Percutaneous Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Coaxial Cutting Needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Lesions: Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety.

PURPOSE: To appraise the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of pancreatic lesions using a 0.4-T open magnetic resonance imaging scanner with optical tracking navigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 158 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging-guided pancreatic lesion biopsy procedures from May 2019 to December 2020. Two to four specimens were collected from each patient. Pathological diagnosis and clinical follow-ups were conducted to establish the final diagnosis. The procedures were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic accuracy, and complications. The Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe guidelines were used to classify complications. RESULTS: Biopsy pathology revealed 139 pancreatic tumor malignancies and 19 benign pancreatic lesions. Finally, 151 patients were diagnosed with pancreatic malignancy and 7 with benign disease confirmed by surgery, re-biopsy, and clinical follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of pancreatic diseases were 92.1%, 100%, 100%, 36.8%, and 92.4%, respectively. The biopsy accuracy was significantly related to the size (≤ 2 cm, 76.2%; 2-4 cm, 94.0%; > 4 cm, 96.2%, P = .02) and not the lesion's location (head of pancreas, 90.7%; neck of pancreas, 88.9%; body of pancreas, 94.3%; tail of pancreas, 96.7%, P = .73). Minor complications included two patients experiencing mild abdominal pain and two with a minor occurrence of hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous magnetic resonance imaging-guided pancreatic lesion biopsy combined with optical navigation has high diagnostic accuracy and is safe for clinical practice. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case-series.

The effect of prophylactic balloon occlusion in patients with placenta accreta spectrum: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) can induce severe life-threatening obstetric hemorrhage. Herein, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis of previous studies to evaluate the relative benefits of different prophylactic balloon occlusion (PBO) procedures. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 2021. Blood loss volume, blood transfusion volume, and hysterectomy rate were regarded as the primary endpoints. The data were pooled using a Bayesian network and traditional pairwise meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-nine articles with a total sample size of 5150 patients were included. Compared with no PBO (non-PBO) intervention, PBO of the abdominal aorta (PBOAA, mean difference(MD) - 1.02, 95% credible interval (CrI) - 1.4 to - 0.67), common iliac artery (PBOCIA, MD - 0.84; 95%CrI - 1.36 to - 0.06) and internal iliac artery (PBOIIA, MD - 0.42; 95%CrI - 0.72 to - 0.13) significantly lowered blood loss volume, with PBOAA being more effective than PBOIIA (MD - 0.60; 95%CrI - 1.05 to - 0.17). PBOAA and PBOIIA also significantly decreased blood loss volume (MD - 2.33; 95%CrI - 3.74 to - 0.94, MD - 1.57; 95%CrI - 2.77 to - 0.47 respectively) and hysterectomy rate (OR 0.31; 95%CrI 0.16 to 0.54, OR 0.53; 95%CrI 0.29 to 0.92 respectively). PBOAA has the highest probability of being more effective in reducing the blood loss volume, blood transfusion volume, and hysterectomy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Performing PBOAA, PBOCIA, or PBOIIA in PAS patients is an effective way to minimize blood loss volume, while PBOAA and PBOIIA also reduce blood transfusion volume and hysterectomy rate. PBOAA is a notably more effective strategy to reduce blood loss volume than PBOIIA. KEY POINTS: • PBOAA, PBOCIA, and PBOIIA procedures can significantly reduce the blood loss volume compared to non-PBO intervention in PAS patients, of which PBOAA was more effective than the PBOIIA procedure. • PBOAA and PBOIIA could significantly reduce the blood transfusion volume and hysterectomy rate in contrast to the non-PBO intervention in patients with PAS. • According to our statistical treatment ranking, PBOAA was statistically superior in reducing blood transfusion volume, blood transfusion volume, and hysterectomy rate than other PBO procedures.