Savviness of prey to introduced predators.

The prey naivety hypothesis posits that prey are vulnerable to introduced predators because many generations in slow gradual coevolution are needed for appropriate avoidance responses to develop. It predicts that prey will be more responsive to native than introduced predators and less responsive to introduced predators that differ substantially from native predators and from those newly established. To test these predictions, we conducted a global meta-analysis of studies that measured the wariness responses of small mammals to the scent of sympatric mammalian mesopredators. We identified 26 studies that met our selection criteria. These studies comprised 134 experiments reporting on the responses of 36 small mammal species to the scent of six introduced mesopredators and 12 native mesopredators. For each introduced mesopredator, we measured their phylogenetic and functional distance to local native mesopredators and the number of years sympatric with their prey. We used predator and prey body mass as a measure of predation risk. Globally, small mammals were similarly wary of the scent of native and introduced mesopredators; phylogenetic and functional distance between introduced mesopredators and closest native mesopredators had no effect on wariness; and wariness was unrelated to the number of prey generations, or years, since first contact with introduced mesopredators. Small mammal wariness was associated with predator-prey body mass ratio, regardless of the nativity. The one thing animals do not seem to recognize is whether their predators are native.

La hipótesis de la ingenuidad de la presa plantea que ésta es vulnerable a los depredadores introducidos porque se requiere que muchas generaciones atraviesen una coevolución lenta y gradual para que se desarrollen las respuestas de evasión adecuadas. La hipótesis supone que la presa será más sensible a los depredadores introducidos que difieren notoriamente de los nativos y de aquellos recién establecidos. Realizamos un metaanálisis global de estudios que midieron las respuestas cautelosas de mamíferos pequeños ante el rastro de meso depredadores simpátricos para probar estas suposiciones. Identificamos 26 estudios que cumplieron con nuestro criterio de selección. Estos estudios estuvieron conformados por 134 experimentos que reportaban las respuestas de 36 especies de mamíferos pequeños ante el rastro de seis meso depredadores introducidos y 12 nativos. Medimos la distancia funcional y filogenética entre cada meso depredador introducido y los meso depredadores locales nativos y el número de años simpátricos con su presa. Usamos la masa corporal del depredador y la presa como medida del riesgo de depredación. A nivel mundial, los mamíferos pequeños compartieron la cautela ante el rastro de los meso depredadores nativos e introducidos; la distancia funcional y la filogenética entre los meso depredadores introducidos y el meso depredador nativo más cercano no tuvieron efecto sobre la cautela; y la cautela no estuvo relacionada con el número de generaciones de la presa, o años, desde el primer contacto con los meso depredadores introducidos. La cautela de los mamíferos pequeños estuvo asociada con las proporciones de masa corporal entre el depredador y la presa, sin importar el origen. Lo único que los animales parecen no reconocer es si el depredador es nativo o no.

A geometric basis for surface habitat complexity and biodiversity.

Structurally complex habitats tend to contain more species and higher total abundances than simple habitats. This ecological paradigm is grounded in first principles: species richness scales with area, and surface area and niche density increase with three-dimensional complexity. Here we present a geometric basis for surface habitats that unifies ecosystems and spatial scales. The theory is framed by fundamental geometric constraints between three structure descriptors-surface height, rugosity and fractal dimension-and explains 98% of surface variation in a structurally complex test system: coral reefs. Then, we show how coral biodiversity metrics (species richness, total abundance and probability of interspecific encounter) vary over the theoretical structure descriptor plane, demonstrating the value of the theory for predicting the consequences of natural and human modifications of surface structure.

Climate-driven shift in coral morphological structure predicts decline of juvenile reef fishes.

Rapid intensification of environmental disturbances has sparked widespread decline and compositional shifts in foundation species in ecosystems worldwide. Now, an emergent challenge is to understand the consequences of shifts and losses in such habitat-forming species for associated communities and ecosystem processes. Recently, consecutive coral bleaching events shifted the morphological makeup of habitat-forming coral assemblages on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Considering the disparity of coral morphological growth forms in shelter provision for reef fishes, we investigated how shifts in the morphological structure of coral assemblages affect the abundance of juvenile and adult reef fishes. We used a temporal dataset from shallow reefs in the northern GBR to estimate coral convexity (a fine-scale quantitative morphological trait) and two widely used coral habitat descriptors (coral cover and reef rugosity) for disentangling the effects of coral morphology on reef fish assemblages. Changes in coral convexity, rather than live coral cover or reef rugosity, disproportionately affected juvenile reef fishes when compared to adults, and explained more than 20% of juvenile decline. The magnitude of this effect varied by fish body size with juveniles of small-bodied species showing higher vulnerability to changes in coral morphology. Our findings suggest that continued large-scale shifts in the relative abundance of morphological groups within coral assemblages are likely to affect population replenishment and dynamics of future reef fish communities. The different responses of juvenile and adult fishes according to habitat descriptors indicate that focusing on coarse-scale metrics alone may mask fine-scale ecological responses that are key to understand ecosystem functioning and resilience. Nonetheless, quantifying coral morphological traits may contribute to forecasting the structure of reef fish communities on novel reef ecosystems shaped by climate change.