Comparison of the medial midline and the anterolateral portal in ankle arthroscopy for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the medial talus.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy and complication rates between the medial midline and anterolateral portals in ankle arthroscopy for treating medial osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with medial OLTs who underwent either a dual medial approach (via the medial midline and anteromedial portal) or a traditional approach (via the anterolateral and anteromedial portal) between June 2017 and January 2023. The degree of injury was evaluated by radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scoring system. The incidence of postoperative complications, including superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) injury, was evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: There were 39 patients in total; 16 patients underwent the dual medial approach, and 23 patients underwent the traditional approach. The mean age was 39.4 ± 9.0 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 18.7 ± 6.4 months. The clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups (*P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative complications were mainly SPN injury. The incidence of SPN injury was 13.0% in the traditional approach group and 0% in the dual medial approach group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05), but a trend of reduction in SPN injury was observed in the dual medial approach group. CONCLUSION: The dual medial approach can also treat medial OLTs well, providing clear visualization and more convenient operation and reducing the possibility of injury to the SPN compared with the traditional approach. Therefore, we consider that the MM portal would be a good alternative to the anterolateral portal in treating medial OLTs.

A comparison of treatment between mini T-plate and headless cannulated compression screw in calcaneal osteotomy.

PURPOSE: In clinical studies, we discovered that when using headless cannulated compression screw fixation, many patients complain of heel pain and frequently need to have the screws removed, whereas this occurrence is uncommon with plate fixation. This study aims to compare the clinical outcome of a mini T-plate and headless cannulated compression screws in calcaneal osteotomy. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who had calcaneal osteotomy performed by one senior chief surgeon in our hospital between January 2014 and May 2021. Thirty-nine patients met the selection criteria: 22 were fixed using a mini T-plate through a modified small "L" incision on the lateral aspect of the calcaneus and 17 were fixed using double screws through an oblique incision on the lateral aspect of the calcaneus. Then, we compared the patient demographics, surgical statistics, and postoperative complications in calcaneal osteotomy between a mini T-plate and double 6.5-mm headless cannulated compressed screws. RESULTS: Each patient attained radiographic union. The average age was 49.23±13.80 (range: 24-76) years and the average follow-up duration was 47.07±8.64 (range: 36-66) weeks. The average operation duration and times of intraoperative fluoroscopy were significantly lower in the mini T-plate group (P<0.05). There was a savings of $838.88 per patient when using double screws for fixation. The incidence of hardware-related pain and implant removal was lower in the mini T-plate group (P<0.05). There is no significant difference between the two groups in terms of delayed incision healing and clinical neurological complications (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In calcaneal osteotomy, the operation duration, times of intraoperative fluoroscopy, hardware-related pain, and implant removal rate were lower with mini T-plate fixation than with double screws fixation. Therefore, we consider that the mini T-plate would be a good alternative to double screws in calcaneal osteotomy.

Experimental study on repair of cartilage defects in the rabbits with GelMA-MSCs scaffold prepared by three-dimensional bioprinting.

Cartilage damage is a common orthopedic disease, which can be caused by sports injury, obesity, joint wear, and aging, and cannot be repaired by itself. Surgical autologous osteochondral grafting is often required in deep osteochondral lesions to avoid the later progression of osteoarthritis. In this study, we fabricated a gelatin methacryloyl-marrow mesenchymal stem cells (GelMA-MSCs) scaffold by three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. This bioink is capable of fast gel photocuring and spontaneous covalent cross-linking, which can maintain high viability of MSCs and provide a benign microenvironment to promote the interaction, migration, and proliferation of cells. In vivo experiments, further, proved that the 3D bioprinting scaffold can promote the regeneration of cartilage collagen fibers and have a remarkable effect on cartilage repair of rabbit cartilage injury model, which may represent a general and versatile strategy for precise engineering of cartilage regeneration system.