Diagnostic accuracy of SATB2 in identifying primary and metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a comparative immunohistochemical study.

Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a new marker that could identify the colonic origin, but whether its expression is preserved in metastatic colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate SATB2 validity in the identification of CRC either alone or in combination with caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2) and/or cytokeratin 20 (CK20). Moreover, we examined the concordance of SATB2 expression in primary CRC and paired metastatic specimen. Immunohistochemical expression of SATB2, CDX2 and CK20 was evaluated in primary CRC, 50 paired metastatic CRC and 80 non-CRC specimens. This study demonstrated that the ideal SATB2 cut-off value for recognising colonic from non-colonic origin was 10%. SATB2 was more sensitive and specific than CK20. However, it was more specific but less sensitive than CDX2. Analysing the combined markers expression, SATB2 and CDX2 combination revealed better sensitivity, specificity and larger area under curve compared to SATB2 alone, CDX2 alone and combined CDX2 and CK20. Moreover, SATB2 was able to retain its expression at the metastatic sites. SATB2 was totally concordant between primary CRC and their paired metastatic sites (concordance rate = 100%) with perfect level of agreement. SATB2 could be considered as an accurate diagnostic marker of primary and metastatic CRC. SATB2 and CDX2 is the best combination serving the highest sensitivity and specificity in detection of CRC.

Could Obesity be a Triggering Factor for Endometrial Tubal Metaplasia to be a Precancerous Lesion?

Background & Aims: Endometrial tubal metaplasia (ETM) is mostly described in conjunction with unopposed estrogen levels, and its association with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma (EC) is striking. Obesity is a risk factor for endometrial hyperplasia and EC development. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of BMI and serum estradiol level on expression of PAX-2, H-TERT, P16, Ki-67, and P53 in studied ETM in reference to benign endometrium and EC. Methods: The study was conducted on the following groups: group (1) consists of 57 cases that had endometrial biopsies with histologically demonstrable ETM (typical or atypical) and all were subjected to serum estradiol levelling and body mass index (BMI) evaluation; group (2) had adjacent benign endometrial tissue as control; group (3) consists of 52 cases of conventional endometrial carcinoma and 16 serous carcinoma paraffin blocks which were collected and reevaluated. All included groups were immunostained for PAX-2, H-TERT, p16, ki67, and p53. Results: The relation between BMI and serum estradiol level in group 1 and PAX-2, H-TERT, P16, and p53 was statistically significant, while their relation with atypia and ki67 expression was insignificant. Twenty-three ETM cases (40.4%) out of group 1 were all (100%) obese, 87% had high serum estradiol level, and 73.9% were postmenopausal and had a similar immunohistochemical profile as EC cases (group 3). Conclusions: The presence of ETM regardless of the histologic atypia in obese postmenopausal patients with high serum estradiol level is an alarming sign. This implies that ETM might not be as benign as generally accepted, as under certain clinical conditions, it may turn into a potential premalignant lesion.

Immunohistochemical staining with chemokine panel of non-specific colitis predicts future IBD diagnosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is a possible significant difficulty in differentiating between non-specific colitis (NSC) and early IBD patients with no cardinal endoscopic features. This clarifies the need to find markers with high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between both and other forms of specific colitis. The aim of this study to investigate the ability to use a chemokine panel (CCR9, CD146 and Foxp3) among patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms found to have NSC (but do not have current IBD) to predict which patients progress to/develop future IBD or other diagnoses of specific colitis. METHODS: Colonoscopy was done for 182 patients complaining of chronic diarrhea and or constipation, abdominal distention and pain with negative history for IBD, after Histopathological evaluation; 138 cases showing non-specific inflammation submitted for further immunohistochemical CCR9, CD146 and Foxp3 staining. On follow up patients with persistent symptoms or worsen symptoms recolonoscopy was done followed by Histopathological examination of samples and compared by the earlier results. RESULTS: The studied markers expressed significantly in IBD patients differentiating them from NSC patients (p < 0.001) except for CCR9 expression was statistically insignificant in CD patients (p = 0.528). According to the ROC curves in prediction of progression using studied panel, the use of studied markers in combination was more statistically significant in comparison to each marker alone. Median follow up for studied patients was 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This panel of markers holds a promising hope for early IBD as predictive markers, discriminating IBD from NSC and as potential therapeutic targets.