Chronic automated red cell exchange therapy for sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: The data to support chronic automated red cell exchange (RCE) in sickle cell disease (SCD) outside of stroke prevention, is limited, especially in adults. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with SCD who were referred for chronic RCE at our institution over a 10-year period. Data that were evaluated included patient demographics, referral indications, and procedural details (e.g., vascular access, adverse events, etc.). In a subanalysis, the number of annual acute care encounters during 3 years of chronic RCE was compared with that in the year preceding the first RCE. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were referred for chronic RCE: median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 22-36) at referral and 60% were female. Seventy (42.6%) were naïve to chronic transfusion (simple or RCE) prior to referral. The leading indications for referral were refractory pain (73/164, 44.5%) and iron overload (57/164, 34.7%). A total of 5090 procedures occurred during the study period (median = 19, IQR = 5-45). Of the 138 patients who had central vascular access, 8 (6%) and 16 (12%) had ≥1 central-line-related thrombosis and/or infection, respectively. Of those who were not RBC alloimmunized at initiation of RCE, 12/105 (11.4%) developed new antibodies during chronic RCE. In those 30 patients who were adherent to therapy for 3 years, there was no significant difference in acute care encounters following initiation of RCE. CONCLUSION: Prospective clinical trials are needed to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from chronic RCE and refine selection accordingly.

Euvolemic automated transfusion to treat severe anemia in sickle cell disease patients at risk of circulatory overload.

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion remains a major treatment for sickle cell disease (SCD). Patients with SCD have a high prevalence of renal impairment and cardiorespiratory disease, conferring risk of transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We describe an approach, titled euvolemic automated transfusion (EAT), to transfuse SCD patients with severe anemia who are at risk of TACO. In EAT, plasmapheresis is performed using donor RBCs, rather than albumin or plasma, as replacement fluid. Euvolemia is maintained. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with SCD who underwent EAT at our institution over a 10-year period, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EAT. RESULTS: Eleven SCD patients underwent 109 EAT procedures (1-59 procedures per patient). The median age was 42 years (IQR = [30-49]) and 82% (n = 9) were female. Most (82%; n = 9) patients had severe chronic kidney disease and 55% (n = 6) had heart failure. One (9%) patient had a history of life-threatening TACO. Mean pre- and post-procedure Hct values were 19.8% (SD ± 1.6%) and 29.1% (SD ± 1.4%), respectively. The average Hct increment was 3.2% per RBC unit. Only two EAT-related complications were recorded during the 109 procedures: central line-associated infection and citrate toxicity (muscle cramping). EAT used an average of two RBC units less than that projected for standard automated RBC exchange. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that EAT is safe and effective to treat patients with SCD and severe anemia, who are at risk for TACO. EAT requires fewer RBC units compared to automated RBC exchange.

Survey of intrauterine red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices in the United States.

BACKGROUND: A paucity of data exists about the current practice of fetal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the United States (US). This investigation describes intrauterine transfusion (IUT) RBC product selection and processing practices at different US institutions. METHODS: A transfusion medicine and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) team designed a survey to interrogate and characterize RBCs utilized for IUT. This survey was distributed to seventy US institutions with fetal treatment centers (October 2020-April 2021) identified through the NAFTNet (North American Fetal Therapy Network). RESULTS: Thirty-seven institutions responded (response rate 53%, 37/70), but five were excluded for not performing IUTs. Most (84%; 27/32) performed 1-24 IUTs annually; two performed >50 IUTs/year. Group O, Rh(D) negative RBC units were always used by 66% (21/32), and 75% (24/32) provided hemoconcentrated RBCs by washing (17/24) or dry packing (6/24). Overall, 66% (21/32) targeted a hematocrit ≥75%. Fifty percent provided both leukocyte-reduced and CMV-negative RBC units. Irradiation of RBC units was performed within 6 h of issue at 63% (20/32) of sites. Most (81%, 26/32) used RBC units at <7 days of age after collection, 56% (18/32) always provided washed RBC units, while 19% (6/32) issued washed RBC only if fresh units are unavailable. Implicated maternal RBC alloantibodies were matched for 78% (25/32) of the time. The transfused volume was universally determined by the MFMs. DISCUSSION: Heterogeneity and lack of standardization exist in RBC product selection and special processing steps for IUTs in the US. Hence, the establishment of a consensus to standardize IUT protocols is needed.