecular biology in evaluation of metastatic melanoma in routine practice.

[The accreditation of a surgical pathology and somatic genetic laboratory (LPCE, CHU of Nice) according to the ISO 15189 norm: Sharing of experience]. / L'accréditation selon la norme ISO 15189 d'un laboratoire de pathologie et de génétique somatique (LPCE, CHU de Nice) : retour d'expérience.

Accreditation is going to be vital and unavoidable in the medium term for medical biology laboratories in France. This accreditation will certainly condition the authorization to conduct biological testing in the health care system. All the biological specialities are now affected by this procedure, including the somatic genetics. The anatomo-pathology, which is a medical speciality in France, may be also concerned by the accreditation. However, the nature and the practices of this specialty increase the complexity of this approach to be implemented according to the standard requested by the authorities, i.e. the ISO 15189 normative standard (standard on "specific requirements for quality and competence for medical biology analysis laboratories"). The present article recounts the experience of a hospital laboratory (LPCE, Nice University Hospital) composed of a surgical pathology and a somatic genetics unit: (1) in the accreditation process according to the ISO 15189 standard, (2) at the time of the audit made by the team of "COFRAC" evaluators, and, (3) in evaluating the strategy implemented following the audit.

[Accreditation of the activity of molecular pathology according to ISO 15189: key steps to follow and the main potential pitfalls]. / Accréditation de l'activité de pathologie moléculaire selon la norme ISO 15189. Principales étapes à respecter et principaux écueils possibles.

The quick emerging of the several targeted therapies and the concept of personnalized medicine underlie the necessity to develop and to well organize a molecular biology (or molecular pathology) unit of high quality, dedicated to clinical care, in order to look for tissular and cellular theragnosis biomarkers. This new and sudden area of activity for a clinical pathologist is strongly linked to the knowledge of a new medical speciality in health care institutions. Thus, the molecular pathology (or molecular biology made from cellular or tissular samples) can nicely be implemented in a clinical pathology laboratory. This new mission for a pathologist has to be done in respect with a great quality assurance which should allow obtaining in a short-term an ISO 15189 accreditation to keep going to perform this activity. The present work aims to describe the main steps to be set up in the order to get an ISO 15189 accreditation in molecular pathology. The different chapters of this norm will not be described in their exhaustivity, but in their large lines. Finally, we will describe the potential difficulties and pitfalls to be avoided before getting this accreditation.

[Setting up a department of molecular pathology in oncology in a pathology laboratory (LPCE, CHU de Nice)]. / Mise en place d'un secteur de pathologie moléculaire en oncologie au sein d'un laboratoire d'anatomie pathologique (LPCE, CHU de Nice).

The advent of targeted therapies and personalized medicine in oncology has led in France to the settlement and organisation of a network of hospital molecular genetic platforms under the impetus of the National Cancer Institute (INCa). These platforms are, according to the concerned sites, integrated or not in pathology laboratories. The development of molecular biology methods, the choice of the procedures, the establishment of sample workflow, the quality control and the selection of the genomic alterations to be detected on each platform, have been left to the discretion of the different laboratories. Based on calls for project made by the INCa, hospital molecular genetic platforms were able to adapt their activity according to the assigned budgets. While the presence of some genomic alterations (i.e. KRAS gene mutations in metastatic colon adenocarcinoma or EGFR gene mutations in lung adenocarcinomas), may lead to administration of targeted therapies under the Marketing Authorization Application (MAA), others are associated with therapeutic clinical trials. However, increasing number of MAA for new molecules targeting genomic alterations is likely in the near future. In this context, it is necessary to quickly adapt the organisation of work of the hospital pathology laboratories performing molecular biology tests in order to meet the growing demand of oncologists in the field of targeted therapies. The purpose of this article is to describe the different steps of the settlement of a molecular genetic platform in an academic pathology laboratory (LPCE, CHU de Nice) and to show the experience of this laboratory specifically oriented on the support of the morphological and molecular diagnosis of lung cancer, thyroid cancer and malignant melanoma.