Assessment of treatment options for patients with hepatitis C virus recombinant form 2k/1b.

AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) intergenotype recombinant form (RF) 2k/1b has been actively circulating in HCV-infected patients, and the prevalence of this RF virus in the Republic of Georgia is one of the highest reported worldwide. The aim of this study was to define the optimal treatment regimen for patients with RF_2k/1b. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 2735 patients who started treatment at the Medical Center Mrcheveli within Georgia's hepatitis C elimination program from May 2015 through December 2019. The patients were treated with sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens. For identification of RF_2k/1b variants, refinement of standard (INNO-LiPA) genotyping results for all patient samples assigned the unspecific HCV genotypes (GT) 2a/2c was carried out by sequencing of core and non-structural protein 5B genes. RESULTS: Overall, 444 patients, representing 66% of GT2 and 16% of the total samples, were RF_2k/1b. Treatment of patients with RF_2k/1b with SOF/ledipasvir and SOF/velpatasvir was highly effective and viral cure rates did not differ among genotypes treated with the same regimen: RF_2k/1b, 99% (343/346); GT1, 99% (876/885); GT2, 96% (156/162); and GT3, 99% (545/552). A separate comparison analysis of sustained virologic response rate, treated with SOF plus ribavirin, showed significantly higher sustained virologic response (96%) in patients with confirmed GT2 (by sequencing) compared to unspecified GT2 (by INNO-LiPA) (79%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir-based regimens are highly effective for treatment of RF 2k/1b patients, and with availability of new pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals, genotyping to identify RF 2k/1b patients might not be necessary.

Identification of hepatitis C virus 2k/1b intergenotypic recombinants in Georgia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of the hepatitis C virus intergenotype recombinant strain RF1_2k/1b in Georgia, confirm viral recombination by full genome sequencing, and determine a genetic relationship with previously described recombinant hepatitis C viruses. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 1421 Georgian patients with chronic hepatitis C. Genotyping was performed with the INNO-LiPA VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay. RESULTS: Virus isolates were assigned to nonspecific hepatitis C genotypes 2a/2c (n = 387) as performed by sequencing of core and NS5B genes. Subsequently, sequencing results classified the core region as genotype 2k and the NS5B region as genotype 1b for 72% (n = 280) of genotype 2 patients, corresponding to 19.7% of hepatitis C patients in Georgia. Eight samples were randomly selected for full genome sequencing which was successful in 7 of 8 samples. Analysis of the generated consensus sequences confirmed that all 7 viruses were 2k/1b recombinants, with the recombination breakpoint located within 73-77 amino acids before the NS2-NS3 junction, similar to the previously described RF1_2k/1b virus. Phylogenetic analysis revealed clustering of the Georgian 2k/1b viruses and RF1_2k/1b, suggesting that they are genetically related. CONCLUSIONS: The 19.7% prevalence of RF1_2k/1b in Georgia patients is far higher than has generally been reported to date worldwide. Identification of recombinants in low income countries with a high prevalence of HCV infection might be reasonable for choosing the most cost-effective treatment regimens.

Emergence of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype Recombinant Forms 2k/1b in Georgia.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) evolution is thought to proceed by mutations within the six major genotypes. Studies of HCV recombinant genotypes in different parts of the world have recently been initiated. Only a few cases of recombination have been identified worldwide, predominantly in Eastern Europe and Asia. In 2011 we detected the recombinant form (RF) of a HCV genotype RF_2k/1b in Georgia. Therefore, we reviewed HCV genotyping data of 491 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infections of our center in Tbilisi over a period of two years. METHODS: Initially all genotyping analyses were performed with the VERSANT HCV genotype assay (Siemens, LiPA). In a second analysis, parts of the core and the NS5B region were sequenced for all HCV genotypes 2a/2c. RESULTS: Approximately 2/3 of genotype 2 cases were identified as the recombinant form HCV-RF 2k/1b. Overall, this type represented 19% of all HCV patients who underwent genotyping. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that almost 20% of HCV infected Georgian patients are infected with HCVRF_2k/ 1b.

IL28B favorable genotype and ultrarapid viral response as the earliest treatment predictors of a sustained viral response in a Georgian cohort infected with the hepatitis C genotype 1.

OBJECTIVES: The early identification of factors contributing to the successful treatment of hepatitis C infection is important for researchers and clinicians. Studies carried out on the role of an ultrarapid viral response (URVR) for the prediction of a sustained viral response (SVR) have shown its high positive predictive value (PPV). However, data on the combined effect of URVR with IL28B genotypes for the prediction of SVR are lacking. Our aim was to study the role of URVR and IL28B genotypes in the prediction of SVR among patients in Georgia infected with genotype 1. METHODS: Of a total of 156 patients enrolled in the study, 143 were included in the final analyses. Viral load testing for monitoring the viral response was carried out at 3, 24, 48, and 72 h and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment. IL28B single nucleotide polymorphisms in rs12979860 were genotyped using real-time PCR methods. RESULTS: Our study showed that URVR was the earliest treatment predictor among genotype 1 patients harboring the IL28B C/C genotype (PPV-100%). Moreover, the C/C genotype was found to have a high PPV among genotype 1 patients without URVR or a rapid viral response, unlike patients infected with genotype 2 or 3. URVR and IL28B C/C genotypes were not as predictive of an SVR among genotype 2 and 3 patients; however, rapid viral responses were highly predictive of an SVR in these patients. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that testing for IL28B genotypes and viral load at weeks 1 and 2 may improve the ability to predict an SVR among hepatitis C virus genotype 1 patients; this information may be useful to ensure patient compliance with treatment.