RESUMO
Introduction Color vision testing was first seen as a parameter to be tested in the 1700s. Nowadays, it is a well-known phenomenon with significant quality-of-life implications. Structures involved in color vision include the lens, pupil, retinal cone photopigments, and several photoreceptor processes that translate the incoming spectrum of different light wavelengths into a processed colored image. An initial color vision assessment was made simply by comparing the color perception of the individual to that of the examiner. The most commonly used tools to screen for color vision defects today are color plates, such as the Ishihara color plates. In the modern age, smartphones have evolved to become an essential part of our everyday lives with applications such as Eye Handbook, which allow easier access to color vision testing using color plates displayed on smartphone screens. In this study, we compared color vision testing on Android and iOS devices to the standard Ishihara booklet. Materials and methods A cross-sectional validation study was performed on patients presenting to the Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan for six months. The sample size collected was 162 with a 95% confidence interval. The age range of the sample population was kept at 12-70 years. A patient was selected for participation in the study, and a color vision assessment was performed using the Ishihara color plates and Android and iOS smartphones. The collected data was then entered into IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Statistics 25 for analysis, with the p-value being kept at 0.05. Results The sample size was 162, with the gender distribution being predominantly male (69.14%). The average age of the participants was 35.94 (SD = 12.04). The result of the two-tailed paired sample z-testwas not significant based on a p-value of 0.565, indicating the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. This finding suggests the difference between the mean of Ishihara and the mean of the iPhone was not significantly different from zero. Similar results were found for comparisons between Android smartphones and the Ishihara booklet. Conclusions Previous studies conducted showed nearly 60% of subjects with normal color vision correctly identified all colors on standard Ishihara color plates. The two-tailed paired sample t-test conducted in our study showed no significant difference between either of the smartphone groups (iPhone or Android) and the Ishihara booklet group, indicating that smartphones present a viable alternative to standard Ishihara booklet testing. However, there are certain limitations to our study. Different types of smartphone screens present a challenge in standardization while testing color vision, something that is not a problem when using the Ishihara booklet. However, smartphones are more widely available, more versatile, and present far greater ease of access. Both these factors should be considered when comparing the two in future studies.
RESUMO
Efforts to control the COVID-19 pandemic have expanded to the vaccination of children and adolescents. This systematic review assesses the utility of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in children and adolescents aged 5-18 years, considering its effectiveness against COVID infection, hospital and intensive care admission and duration of effectiveness after vaccination. Six databases were searched following the PRISMA guidelines. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using meta-analysis. Fifteen studies were included in the systematic review, while 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Evidence suggests that the two-dose vaccination regime provided high effectiveness of 92% (95% CI, 86-96) against COVID infection. Vaccination also conferred high protection against hospitalisation (91%) and intensive care admission (85%). The vaccine was highly protective against the Delta variant of the virus, but showed a lower protection against the Omicron variant. Most adverse effects were transient and mild, commonly including pain at the injection site, fatigue and headache. Current findings are suggestive of waning immunity over time; however, further research is needed to investigate the relevance of booster doses in this age group. In summary, the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine demonstrated high levels of protection against COVID-19 infection and its complications while maintaining an adequate safety profile in children and adolescents.
RESUMO
Introduction Standard automated perimetry (SAP) is the gold standard of visual field assessment in patients with neuro-ophthalmic conditions. Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy characterized by damage to the ganglion cell complex with corresponding visual field defects and intraocular pressure (IOP) being the only modifiable ocular risk factor. Recent advances in technology have paved the way for remote screening and monitoring of visual field defects with the aid of a computer or tablet-based software. One such personal computer (PC)-based software is 'Specvis', which has shown promising reliability as compared to SAP. The primary objective of this study was to compare Specvis and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) visual field reports in the graphical domain while secondary objectives were to estimate the ease of use of Specvis in comparison to HFA and comparison of test duration between Specvis and HFA. Materials and methods This was a cross-sectional validation study performed at a tertiary care ophthalmology institute in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Subjects presenting to the outpatient department were recruited based on consecutive sampling technique and were divided into healthy and diseased groups. Basic data collection instrument after informed consent was filled with demographic data, ophthalmic data, disease condition, and attached with analysis reports of both HFA and Specvis for assessment by three senior ophthalmology consultants independently. A total of 218 eyes of 109 subjects were included in this pilot study. SAP was done on the VF 30-2 program using HFA 3. The same patient then performed the visual field assessment on a PC with Specvis installed and settings adjusted to match the VF 30-2 program of HFA as closely as possible. Visual fields of a subject obtained from HFA and Specvis were then coupled and sent to three different senior ophthalmologists. The assessment was done by comparing the greyscale visual field printouts in the graphical domain and scored based on a 5-point Likert scale which were then analyzed for inter-observer reliability. After each test, all subjects were asked to rate the difficulty level of performing the test on HFA and Specvis based on a 5-point Likert scale. The duration of the test performed on HFA and Specvis was also noted for comparison. Results We observed male preponderance in our study participants (n=128, 58.72%). The majority of the participants were non-diseased (n=170, 77.98%) while advanced glaucoma was the commonest disease in the diseased group (n = 22, 10.09%). The mean age of the participants was 40.71 (SD=15.24). The observations for the HFA test duration had an average of 213.33 seconds (SD=33.49, Min=174.00, Max=314.00) while the Specvis test duration had an average of 267.36 seconds (SD=35.98, Min=228.00, Max=370.00). A significant positive correlation was observed between score 1, score 2, and score 3 given by the three ophthalmologists. A significant negative correlation was observed between ease of using HFA and age, with a correlation of -.28. A significant negative correlation was also observed between ease of using Specvis and age. Conclusion Specvis, a computer-based free open-source software used in our study, can give promising results in diagnosing as well as monitoring the progression of visual field defects. It can act as a significantly cost-effective and readily available bridge between visual field examination by confrontation method and SAP.
