Impact of the Omics-Based Biomarkers on the Mirtazapine's Steady-State Concentration, Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Affective Disorders Comorbid with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Introduction: Mirtazapine is commonly administered to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some of these patients do not show adequate response to the therapy with mirtazapine, whereas many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research revealed that CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of mirtazapine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, and 5-HTR2A genes on the concentration/dose indicator of mirtazapine and on the CYP3A expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from a recurrent depressive disorder. Material and Methods: Our study included 108 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age - 35.2 ± 15.1 years). The treatment regimen included mirtazapine in an average daily dose of 45.0 [30.0; 60.0] mg per week. Therapy efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6b-HC/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our study didn't reveal any statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy and safety of the therapy. We also didn't reveal a statistical significance for the concentration/dose indicator of mirtazapine in patients with different genotypes. Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't demonstrate the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the mirtazapine efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMD scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.2, p = 0.46. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.029, p = 0.93. In addition, we didn't reveal the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0,188, p = 0.85. However, the difference in the CYP3A enzymatic activity in carriers of AG and GG genotypes of the 6986A > G polymorphism of CYP3A5 gene has been revealed: (AG) 4.75 [1.28; 7.34] vs (GG) 8.83 [4.73; 13.62], p-value = 0.023. Conclusion: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, 5-HTR2A gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of mirtazapine was not demonstrated in a group of 108 patients with depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder.

Impact of the Omics-Based Biomarkers on the Fluvoxamine's Steady-State Concentration, Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Affective Disorders Comorbid with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Introduction: Fluvoxamine is commonly administered to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some of these patients do not show adequate response to the therapy with fluvoxamine, whereas many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research revealed that CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of fluvoxamine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, and 5-HTR2A genes on the concentration/dose indicator of fluvoxamine and on the CYP3A expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from a recurrent depressive disorder. Material and Methods: Our study included 105 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age - 37.5 ± 13.2 years). The treatment regimen included fluvoxamine in an average daily dose of 117.6 ± 44.3 mg per week. Therapy efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6b-HC/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our study didn't reveal any statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy and safety of the therapy. We also didn't reveal a statistical significance for the concentration/dose indicator of fluvoxamine in patients with different genotypes. Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't demonstrate the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the fluvoxamine efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMD scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.012, p = 0.63. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = -0.175, p = 0.30. In addition, we didn't reveal the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.197, p < 0.32. However, the difference in the CYP3A enzymatic activity in carriers of AG and GG genotypes of the 6986A > G polymorphism of CYP3A5 gene has been revealed: (AG) 4.72 [1.18; 8.45] vs (GG) 9.23 [5.12; 15.53], p-value = 0.23. Conclusion: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, 5-HTR2A gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of fluvoxamine was not demonstrated in a group of 105 patients with depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder.

Effects of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the steady-state concentration of citalopram in patients with major depressive disorder.

Citalopram is commonly prescribed to patients suffering from major depressive disorder. Some of them do not respond adequately to therapy with citalopram, while many of them experience type A adverse drug reactions. Current research revealed that CYP2C19 isoenzyme is involved in the biotransformation of citalopram. The objective of our study was to investigate the impact of 681G>A polymorphism of the CYP2C19 gene on the efficacy, safety and the concentration/dose indicator of citalopram. Our study enrolled 130 patients with major depressive disorder and comorbid alcohol use disorder (average age-38.7 ± 14.1 years). Therapy regimen included citalopram in an average daily dose of 31.1 ± 14.4 mg per week. Therapy efficacy and safety were evaluated using the international psychometric scales. For genotyping, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. Our findings revealed the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMD scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 8.0 [8.0; 9.0] and (GA) 10.0 [9.0; 11.0], p < 0.001. In the safety profile (the UKU scores), the statistical significance was also obtained: (GG) 3.0 [3.0; 4.0] and (GA) 5.0 [4.0; 5.0], p < 0.001. We revealed a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of citalopram in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 2.543 [1.659; 4.239] and (GA) 4.196 [2.643; 5.753], p < 0.001). The effect of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the efficacy and safety profiles of citalopram was demonstrated in a group of 130 patients with major depressive disorder.

Effects of plasma concentration of micro-RNA Mir-27b and CYP3A4*22 on equilibrium concentration of alprazolam in patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder.

Alprazolam is used in the treatment of patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder. Some proportion of these patients does not respond adequately to treatment with alprazolam, while many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Results of the previous studies have shown that CYP3A is involved in the biotransformation of alprazolam, the activity of which is dependent, inter alia, on the polymorphism of the encoding gene. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of 99366316G>A polymorphism of the CYP3A4 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of alprazolam in patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP3A (as evaluated by the 6-beta-hydroxy-cortisol/cortisol ratio measurement) and on CYP3A4 expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcoholism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study enrolled 105 patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder (age - 37.8±14.6 years). Therapy included alprazolam in an average daily dose of 5.6±2.4 mg per day. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6- beta-hydroxy-cortisol/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Our study revealed the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMA scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 5.0] and (GA) 4.0 [4.0; 5.0], p = 0.007; at the same time, the statistical significance in the safety profile was not obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 3.8] and (GA) 3.0 [1.5; 4.0], p = 0.650. We revealed a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of alprazolam in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 1.583 [0.941; 2.301] and (GA) 2.888 [2.305; 4.394], p = 0.001). Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't show the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 25.6 [20.4; 28.8], (GA) 25.7 [19.7; 33.1], p = 0.423. At the same time, correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the alprazolam efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMA scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = 0.20, p = 0.042. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.15, p = 0.127. In addition, we revealed the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity (as evaluated by 6-beta-hydroxycortisol/ cortisol ratio measurement) and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.27, p = 0.006. At the same time, correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the alprazolam concentration and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = 0.28, p = 0.003. CONCLUSION: The effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4 gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of alprazolam was demonstrated in a group of 105 patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder. At the same time, miR-27b remains a promising biomarker for assessing the level of CYP3A4 expression, because it correlates with the encoded isoenzyme's activity.