The Role of Plant-Based Diets in Preventing and Mitigating Chronic Kidney Disease: More Light than Shadows.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a non-communicable disease that affects >10% of the general population worldwide; the number of patients affected by CKD is increasing due in part to the rise in risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. As many studies show, diet can be an important tool for preventing and mitigating the onset of non-communicable diseases. Plant-based diets (PBDs) are those that emphasize the consumption of plant foods and may or may not include small or moderate amounts of animal foods. Recently, these diets have received increasing interest because they have been associated with favourable effects on health and also appear to protect against the development and progression of CKD. PBDs, which are associated with protein restrictions, seem to offer adjunctive advantages in patients with chronic kidney disease, as compared to conventional low-protein diets that include animal proteins. The principal aims of this review are to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature regarding the role of plant-based diets and low-protein, plant-based diets in the context of chronic kidney disease. Moreover, we try to clarify the definition of plant-based diets, and then we analyse possible concerns about the use of PBDs in patients with chronic kidney disease (nutritional deficiency and hyperkalaemia risk). Finally, we offer some strategies to increase the nutritional value of plant-based low-protein diets. In the Materials and Methods section, many studies about plant-based diets and low-protein plant-based diets (e.g., the very-low-protein diet and vegan low-protein diet, LPD) in chronic kidney disease were considered. In the Results and Conclusion section, current data, most from observational studies, agree upon the protective effect of plant-based diets on kidney function. Moreover, in patients with advanced CKD, low-protein plant-based options, especially a very-low-protein diet supplemented with heteroanalogues (VLPDs), compared to a conventional LPD appear to offer adjunctive advances in terms of delaying dialysis and mitigating metabolic disturbances. However, further studies are necessary to better investigate the possible metabolic and cardiovascular advantages of plant-based LPDs versus conventional LPDs.

Nutritional and Dietary Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Under Conservative and Preservative Kidney Care Without Dialysis.

While dialysis has been the prevailing treatment paradigm for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), emphasis on conservative and preservative management in which dietary interventions are a major cornerstone have emerged. Based on high-quality evidence, international guidelines support the utilization of low-protein diets as an intervention to reduce CKD progression and mortality risk, although the precise thresholds (if any) for dietary protein intake vary across recommendations. There is also increasing evidence demonstrating that plant-dominant low-protein diets reduce the risk of developing incident CKD, CKD progression, and its related complications including cardiometabolic disease, metabolic acidosis, mineral and bone disorders, and uremic toxin generation. In this review, we discuss the premise for conservative and preservative dietary interventions, specific dietary approaches used in conservative and preservative care, potential benefits of a plant-dominant low-protein diet, and practical implementation of these nutritional strategies without dialysis.

Vegetarian Nutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease.

There is rising interest globally with respect to the health implications of vegetarian or plant-based diets. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that higher consumption of plant-based foods and the nutrients found in vegetarian and plant-based diets are associated with numerous health benefits, including improved blood pressure, glycemic control, lipid levels, body mass index, and acid-base parameters. Furthermore, there has been increasing recognition that vegetarian and plant-based diets may have potential salutary benefits in preventing the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). While increasing evidence shows that vegetarian and plant-based diets have nephroprotective effects, there remains some degree of uncertainty about their nutritional adequacy and safety in CKD (with respect to protein-energy wasting, hyperkalemia, etc.). In this review, we focus on the potential roles of and existing data on the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of various vegetarian and plant-based diets in CKD, as well as their practical application in CKD management.

A Comprehensive Examination of Vegan Lifestyle in Italy.

The popularity of veganism and plant-based diets is rapidly increasing worldwide, including in Italy, where more individuals and families are adopting this lifestyle. However, medical and health professionals often lack the necessary knowledge and are skeptical about this diet despite the scientific evidence. It is important for them to provide support and expertise to those following this diet. The survey evaluated various aspects of the lifestyle of Italian vegans living in Italy and abroad, including food frequency, vitamin and mineral supplementation, relationship with medical and health professionals, and perceived difficulties in daily life. The emphasis was on potentially critical aspects for those following this dietary choice. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Italy between March and April 2022. A questionnaire was distributed through social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, and Telegram, and 2180 Italian adults who follow a vegan diet completed it. The survey found that most of the vegan population surveyed were female, showed a greater sensitivity to ethical issues, were aware of the need for vitamin B12 supplementation, and followed healthy-eating guidelines. It is evident that despite the increasing popularity of plant-based diets, many medical and health professionals remain cautious and hesitant to recommend them.

[Dialysis withdrawal and shared end-of-life management between nephrology and palliative care: our three-year experience].

Most dialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) lack access to palliative care services. According to the data of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Study (DOPPS), Italy when compared to other countries included in the study, had the lowest rates of dialysis discontinuation. Indeed, there is a growing interest in the implementation of international and national programs for the co-management between nephrology and palliative care in end-of-life decision-making for patients with ESKD. On behalf of this, since 2017, we started in the nephrology outpatient clinic and hemodialysis facilities of the Provincia Autonoma of Trento a shared program between Nephrology and Palliative Care Units to improve the end-of-life quality of care in ESKD patients in conservative and dialytic therapy. Methods:A retrospective analysis, from the 1st of January 2019 to 31st December 2021, of dialysis withdrawal in a cohort of patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Results:Dialysis withdrawal and subsequent death, according to the integrated protocol with the Palliative Care resources, were 24 in 2019, 20 in 2020, and 28 in 2021. The mean age was 75 years in 2019, 78 years in 2020, and in 2021. Most of the patients were male. Dialysis discontinuation was higher in chronic dialysis patients (80% in 2019 and 2020, and 79% in 2021), and considering the annual rates of death of all the dialysis patients, those who died because of dialysis withdrawal were 38% in 2019, 31% in 2020 and 40% in 2021. Survival after dialysis withdrawal was in most of the cases less than 7 days; only few patients lived more than 30 days. Furthermore, the data, in the 3 years considered, showed a reduction of hospitalization and an increase of the rate of death at home. Conclusions:As described in the present study, strategies to expand palliative care by a shared protocol among nephrology and palliative care staff improved the quality of care in the end of life and reduced the hospitalization rates of admission of patients after dialysis withdrawal.

Novel conservative management of chronic kidney disease via dialysis-free interventions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with progressive uremia, dialysis has traditionally been the dominant treatment paradigm. However, there is increasing interest in conservative and preservative management of kidney function as alternative patient-centered treatment approaches in this population. RECENT FINDINGS: The primary objectives of conservative nondialytic management include optimization of quality of life and treating symptoms of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Dietetic-nutritional therapy can be a cornerstone in the conservative management of CKD by reducing glomerular hyperfiltration, uremic toxin generation, metabolic acidosis, and phosphorus burden. Given the high symptom burden of advanced CKD patients, routine symptom assessment using validated tools should be an integral component of their treatment. As dialysis has variable effects in ameliorating symptoms, palliative care may be needed to manage symptoms such as pain, fatigue/lethargy, anorexia, and anxiety/depression. There are also emerging treatments that utilize intestinal (e.g., diarrhea induction, colonic dialysis, oral sorbents, gut microbiota modulation) and dermatologic pathways (e.g., perspiration reduction) to reduce uremic toxin burden. SUMMARY: As dialysis may not confer better survival nor improved patient-centered outcomes in certain patients, conservative management is a viable treatment option in the advanced CKD population.

[Vascular access survey in the Triveneto area: data analysis for the year 2017].

In 2017 the Italian Society of Nephrology operating in the Triveneto area investigated through a questionnaire, distributed to the various nephrological centers in the regions of Friuli Venezia Giulia, Trentino Alto Adige and Veneto, the differences concerning organizational models, choice of dialysis, creation and management of vascular access. The results emerging from the analysis of the collected data are presented.

Survival and time-to-transplantation of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease patients: competing-risks regression model in a single Italian center experience.

AIMS: Despite several studies reporting similar outcomes for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), the former is underused worldwide, with a PD prevalence of 15% in Italy. In 2008, the Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis of the Healthcare Trust of the Autonomous Province of Trento implemented a successful PD program which has increased the proportion of PD incident patients from 7 to 47%. We aimed to assess the effect of this extensive use of PD by comparing HD and PD in terms of survival and time-to-transplantation. METHODS: A total of 334 HD and 153 PD incident patients were enrolled between January 2008 and December 2014. After screening for exclusion criteria and propensity score matching, 279 HD and 132 PD patients were analyzed. Survival and time-to-transplantation were assessed by competing-risks regression models, using death and transplantation as primary and competing events. RESULTS: Crude and adjusted regression models for survival revealed the absence of significant differences between HD and PD cumulative incidence functions (subhazard ratio: 1.09, p = 0.62 and 1.34, p = 0.10, respectively). Differently, crude and adjusted regression models for transplantation revealed a lower time-to-transplantation for PD versus HD patients (subhazard ratio: 2.34, p < 0.01, and 2.57, p < 0.01, respectively). The waiting time for placement in the transplant waiting list was longer in HD than PD patients (330 vs. 224 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The extensive use of PD did not lead to any statistically significant difference in mortality. Furthermore, PD was associated with lower time to transplantation. PD may be a viable option for large-scale dialytic treatment in the advanced chronic kidney disease population.

[Identikit of the patient who chooses the PD. Experience of the Autonomous Province of Trento]. / Caratterizzazione dei pazienti con questionario strutturato per la scelta della terapia renale sostitutiva. L'esperienza della provincia autonoma di Trento (PAT).

Peritoneal dialysis is a method still underused in Italy. In the Autonomous Province of Trento (PAT) since 2008 has been implemented, with excellent results, a program for the enhancement of the use of this therapy. The most important innovation was the introduction of a questionnaire proposed by nurses to patients in pre-dialysis colloquia. The questionnaire aimed to outline the patient personal and family profile in relation to the chosen dialysis methods. We analyzed 174 questionnaires collected from 1/04/2008 to 01/12/2015. Among these 84 patients had opted for the peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 90 had chosen the Hemodialysis (HD). The questionnaire comparison shown that the patient who opted for the PD have a more positive attitude towards this method. PD patient had more often a job, lived far away from the center of HD, had more frequently the support of a family and had a psychological profile more "sad" or "emotional" than the HD patient, who was more "insecure". On the other hand, factors like age, type of family, degree of autonomy and nationality do not affect the choice about dialysis.

[Late recovery of renal function in a patient with acute on chronic renal failure treated with peritoneal dialysis]. / Tardivo recupero della funzione renale in un paziente con insufficienza renale acuta su cronica trattato con dialisi peritoneale.

Contrast-induced nephropathy has become a significant source of hospital morbidity and mortality particularly in patients with multi-organs defects. No current treatment can reverse or ameliorate contrast induced nephropathy once it occurs, but prophylaxis is possible. We present the case of a 61-year-old male patient with concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD stage III K/DOQI) and diabetes complicated by severe multi-vascular disease, who developed acute kidney damage probably due to the simultaneously exposure to intravascular contrast media and cholesterol crystal embolism. In addition, owing to rapid deterioration of renal function, this patient started renal replacement therapy. No renal biopsy was performed due to the poor clinical condition of the patient. After a month of hemodialysis, he switched to a peritoneal dialysis procedure to which specific treatment for vascular lesions, including antibiotics, prostanoids, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, antiaggregants/anticoagulants and physiotherapy, was associated. After 7 months, the dialysis treatment was stopped and he began intensive clinical follow-up. At present, the patient is in conservative medical treatment (the Tenckhoff catheter has been removed), he is in good condition and severe vascular lesions are absent. Our conclusion is that contrast-induced nephropathy in vasculopathic diabetic patients requires a multidisciplinary approach. In particular, good cooperation between nephrologists and angiologists is useful to avoid rapid and chronic deterioration of renal failure and to prevent the onset and development of severe vascular damage.