Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 2024 Jan 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38231251

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the mandible has been a well-studied topic. However, there has not been a study investigating the relationship between suture type and complications. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained mandibular fractures was conducted at an urban level I trauma center (2010-2018). Descriptive statistics were used to categorize the sociodemographic data. χ2 and Mann-Whitney U testing were used to compare variables between the polyglactin 910 (vicryl) and chromic sutured groups. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 102 patients who underwent ORIF of the mandible through the transoral approach. Fifty-nine (57.8%) patients were closed with vicryl suture, whereas 43 (42.2%) with chromic gut suture. There were no differences in sociodemographics, immune status, substance abuse status, fracture type, time to repair, and managing care team between the two groups. Both groups had similar rates of wound dehiscence, infection, and revision surgery. Patients who were operated on earlier were more likely to experience a postoperative infection and dehiscence compared with patients operated on later (P = 0.029 and P = 0.008, respectively). Smokers were more likely to experience dehiscence compared with nonsmokers (P = 0.001). Females and immunocompromised patients were more likely to require revision surgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Suture type for transoral, ORIF of the mandible does not impact the rate of infection, wound dehiscence, and revision surgery. However, risk factors for complications can include early operative repair, smoking, female sex, and immunosuppression.

2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 85(S1 Suppl 1): S127-S128, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205494

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Advanced levels of professorship and executive positions are considered markers of success in medical academia. Despite sex parity in medical school graduates, sex disparities within positions of power remain unequal. The purpose of this study was to analyze sex composition at different levels of leadership at multiple academic, highly ranked institutions. METHODS: Hospital executives and academic plastic surgery faculty were identified through an internet-based search of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited plastic surgery integrated and independent residency training programs. Institutions from the U.S. News 2018-19 Top 20 Best Hospitals Honor Roll and Beckers Review 2018: 100 Great Hospitals in America were also included. Information on board of directors/trustees (BOD), administrators, and plastic surgery faculty with focus on title, sex, degree, specialty, and academic rank was collected from departmental and hospital websites. Duplicate institutions were excluded. RESULTS: Data on chief executive officers (CEOs)/presidents (n = 275) and BOD members (n = 5347) from 153 medical institutions were analyzed. Physicians consisted of 40.7% (n = 112) of CEOs/presidents, of which 10.7% (n = 12) were surgeons, and 15.6% (n = 835) of the BOD membership. Female physicians in executive roles were disproportionally low, consisting of 5% (n = 14) of CEOs/presidents, reaching significance (P = 0.033).Sex representation within plastic surgery departments demonstrated similar trends. Women comprised 18.3% of the overall plastic surgery faculty (n = 1441). Significant differences between mean male and female plastic surgeons (8.2 vs 1.84, P = <0.001) were observed. In addition, female plastic surgeons represented only 26.3% of all assistant professors (P = <0.001), 18.75% of total associate professors (P = <0.001), and 7.8% of full professors (P = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although women are increasingly pursuing careers in medicine and surgery, the data suggest that there remains a paucity of female physicians in top leadership roles. At the departmental level, female plastic surgeons are also underrepresented. At the executive level, men make up over 88% of physician CEOs at the highest-ranked medical institutions. This study further highlights the need for the development of educational, mentorship, and career pathways to further improve female representation in positions of power within academia.


Assuntos
Diretores Médicos , Cirurgiões , Cirurgia Plástica , Docentes de Medicina , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Faculdades de Medicina , Cirurgia Plástica/educação , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA