Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microvasc Res ; 142: 104348, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35245516

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma protein (Rb) supports vasoprotective E2F Transcription Factor 1 (E2f1)/Dihydrofolate Reductase (Dhfr) pathway activity in endothelial cells. Cyclin I (Ccni) promotes Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-5 (Cdk5)-mediated Rb phosphorylation. Therefore, we hypothesized that endothelial Ccni may regulate cardiovascular homeostasis, vessel remodeling, and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) formation. METHODS: Aortic CCNI mRNA expression was analyzed in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) GSE57691 cohort consisting of AAA patients (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 10). We employed wild-type (WT) mice and endothelial Ccni knockout (Ccnifl/flTie2-Cre) mice to conduct in vivo and ex vivo experimentation using an Angiotensin (Ang) II hypertension model and a CaCl2 AAA model. Mice were assessed for Rb/E2f1/Dhfr signaling, biopterin (i.e., biopterin [B], dihydrobiopterin [BH2], and tetrahydrobiopterin [BH4]) production, cardiovascular homeostasis, vessel remodeling, and AAA formation. RESULTS: Aortic CCNI mRNA expression was downregulated in AAA patients. Both Ang II- and CaCl2-induced WT mice showed aortic Ccni upregulation coupled with vasculoprotective upregulation of Rb/E2f1/Dhfr signaling and biopterins. Endothelial Ccni knockout downregulated medial Rb/E2f1/Dhfr signaling and biopterins in Ang II-induced hypertensive mice, which exacerbated eNos uncoupling and H2O2 production. Endothelial Ccni knockout impaired in vivo hemodynamic responses and endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in ex vivo mesenteric arteries in response to Ang II. Endothelial Ccni knockout exacerbated mesenteric artery remodeling and AAA risk in response to Ang II and CaCl2. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial Ccni acts as a critical negative regulator of eNos uncoupling-mediated ROS generation and thereby reduces vulnerability to hypertension-induced vascular remodeling and AAA development in mice.


Assuntos
Angiotensina II , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Hipertensão , Remodelação Vascular , Angiotensina II/farmacologia , Animais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/induzido quimicamente , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/genética , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/prevenção & controle , Biopterinas/metabolismo , Cloreto de Cálcio/metabolismo , Ciclina I/metabolismo , Proteína Rica em Cisteína 61/metabolismo , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Células Endoteliais/metabolismo , Endotélio/metabolismo , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/metabolismo , Hipertensão/genética , Hipertensão/metabolismo , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Camundongos Knockout , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Tetra-Hidrofolato Desidrogenase/genética , Tetra-Hidrofolato Desidrogenase/metabolismo
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(51): e31943, 2022 Dec 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36595814

RESUMO

TRIAL DESIGN: Our study is to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of multiple cardiovascular factors intervention (MFI) in type 2 diabetes patients in China's primary care setting. METHODS: We performed a cluster randomized trial to compare the proportion of patients achieved the targets between usual care group (control, 9 sites, n = 868) and MFI group (8 sites, n = 739) among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care setting. Logistic regression model with random effects was used to estimate the association of the effect of intervention and the proportion achieved the targets. RESULTS: At baseline, the end of 1 year, and 2 years follow-up, the proportion of patients achieved all 3 target goals (HbA1c < 7.0%, blood pressure < 130/80 mm Hg and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 2.6 mmol/L) were 5.7%, 5.9%, 5.7% in the control group and 5.9%, 10.6%, 12.3% in the MFI group. After adjusting sex, age, diabetes duration, body mass index, HbA1c, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline, there was no difference between the 2 groups (OR (95% CI): 1.27 (0.38-4.27) and 1.86 (0.79-4.38) for the first year and second year, respectively). When stratified by payment method, the patients with medical insurance or public expenses had a higher proportion achieved target goals (6.9% vs 16.4%, OR (95% CI): 2.30 (1.04-5.08)) in the second year. CONCLUSIONS: The controlling of cardiovascular risk factor targets remains suboptimal among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care setting. MFI in type 2 diabetes improved cardiovascular disease risk profile, especially in the patients with medical insurance.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Pressão Sanguínea , LDL-Colesterol
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA