Balancing Expectations: Navigating Medically Necessary Torso Procedures with Cosmetic Components in the Military Healthcare System.

Background: Surgeons performing federal insurance-financed procedures involving medically necessary and cosmetic components must navigate patient expectations to avoid postoperative disappointment. This challenge is amplified in military healthcare, where different surgical specialties concurrently address the same diagnosis, while the Department of Defense policy on cosmetic fees and TRICARE's definition of excluded services adds further complexity. With the increasing prevalence of elevated body mass index, focus is directed toward diagnoses involving the torso, specifically gynecomastia in male individuals, and diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles (DRAM) in female individuals. Methods: The study involves a team of experienced board-certified surgeons conducting a narrative review of surgical procedures addressing gynecomastia and DRAM. Relevant literature from 2000 to 2023 is reviewed, focusing on patient satisfaction regarding outcome of medically necessary and cosmetic aspects. Results: For gynecomastia, distinguishing between true and pseudogynecomastia is critical. A protocol is presented based on the Simon classification, offering evidence-based guidelines for surgical interventions. Similarly, for DRAM, a minimally invasive approach balances deployment readiness and surgical recovery. The presence of a symptomatic panniculus, however, requires more invasive intervention. The downstream ramification of limited Current Procedural Terminology codes for these interventions is discussed. Conclusions: In medically necessary procedures funded through federal health plans such as TRICARE, the primary goal is functional improvement, not the final torso contour. Clear communication and preoperative counseling are crucial to managing patient expectations. Providers in military healthcare must navigate the complex landscape of patient expectations, policy guidelines, and duty readiness while maintaining the standard of care.

Applying Principles of Evolutionary Biology to Plastic Surgery at an Organizational Level Predicts an Extinction Event.

As an organized profession, plastic surgery struggles delivering a clear message regarding scope of practice to patients given the diversity of procedures performed. Whereas granting licensure to practice medicine resides with governmental bodies, certification rests with organizations. However, certification is not required to practice plastic surgery. Since plastic surgery operationalizes techniques rather than working within a defined body organ, competition for patients is intense. Mapping territorial interactions between healthcare providers while parsing taxonomy elucidates individual, community, organizational, and governmental levels, creating various selection pressures. Applying evolutionary biology as a framework predicts the termination of plastic surgery over time as a unique specialty. An entirely new domain, Restorative Healthcare, is proposed which circumvents an extinction outcome.

Downstream Impact for Plastic Surgeons in the United States from the "No Surprises Act".

The No Surprises Act, signed into the US federal law in 2020, establishes a floor for reimbursement determined by insurance payors for out-of-network charges rendered by providers in emergency services. Physicians are not permitted to balance bill patients for the difference. An arbitration process is outlined for mediation between provider and payor if needed. Methods: Policy analysis demonstrates many plastic surgeons utilize a revenue stream including both fee-for-service cosmetic work and insurance-covered reconstructive intervention. For Maintenance of Certification from the American Board of Plastic Surgery and/or membership to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, plastic surgeons must operate only in accredited facilities, which in turn require that similar privileges are held in a hospital. Results: Given rapidly developing economic pressures, hospitals no longer remain neutral sites for surgical privileging as they seek strategies to mitigate financial loss by directly competing for patients. A downstream consequence of the requirement for hospital privileging is that plastic surgeons are forced to manage increasing on-call responsibilities despite shrinking reimbursement. Plastic surgeons whose board certification was the first to be time-limited are now reaching the stage of practice where they may transition exclusively to out-patient services. Conclusions: Plastic surgeons in independent solo or small group practices are rendered vulnerable since they may not be able to find coverage of in-patient responsibilities at lower reimbursement rates. Rather than allowing loss of board certification in this population, rational alternatives on an organizational level are proposed for keeping the process equitable as plastic surgeons progress along the practice pathway.

Socio-Ecologic Perspective: Barriers Complicating Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Mitigation.

Objective:Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is a phenomenon whereby survivors of an intensive care unit (ICU) admission subsequently experience issues with physical, cognitive, or mental health status persisting beyond the acute hospitalization. Risk factors for developing PICS include prolonged mechanical ventilation with sedation and immobility. PICS is a devastating illness that negatively alters the life path of many individuals with tremendous economic impact. Methods: This qualitative study employed a grounded theory approach to understand the systemic barriers blocking mitigation and treatment of PICS in all seven ICUs across Essex County, New Jersey (NJ) through semi-scripted interviews conducted with 11 members of the healthcare teams with at least one from each site. Thematic analysis was performed with open, axial, and selective coding. Results: Applying socio-ecologic viewpoint to data illustrate significant barriers on both an interpersonal and organizational level that decrease the operationalization of PICS mitigation measures as identified by healthcare providers. Of those interviewed, eight (73%) were physicians and the remaining were nurses. Significant thematic issues included understanding the risk factors of PICS but feeling powerless to institute mitigation efforts; experiencing lack of enthusiasm due to the absence of institutionalized mitigation protocols; noting frustration about closing the gap between academic recommendations and the ability to operationalize these appropriately; and feeling unable to effectuate meaningful change. Conclusion: Providing education to the target population and healthcare provider stakeholders regarding the barriers against PICS mitigation can alter the status quo.

Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers in the Older Patient.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The incidence of non-melanomatous skin cancer (NMSC) increases with age and there are specific considerations regarding management of NMSC for the older patient population. Here we will review current data regarding treatment considerations and options for older patients with NMSC. RECENT FINDINGS: Hypofractionated regimens and high-dose brachytherapy may be non-surgical treatment options for older patients with NMSC. Other less aggressive strategies such as active surveillance can also be considered in some settings. Management of NMSC in the older patient population requires a thorough assessment of comorbidities, frailty, and life expectancy. Additionally, discussions regarding goals of care and quality of life (QOL) issues are especially important in this population. Older patients with NMSC in particular may benefit from a tailored treatment plan based on current available data rather than a broad application of general treatment guidelines for NMSC.

Consultation for Simple Laceration Repair When On-Call in the Emergency Department: Potential Quagmire.

What are the forces obligating a plastic surgeon who is on-call for the emergency department to respond to a consultation request for repair of a simple laceration? Although the duties are clear in cases of obvious surgical emergency, ambiguity and subsequent conflict may arise when the true nature of the emergency is less clear. Does the consultant's clinical discretion dictate the obligation in the case of a simple laceration; or is it subservient to either the discretion of the requesting health-care provider or even the patient? Do federal statutes such as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or perhaps more local rules apply, such as the by-laws of the hospital? It would behoove all medical practitioners to familiarize themselves with both the legal and moral implications of these issues. Having legitimate policies in place which actively address those situations where the consultative obligation is unclear is critical to resolve potential conflict.

Closing the Generational Gap in Surgery: Why So Angry?

Significant and rapid changes in healthcare delivery are forcing surgeons into collaborative teams. Additionally, surgeons are faced with new bureaucratic requirements that do not directly impact patient care, but nevertheless require allocation of time and attention. Surgeons are required to communicate with an expanding group of individuals at various professional levels, adding further stress to daily tasks. Even the method of communication is undergoing rapid transformation. Some surgeons, especially those who are members of the Boomer or X Generation, find this revolution difficult to manage; whereas those who are members of the Y Generation may in fact be better equipped. Surgeons who either refuse to acknowledge these changes or simply lack emotional self-awareness run the risk of being labeled as disruptive. Behavioral techniques are explored which may help those surgeons who are having difficulty.

Identifying and managing those patients at risk for aborted mohs micrographic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of nonmelanoma cutaneous carcinoma with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a well-recognized therapy. However, there are infrequent times when MMS must be aborted before achieving adequately clear margins. Reasons cited by those who have aborted MMS include patient discomfort and/or concern regarding damage to deeper structures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was created consisting of patients who were referred for reconstructive procedures following MMS during a 4-year period. Patients who experienced aborted MMS were identified from this cohort, and a chart review performed. RESULTS: The overall occurrence of aborted MMS in the community was significantly less than 1% with a cumulative frequency in this particular reconstructive cohort of 1.7%. Approximately one-third of patients had persistent tumor on subsequent treatment, and approximately 14% required multiple excisional procedures to clear tumor. Risk factors for experiencing aborted MMS include histology of dermatofibroma sarcoma protuberans, significant pain during MMS, and location of tumor over a cranial nerve. Follow-up failed to reveal recurrence after further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative identification of patients at risk for aborted MMS would allow for direct referral using surgical excision, hence decreasing anxiety, morbidity, and cost. A treatment algorithm is proposed for patients who experience aborted MMS.

An evidence-based approach to secondary cleft lip nasal deformity.

The Maintenance of Certification module series is designed to help the clinician structure his or her study in specific areas appropriate to his or her clinical practice. This article is prepared to accompany practice-based assessment of preoperative assessment, anesthesia, surgical treatment plan, perioperative management, and outcomes. In this format, the clinician is invited to compare his or her methods of patient assessment and treatment, outcomes, and complications, with authoritative, information-based references. This information base is then used for self-assessment and benchmarking in parts II and IV of the Maintenance of Certification process of the American Board of Plastic Surgery. This article is not intended to be an exhaustive treatise on the subject. Rather, it is designed to serve as a reference point for further in-depth study by review of the reference articles presented.

The disruptive physician: righteous Maverick or dangerous Pariah?

BACKGROUND: "Disruptive physician" is a term appearing more frequently in many hospital bylaws. It has significant negative implications that can lead to loss of privileges for plastic surgeons. METHODS: Exploring the various definitions of disruptive physician reveals palpable differences between those of the Joint Commission and the American Medical Association. These discrepancies expose plastic surgeons to potential harm when actively addressing quality issues in the hospital environment. RESULTS: The disruptive label can be inappropriately leveraged by hospital administrators against plastic surgeons who confront quality issues. Moreover, the term disruptive is open to subjective interpretation. Challenging the disruptive label in court reveals only that the justice system is concerned that the actual process leading to the disruptive charge is followed appropriately as outlined within the organizational bylaws; the courts are not interested in the actual quality issues and generally will not second-guess the judgment of peer review panels or hospital administrators. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons would benefit from familiarizing themselves with these issues. Hospitals should be required to use root cause analysis when dealing with quality issues raised by members of the medical staff. Furthermore, findings from root cause analysis should be privileged from legal discovery in all jurisdictions to permit honest exploration of quality issues. When a conflict does arise, consideration of mediation should be given to resolve disputes.

Ethical issues for the plastic surgeon in a tumultuous health care system: dissecting the anatomy of a decision.

BACKGROUND: Society anticipates that plastic surgeons will make ethical decisions that are solely in the best interest of their patients. However, a variety of competing factors exert an influence on all decision-making processes. METHODS: Multiple competing factors that commonly influence decision-making by plastic surgeons, on both conscious and subconscious levels, are identified. By exploring the ramifications of these factors, a more ethical outcome can be achieved. RESULTS: Some of these competing interests that can sidetrack ethical decision-making include personal finances (e.g., ownership of surgical centers, selection of procedures, pricing); outside regulations (e.g., Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act of 1986 and care of the uninsured); and professional duty (e.g., informed consent, discussion of error). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons who are aware of the competing interests that influence their decision-making processes stand a greater chance of achieving ethical outcomes. Nevertheless, with the growing volume of nonreimbursed care and expectations of perfect outcomes, achieving uniformly ethical decisions without burdensome self-sacrifice is difficult at best.

MOC-PSSM CME article: Nonmelanoma facial skin malignancy.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify the environmental and genetic risk factors in developing nonmelanoma facial skin malignancy. 2. Understand the proper evaluation of a patient presenting with nonmelanoma facial skin malignancy. 3. Outline the various treatment options available for patients with nonmelanoma facial skin malignancy and understand the specific technique of Mohs' micrographic surgery versus surgical excision with frozen section control. 4. Describe the various options for reconstruction and the associated anesthetic requirements. BACKGROUND: The incidence of nonmelanoma facial skin malignancy is rising dramatically. Physicians should be well versed on the appropriate methodology required to both evaluate and treat these patients. METHODS: A literature review was performed regarding the evaluation and various management options for patients with nonmelanoma facial skin malignancy. Specific attention was paid to the Mohs' technique versus surgical excision with frozen section control for treatment of these patients. RESULTS: An algorithm is presented regarding the appropriate assessment and treatment of patients with nonmelanoma facial skin malignancy. Comparison of the Mohs' technique with frozen section control showed potentially similar disease-free outcomes. However, the lack of adequate scientific studies for surgical excision with frozen section control was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Various treatment algorithms exist for nonmelanoma facial skin malignancy. Consideration must be given by the physician to patient comorbidities, anesthesia requirements, appropriate monitoring, and cost of excision.

Repair of congenital nasal anomalies involving redundancy of structures.

OBJECTIVE: Rare congenital nasal anomalies include symmetric complete nasal duplication and asymmetric supernumerary nostrils. Complete nasal duplication may be either vertically stacked or horizontally oriented. It is a result of duplication of the nasal placode pair. Supernumerary structures include nostrils (with or without accessory cartilage) or fistulas that result from a fissure of the lateral nasal process. A case report is described whereby an adult accessory nostril, complete with an extra lower lateral cartilage, is repaired through direct excision and tip suturing. The importance of removing superfluous structures and reconstructing the normal anatomy by using an open rhinoplasty technique is stressed to achieve an aesthetic outcome.